Abstract
Forest loss can affect host–parasite dynamics, posing risks to wildlife and human health. Most work has investigated how host traits moderate associations between forest loss and prevalence, but the role that parasite traits play is less understood. We synthesized parasite prevalence and parasite trait data from publicly available databases representing carnivores, ungulates, and primate host species. We combined these data with open-source, remote-sensing forest loss data and conducted multi-level phylogenetic meta-analyses. While we found no overall association between forest loss and prevalence across parasites, trends emerged when considering different parasite taxa. Further, although prevalence did not differ by transmission mode overall, forest-loss prevalence associations varied by transmission mode within parasite taxa. For instance, prevalence decreased with forest loss for closely transmitted helminths but increased for not closely transmitted helminths. These results illustrate that parasite traits must be considered to understand complex associations between environmental change and infection outcomes.
Full text
1,924 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Forest loss can affect host–parasite dynamics, posing risks to wildlife and human health. Most work has investigated how host traits moderate associations between forest loss and prevalence, but the role that parasite traits play is less understood. We synthesized parasite prevalence and parasite trait data from publicly available databases representing carnivores, ungulates, and primate host species. We combined these data with open-source, remote-sensing forest loss data and conducted multi-level phylogenetic meta-analyses. While we found no overall association between forest loss and prevalence across parasites, trends emerged when considering different parasite taxa. Further, although prevalence did not differ by transmission mode overall, forest-loss prevalence associations varied by transmission mode within parasite taxa. For instance, prevalence decreased with forest loss for closely transmitted helminths but increased for not closely transmitted helminths. These results illustrate that parasite traits must be considered to understand complex associations between environmental change and infection outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2PD2Q
Life Sciences
deforestation, fragmentation, land conversion, pathogen spillover, zoonotic disease
Published: 2024-12-18 18:26
Last Updated: 2024-12-19 02:26
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data required to replicate the analyses are publicly available, as cited in the text.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.