Full text
59,146 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Impact of Peptide Initial Configuration and Membrane Composition on Melittin’s Pore-Forming Ability under Unbiased All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Impact of Peptide Initial Configuration and Membrane Composition on Melittin’s Pore-Forming Ability under Unbiased All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Zhihao Zhao , Yilin Guo , Jiaxiang Cai , Peilin Xie , Jiahui Guan , Lantian Yao , Yulan Liu , Chia-Ru Chung , Tzong-Yi Lee , View ORCID Profile Ying-Chih Chiang doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.28.656502 Zhihao Zhao 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yilin Guo 2 School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jiaxiang Cai 2 School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Peilin Xie 3 School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jiahui Guan 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China 2 School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lantian Yao 3 School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yulan Liu 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Chia-Ru Chung 4 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University , Taoyuan, Taiwan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tzong-Yi Lee 5 Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University ,Hsinchu, Taiwan 6 Center for Intelligent Drug Systems and Smart Bio-devices (IDS2B), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University , Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: chiangyc{at}cuhk.edu.cn leetzongyi{at}nycu.edu.tw Ying-Chih Chiang 1 Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518172, Shenzhen, China 3 School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China 2 School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen, 2001 Longxiang Blvd, Longgang District, 518172, Shenzhen, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ying-Chih Chiang For correspondence: chiangyc{at}cuhk.edu.cn leetzongyi{at}nycu.edu.tw Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract The rising challenge of antimicrobial resistance has accelerated the search for alternative therapeutics. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), a class of naturally occurring defense molecules found across diverse species, are promising candidates. Despite their potent membrane-disrupting activity, the atomic details of the pore formation process remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we employed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the pore formation process of melittin under different initial configurations. Simulations were conducted using three different membrane systems: a pure POPC bilayer, a mammalian membrane model (DOPC:Cholesterol, 9:1), and a bacterial membrane model (DOPE:DOPG, 3:1). For each system, we examined four different starting configurations, in which six melittin peptides were arranged in a star-like pattern. Our results demonstrated that the pore formation process strongly depends on the initial peptide configuration. In one specific initial arrangement (termed as Conf.I), pore formation consistently occurred within 100 nanoseconds, regardless of membrane composition. Furthermore, the simulations revealed that pore formation was more challenging in the mammalian membrane model and even more so in the bacterial membrane model, in comparison with the pure POPC bilayer. These findings are in line with previously reported minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the 50% hemolysis concentration (HC 50 ) of melittin in the literature. Additionally, we identified lysine-7 (K7) as the key residue in determining whether a stable pore can form. In configurations where the K7 side chain formed electrostatic interactions with the phosphate group of a lipid, melittin were anchored to the membrane surface, thereby preventing pore formation. In contrast, simulations of melittin mutants K7A and K7Q showed no such anchoring effect, and thus pore formation was possible in multiple initial configurations. Notably, the K7Q mutation showed a preference for pore formation in bacterial membranes over mammalian membranes, suggesting that reducing toxicity while maintaining antimicrobial efficacy is possible. 1 Introduction Since Alexander Fleming’s discovery of penicillin in 1928, antibiotics have served as the primary defense against bacterial infections [ 1 ]. However, widespread misuse and overprescription have accelerated the emergence of antibiotic resistance [ 2 ]. The World Health Organization estimates that antimicrobial resistance could contribute to approximately 10 million deaths annually by 2050 [ 3 , 4 ], underscoring the urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have emerged as promising candidates to address this challenge [ 5 – 7 ]. These peptides exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and possess diverse functionalities, including antiviral, antifungal, anticancer, and immunomodulatory properties, making them viable alternatives to conventional antibiotics [ 8 – 11 ]. Currently, the most comprehensive AMP database, dbAMP 3.0, catalogs 35,518 AMPs and 2,453 antimicrobial proteins sourced from 3,534 species, with ongoing updates and expansion [ 12 ]. The rapid expansion of the AMP database highlights the significance of AMP development. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have fundamentally transformed the research and development of AMPs [ 13 , 14 ]. Computational frameworks, such as Multi-Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks [ 13 ] and Transformer-based neural network architectures [ 15 ], now achieve prediction accuracies exceeding 90%. While sequence-based prediction algorithms effectively identify statistically significant residues, they lack the ability to provide atomic-level insights into the mechanisms of action of AMPs. This is particularly crucial when addressing questions such as why one AMP sequence exhibits higher activity against bacteria than another, or whether a specific sequence demonstrates greater toxicity than alternatives. Conventional experimental techniques so far are inadequate for capturing the transient pore formation process at atomic resolution. As a result, insights into the mechanisms of the pore formation process and the underlying peptide-lipid interactions, largely rely on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [ 16 , 17 ]. Recent advances in computational power have enabled millisecond-long MD simulations of systems containing billions of atoms, which allows researchers to employ MD techniques to simulate critical AMP mechanisms such