Is V-NOTES Hysterectomy as Safe and Feasible as Outpatient Surgery Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomy?

Margaux Merlier, Pierre Collinet, Adeline Piérache, Adeline Pierache, David Vandendriessche, Victoire Delporte, Chrystèle Rubod, Michel Cosson, Géraldine Giraudet
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2022 · vol. 29(5) , pp. 665–672 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2022.01.007 · PMID:35074513 · W4205643771
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study compared the safety and feasibility of V-NOTES hysterectomy with outpatient surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Hysterectomy, Vaginal Hysterectomy, Vaginal Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (1)

References (35)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:03.506079+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK