Full text
2,034 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
The human cerebral cortex contains groups of areas that support sensory, motor, cognitive, and affective functions, often categorized into functional networks. These networks show stronger internal and weaker external functional connectivity (FC), with FC profiles more similar within the same network. Previous studies have shown these networks develop from nascent forms before birth to their mature, adult-like structures in childhood. However, these analyses often rely on adult functional network definitions. This study assesses the potential misidentification of infant functional networks when using adult models and explores the consequences and possible solutions to this problem.
Our findings suggest that although adult networks only marginally describe infant FC organization better than chance, misidentification is primarily driven by specific areas. Restricting functional networks to areas with adult-like network clustering revealed consistent within-network FC across scans and throughout development. These areas are also near locations with low network identity variability. Our results highlight the implications of using adult networks for infants and offer guidance for selecting and utilizing functional network models based on research questions and scenarios.
Highlights
Previous studies primarily investigated age-specific networks in infants, with limited focus on how well adult networks describe infant functional connectivity (FC).
ur analysis identified a subset of areas in infants showing adult-like network organization, where within-network FC shows less age-related variation and higher scan-to-scan reliability.
These areas are positioned near locations with low variability in functional network identity in adults, indicating a potential link between developmental sequence and interindividual variability in functional network organization.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
some minor formatting and figure color update/typo fix
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.