as membrane pore formation, lipid disruption, and transmembrane insertion [ 18 , 19 ]. However, in conventional (unbiased) all-atom MD simulations, peptides typically remain on the membrane surface, i.e. so called “surface-bound state” (S-state), due to the high energy barriers associated with peptide insertion. Consequently, spontaneous pore formation was often not observed in standard MD simulations [ 20 – 23 ]. To simulate pore formation process caused by AMPs, various approaches have been employed. For example, Ulmschneider et al. demonstrated that WALP peptides can unfold and insert into DPPC/DMPC lipid bilyaers at 353 K [ 24 ]. Subsequently, simulations of maculatin at even higher temperatures (363.15-423.15 K) revealed the spontaneous formation of membrane channels [ 25 ]. These channels were transient, functional pores formed by various number of helices, structurally resembling transmembrane proteins. Further developments included the use of shorter lipids to enable simulations at reduced temperatures (343.15 K) [ 26 ]. Alternatively, coarse-grained modeling via the Martini force field has also been employed to investigate the pore formation process. Examples include studies on the membrane poration kinetics of melittin [ 27 ] and the localization preference of AMPs on membranes composed of different lipid phases [ 28 ]. The latter study observed the spontaneous aggregation of magainin-2 into star-like assemblies on the membrane surface, which was subsequently followed by pore formation. Notably, similar configurations (star-like assemblies) were observed also in other Martini simulations [ 29 , 30 ]. Interestingly, Miyazaki et al. recently observed a rapid poration by melittin using conventional all-atom MD simulations. Their simulations were conducted at physiological temperature, and initiated from a specific initial configuration, viz six peptides were initially arranged in a star-like configuration with their N-termini oriented toward the center [ 31 ]. Under these conditions, melittins were partially inserted into the upper leaflet of the membrane. Subsequently, through collective insertion of melittins, spontaneous pore formation was observed within 100 nanoseconds. These findings suggest that poration may result from the collective motion of AMP aggregates. Following this idea, we investigate the impact of different initial configurations of melittin assemblies, as well as variations in membrane composition, on poration dynamics. 2 Method 2.1 Simulation Systems A total of 24 systems were constructed to investigate pore formation under various conditions ( Table 1 ). Each system contained a lipid bilayer with different membrane compositions: pure POPC, DOPC:Cholesterol at a 9:1 ratio, representing a mammalian cell membrane model, and DOPE:DOPG at a 3:1 ratio, representing a Gram-negative bacterial cell membrane model [ 32 , 33 ]. All bilayers were constructed using CHARMM-GUI [ 34 – 36 ], consisting of 256 lipids evenly distributed between the upper and lower leaflets (128 lipids per leaflet). The systems were solvated with water molecules and salted with NaCl at a physiological concentration of 0.15 M, along with counter ions to ensure overall charge neutrality. Melittin (PDB code: 2MLT) is a 26-residue AMP with the sequence GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQ-NH 2 . It consists of a hydrophobic N-terminal segment (residues 1-11) and a highly charged, hydrophilic C-terminal segment (residues 12-26), connected by a characteristic kink at Pro14 [ 37 ]. In this study, we also investigated two melittin mutants, K7A and K7Q, in which the lysine at position 7 was substituted with alanine and glutamine, respectively. The structures of these mutants were predicted using AlphaFold 3 [ 38 ]. As illustrated in Figure 1 , the helical structure and amino acid distribution of melittin highlight its amphipathic nature, with clearly defined polar and nonpolar regions [ 39 , 40 ]. Melittin carries a net positive charge of +6 and can undergo a conformational transition from a disordered random coil in aqueous environments to an amphipathic α -helical structure upon membrane association [ 41 ]. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Simulated systems in this work. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 1. Structural representation of melittin. (a) Helical wheel projection of melittin illustrating the distribution of amino acids. The color scheme indicates residue types: red for polar/basic residues, green for polar (uncharged) residues, and white for nonpolar residues. Numbers correspond to the positions of each amino acid in the sequence. (b) Three-dimensional structure of melittin, with the helix colored according to the same scheme as in panel (a). As shown in Figure 2 , four initial configurations were: Configuration I (Conf.I) : The C-terminal segments are placed on the membrane surface, while the N-terminal segments are oriented toward the membrane center and are partially embedded in the upper leaflet. (This is the same configuration as reported in literature [ 31 ].) Configuration II (Conf.II) : Similar to Conf.I, but the peptides are shifted upward by approximately 2 Å above the membrane surface. Configuration III (Conf.III) : The C-terminal segments are pointed away from the membrane, while the N-terminal segments are positioned parallel to the membrane surface and are partially embedded in the upper leaflet. Configuration IV (Conf.IV) : Similar to Conf.III, but the peptides are shifted upward by approximately 2 Å above the membrane surface. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 2. Initial configurations of melittin employed in this study. Six melittin peptides are arranged in a star-shaped assembly with their N-termini oriented toward the center. Conf.I: The C-terminal segments are placed on the membrane surface, while the N-terminal are partially embedded in the upper leaflet. Conf.II: Similar as Conf.I, but shifted upward by approximately 2 Å above the membrane surface. Conf.III: The C-terminal are pointed away from the membrane, while the N-terminal segments are placed parallel to the membrane surface and partially embedded in the upper leaflet. Conf.IV: Similar as Conf.III, but shifted upward by approximately 2 Å above the membrane surface. Additional systems incorporating the K7A and K7Q mutations of melittin were prepared in both Conf.I and Conf.III configurations (denoted as Conf.I-K7A, Conf.III-K7A, Conf.I-K7Q, and Conf.III-K7Q) to elucidate the functional role of this specific residue. For each system, three independent simulations were performed to ensure reproducibility of the observed phenomena and statistical robustness in subsequent analyses. 2.2 Simulation Details All MD simulations were performed using GROMACS 2024.2 [ 42 , 43 ]. Each system was prepared through energy minimization, followed by two equilibration phases: 250 ps in the NVT ensemble and 1,625 ps in the NPT ensemble. During equilibration, restraints on protein backbone atoms, side chains, and lipid molecules were gradually lifted. Production runs were carried out using the leap-frog integrator with a 2 fs time step, each running for 750 ns, with three independent replicates per system. Pore formation events were typically observed within the first 100 ns in energetically favorable configurations, indicating that the 750 ns simulation duration was sufficient to capture pore formation propensities across different initial configurations. This timescale allows for a clear distinction between configurations that readily facilitate pore formation and those that encounter substantial energetic barriers under physiological conditions. The CHARMM36m [ 44 ] force field was employed for peptides, lipids, and ions, while water molecules were represented using the TIP3P model. The temperature was maintained at 310 K using the velocity-rescale thermostat [ 45 ] with a coupling time constant of 1.0 ps. Pressure was controlled at 1 bar using the C-rescale barostat [ 46 ] (coupling time constant: 5.0 ps; compressibility: 4.5 × 10 − 5 bar − 1 ) with semi-isotropic coupling to account for membrane-specific dynamics. Long-range electrostatic interactions were treated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method [ 47 , 48 ] with a real-space cutoff of 1.2 nm. Van der Waals interactions were modeled using a force-switch modifier between 1.0 to 1.2 nm. The Verlet cut-off scheme was employed, with neighbor lists updated every 20 steps. Bond constraints involving hydrogen atoms were applied using the LINCS algorithm [ 49 , 50 ]. Center of mass motion was removed every 200 fs for the solute-membrane and solvent groups independently. Trajectory coordinates were saved at 100 ps intervals for subsequent analysis. 3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Impact of Initial Configuration on Pore Formation In POPC membrane systems, pore formation was observed exclusively in system I-a, consistent with previous findings [ 31 , 51 ]. The rapid poration process began with the collective insertion of melittin peptides into the POPC bilayer, resulting in the formation of a stable transmembrane channel, as illustrated by the trajectory snapshots in Figure 3 . Analysis of the peptides’ center of mass (COM) further supports this conclusion. As shown in Figure 4(a) , the COM of melittin peptides along the z-axis was located between the COMs of phosphate groups in the upper and lower leaflets in system I-a, suggesting a successful pore formation. Notably, the cationic C-terminal residues (KRKR) formed a stable electrostatic interactions with the phosphate groups of POPC lipids, causing the melittins’ COM to center at about 1 nm above the membrane center (z=0). In contrast, the same analysis for the other three systems showed no peptide insertion. In particular, in panels (b) and (d), the COM of melittins was located around 5 nm above the phosphate groups of the upper leaflet, indicating that simulations initiated with peptides in the solvent (system II-a and IV-a) did not show any pore formation within 750 ns. Figure S1 provides representative frame snapshots for systems II-a and IV-a, illustrating their non-porating configurations. In system III-a, although pore formation was not observed, the melittins remained associated with the membrane surface, adopting the S-state. See Figure 4(c) the position of the peptides’ COM closely following the location of the COM of phosphorus atoms in the upper leaflet. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 3. Pore formation in the POPC bilayer induced by melittin peptides in system I-a. At 0 ns, the peptides are partially embedded in the upper leaflet. Water molecules already enter the membrane center during the equilibration step. By 10 ns, membrane deformation is observed, and the peptides begin to insert into the bilayer. At 450 ns, a transmembrane channel (pore) is formed, which remains stable through the end of the simulation at 750 ns. Peptides are shown in cartoon representation, colored according to residue type. Phosphorus atoms of POPCs are displayed in van der Waals (VDW) representation, while water molecules are depicted as a transparent surface. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 4. Positions along the z-axis of the COMs for melittin peptides and the phosphate groups of the two leaflets. Results are shown for systems: (a) system I-a, (b) system II-a, (c) system III-a, and (d) system IV-a. Black lines indicate the average z-position of phosphate groups in the upper and lower leaflets. Colored lines (red, blue, green) represent the COM of peptides from three independent simulations. In system I-a, the COM was located between the leaflets (approx. 1 nm from the bilayer center). In system III-a, peptides remain associated with the membrane surface. In contrast, for systems II-a and IV-a, peptides are in average 5 nm above the upper leaflet. No insertion was observed. To understand why only simulations initiated from system I-a can successfully capture poration, we compared the initial configurations of the four systems. The membranes in systems II-a and IV-a remained intact, as shown in Figure S2 of the supplementary information. In contrast, both systems I-a and III-a had a hole (14 Å in diameter) on the upper leaflet. The hole was resulted from the partial embedding of melittins. Although the size of the hole in both cases are similar, only the one in system I-a spontaneously developed into a stable pore. Instead, the hole in system III-a rapidly disappeared during the simulations. To quantify this difference, we computed the number of water molecules located within ± 2.5 Å of the membrane center throughout the MD simulations. The three independent trajectories were concatenated for statistical analysis. For instance, probability distributions of number of water molecules were calculated using data from all three production runs. These probabilities were expressed as percentages of the total simulation time. This metric directly reflects the number of water molecules entering the pore during the simulations. Figure 5(a-b) presents the distribution of number of water molecules obtained from simulations of systems I-a and III-a. As expected, a large number of water molecules were observed in system I-a. This result is consistent with stable pore formation across three replicas. In contrast, very few water molecules were found at the bilayer center in system III-a, indicating the absence of pore. