Interconnected Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene: A Systems-Based Review of Drivers, Feedbacks, and Governance

Interconnected Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene: A Systems-Based Review of Drivers, Feedbacks, and Governance | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Interconnected Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene: A Systems-Based Review of Drivers, Feedbacks, and Governance Paola Angelini, Giancarlo Angeles Flores, Gaia Cusumano, Roberto Venanzoni This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract In the Anthropocene, environmental risks are increasingly interconnected, forming complex systems characterized by feedback loops, cascading effects, and cross-scale interactions. This study presents a structured interdisciplinary review of twelve major environmental domains, examining how climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, resource depletion, and environmental injustice interact within a tightly coupled Earth system. A systematic literature review was conducted across major scientific databases and complemented by key institutional reports, resulting in a dataset of 218 sources analyzed through qualitative thematic coding. The analysis identifies shared structural drivers—including unsustainable production and consumption patterns, technological development trajectories, and governance fragmentation—that generate and amplify systemic environmental risks. The findings show that environmental challenges are not isolated phenomena but interconnected components of a dynamic system in which impacts propagate across domains, reinforcing vulnerability and accelerating the transgression of planetary boundaries. By integrating biophysical processes with governance structures and environmental justice considerations, this study develops a systems-oriented conceptual framework that highlights feedback mechanisms and identifies potential leverage points for intervention. The results underscore the need for integrated, adaptive, and equitable governance strategies capable of addressing interconnected environmental risks. Advancing sustainability in the Anthropocene requires moving beyond fragmented approaches toward systemic and transformative responses that align ecological limits with socio-economic systems. Sustainability science systems thinking environmental governance environmental risks planetary boundaries Anthropocene socio-ecological systems environmental justice Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 1. Introduction Humanity is entering a phase of unprecedented planetary transformation, increasingly conceptualized as the Anthropocene, in which human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth system dynamics [ 1 – 3 ]. Accelerating climate change, biodiversity loss, widespread pollution, and large-scale resource depletion are no longer isolated environmental challenges, but deeply interconnected processes that collectively threaten the stability, resilience, and functioning of planetary systems [ 4 – 7 ]. Over recent decades, scientific research has made substantial progress in identifying, quantifying, and modelling individual environmental risks. Frameworks such as planetary boundaries and Earth system science have significantly advanced understanding of global thresholds, tipping dynamics, and systemic risks [ 11 – 14 ]. However, much of the existing literature continues to address environmental challenges within disciplinary or sectoral boundaries, limiting the ability to fully capture their interdependencies, feedback mechanisms, and cumulative effects [ 8 – 10 , 15 – 17 ]. Increasing evidence suggests that contemporary environmental crises are best understood as components of a tightly coupled socio-ecological system characterized by non-linear dynamics, cascading effects, and cross-scale interactions [ 18 – 20 ]. These dynamics are driven by underlying structural factors, including unsustainable production and consumption patterns, global economic inequalities, and fragmented governance systems, which together reinforce systemic vulnerability and risk propagation across environmental domains [ 21 , 22 ]. Figure 1 illustrates the conceptual framework developed in this study, highlighting the interconnected nature of environmental threats, their shared drivers, and the feedback mechanisms that generate systemic risk across domains. Despite growing recognition of these interconnections, integrative syntheses that explicitly link biophysical processes with governance structures and environmental justice remain limited. In particular, there is a need for analytical frameworks capable of capturing how diverse environmental threats co-evolve, interact across scales, and generate systemic risks within the Earth system. To address this gap, this study presents a structured interdisciplinary review of twelve major environmental threats shaping contemporary Earth system dynamics. Drawing on a systematic literature review and qualitative thematic analysis, the paper examines how these domains interact, identifies shared drivers and feedback mechanisms, and explores their implications for governance and sustainability transitions. In doing so, this study advances the current literature in three key ways. First, it provides a systematic and comparative synthesis of multiple environmental domains that are typically examined in isolation, explicitly identifying cross-domain interactions, feedback loops, and cascading risks within a unified analytical framework. Second, it integrates biophysical dynamics with governance structures and environmental justice considerations, bridging a critical gap between Earth system science and sustainability governance research [ 23 , 24 ]. Third, the paper develops a systems-oriented conceptual framework that highlights common structural drivers and identifies potential leverage points for intervention, offering a more holistic basis for understanding and addressing interconnected environmental risks in the Anthropocene. By advancing a systems-based and integrative perspective, this work contributes to the environmental studies and sustainability science literature by providing a transparent and transferable framework for analysing complex environmental crises, bridging disciplinary boundaries, and informing pathways for transformative change toward sustainability and equity. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Study Design and Scope This study adopts a structured and interdisciplinary systematic review design aimed at synthesizing twelve critical domains of environmental risk that collectively define key frontiers in planetary health (Table 1 ). The review is guided by a systems-thinking perspective and follows a transparent and reproducible approach to identify major trends, shared drivers, and cross-scale interactions across environmental domains. This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines [ 25 ] and was not prospectively registered. Rather than providing an exhaustive technical assessment of each domain, the study applies a comparative analytical strategy to detect recurring patterns, feedback mechanisms, and interdependencies. The objective is to bridge disciplinary silos and develop a coherent, systems-oriented understanding of converging environmental crises in the Anthropocene. 2.2 Literature Search Strategy and Selection Criteria A structured literature search was conducted across major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, covering publications from 2014 to early 2026 to capture recent developments in environmental research. The search was updated in April 2026 to include the most recent studies. A structured literature search was conducted across major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, covering publications from 2014 to early 2025 to capture recent developments in environmental research. This was complemented by a targeted review of grey literature from key international organizations, including UNEP, IPCC, WHO, and WWF, to incorporate policy-relevant and global assessment reports. Search strings were developed for each thematic domain using combinations of keywords (e.g., “climate tipping points”, “PFAS exposure”, “deep-sea mining impacts”), and were adapted to the syntax of each database. Full search strategies are reported in Appendix A. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (i) relevance to one or more of the twelve environmental domains considered; (ii) focus on environmental drivers, impacts, or systemic interactions; (iii) publication in peer-reviewed journals or authoritative institutional reports; and (iv) availability in English. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking empirical or analytical relevance to the research objectives or focusing on highly localized phenomena without broader systemic implications. The selection process followed a multi-stage screening procedure. An initial pool of over 500 records was identified. After removal of duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, followed by full-text assessment. This process resulted in a final dataset of approximately 218 sources. 2.3 Data Extraction and Thematic Coding To ensure analytical consistency, the selected studies were examined through a qualitative thematic analysis. Each source was systematically coded according to predefined analytical dimensions, including: (i) primary environmental drivers; (ii) observed impacts; (iii) cross-system interactions and feedback mechanisms; and (iv) governance implications and policy responses. The coding framework was applied iteratively to identify recurring patterns and systemic linkages across the twelve environmental domains. Where necessary, coding categories were refined during the analysis to better capture emerging themes and cross-domain dynamics. 2.4 Data Sources and Validation Quantitative indicators—including emissions trajectories, biodiversity loss metrics, public health burdens, and resource use projections—were derived from authoritative international datasets. Key sources included the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, and national statistical agencies. Where possible, data were cross-validated using independent repositories, such as the Global Carbon Atlas and EarthStat, to enhance robustness and consistency. All data reflect the most recent values available at the time of writing (early 2025). 2.5 Analytical Framework The analytical framework was applied systematically across all selected studies to synthesize findings into an integrated systems perspective. By combining thematic coding with cross-domain comparison, the analysis identifies key feedback loops, cascading risks, and interdependencies linking environmental domains. This approach enables the construction of an integrative conceptual framework (Fig. 1 ) that captures the systemic nature of environmental risks and highlights shared drivers and potential leverage points for intervention. 2.6 Limitations This review is subject to several limitations. Although a structured and transparent approach was adopted, the breadth of topics addressed required balancing analytical depth with integrative synthesis. Some emerging or region-specific evidence may not have been fully captured, particularly in rapidly evolving research areas. In addition, the integration of heterogeneous sources, including peer-reviewed articles and grey literature, introduces variability in methodological approaches and levels of evidence. While efforts were made to ensure consistency through systematic coding, the synthesis inevitably involves an interpretative component, particularly in identifying cross-domain interactions and systemic patterns. Despite these limitations, the review provides a robust and transparent framework for understanding interconnected environmental risks and supports comparative and interdisciplinary analysis across scientific and policy domains. 2.7 Study Selection Process The study selection process was conducted in multiple stages, including title and abstract screening followed by full-text assessment. Screening was performed by two reviewers independently, with discrepancies resolved through discussion. 2.8 Data Collection Process Data extraction was conducted using a standardized approach. Two reviewers independently collected and cross-checked the data to ensure consistency. 2.9 Data Items Extracted data included environmental drivers, impacts, cross-system interactions, governance implications, study type, and geographic scope. 2.10 Risk of Bias Assessment A formal risk of bias assessment was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of sources. However, priority was given to authoritative and peer-reviewed sources. 2.11 Effect Measure No quantitative effect measures were applied, as the study is based on qualitative synthesis. 2.12 Synthesis Methods Data were synthesized through qualitative thematic analysis and cross-domain comparison across the twelve environmental domains. 2.13 Reporting Bias Assessment Reporting bias was not formally assessed, although the inclusion of grey literature aimed to reduce publication bias. 2.14 Certainty Assessment Certainty of evidence was not formally evaluated but is supported by the consistency of findings across multiple sources. Table 1 Overview of the twelve environmental threats, summarizing their key characteristics, drivers, and systemic interactions. Environmental Domain Key Environmental Issues Systemic relevance Bibliographic References 3. Sixth Mass Extinction Rapid biodiversity loss, habitat destruction; species extinction; ecosystem fragmentation Undermines ecosystem stability and resilience, weakening essential life-support systems and amplifying climate feedbacks [ 24 – 39 ] 4. Plastic Pollution Micro- and nanoplastics; marine litter; accumulation in food chains; inadequate waste management Represents a persistent and global pollutant linking production systems, environmental contamination, and human health risks [ 40 – 60 ] 5. Air Pollution PM2.5 and ozone exposure; industrial and transport emissions; indoor air pollution Acts as a cross-cutting driver of public health crises and climate interactions, with immediate and uneven socio-spatial impacts [ 61 – 72 ] 6. PFAS Contamination Persistent environmental contamination; bioaccumulation; widespread human exposure Illustrates systemic failures in chemical governance and the long-term persistence of industrial pollutants across ecosystems and human populations [ 73 – 87 ] 7. Water Scarcity Water stress; groundwater depletion; declining water quality; unequal access Links climate change, resource use, and socio-economic inequality, acting as a critical constraint on food security and human development [ 88 – 106 ] 8. Ocean Degradation and Deep-Sea Mining Coral bleaching; ocean warming; acidification; deep-sea ecosystem disturbance Disrupts global biogeochemical cycles and climate regulation, while exposing tensions between conservation and resource extraction [ 107 – 125 ] 9. Soil Degradation and Desertification Erosion; nutrient depletion; desertification; loss of soil organic matter Reduces ecosystem productivity and carbon sequestration capacity, undermining food systems and climate mitigation potential [ 126 – 139 ] 10. Fast Fashion Textile waste; high water and energy use; chemical pollution; microfibre release Embodies unsustainable production and consumption patterns, driving resource depletion, pollution, and global waste flows [ 140 – 152 ] 11. ICT Environmental Impacts High energy consumption; e-waste generation; rare earth extraction; short device lifespans Highlights the material and energy footprint of digital systems, linking technological growth to resource extraction and climate pressures [ 153 – 180 ] 12. Environmental Injustice Unequal exposure to pollution; environmental health disparities; marginalized communities at risk Reveals structural inequalities in the distribution of environmental risks and benefits, shaping vulnerability and governance outcomes [ 181 – 207 ] 13. Governance and Ecological Collapse Policy fragmentation; weak enforcement; lack of coordination; institutional inefficiencies Represents the systemic inability of current governance structures to manage interconnected environmental risks and ensure sustainability [ 208 – 218 ] 3. Study Selection and Overview of Included Studies The literature search identified over 500 records. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, a subset of studies was selected for full-text review. This process resulted in a final dataset of 218 sources included in the analysis. The study selection process is summarized in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 2 ). 4. The Sixth Mass Extinction: Drivers, Impacts, and Systemic Implications The ongoing biodiversity crisis, increasingly framed as the Sixth Mass Extinction, represents one of the most critical manifestations of systemic environmental change in the Anthropocene [ 24 , 25 ]. Unlike previous extinction events driven by natural processes, current biodiversity loss is primarily the result of interacting anthropogenic pressures operating at unprecedented rates and across global scales [ 26 , 27 ]. As such, it cannot be understood as an isolated ecological phenomenon, but rather as a core component of a tightly coupled Earth system. Recent assessments by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) indicate that up to one million species are at risk of extinction, with current extinction rates far exceeding background levels [ 28 – 30 ]. However, beyond these headline figures, the biodiversity crisis is best understood in terms of its underlying systemic drivers and cross-domain interactions. Land-use change, particularly deforestation and agricultural expansion, remains the dominant driver of biodiversity loss, reshaping ecosystems and reducing habitat connectivity [ 31 ]. Climate change is increasingly amplifying these pressures by altering species distributions, disrupting ecological interactions, and increasing the frequency of extreme events [ 32 , 33 ]. Additional drivers—including overexploitation, pollution, and invasive species—interact in non-linear ways, generating cumulative and often irreversible ecological impacts [ 34 – 36 ]. From a systems perspective, biodiversity loss both influences and is influenced by other environmental domains through reinforcing feedback mechanisms. The degradation of forests, wetlands, and other carbon-rich ecosystems reduces the capacity of natural systems to sequester carbon, thereby accelerating climate change [ 38 ]. In turn, climate change further intensifies biodiversity decline, creating feedback loops that amplify systemic instability within the Earth system. Similar cross-domain interactions link biodiversity loss to soil degradation, water scarcity, and marine ecosystem disruption, highlighting its central role within broader environmental dynamics. The impacts of biodiversity loss extend beyond ecological boundaries, affecting the provision of essential ecosystem services such as pollination, water regulation, soil fertility, and climate stabilization [ 37 ]. These disruptions have direct consequences for food security, public health, and economic systems, particularly in regions where livelihoods are closely dependent on natural resources. As such, biodiversity loss represents not only an environmental crisis, but also a socio-economic and governance challenge. Importantly, the distribution of biodiversity loss and its impacts is highly uneven. Indigenous peoples and local communities, who often rely directly on ecosystem services, are disproportionately affected despite contributing least to its drivers [ 39 ]. This highlights the intersection between biodiversity loss and environmental justice, emphasizing the need to integrate equity considerations into conservation and governance strategies. From a governance perspective, current approaches remain largely fragmented and insufficient to address the systemic nature of biodiversity decline. Conservation strategies have traditionally focused on protected areas, often neglecting broader landscape-level processes, socio-economic drivers, and cross-scale interactions. Emerging approaches, including nature-based solutions and integrated land-use planning, offer more holistic pathways by simultaneously addressing biodiversity conservation, climate mitigation, and human well-being. Ultimately, the Sixth Mass Extinction exemplifies how environmental crises in the Anthropocene are embedded within interconnected socio-ecological systems characterized by feedback loops, cross-scale dynamics, and governance constraints. Addressing biodiversity loss therefore requires a shift from isolated conservation efforts toward systemic transformation, aligning ecological processes with economic systems and institutional frameworks to enhance resilience and sustainability [ 4 , 5 , 12 , 13 ]. 5. Plastic Pollution: Sources, Impacts, and Emerging Risks Plastic pollution has emerged as a pervasive and rapidly intensifying environmental risk in the Anthropocene, reflecting deeper structural dynamics of contemporary production and consumption systems. Global plastic production exceeded 460 million tonnes in 2024, driven by linear economic models that prioritize disposability, short product lifecycles, and low-cost materials [ 40 ]. Rather than representing an isolated pollution issue, plastic accumulation illustrates how material flows are embedded within broader socio-economic and industrial systems. From a systems perspective, plastic pollution operates across multiple environmental domains through interconnected pathways. Each year, an estimated 11 million tonnes of plastic waste enter marine environments, where fragmentation processes generate micro- and nanoplastics with increasing mobility and bioavailability [ 41 – 45 ]. These particles interact with ecological systems at multiple scales, affecting marine food webs, altering biogeochemical processes, and enabling the transfer of contaminants across trophic levels. Importantly, plastic pollution is characterized by feedback mechanisms that reinforce systemic risk. The persistence and accumulation of plastics in ecosystems contribute to long-term environmental degradation, which in turn reduces ecosystem resilience and amplifies vulnerability to other stressors such as climate change and biodiversity loss. For example, microplastic contamination can affect primary producers and marine organisms, with cascading effects on ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling processes. Plastic pollution is also closely linked to fossil fuel-based production systems, highlighting a critical intersection with climate change. The expansion of plastic production, increasingly tied to petrochemical industries, creates reinforcing linkages between material consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental contamination. These dynamics illustrate how environmental risks propagate across domains, rather than remaining confined within sectoral boundaries. At the human scale, emerging evidence of micro- and nanoplastic presence in biological systems—including blood, lung tissue, and placental samples—points to a diffuse and persistent exposure pathway with uncertain but potentially significant health implications [ 47 – 49 ]. This highlights the integration of environmental and public health risks within a shared system of exposure and vulnerability. From a governance perspective, plastic pollution reflects systemic failures in managing production, consumption, and waste at global scales. Current responses, often focused on downstream waste management, are insufficient to address upstream drivers embedded in economic structures and global supply chains. Initiatives such as the development of a legally binding global plastics treaty under the United Nations Environment Assembly represent important steps toward more coordinated governance [ 50 ]. However, their effectiveness will depend on the ability to address structural drivers, including production growth and unequal waste management capacities across regions. Addressing plastic pollution therefore requires a systemic transition from linear to circular material flows, combined with regulatory frameworks that integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This includes reducing material throughput, redesigning products, and strengthening global governance mechanisms capable of managing transboundary environmental risks. Ultimately, plastic pollution exemplifies how environmental challenges in the Anthropocene are embedded within interconnected systems characterized by feedback loops, cross-scale interactions, and governance constraints. Understanding these dynamics is essential for identifying effective leverage points and developing more integrated responses to complex sustainability challenges [ 54 – 60 ]. 