The Composite Method Produces High False Positive Rates
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Using a single pair or a small number of pairs of composite stimuli to assess the relationship between morphology and other traits is a common method in face research. Here, I use data simulation to demonstrate how this method inevitably leads to a high false positive rate, and how this problem is made worse by using a larger number of raters. I conclude by suggesting alter- native methods for assessing the relationship between face morphology and individual traits.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00