Multimodal Characterization of High-risk PH-HFpEF phenogroup with Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Vascular Mechanics and Myocardial Transcriptomics

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Pulmonary hypertension due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF) is a highly heterogeneous disease associated with right ventricular (RV) failure and adverse outcomes. Current diagnostic tools inadequately characterize pulmonary vascular disease and RV dysfunction, limiting treatment precision. We hypothesized that deep phenotyping—including invasive hemodynamics, advanced imaging, and myocardial transcriptomics—would identify high-risk PH-HFpEF phenotypes with distinct clinical, physiologic, and molecular characteristics. Methods 42 PH-HFpEF participants (and 25 pre-capillary PH participants, as a comparison group) underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, cardiac MRI (cMRI), and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET). K-means clustering considering clinical, iCPET, and cMRI data stratified participants into distinct clusters (phenogroups). A subset underwent further characterization by invasive pulmonary vascular mechanics (n=17 PH-HFpEF, n=5 pre-capillary PH) and 4D flow cMRI (n=10 PH-HFpEF, n=5 pre-capillary PH). Endomyocardial biopsies from 10 PH-HFpEF participants were analyzed using long-read RNA-sequencing for differential gene and transcript expression. Results Clustering revealed two PH-HFpEF phenogroups with significantly different outcomes at one-year follow-up (HR=11.96, CI: 2.66–53.86). High-risk participants had greater left ventricular mass, reduced RV ejection fraction, worse exercise-induced PH, impaired gas exchange (↓peak oxygen consumption, ↑slope of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production), and lower myocardial strain. Pulmonary vascular mechanics showed higher proximal pulmonary artery stiffness (↑characteristic impedance), increased RV energy expenditure (↑compression waves), and abnormal distal vascular reflections (↓diastolic reflection index) in the high-risk group. 4D flow MRI revealed disturbed flow in pulmonary vasculature (both arteries and veins) in high-risk participants. Transcriptomic analysis implicated differences in post-transcriptional RNA processing and translational control, as well as mitochondrial function, in phenotypic divergence between these HFpEF subgroups. In particular, differential transcript usage for the TTN gene, encoding the giant sarcomeric protein titin, may be particularly relevant to elevated myocardial stiffness, which worsens vascular remodeling and precipitates RV dysfunction and failure. Conclusions In PH-HFpEF, unsupervised clustering using deep physiologic and imaging data identified a high-risk group with impaired RV function and unique transcriptomic profiles. Our findings suggest that proximal and distal pulmonary vascular remodeling, as well as differences in titin isoform expression, may underlie RV failure in this phenogroup. This comprehensive approach provides a framework for mechanistically driven precision medicine strategies in PH-HFpEF. Clinical perspectives 1. What is new? Unsupervised clustering integrating exercise hemodynamics, cardiac MRI, and clinical features revealed a distinct PH-HFpEF subgroup at significantly higher risk for adverse outcomes (HR = 11.96), independent of traditional IpcPH/CpcPH classification. Invasive wave mechanics (impedance and wave separation analyses) and non-invasive 4D flow cardiopulmonary MRI reveal unique patterns of proximal stiffness, RV energy inefficiency, and abnormal distal reflections in high-risk PH-HFpEF, providing insights into segmental vascular dysfunction. Long-read RNA sequencing of endomyocardial biopsies from PH-HFpEF patients revealed distinct transcriptomic signatures between high- and low-risk PH-HFpEF phenogroups. Long-read RNA-seq identified distinct transcript usage of gene TTN, encoding a giant sarcomeric protein (titin) that is a key determinant for myocardial stiffness, suggesting a potential underlying mechanism for RV dysfunction in PH-HFpEF. 2. What are clinical implications? These findings offer a framework for more refined patient classification beyond traditional PVR-based methods, which may improve identification of high-risk individuals who require closer monitoring or targeted therapy. The integrative approach highlights titin isoform imbalance and vessel-specific stiffness as potential therapeutic targets, supporting the development of biology-informed, phenotype-specific interventions for PH-HFpEF with RV dysfunction.
Full text 6,388 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Pulmonary hypertension due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF) is a highly heterogeneous disease associated with right ventricular (RV) failure and adverse outcomes. Current diagnostic tools inadequately characterize pulmonary vascular disease and RV dysfunction, limiting treatment precision. We hypothesized that deep phenotyping—including invasive hemodynamics, advanced imaging, and myocardial transcriptomics—would identify high-risk PH-HFpEF phenotypes with distinct clinical, physiologic, and molecular characteristics.