6. Air Pollution: Sources, Exposure, and Human Health Impacts Air pollution remains one of the most pervasive and significant environmental threats to human health in the twenty-first century. It is estimated to contribute to approximately 6.7 million premature deaths annually worldwide, exceeding the combined mortality from HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis [ 61 ]. The primary pollutants of concern, fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) and ground-level ozone, are strongly associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and are increasingly linked to neurological, developmental, and metabolic disorders [ 62 ]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 99% of the global population is exposed to air quality levels that exceed recommended guidelines, highlighting the near-universal nature of this risk [ 63 ]. However, both the sources and intensity of air pollution vary significantly across regions. In rapidly industrializing countries such as India and South Africa, coal combustion remains a dominant source of PM₂.₅ emissions [ 64 ], while in many European urban areas, transport-related emissions—particularly from diesel vehicles—are the primary contributors. In sub-Saharan Africa, biomass burning for cooking and heating continues to degrade both indoor and outdoor air quality, especially during dry seasons [ 65 ]. Exposure to air pollution is highly uneven and reflects broader patterns of socio-economic inequality. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and low-income communities, are disproportionately affected, often experiencing pollutant concentrations significantly higher than those observed in more affluent areas [ 66 ]. This unequal exposure contributes to substantial public health burdens, including increased morbidity, reduced life expectancy, and long-term socio-economic impacts such as diminished productivity and educational attainment. Technological interventions have demonstrated considerable potential in reducing emissions and improving air quality. Electrified public transport systems, clean cooking technologies, and industrial emission control measures have all contributed to measurable health benefits in various contexts [ 67 ]. However, the effectiveness and scalability of these solutions depend heavily on policy design and governance capacity. Real-time air quality monitoring systems can enhance transparency and accountability, while targeted fiscal instruments—such as pollutant-specific taxation on diesel and coal—can incentivize cleaner alternatives [ 68 ]. Legal mechanisms, including environmental justice litigation, also play an important role in empowering affected communities. Urban policy interventions provide evidence of the effectiveness of integrated approaches. For example, London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) has led to significant reductions in nitrogen dioxide concentrations in roadside environments within a relatively short timeframe [ 69 ]. Similarly, Seoul’s Green Transport Zone has demonstrated improvements in both particulate pollution levels and respiratory health outcomes [ 70 ]. These cases highlight the potential of targeted, context-specific measures when embedded within broader regulatory frameworks. Despite these advances, air pollution remains a largely invisible and often normalized environmental threat. This invisibility contributes to policy inertia and public complacency, allowing environmental externalities from industry, transport, and energy systems to persist. Reframing clean air as a fundamental human right, rather than a byproduct of economic development, is therefore essential for driving more equitable and effective policy responses. In the context of rapid urbanization and intensifying climate change, ensuring access to clean air must become a central priority of environmental governance. Addressing air pollution requires integrating technological innovation with social equity considerations, placing the health of vulnerable populations at the forefront of policy design. Clean air should not be treated as an externality of progress, but as a fundamental precondition for sustainable and inclusive development [ 71 , 72 ]. 7. PFAS Contamination: Persistence, Exposure, and Health Risks Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” represent a paradigmatic case of persistent and systemic environmental contamination in the Anthropocene. Their widespread use across industrial processes and consumer products—driven by desirable chemical properties such as thermal stability and resistance to degradation—has resulted in their global dispersion across environmental compartments [ 73 , 74 ]. As such, PFAS contamination exemplifies how technological innovation, when decoupled from precautionary governance, can generate long-term and transboundary environmental risks. A defining characteristic of PFAS is their extreme environmental persistence, largely due to the strength of the carbon–fluorine bond. This persistence enables their accumulation across air, soil, and water systems, as well as within biological organisms, leading to widespread and chronic exposure [ 75 – 77 ]. From a systems perspective, PFAS contamination operates through interconnected pathways that link environmental media, food systems, and human health, illustrating the diffusion of risk across domains. Human exposure to PFAS occurs through multiple and interacting pathways, including contaminated drinking water, food consumption, inhalation, and contact with consumer products. Once absorbed, PFAS can bioaccumulate in the human body, with long biological half-lives and potential adverse health effects, including immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and increased risks of certain cancers [ 9 , 10 ]. These dynamics highlight the integration of environmental and public health risks within a shared system of exposure and vulnerability. Importantly, PFAS contamination is characterized by temporal feedbacks and path dependency. Their persistence means that past production and use continue to generate present and future risks, creating a legacy effect that constrains current governance responses. This temporal dimension distinguishes PFAS from many other pollutants and underscores the long-term implications of delayed regulatory action. From a governance perspective, PFAS contamination reveals structural shortcomings in existing regulatory frameworks. Traditional approaches to chemical regulation, which often assess substances individually, have proven inadequate for addressing large classes of persistent compounds with similar properties. This has led to regulatory lag, widespread environmental contamination, and significant remediation challenges [ 78 , 79 ]. Technological solutions for PFAS removal, including granular activated carbon, ion exchange resins, and emerging advanced treatment technologies, offer partial mitigation but are often costly, energy-intensive, and generate secondary waste streams [ 80 – 83 ]. These limitations reinforce the need to shift from downstream remediation toward upstream prevention, including restrictions on non-essential uses, improved chemical transparency, and the development of safer alternatives [ 84 , 85 ]. PFAS contamination also illustrates broader systemic linkages with other environmental domains. It intersects with water scarcity through contamination of drinking water sources, with pollution through cumulative chemical exposure, and with environmental injustice, as vulnerable communities are often disproportionately affected by contaminated environments and limited access to remediation resources. Ultimately, PFAS represent not only a chemical pollution issue, but a systemic governance challenge rooted in the interaction between industrial production systems, regulatory frameworks, and long-term environmental persistence. Addressing PFAS contamination requires a shift toward precautionary, group-based regulatory approaches and more integrated governance mechanisms capable of managing persistent and transboundary environmental risks [ 86 , 87 ]. 