Editorial: Vaginal dysbiosis and biofilms, volume II.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-09

This editorial introduces the second volume of research on vaginal dysbiosis and biofilms, highlighting current knowledge and future directions in the field.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 13,825 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

References

1 CeccaraniC.FoschiC.ParolinC.D’AntuonoA.GaspariV.ConsolandiC.et al. (2019). Diversity of vaginal microbiome and metabolome during genital infections. Sci. Rep.9, 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50410-x 2 De GregorioP. R.ParolinC.AbruzzoA.LuppiB.ProttiM.MercoliniL.et al. (2020). Biosurfactant from vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus BC1 as a promising agent to interfere with Candida adhesion. Microb. Cell Fact19, 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01390-5 3 HenriquesA.CereijaT.MachadoA.CercaN. (2012). In silico vs in vitro analysis of primer specificity for the detection of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae and Lactobacillus spp. BMC Res. Notes5, 637. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-637 4 MachadoA.CastroJ.CereijaT.AlmeidaC.CercaN. (2015). Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by a new multiplex peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization method. PeerJ3, e780. Available at: https://peerj.com/articles/780/ (Accessed March 01, 2025). 5 MachadoA.FoschiC.MarangoniA. (2022). Editorial: Vaginal dysbiosis and biofilms. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.976057 6 MachadoA.SalgueiroD.HarwichM.JeffersonK. K.CercaN. (2013). Quantitative analysis of initial adhesion of bacterial vaginosis-associated anaerobes to ME-180 cells. Anaerobe23, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.07.007 7 MorselliS.CeccaraniC.DjusseM. E.LaghiL.CamboniT.ConsolandiC.et al. (2024). Anti-chlamydial activity of vaginal fluids: new evidence from an in vitro model. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.14. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1403782 8 Muñoz-BarrenoA.Cabezas-MeraF.TejeraE.MachadoA. (2021). Comparative effectiveness of treatments for bacterial vaginosis: A network meta-analysis. Antibiotics10, 1–16. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10080978 9 ParolinC.MarangoniA.LaghiL.FoschiC.PalominoR.A. Ñ.CalonghiN.et al. (2015). Isolation of vaginal lactobacilli and characterization of anti-candida activity. PloS One10, 1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131220 10 Rodríguez-AriasR. J.Guachi-ÁlvarezB. O.Montalvo-ViveroD. E.MachadoA. (2022). Lactobacilli displacement and Candida albicans inhibition on initial adhesion assays: a probiotic analysis. BMC Res. Notes15, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06114-z 11 SalinasA. M.OsorioV. G.EndaraP. F.SalazarE. R.VascoG. P.ViveroS. G.et al. (2018). Bacterial identification of the vaginal microbiota in Ecuadorian pregnant teenagers: an exploratory analysis. PeerJ6, e4317. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4317 Summary

Keywords

biofilms, vaginal dysbiosis, reproductive health, vaginal microbiota, accurate diagnostics, antimicrobial resistance, novel treatments Citation Machado A, Foschi C and Marangoni A (2025) Editorial: Vaginal dysbiosis and biofilms, volume II. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1588434. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1588434 Received 05 March 2025 Accepted 10 March 2025 Published 19 March 2025 Volume 15 - 2025 Edited and reviewed by Christophe Beloin, Institut Pasteur, France Updates Copyright © 2025 Machado, Foschi and Marangoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. *Correspondence: António Machado, [email protected]; [email protected] Disclaimer All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0