Integrating spatiotemporal and cultural dimensions of animal behavior can enhance conservation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Behavioral ecology has seen a recent integration of the spatiotemporal and cultural elements of animal behavior. However, similar integration in ecosystem management and wildlife conservation remains an important gap. Here we explore how the intersections among space, time, and culture in animal behavior can inform and enhance conservation practices. Drawing on instructive examples from cetaceans, we examine instances where protection of a location or resource can facilitate the conservation of culture (e.g., place-based, socially learned behaviors), and where focusing on conserving culturally distinct groups can yield protection in space and time (e.g., memory of migratory destinations). These examples highlight the value of examining these intersecting dimensions and their interactions. We propose that the foundations learned from behavioral ecology theory can aid in identifying key research gaps, and can guide conservation actions which consider space, time, and culture in concert. Such integrated efforts can enable more holistic protections for diverse taxa.
Full text 1,847 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Behavioral ecology has seen a recent integration of the spatiotemporal and cultural elements of animal behavior. However, similar integration in ecosystem management and wildlife conservation remains an important gap. Here we explore how the intersections among space, time, and culture in animal behavior can inform and enhance conservation practices. Drawing on instructive examples from cetaceans, we examine instances where protection of a location or resource can facilitate the conservation of culture (e.g., place-based, socially learned behaviors), and where focusing on conserving culturally distinct groups can yield protection in space and time (e.g., memory of migratory destinations). These examples highlight the value of examining these intersecting dimensions and their interactions. We propose that the foundations learned from behavioral ecology theory can aid in identifying key research gaps, and can guide conservation actions which consider space, time, and culture in concert. Such integrated efforts can enable more holistic protections for diverse taxa. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2QW7R Life Sciences Animal Culture, behavioral ecology, cetaceans, conservation, social learning, migration, foraging, Communication, social behavior Published: 2025-02-05 13:02 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00