8. Water Scarcity: Drivers, Impacts, and Governance Challenges Water scarcity is increasingly recognized as a systemic environmental risk in the Anthropocene, emerging from the interaction of climatic, ecological, and socio-economic processes. As of 2024, approximately 2.4 billion people live in regions experiencing high water stress, a figure projected to rise under the combined pressures of population growth, economic development, and climate change [ 88 , 89 ]. Rather than reflecting a simple imbalance between supply and demand, water scarcity represents a complex and multi-dimensional challenge embedded within interconnected socio-ecological systems. From a systems perspective, water scarcity is shaped by interacting drivers operating across scales. Climate change is altering hydrological cycles, leading to shifts in precipitation patterns, increased frequency and intensity of droughts, and reduced snowpack in critical regions [ 92 , 93 ]. At the same time, unsustainable water use—particularly in agriculture, which accounts for approximately 70% of global freshwater withdrawals—places significant pressure on already stressed water systems [ 94 ]. These dynamics are further intensified by urbanization, industrial expansion, and demographic growth, creating cumulative pressures on water availability and quality. Water scarcity is closely linked to other environmental domains through cross-sectoral interactions, often conceptualized as the water–energy–food nexus. For instance, agricultural water use directly affects food production systems, while energy production—particularly thermoelectric power generation and hydropower—depends heavily on water availability. These interdependencies generate feedback loops in which stress in one sector propagates across others, amplifying systemic vulnerability. Groundwater depletion represents a critical manifestation of these dynamics. In key agricultural regions such as California’s Central Valley and the Indo-Gangetic Basin, aquifers are being depleted at rates exceeding natural recharge, creating long-term risks for both food security and water availability [ 95 ]. This overextraction reflects not only physical scarcity, but also governance failures related to regulation, pricing, and resource allocation. Water quality degradation further compounds scarcity, illustrating the interconnected nature of environmental risks. Agricultural runoff, industrial pollution, and emerging contaminants—including PFAS and microplastics—reduce the availability of safe water, effectively shrinking usable freshwater resources [ 96 – 100 ]. These processes link water scarcity to broader pollution dynamics and highlight how multiple environmental stressors interact within shared systems. The impacts of water scarcity are unevenly distributed, reflecting underlying socio-economic inequalities and governance disparities. Vulnerable populations, particularly in low-income regions, face disproportionate challenges in accessing safe and reliable water resources, increasing exposure to health risks, economic instability, and social conflict [ 101 ]. This underscores the strong intersection between water scarcity and environmental justice. From a governance perspective, water scarcity illustrates the limitations of fragmented and sector-specific management approaches. Traditional water governance systems often fail to account for cross-scale interactions, competing demands, and long-term sustainability considerations. Addressing these challenges requires integrated water resource management, the incorporation of economic instruments such as tiered pricing, and the adoption of nature-based solutions, including watershed restoration and green infrastructure [ 102 , 103 ]. Ultimately, water scarcity is not solely a biophysical constraint, but a systemic governance challenge rooted in how water is allocated, valued, and managed within interconnected socio-ecological systems. Addressing it requires coordinated, multi-scalar governance approaches that integrate climate adaptation, resource efficiency, and social equity. Without such integration, water scarcity risks becoming a key amplifier of broader environmental and socio-economic instability in the Anthropocene [ 104 – 106 ]. 9. Ocean Degradation: Climate Change Impacts and Deep-Sea Mining Risks The world’s oceans, long regarded as vast and resilient, are increasingly exhibiting signs of systemic stress under the combined pressures of climate change and expanding industrial activities. In recent years, global sea surface temperatures have reached record levels, contributing to widespread ecological disruption and altering the functioning of marine ecosystems at multiple scales [ 107 , 108 ]. One of the most visible manifestations of ocean degradation is the widespread bleaching of coral reef systems. The Great Barrier Reef, a cornerstone of global marine biodiversity, has experienced repeated mass bleaching events, with some regions approaching ecological collapse [ 109 ]. These changes are part of a broader pattern driven by ocean warming, acidification, and deoxygenation, which together are reshaping marine ecosystems and reducing their resilience [ 113 , 114 ]. Beyond biodiversity loss, ocean degradation has significant implications for the global carbon cycle. Marine ecosystems, including phytoplankton, seagrasses, and coastal wetlands, play a crucial role in carbon sequestration. However, the degradation of these systems reduces their capacity to act as carbon sinks and may, in some cases, transform them into net sources of carbon emissions, thereby amplifying climate feedbacks [ 110 – 112 ]. At the same time, the deep ocean is emerging as a new frontier of resource extraction. Deep-sea mining, particularly targeting polymetallic nodules rich in cobalt, nickel, and manganese, is being promoted as a means to support the transition to low-carbon technologies, including batteries and renewable energy systems [ 115 , 116 ]. Pilot projects in regions such as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone indicate that industrial-scale seabed mining may soon become operational [ 117 ]. However, the ecological risks associated with deep-sea mining remain substantial and poorly understood. Mining activities generate sediment plumes that can smother benthic ecosystems, disrupt biogeochemical cycles, and affect species far beyond the immediate extraction site. Additional impacts include noise pollution, light disturbance, and habitat destruction in environments characterized by slow biological processes and limited recovery capacity [ 115 ]. Governance frameworks for deep-sea mining are still evolving. The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is currently developing regulatory mechanisms to manage mining activities in international waters [ 118 ]. However, concerns persist regarding the adequacy of environmental safeguards, the lack of baseline ecological data, and the limited enforcement capacity of existing governance structures [ 119 ]. In response, several countries and scientific bodies have called for precautionary moratoria or temporary bans until the environmental risks are better understood. Alternative strategies are increasingly being explored to reduce dependence on deep-sea resource extraction. Circular economy approaches, including the recovery of critical minerals from electronic waste, improved recycling systems, and the development of longer-lasting battery technologies, offer pathways to decouple technological advancement from new extractive pressures [ 120 – 122 ]. Ocean degradation thus reflects a broader tension within the global sustainability transition. Efforts to decarbonize energy systems, while essential, risk reproducing extractive paradigms in new environmental domains. Addressing this challenge requires a shift toward precautionary governance, ecosystem-based management, and long-term stewardship of marine resources. Ultimately, the health of ocean systems is fundamental to planetary stability. Protecting marine ecosystems is not only a matter of biodiversity conservation, but also a prerequisite for climate regulation, food security, and the resilience of socio-economic systems that depend on ocean resources [ 123 – 125 ]. 