Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems.

Yazawa H, Takiguchi K, Imaizumi K, Wada M, Ito F
Fukushima journal of medical science · 2018 · doi:10.5387/fms.2017-22 · PMID:29540624 · PMC5956089
OA: closed CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 ⓘ

This retrospective study compared total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes using 3D versus 2D systems, finding that the 3D system significantly reduced operative time while maintaining safety and comparable blood loss.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective study compared surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy using three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic systems. The analysis included 47 procedures performed with the 3D system and a historical control group using the 2D system, finding that the 3D approach significantly reduced mean operative time without increasing blood loss or complication rates. A subset analysis controlling for energy device usage confirmed the reduction in operative duration, while postoperative adverse events remained low and comparable between groups. This paper is not centrally about endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgical systems have been developed to account for the lack of depth perception, a known disadvantage of conventional 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. In this study, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with 3D versus conventional 2D laparoscopy. From November 2014, when we began using a 3D laparoscopic system at our hospital, to December 2015, 47 TLH procedures were performed using a 3D laparoscopic system (3D-TLH). The outcomes of 3D-TLH were compared with the outcomes of TLH using the conventional 2D laparoscopic system (2D-TLH) performed just before the introduction of the 3D system. The 3D-TLH group had a statistically significantly shorter mean operative time than the 2D-TLH group (119±20 vs. 137±20 min), whereas the mean weight of the resected uterus and mean intraoperative blood loss were not statistically different. When we compared the outcomes for 20 cases in each group, using the same energy sealing device in a short period of time, only mean operative time was statistically different between the 3D-TLH and 2D-TLH groups (113±19 vs. 133±21 min). During the observation period, there was one occurrence of postoperative peritonitis in the 2D-TLH group and one occurrence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in each group, which was not statistically different. The surgeon and assistant surgeons did not report any symptoms attributable to the 3D imaging system such as dizziness, eyestrain, nausea, and headache. Therefore, we conclude that the 3D laparoscopic system could be used safely and efficiently for TLH.
Full text 2,064 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Original Article Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems 2018 Volume 64 Issue 1 Pages 38-45 Details Abstract Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgical systems have been developed to account for the lack of depth perception, a known disadvantage of conventional 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. In this study, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with 3D versus conventional 2D laparoscopy. From November 2014, when we began using a 3D laparoscopic system at our hospital, to December 2015, 47 TLH procedures were performed using a 3D laparoscopic system (3D-TLH). The outcomes of 3D-TLH were compared with the outcomes of TLH using the conventional 2D laparoscopic system (2D-TLH) performed just before the introduction of the 3D system. The 3D-TLH group had a statistically significantly shorter mean operative time than the 2D-TLH group (119±20 vs. 137±20 min), whereas the mean weight of the resected uterus and mean intraoperative blood loss were not statistically different. When we compared the outcomes for 20 cases in each group, using the same energy sealing device in a short period of time, only mean operative time was statistically different between the 3D-TLH and 2D-TLH groups (113±19 vs. 133±21 min). During the observation period, there was one occurrence of postoperative peritonitis in the 2D-TLH group and one occurrence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in each group, which was not statistically different. The surgeon and assistant surgeons did not report any symptoms attributable to the 3D imaging system such as dizziness, eyestrain, nausea, and headache. Therefore, we conclude that the 3D laparoscopic system could be used safely and efficiently for TLH. © 2018 The Fukushima Society of Medical Science This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International] license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Favorites & Alerts Recently viewed articles

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0