A Decade of Deep Learning-based Biomedical Image Segmentation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Biomedical image segmentation is a fundamental problem in computational biomedicine that aims to precisely delineate anatomical and biological structures, tissue types, or pathological regions in biomedical images. Accurate segmentation is essential for interpretation, decision-making, and quantitative analysis across a wide range of biological and medical applications. Over the past decade, the field has undergone a profound paradigm shift, evolving from task-specific specialist models to universal foundation models. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the evolution, tracing how the limitations of local discriminative learning drove the transition toward transformer-based global modeling, and large-scale generative pre-training. To help navigate the diverse landscape of interaction paradigms, we introduce the first systematic taxonomy of promptable biomedical image segmentation, categorizing existing methods into six distinct types, enabling users to intuitively select appropriate prompting strategies based on visual demonstrations and quickly pinpoint relevant literature ( Prompt Type Visualization ). Beyond model architectures, we discuss parallel advancements in dataset development, evaluation protocols, and application-specific adaptations across radiology, pathology, and biology. Integrating these powerful foundation models with rigorous domain-specific adaptation has great potential to improve patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency. Finally, we highlight key challenges in trustworthiness and clinical integration that must be overcome to realize the potential of the next generation of biological and medical generalists.
Full text 1,751 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Biomedical image segmentation is a fundamental problem in computational biomedicine that aims to precisely delineate anatomical and biological structures, tissue types, or pathological regions in biomedical images. Accurate segmentation is essential for interpretation, decision-making, and quantitative analysis across a wide range of biological and medical applications. Over the past decade, the field has undergone a profound paradigm shift, evolving from task-specific specialist models to universal foundation models. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the evolution, tracing how the limitations of local discriminative learning drove the transition toward transformer-based global modeling, and large-scale generative pre-training. To help navigate the diverse landscape of interaction paradigms, we introduce the first systematic taxonomy of promptable biomedical image segmentation, categorizing existing methods into six distinct types, enabling users to intuitively select appropriate prompting strategies based on visual demonstrations and quickly pinpoint relevant literature (Prompt Type Visualization). Beyond model architectures, we discuss parallel advancements in dataset development, evaluation protocols, and application-specific adaptations across radiology, pathology, and biology. Integrating these powerful foundation models with rigorous domain-specific adaptation has great potential to improve patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency. Finally, we highlight key challenges in trustworthiness and clinical integration that must be overcome to realize the potential of the next generation of biological and medical generalists. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00