Predicting pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the IVF clinic by analysing patient profiles

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-08-03

This study analyzed IVF patient and cycle data to predict pregnancy and live birth rates, finding age, gonadotrophin dose, and certain medical issues significantly affected outcomes, but current variables yielded only moderate prediction accuracy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-06 · read from full text

This study analyzed IVF cycle data from 3,221 patients to identify characteristics predicting pregnancy and live birth rates. The researchers employed logistic regression with multiple imputation for missing data and a Random Forest model for prediction, noting that age, gonadotrophin dose, transport problems, ovulation problems, and pituitary inhibition significantly affected pregnancy outcomes. While implantation problems and treatment also influenced live birth rates, the predictive models achieved only moderate accuracy of approximately 52-53%, indicating that the current variable set is insufficient for robust outcome prediction. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis status was included as one of the patient variables in the dataset, though it was not highlighted as a primary focus or significant predictor compared to other factors like age and gonadotrophin dose.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,992 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 1 sections · click to expand

Section

This study used data of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles from 3,221 patients during 2004 to 2013, collected in Leuven University Fertility Center, aiming to identify patient and cycle characteristics to predict pregnancy and live birth rate. Variables include age, gonadotrophin dose, year of the IVF cycle, implantation problems, transport problems, ovulation problems, male pathology, pituitary inhibition, treatment, medication, and endometriosis status. One major issue of our dataset was the presence of missing data and unknown' fill-in in some of the variables. Due to the conceptual overlapping between missing and unknown', we employed two different setups to treat the unknowns': 1) as a new category; 2) as missing values. As ignoring the missingness would have significant impact on potential conclusions, we conducted multiple imputation on the missing data. The logistic regression model inclusive of a subject-specific random intercept was next fitted to the imputed dataset to assess the effect of the variables on the probability of transfer/pregnancy success. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to check for the influence of missing mechanism. For the prediction purpose, the non-parametric Random Forest model was used, and 10-fold cross-validation was performed to obtain the prediction accuracy. Our results suggest that the outputs of these two setups are mostly comparable in the generalized linear mixed model. Other than the most well-known factor-age, we found that gonadotrophin dose, transport problems, ovulation problems, pituitary inhibition also have significant main effects on pregnancy rate. The same set of variables plus implantation problems and treatment have significant fixed effect on live birth rate. The random forest model can achieve average prediction accuracy of 53% on transfer outcome and 52% on pregnancy outcome, which indicates that our current set of variables are not enough to yield good prediction performance on IVF outcomes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0