Beyond intersubjective validity: recent empirical investigations into the nature of aesthetic judgment
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
According to a longstanding tradition in philosophy of art, people spontaneously attribute universal, intersubjective validity to their aesthetic judgments. In this chapter, I discuss recent empirical evidence against this claim. I then present the results of two new studies that extend these findings by showing that, far from being intersubjectively valid, the truth-value of aesthetic judgment can also vary in function of (i) the etiology of these judgments, and (ii) the person they are directed to.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00