Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst

Background: Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease. Laparoscopy is currently the preferred method of ovarian endometriosis. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal still need to be discussed. Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for the ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 47 patients who had undergone LESS and LESS ovarian cystectomy due to ovarian endometrioid cyst in our hospital from March 2018 to April 2019. The patients were classified into single-port group (14) and multiport group (33) based on surgical paths. The patients’ general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in the operation time and the maximum body temperature in 24 h after operation. There were significant statistical differences (all P<0.05) in postoperative decrease of Hb, intraoperative bleeding volume, total hospital stay and CS score. Conclusion: LESS for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal is safe and feasible, and it better than CMPL in relieving postoperative pain and inproving cosmetic effects and so on. | Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 9, Issue 2) | | DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 | | Page(s) | 46-49 | | Creative Commons | This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. | | Copyright | Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery, Ovarian Cystectomy, Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst

| [1] | F. P. Minson, M. S. Abrão, J. Sardá Júnior, D. C. Kraychete, S. Podgaec, F. D. Assis, [Importance of quality of life assessment in patients with endometriosis], Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia: revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia 34 (1) (2012) 11-5. | | [2] | H. Kitchen, C. Seitz, A. Trigg, N. Aldhouse, T. Willgoss, H. Schmitz, A. Gater, C. Gerlinger, C. Haberland, Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on item importance, scoring, and clinically meaningful differences for the Endometriosis Symptom Diary (ESD) and Endometriosis Impact Scale (EIS), Health and quality of life outcomes 19 (1) (2021) 7. | | [3] | C. Peng, Y. Huang, Y. Zhou, Dydrogesterone in the treatment of endometriosis: evidence mapping and meta-analysis, Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2021). | | [4] | A. N. Fader, L. Rojas-Espaillat, O. Ibeanu, F. C. Grumbine, P. F. Escobar, Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecology: a multi-institutional evaluation, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 203 (5) (2010) 501. e1-6. | | [5] | L. S. Bradford, D. M. Boruta, Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a review of the literature, tools, and techniques, Obstetrical & gynecological survey 68 (4) (2013) 295-304. | | [6] | X. Su, X. Jin, C. Wen, Q. Xu, C. Cai, Z. Zhong, X. Tang, Outcome of Gynecologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Homemade Device and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments in a Chinese Teaching Hospital, BioMed research international 2020 (2020) 5373927. | | [7] | Y. J. Cho, M. L. Kim, S. Y. Lee, H. S. Lee, J. M. Kim, K. Y. Joo, Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study, International journal of women's health 4 (2012) 85-91. | | [8] | I. A. Al-Badawi, O. AlOmar, N. Albadawi, A. Abu-Zaid, Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia, Annals of Saudi medicine 36 (1) (2016) 64-9. | | [9] | H. G. Jeon, W. Jeong, C. K. Oh, E. I. Lorenzo, W. S. Ham, K. H. Rha, W. K. Han, Initial experience with 50 laparoendoscopic single site surgeries using a homemade, single port device at a single center, The Journal of urology 183 (5) (2010) 1866-71. | | [10] | C. Hoyer-Sørensen, I. Vistad, K. Ballard, Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial, Fertility and sterility 98 (4) (2012) 973-9. | | [11] | F. P. Buckley, 3rd, H. Vassaur, S. Monsivais, D. Jupiter, R. Watson, J. Eckford, Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution, Surgical endoscopy 28 (2) (2014) 626-30. | | [12] | E. M. Pontarelli, C. Emami, N. X. Nguyen, M. Torres, D. M. Anselmo, Single-incision laparoscopic resection of ovarian masses in children: a preliminary report, Pediatric surgery international 29 (7) (2013) 715-8. | | [13] | G. O. Chong, D. G. Hong, Y. S. Lee, Single-port (OctoPort) assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy for the treatment of large ovarian cysts: compare to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 22 (1) (2015) 45-9. | | [14] | M. H. Chew, M. H. Chang, W. S. Tan, M. T. Wong, C. L. Tang, Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases, Surgical endoscopy 27 (2) (2013) 471-7. | | [15] | Y. Karasu, B. Akselim, D. Kavak Cömert, Y. Ergün, K. Ülker, Comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies: MITAT: official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy 26 (5) (2017) 278-283. | Cite This Article - APA Style Hongxia Yu, Zhiyong Dong, Wendi Zhang, Shoufeng Zhang, Jia Lu, et al. (2021). Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9(2), 46-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 ACS Style Hongxia Yu; Zhiyong Dong; Wendi Zhang; Shoufeng Zhang; Jia Lu, et al. Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 9(2), 46-49. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 AMA Style Hongxia Yu, Zhiyong Dong, Wendi Zhang, Shoufeng Zhang, Jia Lu, et al. Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst. J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;9(2):46-49. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 - @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14, author = {Hongxia Yu and Zhiyong Dong and Wendi Zhang and Shoufeng Zhang and Jia Lu and Zhenyue Qin and Mingyue Bao and Huihui Wang and Ying Cao and Yilin Sun and Wenjia Liu and Jiming Chen}, title = {Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst}, journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {46-49}, doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20210902.14}, abstract = {Background: Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease. Laparoscopy is currently the preferred method of ovarian endometriosis. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal still need to be discussed. Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for the ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 47 patients who had undergone LESS and LESS ovarian cystectomy due to ovarian endometrioid cyst in our hospital from March 2018 to April 2019. The patients were classified into single-port group (14) and multiport group (33) based on surgical paths. The patients’ general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in the operation time and the maximum body temperature in 24 h after operation. There were significant statistical differences (all P<0.05) in postoperative decrease of Hb, intraoperative bleeding volume, total hospital stay and CS score. Conclusion: LESS for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal is safe and feasible, and it better than CMPL in relieving postoperative pain and inproving cosmetic effects and so on.}, year = {2021} } - TY - JOUR T1 - Clinical Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for the Removal of Ovarian Endometrioid Cyst AU - Hongxia Yu AU - Zhiyong Dong AU - Wendi Zhang AU - Shoufeng Zhang AU - Jia Lu AU - Zhenyue Qin AU - Mingyue Bao AU - Huihui Wang AU - Ying Cao AU - Yilin Sun AU - Wenjia Liu AU - Jiming Chen Y1 - 2021/03/30 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 46 EP - 49 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210902.14 AB - Background: Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease. Laparoscopy is currently the preferred method of ovarian endometriosis. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal still need to be discussed. Objective: To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for the ovarian endometrioid cystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 47 patients who had undergone LESS and LESS ovarian cystectomy due to ovarian endometrioid cyst in our hospital from March 2018 to April 2019. The patients were classified into single-port group (14) and multiport group (33) based on surgical paths. The patients’ general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in the operation time and the maximum body temperature in 24 h after operation. There were significant statistical differences (all P<0.05) in postoperative decrease of Hb, intraoperative bleeding volume, total hospital stay and CS score. Conclusion: LESS for ovarian endometrioid cyst removal is safe and feasible, and it better than CMPL in relieving postoperative pain and inproving cosmetic effects and so on. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER - Author Information Copyright © 2012 -- 2026 Science Publishing Group – All rights reserved.