Methods

42 PH-HFpEF participants (and 25 pre-capillary PH participants, as a comparison group) underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, cardiac MRI (cMRI), and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET). K-means clustering considering clinical, iCPET, and cMRI data stratified participants into distinct clusters (phenogroups). A subset underwent further characterization by invasive pulmonary vascular mechanics (n=17 PH-HFpEF, n=5 pre-capillary PH) and 4D flow cMRI (n=10 PH-HFpEF, n=5 pre-capillary PH). Endomyocardial biopsies from 10 PH-HFpEF participants were analyzed using long-read RNA-sequencing for differential gene and transcript expression.

Results

Clustering revealed two PH-HFpEF phenogroups with significantly different outcomes at one-year follow-up (HR=11.96, CI: 2.66–53.86). High-risk participants had greater left ventricular mass, reduced RV ejection fraction, worse exercise-induced PH, impaired gas exchange (↓peak oxygen consumption, ↑slope of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production), and lower myocardial strain. Pulmonary vascular mechanics showed higher proximal pulmonary artery stiffness (↑characteristic impedance), increased RV energy expenditure (↑compression waves), and abnormal distal vascular reflections (↓diastolic reflection index) in the high-risk group. 4D flow MRI revealed disturbed flow in pulmonary vasculature (both arteries and veins) in high-risk participants. Transcriptomic analysis implicated differences in post-transcriptional RNA processing and translational control, as well as mitochondrial function, in phenotypic divergence between these HFpEF subgroups. In particular, differential transcript usage for the TTN gene, encoding the giant sarcomeric protein titin, may be particularly relevant to elevated myocardial stiffness, which worsens vascular remodeling and precipitates RV dysfunction and failure.

Conclusions

In PH-HFpEF, unsupervised clustering using deep physiologic and imaging data identified a high-risk group with impaired RV function and unique transcriptomic profiles. Our findings suggest that proximal and distal pulmonary vascular remodeling, as well as differences in titin isoform expression, may underlie RV failure in this phenogroup. This comprehensive approach provides a framework for mechanistically driven precision medicine strategies in PH-HFpEF. What is new? Unsupervised clustering integrating exercise hemodynamics, cardiac MRI, and clinical features revealed a distinct PH-HFpEF subgroup at significantly higher risk for adverse outcomes (HR = 11.96), independent of traditional IpcPH/CpcPH classification. Invasive wave mechanics (impedance and wave separation analyses) and non-invasive 4D flow cardiopulmonary MRI reveal unique patterns of proximal stiffness, RV energy inefficiency, and abnormal distal reflections in high-risk PH-HFpEF, providing insights into segmental vascular dysfunction. Long-read RNA sequencing of endomyocardial biopsies from PH-HFpEF patients revealed distinct transcriptomic signatures between high- and low-risk PH-HFpEF phenogroups. Long-read RNA-seq identified distinct transcript usage of gene TTN, encoding a giant sarcomeric protein (titin) that is a key determinant for myocardial stiffness, suggesting a potential underlying mechanism for RV dysfunction in PH-HFpEF. What are clinical implications? These findings offer a framework for more refined patient classification beyond traditional PVR-based methods, which may improve identification of high-risk individuals who require closer monitoring or targeted therapy. The integrative approach highlights titin isoform imbalance and vessel-specific stiffness as potential therapeutic targets, supporting the development of biology-informed, phenotype-specific interventions for PH-HFpEF with RV dysfunction. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants 1R01HL148733-01A1 (to WG), AHA 19TPA3480072 (to WG), AHA 23TPA1069731 (to WG) and Salm Biologics Fund (to WG). American Heart Association (AHA) Grant/Award Number: 23CDA1057697 (to FR) and NIH/NCATS ICTR, Grant/Award Number: KL2TR002374-07 (to FR). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with University of Wisconsin-Madison institutional review board approval. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00