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 5. Water permeation and key peptide-lipid/water interactions. (a-b) The distribution of number of water molecules found at the membrane center (within ± 2.5 Å, z=0). The x-axis represents the number of water molecules and the y-axis shows the corresponding probability, expressed as a percentage of the total simulation length. Panels show results from: (a) system I-a, (b) system III-a. (c-d) Simulation snapshots at 2.5 ns, illustrating (c) transmembrane channel pore formation in system I-a and (d) the peptide S-state configuration in system III-a. (e-f) Zoomin of (c) and (d) to show K7’s interactions: (e) with nearby water molecules (within 3 Å) in system I-a, and (f) with phosphate groups in system III-a. (g) Distribution of number of phosphate groups in upper leaflet interacting with K7 in system I-a (gray) and system III-a (green). A phosphate group is considered to interact with K7 if it is within 5.5 Å of the K7 side chain’s group. Why did the initial hole on the upper leaflet of system I-a develop into a stable pore, while the hole in system III-a resealed during the simulations? A detailed comparison between Conf.I and Conf.III revealed that the orientation of cationic lysine-7 (K7) residue, differs significantly between the systems: in Conf.I, the K7 residues primarily face the solvent, whereas in Conf.III, they orient towards the negatively charged lipid phosphate groups. As shown in Figure 5 , panels (c) and (d) display trajectory snapshots at 2.5 ns, which is the starting phase of the simulations, with system I-a forming a transmembrane pore and system III-a remaining in the S-state. Panels (e) and (f) further reveal distinct surroundings of K7: in system I-a, K7 primarily interacts with water molecules, while in system III-a, K7 strongly interacts with lipid phosphate groups. This observation is further supported by the number of phosphate groups interacting with K7. As shown in Figure 5(g) , the number of phosphate groups interacting with K7 residues in system III-a ranges from 1 to 9, with a peak around 5, but K7 residues in system I-a are rarely in contact with membrane phosphate groups. It is clear that although an initial membrane defect can facilitate poration, strong electrostatic interactions between melittins and the lipid head groups can easily trap the peptides in an S-state, preventing pore formation. 3.2 Effects of Membrane Composition Now, one may wonder, if the results of MD simulations (e.g., pore formation or not) depend so strongly on the initial configurations used, are the results still meaning-ful? To address this question, we extended the simulations to two different membrane models: the mammalian plasma membrane model (DOPC:Cholesterol, 9:1) and a Gram-negative bacterial membrane model (DOPE:DOPG, 3:1). These two models were selected for simulations because melittin-induced poration in the mammalian membrane model and the bacterial membrane model is associated with its hemolytic toxicity and antibacterial activity, respectively. The labels of the systems are provided in Table 1 . The distribution of number of water molecules, obtained from simulations of Conf.I with mammalian membrane model (system I-b) and of Conf.I with bacterial membrane model (system I-c), is depicted in Figure 6(a) . In system I-b, the number of water molecules ranges from 5 to 80, with a peak occurring around 40. In contrast, the number of water molecules in system I-c peaks at 10. Both results indicate that pore formation process was observed in associated simulations, although the pore formed in the mammalian membrane model seems to be larger than that in the bacterial membrane model. Notably, the pore formed in the POPC bilayer is the largest among the three membrane models, as evidenced by its most probable water molecule count (50 molecules). Consistent with this observation, MD simulations demonstrate that the pore formed in the mammalian membrane model is comparatively smaller than that in the POPC bilayer. This finding is consistent with the widely recognized impact of cholesterol-induced membrane ordering [ 52 , 53 ]. At the molecular level, cholesterols inserted among phospholipids can reduce the area per lipid and increase lipid order parameters. This ordering effect enhances bilayer cohesion, tightens lipid packing, and thereby raising the energetic barrier of transmembrane pore formation. Consequently, the presence of cholesterol significantly decreases membrane permeability [ 54 , 55 ]. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 6. Analysis of water permeation and peptide-lipid interactions. (a) Distribution of number of water molecules found at the membrane center (within ±2.5 Å, z=0) for Conf.I. The x-axis represents the number of water molecules and the y-axis shows the corresponding probability, expressed as a percentage of the total simulation length. (b) Distribution of number of phosphate groups. A phosphate group is considered to interact with K7 if it is within 5.5 Å of the K7 side chain’s NH + group. (c) Front view of peptide-lipid interactions in system I-b. (d) Front view of peptide-lipid interactions in system I-c. Peptides are shown in cartoon representation. Lipids with phosphates within 5.5 Å of K7s’ NH + groups are displayed as bonds. (e) Distribution of number of water molecules found at the membrane center for Conf.III. Axes represent the same quantities as in panel (a). Comparing the number of water molecules found in the bacterial membrane model and the mammalian membrane model leads to a rather unexpected conclusion: the pore formed in the bacterial membrane is much smaller than that in mammalian membrane. This observation may seem counterintuitive, especially when numerous studies highlight melittin’s affinity for bacterial cell membranes [ 56 – 58 ]. However, experimental data suggest otherwise. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of melittin against E. coli is 11.4 μ g/ml [ 59 , 60 ], whereas the associated 50% hemolysis concentration (HC 50 ) of human erythrocytes is 2.57 μ g/ml [ 61 ]. According to the data, melittin demonstrates a greater toxicity toward human erythrocytes compared 10 to its antibacterial activity against E. coli . Upon investigating the reason behind this simulation outcome, our attention was once again drawn to the K7 residues. In system I-c, these residues interact with phosphate groups more frequently than they do in systems I-a and I-b, as depicted in Figure 6(b) . This interaction likely makes pore formation more challenging in system I-c. To be more precise, neutral DOPC lipids are rarely drawn to the peptides in system I-b ( Figure 6(c) ), but the strong electrostatic interactions between anionic DOPG and K7 can attract DOPG to block the pore, as shown in Figure 6(d) . Lastly, Figure 6(e) indicates that no pore was formed in simulations initiated with Conf.III, irrespective of the membrane model used. 3.3 The Role of the Seventh Residue in Pore Formation Having identified the impact of K7 on pore formation, we asked whether altering this residue could bias pore formation toward a particular membrane model. To test this hypothesis, two melittin mutants were simulated: one with K7 replaced by alanine (K7A) and the other by glutamine (K7Q). For both mutants, simulations were conducted using initial peptide configurations corresponding to Conf.I and Conf.III, across all three membrane models. The list of these systems was provided in Table 1 . The distribution of water molecules for mutant simulations is depicted in Figure 7 . Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 7. The distribution of number of water molecules found at the membrane center (within ±2.5 Å, z=0). The x-axis represents the number of water molecules and the y-axis shows the corresponding probability, expressed as a percentage of the total simulation length. Panels show results from: (a) Conf.I-K7A, (b) Conf.III-K7A, (c) Conf.I-K7Q, and (d) Conf.III-K7Q. Panel (a) presents the results of K7A simulations with the initial peptide configuration arranged according to Conf.I. The three membrane systems are labeled as I-K7A-a, I-K7A-b, and I-K7A-c, for the POPC bilayer, the mammalian membrane model, and the bacterial membrane model, respectively. All three simulations demonstrate pore formation dynamics, as evidenced by the presence of water molecules in the membrane center. However, compared to the wild type melittin simulations, the pores formed by the K7A mutants appear less stable, and resulted in less water molecules to be found in the center of membrane. Similarly, simulations of K7Q mutants with Conf.I’s initial configurations also captured the pore formation process, as indicated by the distribution of water molecules shown in panel (c). Notably, the pore formed in the mammalian membrane model (system I-K7Q-b) is now smaller than that formed in the bacterial membrane model (system I-K7Q-c). Apparently, replacing the cationic lysine with the polar glutamine reduced electrostatic interactions, while partially preserving the ability for water to pass. This allows the peptide to form pores more easily in bacterial membranes. In other words, mutating K7 to glutamine may reduce melittin’s toxicity towards human cells while maintaining its antimicrobial activity. Interestingly, simulations conducted using Conf.III as the initial peptide configuration with K7A and K7Q mutants also exhibited pore formation. The distribution of number of water molecules of Conf.III-K7A and Conf.III-K7Q is shown in panels (b) and (d), respectively. After mutation, system III-K7Q-c showed no pore formation. While other systems exhibited transient pores, these structures were notably unstable and dissipated rapidly. This behavior differs from systems III-a, III-b, and III-c, where no pores formed at all. These observations suggest that Conf.III represents an unfavorable configuration for stable pore formation. This difference partly aligns with our understanding of K7 residues interaction with lipid phosphate groups, as neither alanine nor glutamine can anchor the peptides to the membrane surface through strong electrostatic interactions with the lipid headgroups. Notably, the pores formed in these simulations are transient and unstable. As demonstrated in Figure S3, the number of water molecules within 5 Å of the bilayer center gradually decays to zero as the simulation progresses. Nevertheless, these simulations demonstrate that while removing the positive charge at the seventh position facilitates peptide insertion and subsequent pore formation in some cases, the resulting configurations with Conf.III are largely unfavorable for stable pore formation. 4 Conclusions In this study, we investigated the impact of initial configuration of melittins on poration dynamics using MD simulations. Four different initial peptide configurations and three distinct membrane models were examined. By counting the number of water molecules within ±2.5 Å of the membrane center, i.e., the number of water molecules in the pore, we assessed whether a stable transmembrane pore is formed during the simulations. Our results confirm that pore formation depends on the initial configuration, particularly on the presence of a small hole in the upper leaflet at the start of the simulation. However, not all small holes can develop into stable pores, as lysine at the seventh position on melittin (K7) can interact strongly with lipid phosphate groups, anchoring the peptides to the membrane surface. Consequently, simulations initiated with K7 facing lipids (Conf.III) only resulted in the S-state, even when a small hole was present initially. Thus, for melittin, only simulations starting from Conf.I successfully captured poration dynamics. Further analysis revealed that pore size decreases in the order: POPC bilayer > mammalian membrane model > bacterial membrane model. This trend aligns with melittin’s MIC against E. coli and its HC 50 against human erythrocytes, and is consistent with the well-known effect of cholesterol-induced membrane ordering. The role of the seventh residue on melittin was further examined by simulating two mutants. Substitution of K7 with alanine (K7A) abolished the strong electrostatic interaction between this residue and lipid phosphates, allowing pore formation even in simulations starting from Conf.III. However, the loss of lysine also reduced the peptide’s ability to attract water molecules from the solvent, resulting in smaller pores in simulations initiated from Conf.I. Notably, replacing K7 with glutamine (K7Q) reduced the interaction between the seventh residue and lipid phosphates while partially preserving its interaction with solvent water molecules. This led to an unexpected pore size distribution across the three membranes: POPC bilayer > bacterial membrane model > mammalian membrane model. While experimental validation is required to determine whether the MD simulations based on Conf.I can be used to guide the design of AMPs, such as to reduce toxicity or to increase antibacterial activity, our results demonstrate that all-atom MD simulations are sufficiently sensitive to reflect the difference in both membrane composition and residue mutations, suggesting that MD simulations is still a useful tool complementary to the widely use AI methods. 