Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis: Thirteen Years of Experience and a Novel Scoring System (SNIPPED Score) for Differentiation

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract We aimed to evaluate clinical and laboratory characteristics of children with preseptal cellulitis (PC) or orbital cellulitis (OC) and to determine whether easily-accessible parameters could be used to predict OC. The data of children diagnosed with PC or OC between January 2008 and December 2020 were evaluated. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years who were treated with intravenous antibiotics were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify possible parameters in differentiating between PC and OC. A beta coefficient-based method was used to derive the scoring system. A total of 375 patients [202 (53.9%) boys], of whom 35 (9.3%) had OC, were evaluated. Median age was 44 (min-max: 1-192) months. Compared to those with PC, patients with OC were older (p = 0.001), had fever and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) symptoms more frequently, and demonstrated prolonged symptom and hospitalization times (p˂0.001 for all). Significant differences between groups were observed for numerous parameters; however, logistic regression analysis revealed only five parameters independently associated with OC. The SNIPPED score variables and weights were as follows: sinusitis (2 points), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 6.78 (3 points), platelet count > 420.5 x103/mm3 (2 points), proptosis (4 points) and duration of symptoms ≥ 4 days (4 points). A cut-off of ≥ 7 points for OC diagnosis was found to have 91.4% sensitivity, 96.2% specificity, 71.1% PPV, 99.1% NPV and 95.7% accuracy. Conclusion: In addition to showing previously known properties of OC versus PC, our study demonstrated that easily-accessible parameters could be used for the identification of OC.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00