Origin and Pathogenic Mechanisms of Uterine Adenomyosis: What Is Known So Far

review OA: green public-domain-us ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09

This review analyzes current knowledge on the origin and pathogenic mechanisms of uterine adenomyosis, examining widely accepted theories and newly reported data.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-16 · read from full text

This paper is a review analyzing current knowledge on the proposed origin and pathogenic mechanisms of uterine adenomyosis, spanning historical and widely accepted theories and newer hypotheses. It describes major mechanistic ideas such as endometrium invaginating into the myometrium via a traumatized interface, alongside alternative concepts including de novo lesion development from Müllerian remnants or adult stem cells, and it synthesizes molecular pathways reported to participate in these processes (e.g., tissue injury/repair concepts, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation, and roles for immune, angiogenic, and hormonal factors). A stated caveat is that the exact origin and pathogenic mechanisms of adenomyosis “still need to be elucidated,” despite progress. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis only insofar as it discusses endometrium invagination and explicitly compares adenomyosis pathogenesis to endometriosis-related theories (e.g., tissue injury and repair and Müllerianosis concepts), while focusing on adenomyosis mechanisms.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Uterine adenomyosis is a benign disease, commonly encountered in reproductive-age women and responsible for chronic pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Although the exact origin and pathogenic mechanisms involved in adenomyosis still need to be elucidated, significant progress has been made over recent years. Ever since the theory of endometrium invaginating the myometrium via a traumatized interface was first proposed, numerous molecular mechanisms have been reported to participate in this process. At the same time, an alternative theory has suggested de novo development of adenomyotic lesions from metaplasia of Müllerian remnants or adult stem cells. Hence, our understanding of the pathogenesis of adenomyosis has been greatly enhanced and is anticipated to pave the way for development of an effective and safe treatment. The goal of this review is to analyze current knowledge on the origin and pathogenic mechanisms of adenomyosis, ranging from the most widely accepted theories to newly reported data.
Full text 17,591 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Uterine adenomyosis is a benign disease, commonly encountered in reproductive-age women and responsible for chronic pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Although the exact origin and pathogenic mechanisms involved in adenomyosis still need to be elucidated, significant progress has been made over recent years. Ever since the theory of endometrium invaginating the myometrium via a traumatized interface was first proposed, numerous molecular mechanisms have been reported to participate in this process. At the same time, an alternative theory has suggested de novo development of adenomyotic lesions from metaplasia of Müllerian remnants or adult stem cells. Hence, our understanding of the pathogenesis of adenomyosis has been greatly enhanced and is anticipated to pave the way for development of an effective and safe treatment. The goal of this review is to analyze current knowledge on the origin and pathogenic mechanisms of adenomyosis, ranging from the most widely accepted theories to newly reported data. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Frankl O. Adenomyosis uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1925;10:680–4. Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93. García-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril. 2018;109:371–9. Levgur M, Abadi MA, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:688–91. Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, Camilli S, Martire FG, Lazzeri L, et al. New sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;S1553–4650(19):31241–5. Brosens I, Gordts S, Habiba M, Benagiano G. Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:420–6. Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Introduction: uterine adenomyosis, another enigmatic disease of our time. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:369–70. Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26:392–411. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:465–77. Parazzini F, Mais V, Cipriani S, Busacca M, Venturini P. Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143:103–6. Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3432–9. Guo SW. The pathogenesis of adenomyosis vis-à-vis endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:485. Puente JM, Fabris A, Patel J, Patel A, Cerrillo M, Requena A, et al. Adenomyosis in infertile women: prevalence and the role of 3D ultrasound as a marker of severity of the disease. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:60. Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Centini G, Orlandini C, Luisi S, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:730–6. Shen F, Liu Y, Lin L, Zhao M, Chen Q. Association of benign gynaecological diseases and risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers. J Cancer. 2020;11:3186–91. Yeh CC, Su FH, Tzeng CR, Muo CH, Wang WC. Women with adenomyosis are at higher risks of endometrial and thyroid cancers: a population-based historical cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194011. Zouzoulas OD, Tsolakidis D, Efstratiou I, Pervana S, Pazarli E, Grimbizis G. Correlation between adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: 6-year experience of a single center. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10:147–52. Johnatty SE, Stewart CJR, Smith D, Nguyen A, O’ Dwyer J, O’Mara TA, et al. Co-existence of leiomyomas, adenomyosis and endometriosis in women with endometrial cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10:3621. Habiba M, Pluchino N, Petignat P, Bianchi P, Brosens IA, Benagiano G. Adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: literature review. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2018;83:313–28. Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, Sorbi F, Petraglia F. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:398–405. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:665–86. Donnez O, Donnez J. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (linzagolix): a new therapy for uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:640–5. Leyendecker G, Wildt L. A new concept of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair (TIAR). Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2011;5:125–42. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:529–38. Kissler S, Zangos S, Wiegratz I, Kohl J, Rody A, Gaetje R, et al. Utero-tubal sperm transport and its impairment in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:38–48. Hatok J, Zubor P, Galo S, Kirschnerova R, Dobrota D, Danko J, et al. Endometrial aromatase mRNA as a possible screening tool for advanced endometriosis and adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:331–6. Artymuk N, Zotova O, Gulyaeva L. Adenomyosis: genetics of estrogen metabolism. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2019;37:/j/hmbci.2019.37.issue-2/hmbci-2018-0069/hmbci-2018-0069.xml. Kitawaki J, Obayashi H, Ishihara H, Koshiba H, Kusuki I, Kado N, et al. Oestrogen receptor-alpha gene polymorphism is associated with endometriosis, adenomyosis and leiomyomata. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:51–5. Mehasseb MK, Panchal R, Taylor AH, Brown L, Bell SC, Habiba M. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isoform distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2228–35. Nisolle M, Donnez J. Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:585–96. Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, Mori T, Kuroboshi H, Ogi H, et al. Biological differences between focal and diffuse adenomyosis and response to hormonal treatment. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;38:634–46. Liu X, Shen M, Qi Q, Zhang H, Guo SW. Corroborating evidence for platelet-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:734–49. Nie J, Liu X, Guo SW. Promoter hypermethylation of progesterone receptor isoform B (PR-B) in adenomyosis and its rectification by a histone deacetylase inhibitor and a demethylation agent. Reprod Sci. 2010;17:995–1005. Batt RE, Yeh J. Müllerianosis: four developmental (embryonic) Müllerian diseases. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:1030–7. Signorile PG, Baldi F, Bussani R, D’Armiento M, De Falco M, Baldi A. Ectopic endometrium in human foetuses is a common event and sustains the theory of Müllerianosis in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, a disease that predisposes to cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:49. Enatsu A, Harada T, Yoshida S, Iwabe T, Terakawa N. Adenomyosis in a patient with the Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:862–3. Chun S, Kim YM, Ji YI. Uterine adenomyosis which developed from hypoplastic uterus in postmenopausal woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. J Menopausal Med. 2013;19:135–8. Gurung S, Deane JA, Masuda H, Maruyama T, Gargett CE. Stem cells in endometrial physiology. Semin Reprod Med. 2015;33:326–32. Chan RWS, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1738–50. Sampson JA. Heterotopic or misplaced endometrial tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1925;10:649–64. Cousins FL, Dorien FO, Gargett CE. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;50:27–38. Patel N, Park E, Kuzman M, Benetti F, Silva FJ, Allickson JG. Multipotent menstrual blood stromal stem cells: isolation, characterization, and differentiation. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:303–11. Yang JH, Wu MY, Der Chen C, Chen MJ, Yang YS, Ho HN. Altered apoptosis and proliferation in endometrial stromal cells of women with adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:945–52. Li J, Yanyan M, Mu L, Chen X, Zheng W. The expression of Bcl-2 in adenomyosis and its effect on proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of endometrial stromal cells. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215:152477. Wang J, Deng X, Yang Y, Yang X, Kong B, Chao L. Expression of GRIM-19 in adenomyosis and its possible role in pathogenesis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1093–101. Chen YJ, Li HY, Huang CH, Twu NF, Yen MS, Wang PH, et al. Oestrogen-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of endometrial epithelial cells contributes to the development of adenomyosis. J Pathol. 2010;222:261–70. Shen M, Liu X, Zhang H, Guo SW. Transforming growth factor β1 signaling coincides with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis in mice. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:355–69. Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–96. Kobayashi H, Kishi Y, Matsubara S. Mechanisms underlying adenomyosis-related fibrogenesis. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2020;85:1–12. Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Fujishita A, Nakashima M, Masuzaki H. Involvement of hepatocyte growth factor-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human adenomyosis. Biol Reprod. 2015;92:35. Zheng D, Duan H, Wang S, Xu Q, Gan L, Li J, et al. FAK regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in adenomyosis. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18:5461–72. Zhou W, Peng Z, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhang Y. ILK-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition promotes the invasive phenotype in adenomyosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497:950–6. Hu R, Peng GQ, Ban DY, Zhang C, Zhang XQ, Li YP. High-expression of neuropilin 1 correlates to estrogen-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of endometrial cells in adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2020;27:395–403. An M, Li D, Yuan M, Li Q, Zhang L, Wang G. Interaction of macrophages and endometrial cells induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like processes in adenomyosis. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:46–57. Suginami K, Sato Y, Horie A, Matsumoto H, Kyo S, Araki Y, et al. Platelets are a possible regulator of human endometrial re-epithelialization during menstruation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12609. Harmsen MJ, Wong CFC, Mijatovic V, Griffioen AW, Groenman F, Hehenkamp WJK, et al. Role of angiogenesis in adenomyosis-associated abnormal uterine bleeding and subfertility: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:647–71. Zhihong N, Yun F, Pinggui Z, Sulian Z, Zhang A. Cytokine profiling in the eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis during the implantation window after ovarian stimulation. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:124–33. Maybin JA, Hirani N, Brown P, Jabbour HN, Critchley HOD. The regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by hypoxia and prostaglandin F 2α during human endometrial repair. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:2475–83. Goteri G, Lucarini G, Montik N, Zizzi A, Stramazzotti D, Fabris G, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), and microvessel density in endometrial tissue in women with adenomyosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28:157–63. Huang TS, Chen YJ, Chou TY, Chen CY, Li HY, Huang BS, et al. Oestrogen-induced angiogenesis promotes adenomyosis by activating the slug-VEGF axis in endometrial epithelial cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1358–71. Maybin JA, Murray AA, Saunders PTK, Hirani N, Carmeliet P, Critchley HOD. Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factor-1α are required for normal endometrial repair during menstruation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:295. Ota H, Igarashi S, Tanaka T. Morphometric evaluation of stromal vascularization in the endometrium in adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:715–9. Schindl M, Birner P, Obermair A, Kiesel L, Wenzl R. Increased microvessel density in adenomyosis uteri. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:131–5. Ota H, Igarashi S, Hatazawa J, Tanaka T. Is adenomyosis an immune disease? Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:360–7. Thiruchelvam U, Dransfield I, Saunders PTK, Critchley HOD. The importance of the macrophage within the human endometrium. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:217–25. Tremellen KP, Russell P. The distribution of immune cells and macrophages in the endometrium of women with recurrent reproductive failure. II: Adenomyosis and macrophages. J Reprod Immunol. 2012;93:58–63. Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44:450–62. An M, Li D, Yuan M, Li Q, Zhang L, Wang G. Different macrophages equally induce EMT in endometria of adenomyosis and normal. Reproduction. 2017;154:79–92. Wang F, Wen Z, Li H, Yang Z, Zhao X, Yao X. Human leukocyte antigen-G is expressed by the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1599–604. Baka S, Frangou-Plemenou M, Panagiotopoulou E, Makrakis E, Kaltsakas G, Hassiakos D, et al. The expression of human leukocyte antigens class I and II in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:419–24. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, Stalf T, Huppert P, Mall G, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:917–32. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Pringle JH, Habiba MA. Uterine adenomyosis is associated with ultrastructural features of altered contractility in the inner myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2130–6. Ibrahim MG, Chiantera V, Frangini S, Younes S, Köhler C, Taube ET, et al. Ultramicro-trauma in the endometrial-myometrial junctional zone and pale cell migration in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1475–83.e1–3. Pinto V, Matteo M, Tinelli R, Mitola PC, De Ziegler D, Cicinelli E. Altered uterine contractility in women with chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1049–52. Takebayashi A, Kimura F, Kishi Y, Ishida M, Takahashi A, Yamanaka A, et al. The association between endometriosis and chronic endometritis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88354. Chen C, Song X, Wei W, Zhong H, Dai J, Lan Z, et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat Commun. 2017;8:875. Herndon CN, Aghajanova L, Shaina B, Erikson D, Barragan F, Goldfien G, et al. Giudice LC global transcriptome abnormalities of the eutopic endometrium from women with adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:1289–303. Xiang Y, Sun Y, Yang B, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Yu T, et al. Transcriptome sequencing of adenomyosis eutopic endometrium: a new insight into its pathophysiology. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:8381–91. Inoue S, Hirota Y, Ueno T, Fukui Y, Yoshida E, Hayashi T, et al. Uterine adenomyosis is an oligoclonal disorder associated with KRAS mutations. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5785. Sideris M, Emin EI, Abdullah Z, Hanrahan J, Stefatou KM, Sevas V, et al. The role of KRAS in endometrial cancer: a mini-review. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:533–9. Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Fellah L. What if deep endometriotic nodules and uterine adenomyosis were actually two forms of the same disease? Fertil Steril. 2019;111:454–6. Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1393–401. Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, Kuroboshi H, Mori T, Ogi H, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;39:343–53. Kishi Y, Shimada K, Fujii T, Uchiyama T, Yoshimoto C, Konishi N, et al. Phenotypic characterization of adenomyosis occurring at the inner and outer myometrium. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189522. Habiba M, Gordts S, Bazot M, Brosens I, Benagiano G. Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;40:569–81.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mira Hryniuk for reviewing the English language of the article. Funding This work was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (5/4/150/5 grant awarded to Marie-Madeleine Dolmans), PregLem via the Fondation Saint-Luc (grant awarded to Christina Anna Stratopoulou) and donations of the Ferrero Family. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of Interest CAS and MMD have no conflict of interest to declare. JD is a member of the SAB of ObsEva and PregLem. Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals Non applicable. Informed Consent Non applicable. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Stratopoulou, C.A., Donnez, J. & Dolmans, MM. Origin and Pathogenic Mechanisms of Uterine Adenomyosis: What Is Known So Far. Reprod. Sci. 28, 2087–2097 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00361-w Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00361-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosischronic_pelvic_paininfertility

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Endometrium Myometrium Uterine Diseases Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Endometrium Female Humans Myometrium Uterine Diseases Uterine Diseases

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-21T06:08:07.822426+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:36.268089+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine