Laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump for a cervical solid mass in a patient with previous supracervical hysterectomy

OA: gold publisher-OA-unknown
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23

This video demonstrates laparoscopic removal of a benign cervical mass from the cervical stump following supracervical hysterectomy, highlighting careful dissection to prevent injury to adjacent structures.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 · read from full text

This case report describes the successful laparoscopic removal of a cervical stump in a 50-year-old woman presenting with pelvic pain and a solid mass following a supracervical hysterectomy ten years prior. The surgical procedure involved dissecting dense adhesions, identifying critical structures like the ureters and iliac arteries, and resecting the four-centimeter benign leiomyoma without complications. The authors emphasize that advanced laparoscopic experience is crucial for safely managing such cases to prevent injury to adjacent organs. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for removal of the cervical stump, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The aim of this video article is to demonstrate a surgical tutorial in which a cervical mass was resected with laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump after supracervical hysterectomy (SCH). First, the dense adhesions due to previous operation were dissected. Then the dissection was continued carefully in order to identify bilateral ureters and iliac arteries. A cervical mass of nearly 4 cm was identified at the posterosuperior aspect. The mass was separated from surrounding tissue and removal of the cervical stump was performed. This is an exciting case, illustrating that minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump after SCH, can be used in the management of benign cervical tumor. The main feature of this operation was to check the relationship of tumor with adjacent structures, including ureters, bowel and vascular structures at every step to prevent unwanted injuries.
Full text 3,042 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 1 sections · click to expand

Intro

Laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump was first reported by Nezhat et al. ( 1 ). It can be considered a definitive therapy for patients with recurrent symptoms after supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) ( 2 ). There are some significant risk factors, including younger age, pelvic pain and endometriosis, for removal of the cervical stump in patients who have previously undergone SCH ( 3 ). It can be performed vaginally, abdominally or laparoscopically and either with or without robotic assistance. If a laparoscopic approach is chosen, advanced experience on laparoscopy is crucial ( 1 ). Here, we present a surgical tutorial in which a cervical mass was resected, with laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump ( Video 1 ). A 50-year-old G2P1 woman was referred to our hospital with the complaint of pelvic pain for three months. She had a history of SCH for abnormal uterine bleeding due to myoma uteri 10 years previously. Bimanual pelvic examination revealed tenderness and vaginal speculum examination was normal. A solid mass of nearly 4x4 cm was identified at the cervical stump on transvaginal ultrasound. Laboratory tests for tumor biomarkers were negative while magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 4 cm in diameter solid mass localized at the cervical region. The patient underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy because of malignancy suspicion but no abnormality was detected. Endocervical biopsy and Pap smear results revealed no abnormality. After fully informing the patient, consent was given for the use of images and videos of the procedure. After the patient preparation, a uterine manipulator was inserted vaginally with a colpotomizer. A 10 mm umbilical port and three 5 mm abdominal ports were placed and the pelvis was explored. There were extremely dense adhesions between bowel, omentum and the anterior abdominal wall. First, the dense adhesions, due to the previous operation, were dissected. Then the dissection was carefully continued in order to identify bilateral ureters and iliac arteries ( Figure 1 ). The previously identified 4 cm cervical mass at the posterosuperior aspect was identified ( Figure 2 ). The mass was separated from surrounding tissue and a laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump was performed. After this procedure, the bladder was investigated with methilene blue for any signs of injury. The operation time was 185 minutes. There were no complications. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the third postoperative day. Histopathological examination confirmed a benign, 4 cm leiomyoma. This is an exciting case illustrating that minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopic removal of the cervical stump after SCH, can be used in the management of benign cervical tumor. The main feature of this operation was to check the relationship of tumor with adjacent structures, including ureters, bowel and vascular structures at every step to prevent unwanted injuries. Video 1. https://www.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2019.0143.video1

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: publisher-OA-unknown · commercial use NOT OK · attribution required