5 Data Availability The data associated with this work are accessible through a Zenodo repository ( https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15241913 ). All molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the GROMACS software package ( https://www.gromacs.org/ ). Analysis of simulation trajectories was conducted using the MDAnalysis Python library ( https://www.mdanalysis.org/ ), and molecular visualization and figure preparation were done using VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics) software ( https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/ ). 6 Author Contributions Z.Z., Y.G., and Y.-C.C. contributed to conceptualization. Y.G., Z.Z., Y.L., and J.C.: investigation (MD simulations). J.C.: methodology, system building. P.X., J.G., L.Y., and C.-R.C.: validation. Y.G., Z.Z., and P.X.: formal analysis, writing original draft. T.-Y.L. and Y.-C.C.: supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. 7 Funding This work was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20230807114206014), Guangdong Province Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund (2025A1515011753), and the Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China. This work was also financially supported by the Center for Intelligent Drug Systems and Smart Biodevices (IDS2B) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project and Yushan Young Fellow Program (113C51N055) by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2321-B-A49-025, 113-2634-F-039-001, 113-2221-E-A49-160-MY3 and 112-2740-B-400-005) in Taiwan and The National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX114-11320BI) in Taiwan. 8 Acknowledgments The authors sincerely appreciate Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University for financially supporting this research. Funder Information Declared Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Council , JCYJ20230807114206014 Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province , 2025A1515011753 Footnotes https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15241913 References [1]. ↵ Fleming , A. : On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of b. influenzae . British journal of experimental pathology 10 ( 3 ), 226 ( 1929 ) OpenUrl Web of Science [2]. ↵ Bell , M. : Antibiotic misuse: a global crisis . JAMA internal medicine 174 ( 12 ), 1920 – 1921 ( 2014 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [3]. ↵ Tang , K.W.K. , Millar , B.C. , Moore , J.E. : Antimicrobial resistance (amr) . British Journal of Biomedical Science 80 , 11387 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [4]. ↵ Kraker , M.E. , Stewardson , A.J. , Harbarth , S. : Will 10 million people die a year due to antimicrobial resistance by 2050? PLoS medicine 13 ( 11 ), 1002184 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [5]. ↵ Wang , G. , Li , X. , Wang , Z. : Apd3: the antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education . Nucleic acids research 44 ( D1 ), 1087 – 1093 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [6]. Balatti , G.E. , Ambroggio , E.E. , Fidelio , G.D. , Martini , M.F. , Pickholz , M. : Differential interaction of antimicrobial peptides with lipid structures studied by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations . Molecules 22 ( 10 ), 1775 ( 2017 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [7]. ↵ Chen , P. , Ye , T. , Li , C. , Praveen , P. , Hu , Z. , Li , W. , Shang , C. : Embracing the era of antimicrobial peptides with marine organisms . Natural Product Reports 41 ( 3 ), 331 – 346 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [8]. ↵ Hsieh , I.-N. , Hartshorn , K.L. : The role of antimicrobial peptides in influenza virus infection and their potential as antiviral and immunomodulatory therapy . Pharmaceuticals 9 ( 3 ), 53 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [9]. Yang , L. , Tian , Z. , Zhou , L. , Zhu , L. , Sun , C. , Huang , M. , Peng , J. , Guo , G. : In vitro antifungal activity of a novel antimicrobial peptide amp-17 against planktonic cells and biofilms of cryptococcus neoformans . Infection and Drug Resistance , 233 – 248 ( 2022 ) [10]. Tornesello , A.L. , Borrelli , A. , Buonaguro , L. , Buonaguro , F.M. , Tornesello , M.L. : Antimicrobial peptides as anticancer agents: functional properties and biological activities . Molecules 25 ( 12 ), 2850 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [11]. ↵ Lesiuk , M. , Paduszyńska , M. , Greber , K.E. : Synthetic antimicrobial immunomodulatory peptides: ongoing studies and clinical trials . Antibiotics 11 ( 8 ), 1062 ( 2022 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [12]. ↵ Yao , L. , Guan , J. , Xie , P. , Chung , C.-R. , Zhao , Z. , Dong , D. , Guo , Y. , Zhang , W. , Deng , J. , Pang , Y. , et al : dbamp 3.0: updated resource of antimicrobial activity and structural annotation of peptides in the post-pandemic era . Nucleic Acids Research , 1019 ( 2024 ) [13]. ↵ Yu , H. , Wang , R. , Qiao , J. , Wei , L. : Multi-cgan: Deep generative model-based multiproperty antimicrobial peptide design . Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 64 ( 1 ), 316 – 326 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl PubMed [14]. ↵ Akbar , S. , Raza , A. , Zou , Q. : Deepstacked-avps: predicting antiviral peptides using tri-segment evolutionary profile and word embedding based multiperspective features with deep stacking model . BMC bioinformatics 25 ( 1 ), 102 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [15]. ↵ Pang , Y. , Yao , L. , Xu , J. , Wang , Z. , Lee , T.-Y. : Integrating transformer and imbalanced multi-label learning to identify antimicrobial peptides and their functional activities . Bioinformatics 38 ( 24 ), 5368 – 5374 ( 2022 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [16]. ↵ Hollingsworth , S.A. , Dror , R.O. : Molecular dynamics simulation for all . Neuron 99 ( 6 ), 1129 – 1143 ( 2018 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [17]. ↵ Necula , G. , Bacalum , M. , Radu , M. : Interaction of tryptophan-and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptide with e . coli outer membrane—a molecular simulation approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 ( 3 ), 2005 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl PubMed [18]. ↵ Bartocci , A. , Grazzi , A. , Awad , N. , Corringer , P.-J. , Souza , P.C. , Cecchini , M. : A millisecond coarse-grained simulation approach to decipher allosteric cannabinoid binding at the glycine receptor α 1 . Nature Communications 15 ( 1 ), 9040 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [19]. ↵ Nguyen-Cong , K. , Willman , J.T. , Moore , S.G. , Belonoshko , A.B. , Gayatri , R. , Weinberg , E. , Wood , M.A. , Thompson , A.P. , Oleynik , I.I. : Billion atom molecular dynamics simulations of carbon at extreme conditions and experimental time and length scales . In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis , pp. 1 – 12 ( 2021 ) [20]. ↵ Aghazadeh , H. , Ganjali Koli , M. , Ranjbar , R. , Pooshang Bagheri , K. : Interactions of gf-17 derived from ll-37 antimicrobial peptide with bacterial membranes: a molecular dynamics simulation study . Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 34 , 1261 – 1273 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [21]. Lou , T. , Zhuang , X. , Chang , J. , Gao , Y. , Bai , X. : Effect of surface-immobilized states of antimicrobial peptides on their ability to disrupt bacterial cell membrane structure . Journal of Functional Biomaterials 15 ( 11 ), 315 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [22]. Wu , Y. , Deng , S. , Wang , X. , Thunders , M. , Qiu , J. , Li , Y. : Discovery and mechanism of action of a novel antimicrobial peptide from an earthworm . Microbiology spectrum 11 ( 1 ), 03206 – 22 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl [23]. ↵ Tang , Z. , Jiang , W. , Li , S. , Huang , X. , Yang , Y. , Chen , X. , Qiu , J. , Xiao , C. , Xie , Y. , Zhang , X. , et al : Design and evaluation of tadpole-like conformational antimicrobial peptides . Communications Biology 6 ( 1 ), 1177 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [24]. ↵ Ulmschneider , M.B. , Ulmschneider , J.P. : Folding peptides into lipid bilayer membranes . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4 ( 11 ), 1807 – 1809 ( 2008 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [25]. ↵ Wang , Y. , Chen , C.H. , Hu , D. , Ulmschneider , M.B. , Ulmschneider , J.P. : Spontaneous formation of structurally diverse membrane channel architectures from a single antimicrobial peptide . Nature communications 7 ( 1 ), 13535 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [26]. ↵ Chen , C.H. , Starr , C.G. , Troendle , E. , Wiedman , G. , Wimley , W.C. , Ulmschneider , J.P. , Ulmschneider , M.B. : Simulation-guided rational de novo design of a small pore-forming antimicrobial peptide . Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 ( 12 ), 4839 – 4848 ( 2019 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [27]. ↵ Deng , Z.-X. , Li , J.-L. , Yuan , B. , Yang , K. : Residue-specialized membrane poration kinetics of melittin and its variants: insight from mechanistic landscapes . Communications in Theoretical Physics 71 ( 7 ), 887 ( 2019 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [28]. ↵ Su , J. , Marrink , S.J. , Melo , M.N. : Localization preference of antimicrobial peptides on liquid-disordered membrane domains . Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 8 , 350 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [29]. ↵ Kabelka , I. , Vácha , R. : Optimal conditions for opening of membrane pore by amphiphilic peptides . The Journal of Chemical Physics 143 ( 24 ) ( 2015 ) [30]. ↵ Sahoo , B.R. , Fujiwara , T. : Membrane mediated antimicrobial and antitumor activity of cathelicidin 6: Structural insights from molecular dynamics simulation on multi-microsecond scale . PLoS One 11 ( 7 ), 0158702 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl [31]. ↵ Miyazaki , Y. , Okazaki , S. , Shinoda , W. : Free energy analysis of membrane pore formation process in the presence of multiple melittin peptides . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1861 ( 7 ), 1409 – 1419 ( 2019 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [32]. ↵ Tyagi , C. , Marik , T. , Szekeres , A. , Vágvölgyi , C. , Kredics , L. , Ötvös , F. : Modeling the effect on a novel fungal peptaibol placed in an all-atom bacterial membrane mimicking system via accelerated molecular dynamics simulations . Life 13 ( 12 ), 2288 ( 2023 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [33]. ↵ Corin , K. , Bowie , J.U. : How bilayer properties influence membrane protein folding . Protein Science 29 ( 12 ), 2348 – 2362 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [34]. ↵ Jo , S. , Kim , T. , Iyer , V.G. , Im , W. : Charmm-gui: a web-based graphical user interface for charmm . Journal of computational chemistry 29 ( 11 ), 1859 – 1865 ( 2008 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [35]. Lee , J. , Cheng , X. , Jo , S. , MacKerell , A.D. , Klauda , J.B. , Im , W. : Charmmgui input generator for namd, gromacs, amber, openmm, and charmm/openmm simulations using the charmm36 additive force field . Biophysical journal 110 ( 3 ), 641 ( 2016 ) OpenUrl [36]. ↵ Brooks , B.R. , Brooks III , C.L. , Mackerell Jr , A.D. , Nilsson , L. , Petrella , R.J. , Roux , B. , Won , Y. , Archontis , G. , Bartels , C. , Boresch , S. , et al : Charmm: the biomolecular simulation program . Journal of computational chemistry 30 ( 10 ) ( 2009 ) [37]. ↵ Terwilliger , T.C. , Eisenberg , D. : The structure of melittin . i. structure determination and partial refinement. Journal of Biological Chemistry 257 ( 11 ), 6010 – 6015 ( 1982 ) OpenUrl PubMed [38]. ↵ Abramson , J. , Adler , J. , Dunger , J. , Evans , R. , Green , T. , Pritzel , A. , Ronneberger , O. , Willmore , L. , Ballard , A.J. , Bambrick , J. , et al : Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3 . Nature 630 ( 8016 ), 493 – 500 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [39]. ↵ Mol , A.R. , Castro , M.S. , Fontes , W. : Netwheels: A web application to create high quality peptide helical wheel and net projections . BioRxiv , 416347 ( 2018 ) [40]. ↵ Humphrey , W. , Dalke , A. , Schulten , K. : Vmd: visual molecular dynamics . Journal of molecular graphics 14 ( 1 ), 33 – 38 ( 1996 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [41]. ↵ Liao , C. , Esai Selvan , M. , Zhao , J. , Slimovitch , J.L. , Schneebeli , S.T. , Shelley , M. , Shelley , J.C. , Li , J. : Melittin aggregation in aqueous solutions: insight from molecular dynamics simulations . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 119 ( 33 ), 10390 – 10398 ( 2015 ) OpenUrl PubMed [42]. ↵ Abraham , M.J. , Murtola , T. , Schulz , R. , Páll , S. , Smith , J.C. , Hess , B. , Lindahl , E. : Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers . SoftwareX 1 , 19 – 25 ( 2015 ) OpenUrl [43]. ↵ Abraham , M. , Alekseenko , A. , Basov , V. , Bergh , C. , Briand , E. , Brown , A. , Doijade , M. , Fiorin , G. , Fleischmann , S. , Gorelov , S. , Gouaillardet , G. , Gray , A. , Irrgang , M.E. , Jalalypour , F. , Jordan , J. , Kutzner , C. , Lemkul , J.A. , Lundborg , M. , Merz , P. , Miletic , V. , Morozov , D. , Nabet , J. , Pall , S. , Pasquadibisceglie , A. , Pellegrino , M. , Santuz , H. , Schulz , R. , Shugaeva , T. , Shvetsov , A. , Villa , A. , Wingbermuehle , S. , Hess , B. , Lindahl , E. : GROMACS 2024.2 Source Code . doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11148655 OpenUrl CrossRef [44]. ↵ Huang , J. , Rauscher , S. , Nawrocki , G. , Ran , T. , Feig , M. , Groot , B.L. , Grubmüller , H. , MacKerell Jr. , A.D. : CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins . Nature Methods 14 , 71 – 73 ( 2017 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [45]. ↵ Bussi , G. , Donadio , D. , Parrinello , M. : Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling . The Journal of Chemical Physics 126 ( 1 ), 014101 ( 2007 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [46]. ↵ Bernetti , M. , Bussi , G. : Pressure control using stochastic cell rescaling . The Journal of Chemical Physics 153 ( 11 ), 114107 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [47]. ↵ Darden , T. , York , D. , Pedersen , L. : Particle mesh ewald: An n log(n) method for ewald sums in large systems . The Journal of Chemical Physics 98 ( 12 ), 10089 – 10092 ( 1993 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [48]. ↵ Essmann , U. , Perera , L. , Berkowitz , M.L. , Darden , T. , Lee , H. , Pedersen , L.G. : A smooth particle mesh ewald method . The Journal of Chemical Physics 103 ( 19 ), 8577 – 8593 ( 1995 ) OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science [49]. ↵ Hess , B. , Bekker , H. , Berendsen , H.J.C. , Fraaije , J.G.E.M. : Lincs: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations . Journal of Computational Chemistry 18 ( 12 ), 1463 – 1472 ( 1997 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [50]. ↵ Hess , B. : P-lincs: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4 ( 1 ), 116 – 122 ( 2008 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [51]. ↵ Sepehri , A. , PeBenito , L. , Pino-Angeles , A. , Lazaridis , T. : What makes a good pore former: a study of synthetic melittin derivatives . Biophysical Journal 118 ( 8 ), 1901 – 1913 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [52]. ↵ Henderson , J.M. , Iyengar , N.S. , Lam , K.L.H. , Maldonado , E. , Suwatthee , T. , Roy , I. , Waring , A.J. , Lee , K.Y.C. : Beyond electrostatics: Antimicrobial peptide selectivity and the influence of cholesterol-mediated fluidity and lipid chain length on protegrin-1 activity . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1861 ( 10 ), 182977 ( 2019 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [53]. ↵ Raghuraman , H. , Chattopadhyay , A. : Cholesterol inhibits the lytic activity of melittin in erythrocytes . Chemistry and physics of lipids 134 ( 2 ), 183 – 189 ( 2005 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [54]. ↵ Chakraborty , S. , Doktorova , M. , Molugu , T.R. , Heberle , F.A. , Scott , H.L. , Dzikovski , B. , Nagao , M. , Stingaciu , L.-R. , Standaert , R.F. , Barrera , F.N. , et al : How cholesterol stiffens unsaturated lipid membranes . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 ( 36 ), 21896 – 21905 ( 2020 ) OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text [55]. ↵ Doole , F.T. , Kumarage , T. , Ashkar , R. , Brown , M.F. : Cholesterol stiffening of lipid membranes . The Journal of Membrane Biology 255 ( 4 ), 385 – 405 ( 2022 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [56]. ↵ Kim , B.Y. , Lee , K.S. , Zou , F.M. , Wan , H. , Choi , Y.S. , Yoon , H.J. , Kwon , H.W. , Je , Y.H. , Jin , B.R. : Antimicrobial activity of a honeybee (apis cerana) venom kazal-type serine protease inhibitor . Toxicon 76 , 110 – 117 ( 2013 ) OpenUrl CrossRef [57]. Park , D. , Jung , J.W. , Lee , M.O. , Lee , S.Y. , Kim , B. , Jin , H.J. , Kim , J. , Ahn , Y.-J. , Lee , K.W. , Song , Y.S. , et al : Functional characterization of naturally occurring melittin peptide isoforms in two honey bee species, apis mellifera and apis cerana . Peptides 53 , 185 – 193 ( 2014 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [58]. ↵ Ulmschneider , J.P. , Ulmschneider , M.B. : Melittin can permeabilize membranes via large transient pores . Nature Communications 15 ( 1 ), 7281 ( 2024 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [59]. ↵ Yan , H. , Li , S. , Sun , X. , Mi , H. , He , B. : Individual substitution analogs of mel(12–26), melittin’s c-terminal 15-residue peptide: their antimicrobial and hemolytic actions . FEBS Letters 554 ( 1-2 ), 100 – 104 ( 2003 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [60]. ↵ Sun , X. , Chen , S. , Li , S. , Yan , H. , Fan , Y. , Mi , H. : Deletion of two c-terminal gln residues of 12–26-residue fragment of melittin improves its antimicrobial activity . Peptides 26 ( 3 ), 369 – 375 ( 2005 ) OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [61]. ↵ Pérez-Payá , E. , Houghten , R.A. , Blondelle , S.E. : The role of amphipathicity in the folding, self-association and biological activity of multiple subunit small proteins (*) . Journal of Biological Chemistry 270 ( 3 ), 1048 – 1056 ( 1995 ) OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted May 30, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Impact of Peptide Initial Configuration and Membrane Composition on Melittin’s Pore-Forming Ability under Unbiased All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Impact of Peptide Initial Configuration and Membrane Composition on Melittin’s Pore-Forming Ability under Unbiased All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Zhihao Zhao , Yilin Guo , Jiaxiang Cai , Peilin Xie , Jiahui Guan , Lantian Yao , Yulan Liu , Chia-Ru Chung , Tzong-Yi Lee , Ying-Chih Chiang bioRxiv 2025.05.28.656502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.28.656502 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Impact of Peptide Initial Configuration and Membrane Composition on Melittin’s Pore-Forming Ability under Unbiased All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Zhihao Zhao , Yilin Guo , Jiaxiang Cai , Peilin Xie , Jiahui Guan , Lantian Yao , Yulan Liu , Chia-Ru Chung , Tzong-Yi Lee , Ying-Chih Chiang bioRxiv 2025.05.28.656502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.28.656502 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Biochemistry Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7637) Biochemistry (17705) Bioengineering (13899) Bioinformatics (41968) Biophysics (21460) Cancer Biology (18603) Cell Biology (25526) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13385) Ecology (19909) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24326) Genetics (15614) Genomics (22513) Immunology (17741) Microbiology (40423) Molecular Biology (17193) Neuroscience (88645) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2835) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7647) Plant Biology (15160) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.