The neural signature of methylphenidate-enhanced memory disruption in human drug addiction: a randomized clinical trial

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Drug-related memories can hinder abstinence goals in drug addiction. Promoting non-drug memories via ventromedial prefrontal cortex- (vmPFC) and amygdala-guided extinction yields mixed success. Post-retrieval extinction (RE) destabilizes and updates memories during reconsolidation, improving extinction. Supplementing RE, we tested methylphenidate (MPH), a dopamine-agonist that promotes PFC-dependent learning and memory in cocaine use disorder (CUD). In an Early Phase 1 double-blind randomized clinical trial using a within-subjects design, participants received oral MPH (20 mg) or placebo before the retrieval of some of the conditioned stimuli (i.e., reminded CS+ vs. non-reminded CS+) followed by extinction; lab-simulated drug-seeking was measured the following day. Results Lower vmPFC activity following non-reminded CS+ (standard extinction) under placebo replicated the putative impairments in CUD; separately, RE (trend) and MPH conditions recruited the vmPFC, and RE’s vmPFC-reliance correlated with drug-seeking only under placebo. Crucially, MPH-combined RE normalized cortico-limbic processing, bypassing the vmPFC and its amygdala connectivity. Conclusions Pharmacologically-enhanced drug memory modulation may inform intervention development for addiction recovery.
Full text 3,852 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Drug-related memories can hinder abstinence goals in drug addiction. Promoting non-drug memories via ventromedial prefrontal cortex- (vmPFC) and amygdala-guided extinction yields mixed success. Post-retrieval extinction (RE) destabilizes and updates memories during reconsolidation, improving extinction. Supplementing RE, we tested methylphenidate (MPH), a dopamine-agonist that promotes PFC-dependent learning and memory in cocaine use disorder (CUD). In an Early Phase 1 double-blind randomized clinical trial using a within-subjects design, participants received oral MPH (20 mg) or placebo before the retrieval of some of the conditioned stimuli (i.e., reminded CS+ vs. non-reminded CS+) followed by extinction; lab-simulated drug-seeking was measured the following day.

Results

Lower vmPFC activity following non-reminded CS+ (standard extinction) under placebo replicated the putative impairments in CUD; separately, RE (trend) and MPH conditions recruited the vmPFC, and RE’s vmPFC-reliance correlated with drug-seeking only under placebo. Crucially, MPH-combined RE normalized cortico-limbic processing, bypassing the vmPFC and its amygdala connectivity.

Conclusions

Pharmacologically-enhanced drug memory modulation may inform intervention development for addiction recovery. Competing Interest Statement J.H.N.: consultant/advisory board for AGB Pharma, Cingulate Therapeutics, Hippo T&C, Lumos, Medice, Mentavi Health, MindTension, Otsuka, Signant Health and Supernus; research support from Cingulate, MindTension, and Supernus; honoraria for disease state lectures from Apsen and Otsuka, and served as a consultant for the US National Football League. The other authors declare no competing interests. Clinical Trial NCT05978167 Funding Statement We thank Yui Ying Wong and Maggie Boros for their assistance in recruitment and data collection. This work was supported by grant no. T32DA053558 to A.O.C. as trainee, and grant no. R21DA054281 to R.Z.G. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participating in the study and were compensated after study completion. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00