Challenges and solutions for ecologists adopting AI

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

1. Motivation: Artificial Intelligence (AI) can rapidly process large ecological datasets, uncover patterns, and inform conservation decisions. However, its adoption by ecologists is often hindered by steep learning curves, overwhelming model options with varying transparency, and uneven access to data, code, and technical skills. We led a workshop, EcoViz+AI: Visualization and AI for Ecology, that brought together 35 experts to synthesize this review and related resources that collectively aim to guide ecologists as they navigate, implement, interpret, and contribute to the fast-evolving AI landscape. 2. Methods: Workshop facilitators led discussions and collaborative coding sessions around five use cases of AI in ecology for processing image, ecophysiological, and acoustic data. Using workshop discussions and experiences as a foundation, this review article synthesizes the opportunities and risks for AI in ecology as well as practical challenges and solutions for adopting AI. 3. Outcomes: Ethical and scientifically sound use of AI requires human review, interpretable methods, and greater technical literacy to minimize risks. However, practical challenges more often prevent adoption than ethical concerns. Four solutions include: (1) educational resources to help researchers assess the opportunity cost associated with AI compared to traditional methods, (2) communities of practice to combat the overwhelming landscape of AI with knowledge, technical skills, collaboration, and inclusivity, (3) effective visualizations to address the transparency deficit of AI for understanding and communicating results including model outputs, performance, and functionality, and (4) computational resources to ease the implementation burden of AI through shared data, modifiable code, and accessible computing. Our workshop compiled resources, including science communication videos for five AI use cases and repositories for ecology-related AI models and communities of practice. 4. Synthesis: Cultural shifts towards formal incentivization of open-access educational materials, inclusive mentorship, science communication, and open science will empower ecologists to leverage AI responsibly. Aligning AI initiatives with broader movements towards interdisciplinary open science and computational literacy will promote inclusivity and the ecological relevance of novel tools, advancing basic research and impactful translational ecology.
Full text 2,779 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can rapidly process large ecological datasets, uncover patterns, and inform conservation decisions, but responsible adoption depends as much on human-centric skills as on technical methods. Ecologists face steep learning curves, an overwhelming and fast-evolving model landscape, uneven access to data and computing, and a growing transparency deficit. These challenges require human-centric skills like time management, critical thinking, collaboration, communication, creativity, and project management to select, implement, interpret, and responsibly translate AI outputs into ecological insight and action. We led a workshop, EcoViz+AI: Visualization and AI for Ecology, that brought together 35 experts to synthesize practical guidance for navigating these challenges across the AI pipeline. Using workshop discussions and experiences as a foundation, this position paper proposes practical solutions and complementary human-centric skill development to address these challenges: (1) educational resources that support opportunity-cost reasoning (time management) and methodological judgment (critical thinking), (2) communities of practice that build inclusive shared expertise (collaboration and mentorship), (3) effective visualizations that improve interpretability and strengthen transparency of model behavior and uncertainty (creativity and communication), and (4) computational resources that reduce implementation burden through shared data, extensible code, and accessible infrastructure (project management and problem-solving). Our workshop compiled resources, including science communication videos for five AI use cases and repositories for ecology-related AI models and communities of practice. Emphasizing human-centric skills and working in tandem with efforts to promote open science and computational literacy can make AI in ecology more rigorous, equitable, and ecologically relevant, advancing research and conservation. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2FK8J Computer Sciences, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology AI, Artificial Intelligence, ecology, education, cyberinfrastructure, Visualization, Science Communication, communities of practice Published: 2025-01-29 10:41 Last Updated: 2026-02-23 12:13 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00