10. Soil Degradation and Desertification: Drivers, Impacts, and Restoration Pathways Soil, often described as the Earth’s “living skin,” is a critical component of terrestrial ecosystems, underpinning food production, biodiversity, and climate regulation. However, this essential resource is being degraded at an alarming rate. Current estimates indicate that over 33% of the world’s soils are moderately to severely degraded, with erosion occurring up to 100 times faster than natural soil formation in intensively managed systems [ 126 ]. The drivers of soil degradation are multiple and interconnected. Unsustainable land-use practices, including intensive tillage, monocropping, overgrazing, and excessive application of chemical inputs, contribute to the loss of soil structure, organic matter, and nutrient balance [ 127 ]. These pressures are further exacerbated by climate change, which intensifies droughts, alters precipitation patterns, and accelerates desertification processes, particularly in already vulnerable regions. Regional examples highlight the scale of the challenge. In the Sahel, the combined effects of climatic variability, population pressure, and land mismanagement have led to widespread land degradation and reduced agricultural productivity. Similarly, in the Mediterranean Basin, prolonged drought conditions and unsustainable agricultural practices have resulted in declining soil fertility, increased erosion, and land abandonment [ 128 , 129 ]. The impacts of soil degradation extend far beyond agricultural productivity. Degraded soils reduce crop yields, undermine food security, and increase vulnerability to climate extremes. At the same time, the loss of soil organic carbon diminishes the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to act as carbon sinks, thereby contributing to climate change. The Global Land Outlook 2 identifies land degradation as a key risk multiplier associated with forced migration, resource conflicts, and economic instability [ 130 ]. In response, a range of restoration and sustainable land management strategies has emerged. Practices such as conservation agriculture, no-till farming, cover cropping, and diversified crop rotations can improve soil structure, enhance water retention, and promote biodiversity within agricultural systems [ 131 ]. The application of biochar has also shown potential in increasing soil fertility while contributing to long-term carbon sequestration [ 132 ]. Large-scale restoration initiatives demonstrate that degradation can be reversed under appropriate conditions. The rehabilitation of China’s Loess Plateau, through integrated approaches including terracing, reforestation, and community-based land management, has led to significant improvements in ecosystem functioning and local livelihoods [ 133 ]. Similarly, the African Great Green Wall initiative aims to restore 100 million hectares of degraded land, contributing to climate mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and socio-economic resilience [ 134 ]. Despite these promising developments, significant barriers remain. These include insecure land tenure, limited access to financial resources and technical knowledge, and policy frameworks that often prioritize short-term productivity over long-term sustainability. Global agricultural subsidies, which frequently support input-intensive practices, can further exacerbate soil degradation rather than promote regenerative approaches [ 35 ]. Ultimately, soil degradation and desertification are not only environmental challenges, but systemic issues linked to how land is valued, managed, and governed. Addressing them requires integrating soil protection into climate policy, agricultural systems, and economic decision-making. Recognizing soils as dynamic and finite ecological systems is essential to ensuring long-term food security, ecosystem resilience, and planetary stability [ 135 – 139 ]. 11. Fast Fashion: Environmental Impacts and Circular Economy Challenges The global fashion industry has undergone a structural transformation over recent decades, shifting from seasonal production models to a system characterized by accelerated production cycles, high-volume output, and declining product lifespans. This transition, commonly described as “fast fashion,” has significantly increased material throughput and consumption intensity, generating substantial environmental and socio-economic externalities. One of the most critical consequences of this model is the rapid expansion of textile waste streams. Global clothing production has doubled over the past 15 years, while average garment utilization has declined markedly [ 140 ]. As a result, an estimated one truckload of textiles is landfilled or incinerated every second, underscoring the systemic inefficiency of current consumption patterns [ 141 ]. Moreover, large volumes of post-consumer clothing are exported from high-income countries to regions such as sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where they frequently overwhelm local waste management systems and disrupt domestic textile economies [ 142 ]. The environmental footprint of textile production is equally significant. The sector is highly resource-intensive, placing substantial pressure on water, energy, and raw material systems. Cotton cultivation, for example, is associated with high water consumption and pesticide use, while synthetic fibers—particularly polyester, which accounts for over 60% of global production—are derived from fossil fuels and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions [ 143 , 144 ]. In addition, the laundering of synthetic textiles releases microplastic fibers into aquatic systems, contributing to the broader problem of microplastic pollution discussed in Section 4 [ 145 ]. Chemical pollution represents another critical dimension. Textile manufacturing processes involve a wide range of dyes, solvents, and finishing agents that can contaminate water bodies, particularly in major production hubs in Asia. These pollutants pose risks not only to aquatic ecosystems but also to the health of workers and surrounding communities, highlighting the intersection between environmental degradation and occupational exposure [ 146 ]. Despite increasing awareness, current sustainability initiatives within the fashion industry remain limited in their transformative potential. Voluntary certification schemes, recycled materials, and corporate sustainability commitments often coexist with continued growth in production volumes, raising concerns about greenwashing and the absence of standardized metrics for environmental performance [ 147 ]. Addressing the environmental impacts of fast fashion requires systemic change grounded in circular economy principles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes can shift accountability toward producers, incentivizing more durable, repairable, and recyclable products. At the policy level, initiatives such as the European Union Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles aim to establish eco-design requirements, improve product durability, and restrict the destruction of unsold goods [ 148 ]. Technological innovation also plays a role in enabling circularity. Advances in textile-to-textile recycling, including chemical and enzymatic processes, offer potential pathways to recover fibers and reduce dependence on virgin materials [ 149 – 152 ]. However, scaling these technologies remains constrained by economic, technical, and design-related challenges, particularly the complexity of blended fabrics. Ultimately, fast fashion exemplifies a broader linear economic model characterized by resource extraction, short product lifecycles, and waste generation. Transitioning toward more sustainable systems will require not only technological and regulatory interventions, but also shifts in consumption patterns. 12. ICT Environmental Impacts: Energy Use, Resource Demand, and E-Waste Challenges The rapid expansion of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has fundamentally reshaped modern societies, enabling unprecedented levels of connectivity, data processing, and technological innovation. However, this digital transformation is accompanied by significant and often underestimated environmental impacts. The ICT sector is currently estimated to account for between 2% and 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with projections indicating continued growth driven by increasing digitalization and data demand [ 153 – 158 ]. A major component of this footprint is the energy consumption associated with digital infrastructure. Data centers, which underpin cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and online services, consumed approximately 460 terawatt-hours of electricity globally in 2022, representing around 2% of total electricity demand [ 159 – 160 ]. While improvements in energy efficiency have reduced energy use per unit of data processed, the rapid expansion of digital services has led to increasing absolute consumption, reflecting a rebound effect. Emerging digital technologies further intensify these pressures. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain systems, particularly those based on energy-intensive consensus mechanisms such as proof-of-work, require substantial computational resources. For example, Bitcoin mining alone has been estimated to consume over 120 terawatt-hours annually, exceeding the electricity consumption of several medium-sized countries [ 161 ]. Although alternative models, such as proof-of-stake, significantly reduce energy requirements, their adoption remains uneven [ 162 – 164 ]. Beyond energy use, ICT systems exert considerable pressure on material resources. The production of electronic devices relies on critical raw materials, including rare earth elements, cobalt, lithium, and precious metals. The extraction and processing of these materials are associated with environmental degradation, habitat destruction, and significant social impacts, particularly in regions with weak regulatory frameworks [ 165 – 168 ]. Electronic waste (e-waste) represents one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally. In 2019, approximately 53.6 million metric tons of e-waste were generated, yet less than 20% was formally collected and recycled [ 169 , 170 ]. Informal recycling practices, common in parts of the Global South, expose workers and communities to hazardous substances, including heavy metals and toxic chemicals, highlighting the intersection between environmental degradation and environmental injustice. Design practices within the ICT sector further exacerbate environmental pressures. Many electronic devices are characterized by limited repairability, short lifespans, and proprietary components that hinder reuse and refurbishment. Planned obsolescence and rapid product turnover contribute to increasing waste generation and resource demand. In response, policy initiatives such as “right-to-repair” legislation are emerging to extend product lifecycles and promote circularity [ 171 , 172 ]. Addressing the environmental impacts of ICT requires a combination of technological, regulatory, and behavioral changes. Transitioning data centers toward renewable energy sources, improving hardware efficiency, and developing circular electronics systems based on durability, modularity, and recyclability are critical steps [ 173 – 176 ]. At the same time, the concept of “digital sobriety” emphasizes the need to reduce unnecessary data flows, optimize software efficiency, and encourage more sustainable patterns of digital consumption [ 177 ]. Despite these efforts, a fundamental tension persists between the rapid expansion of digital technologies and the finite limits of planetary resources. The perception of digital systems as immaterial obscures their substantial physical and environmental footprint, which includes energy-intensive infrastructure, global supply chains, and growing waste streams [ 178 , 179 ]. Ultimately, aligning digital transformation with sustainability objectives requires rethinking the design, governance, and use of ICT systems. Without such a shift, the environmental benefits of digitalization risk being offset by its material and energy demands. Ensuring that digital innovation contributes to, rather than undermines, environmental sustainability is therefore a central challenge for the coming decades [ 180 ]. 13. Environmental Injustice: Unequal Exposure and Socio-Ecological Impacts Environmental degradation is not experienced uniformly across populations, but is distributed unevenly along socio-economic, geographic, and political lines. Environmental injustice, therefore, represents a systemic dimension of environmental risk in the Anthropocene, reflecting structural inequalities embedded within economic systems, governance frameworks, and historical processes [ 181 – 183 ]. From a systems perspective, environmental injustice is not merely an outcome of environmental change, but a co-produced feature of interconnected socio-ecological systems. Environmental risks—such as air and water pollution, hazardous waste exposure, and climate-related impacts—are disproportionately concentrated in communities characterized by socio-economic vulnerability, including low-income populations, Indigenous groups, and marginalized ethnic minorities [ 184 , 185 ]. These patterns are reinforced by feedback mechanisms in which vulnerability, exposure, and limited adaptive capacity interact to amplify systemic risk. Empirical evidence across regions highlights the persistence of these dynamics. In high-income countries, disadvantaged communities are more likely to be located near sources of environmental hazard, including industrial facilities, landfills, and transport corridors [ 186 – 188 ]. Exposure to air pollution, for instance, is significantly higher among marginalized populations, even when controlling for income, reflecting structural inequalities in urban planning and environmental governance [ 189 – 191 ]. Similar patterns are observed globally, where socio-economic status, ethnicity, and political marginalization shape proximity to environmental risks [ 193 , 194 ]. Environmental injustice is also embedded within global production and consumption systems. High-income countries frequently externalize environmental costs to lower-income regions through global supply chains, including the export of electronic waste and the extraction of critical raw materials [ 195 – 198 ]. These transboundary dynamics illustrate how environmental risks are redistributed across space, linking local exposure to global economic structures. Climate change further intensifies these inequalities by disproportionately affecting populations with limited adaptive capacity. Extreme heat, flooding, drought, and food insecurity tend to impact those who have contributed least to greenhouse gas emissions, reinforcing existing socio-economic disparities [ 199 , 200 ]. Urban heat islands, for example, disproportionately affect low-income neighborhoods, where limited access to green space exacerbates exposure to climate extremes. From a governance perspective, environmental injustice reveals fundamental limitations in existing institutional frameworks. Traditional approaches often focus on aggregate outcomes, neglecting distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions of justice. Addressing these challenges requires integrating equity into environmental governance, including ensuring meaningful participation in decision-making processes and recognizing diverse knowledge systems, particularly those of Indigenous peoples [ 201 – 203 ]. Emerging policy initiatives, such as targeted environmental investments and the recognition of rights of nature, represent important steps toward more equitable governance [ 204 , 205 ]. However, implementation remains uneven, and many initiatives risk remaining symbolic without structural changes in power relations and resource distribution. Ultimately, environmental injustice highlights that environmental risks are inseparable from questions of power, governance, and inequality. It serves as a cross-cutting dimension that shapes exposure, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity across all environmental domains considered in this study. Addressing interconnected environmental risks therefore requires not only ecological and technological solutions, but also systemic transformations that confront underlying social and institutional inequalities [ 206 , 207 ]. 