Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging

other OA: closed public-domain-us ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11

This prospective study found that 1.5-T MRI accurately diagnosed endometrial cysts in 77 of 86 cases, with 90% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 96% accuracy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The value of 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in diagnosing endometrial cysts and differentiating them from other gynecologic masses was prospectively evaluated in 374 female patients with clinically suspected adnexal masses. A suggestive diagnosis of endometrial cyst was made when a cyst that was hyperintense on T1-weighted images exhibited homogeneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. A definitive diagnosis was made when a cyst that was hyperintense on T1-weighted images exhibited hypointense signal on T2-weighted images (shading) or when the lesion consisted of multiple hyperintense cysts on T1-weighted images (multiplicity) regardless of the signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Surgery was performed in 293 patients, and confirmation was obtained in 354 lesions. MR imaging enabled accurate diagnosis of 77 of 86 endometrial cysts and exclusion of the diagnosis of endometrial cyst in 263 of 268 other gynecologic masses with or without internal hemorrhage. The overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90%, 98%, 96%, respectively. MR imaging seems to be an acceptable diagnostic test on which clinical decisions can be based in selecting treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Genital Neoplasms, Female Magnetic Resonance Imaging Adnexal Diseases Adnexal Diseases Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Child Endometriosis Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Humans Middle Aged Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:00.397535+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine