The FDA and PLATO investigators death lists: Call for a match
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Purpose: The FDA-issued PLATO trial dataset revealed that some primary deaths causes (PDC) were inaccurately reported favoring ticagrelor. However, the PLATO Investigators operated the shorter death list of uncertain quality. We compared if PDC match when trial fatalities were reported to the FDA and by the PLATO investigators. Method: The FDA list contains precisely detailed 938 PLATO deaths, while shorter investigators dataset consists of 905 deaths. We matched 4 vascular (sudden, post-MI, heart failure and stroke), and 3 non-vascular (cancer, sepsis and suicide) PDC between death lists. Results: There were more sudden deaths in the shorter list than in the FDA dataset (161 vs.138; p<0.03), post-AMI (373 vs.178; p<0.001) but fewer heart failure deaths (73 vs.109; p=0.02). Stroke numbers match well (39 vs. 37; p=NS) with only 2 ticagrelor cases removed. Cancer matched well (32 vs.31; p=NS), and sepsis cases were identical (30 vs. 30; P=NS). However, 2 extra clopidogrel suicides in the shorter list are impossible to comprehend. Conclusions: The PLATO trial PDC were mismatched between FDA and Investigators sets. We are kindly asking the ticagrelor sponsor or/and concerned PLATO Investigators to clarify the PDC dataset match.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00