Adaptive sequential eye-movement sampling and replay under different task demands

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Human cognition is capacity-limited, requiring strategies to actively structure information. Eye movements offer a natural mechanism for sequential sampling, but whether such sequences organize mnemonic representations is unknown. We developed a working-memory task where color-frequency pairings created a consistent latent ordinal structure to optimally reduce memory load. Across two experiments, gaze patterns spontaneously aligned with this structure. Participants sampled items following this sequence during encoding and covertly replayed them during maintenance. Critically, the expression of this structure depended on cognitive demand. In a 3-item task, high performers showed robust sequential sampling during encoding, whereas lower performers compensated with replay-like revisitation during maintenance. Under higher demand (4 items), encoding-based organization was disrupted, and structured replay emerged primarily during maintenance to support memory. These findings show that eye movements do more than reflect memory; they actively organize it, revealing a flexible, behavioral analogue to neural replay when encoding resources are strained.
Full text 1,248 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Human cognition is capacity-limited, requiring strategies to actively structure information. Eye movements offer a natural mechanism for sequential sampling, but whether such sequences organize mnemonic representations is unknown. We developed a working-memory task where color-frequency pairings created a consistent latent ordinal structure to optimally reduce memory load. Across two experiments, gaze patterns spontaneously aligned with this structure. Participants sampled items following this sequence during encoding and covertly replayed them during maintenance. Critically, the expression of this structure depended on cognitive demand. In a 3-item task, high performers showed robust sequential sampling during encoding, whereas lower performers compensated with replay-like revisitation during maintenance. Under higher demand (4 items), encoding-based organization was disrupted, and structured replay emerged primarily during maintenance to support memory. These findings show that eye movements do more than reflect memory; they actively organize it, revealing a flexible, behavioral analogue to neural replay when encoding resources are strained. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00