Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of phytotherapy in supporting reproductive health in patients with endometriosis. A total of 60 women of reproductive age diagnosed with endometriosis were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: the first group received the standard treatment with dienogest, while the second group was treated with a phytocomplex-based vaginal suppository composed of Withania somnifera, Nigella sativa, Propolis, Artemisia absinthium, Cuminum cyminum, and Melissa officinalis. The phytotherapy group demonstrated a decrease in oxidative stress markers, reduction of inflammatory indices, alleviation of pain symptoms, and normalization of the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that phytotherapy represents a promising approach for supporting reproductive health in women with endometriosis.
Full text
1,111 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
"SUPPORTING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS THROUGH PHYTOTHERAPY"
Authors/Creators
Description
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of phytotherapy in supporting reproductive health in patients with endometriosis. A total of 60 women of reproductive age diagnosed with endometriosis were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: the first group received the standard treatment with dienogest, while the second group was treated with a phytocomplex-based vaginal suppository composed of Withania somnifera, Nigella sativa, Propolis, Artemisia absinthium, Cuminum cyminum, and Melissa officinalis. The phytotherapy group demonstrated a decrease in oxidative stress markers, reduction of inflammatory indices, alleviation of pain symptoms, and normalization of the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that phytotherapy represents a promising approach for supporting reproductive health in women with endometriosis.
Files
TAFPS 2116.pdf
Files
(612.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:fa888d8eaa323b2a34860f57ff54e754
|
612.0 kB | Preview Download |
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.