Bleed: Destroying Myths and Misogyny in Endometriosis Care by Tracey Lindeman
This paper examines the historical and ongoing myths and misogyny that have historically hindered endometriosis care and proposes a path toward improved treatment and patient support.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
600 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (4)
- “Do mad people get endo or does endo make you mad?”: Clinicians’ discursive constructions of Medicine and women with endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis in Canada: It Is Time for Collaboration to Advance Patient-Oriented, Evidence-Based Policy, Care, and Research via openalex
- W1546365706 via openalex
- W4230683478 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-18T06:27:49.008893+00:00