14. Conclusions: Ecological Crisis as a Challenge of Governance and Transformation This study demonstrates that contemporary environmental crises cannot be understood or effectively addressed in isolation, but instead emerge as interconnected expressions of a tightly coupled Earth system shaped by shared structural drivers and reinforced through complex feedback mechanisms [ 4 , 5 , 12 , 215 ]. By synthesizing evidence across twelve environmental domains, this review highlights the limitations of fragmented, sector-specific approaches and underscores the need for integrated, systems-oriented frameworks that more accurately reflect the complexity of real-world sustainability challenges [ 209 , 210 , 214 , 216 ]. A central contribution of this work lies in explicitly linking environmental processes with governance structures and environmental justice, showing that systemic risks are not only biophysical, but also deeply embedded in institutional arrangements, socio-economic inequalities, and value systems [ 181 – 185 , 211 , 217 ]. This integrated perspective reveals that environmental degradation and social inequity are co-produced and mutually reinforcing, requiring coordinated responses that address both ecological and societal dimensions. The findings suggest that incremental and reactive policy responses are unlikely to be sufficient. Addressing interconnected environmental risks requires transformative change, including the redesign of governance systems, the alignment of economic activities with ecological limits, and the integration of equity, participation, and inclusiveness as core principles of sustainability transitions [ 212 , 213 , 218 ]. In this context, key leverage points include strengthening cross-sectoral governance coordination, embedding long-term system thinking into policy processes, and promoting circular and regenerative economic models that reduce systemic pressures on natural systems. This highlights the need to move beyond fragmented policy approaches toward integrated governance architectures capable of addressing cross-domain interactions and systemic risks. Further research is needed to operationalize the identification of cross-domain interactions, quantify cascading risks, and evaluate the effectiveness of governance interventions across scales. Advancing these directions will be essential for translating systems-based insights into actionable strategies. Ultimately, the challenge of sustainability extends beyond mitigating environmental degradation to reconfiguring the relationship between human and natural systems in ways that are resilient, equitable, and compatible with planetary boundaries. Navigating this transition will require not only technological innovation and policy reform, but also a fundamental shift in how societies understand, value, and govern their interactions with the Earth system [Table 2 ]. Table 2 Relationships among environmental threats, highlighting key interactions, cascading risks, and implications for sustainability governance. Theme Main Drivers Key Impacts Systemic Interactions Governance Implications Sixth Mass Extinction Land-use change; climate change; overexploitation Biodiversity loss; ecosystem instability; loss of ecosystem services Reinforces climate change via carbon sink loss; interacts with land, food, and water systems Integrated biodiversity governance; ecosystem-based management; nature-based solutions Plastic Pollution Fossil fuel-based production; linear consumption models Marine pollution; bioaccumulation; human health risks Links fossil fuel systems, marine ecosystems, and food chains; enables cross-scale exposure pathways Circular economy policies; production reduction; global treaty frameworks Air Pollution Industrial emissions; transport; fossil fuel combustion Respiratory diseases; premature mortality; environmental degradation Interacts with climate via short-lived pollutants; exacerbates socio-economic inequalities Emission standards; clean energy transition; urban air quality policies PFAS Contamination Persistent chemicals; industrial production; regulatory gaps Bioaccumulation; long-term contamination; health risks Cross-media contamination (water, soil, air); links pollution, health, and food systems Group-based regulation; precautionary approaches; upstream chemical governance Water Scarcity Climate change; overextraction; inefficient use Water stress; reduced agricultural yields; socio-economic instability Water–energy–food nexus; links climate variability, agriculture, and energy systems Integrated water governance; efficiency measures; equitable allocation Ocean Degradation Climate change; overfishing; pollution; seabed mining Biodiversity loss; ecosystem disruption; reduced carbon sinks Links climate regulation, biodiversity loss, and resource extraction systems Marine governance; precautionary approaches; ecosystem-based management Soil Degradation Intensive agriculture; deforestation; erosion Loss of fertility; reduced productivity; desertification Reduces carbon sequestration; links climate, food, and land systems Regenerative agriculture; soil conservation; land restoration policies Fast Fashion Overproduction; global supply chains; fast consumption cycles Textile waste; pollution; resource depletion Links water use, chemical pollution, and microplastic release Circular textiles; sustainable production policies; extended producer responsibility ICT Environmental Impacts Digital expansion; energy demand; resource extraction High energy use; e-waste; resource depletion Links energy systems, rare earth extraction, and global waste flows Green IT policies; energy efficiency; circular electronics Environmental Injustice Socio-economic inequality; governance failures; spatial disparities Unequal exposure; health disparities; vulnerability Cross-cuts all domains; shapes exposure, risk distribution, and adaptive capacity Equity-focused governance; inclusive policies; justice frameworks Declarations Ethics approval This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests Funding This research received no external funding. Author contributions Conceptualization: P.A.; Methodology: P.A., G.A.F.; Formal analysis: P.A., G.C.; Investigation: P.A., G.A.F., G.C.; Writing – original draft: P.A.; Writing – review & editing: all authors; Supervision: R.V. Data Availability Data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. References Svenning JC, Kerr MR, Mungi NA, Ordonez A, Riede F (2024) Defining the Anthropocene as a geological epoch captures human impacts’ triphasic nature to empower science and action. One Earth 7(10):1678–1681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.004 Kuwae M, Yokoyama Y, Tims S, Froehlich M, Fifield LK, Aze T, Tsugeki N, Doi H, Saito Y (2024) Toward defining the Anthropocene onset using a rapid increase in anthropogenic fingerprints in global geological archives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121(41):e2313098121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313098121 Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML et al (2022) Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ Sci Technol 56:1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158 Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 IPCC (2023) Climate change 2023: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ Lüthi D, Le Floch M, Bereiter B, Blunier T, Barnola JM, Siegenthaler U et al (2008) High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present. Nature 453:379–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949 WWF, Frederiksberg (2022) Living Planet Report 2022: Building a Nature-Positive Society. WWF. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/embargo_13_10_2022_lpr_2022_full_report_single_page_1.pdf Yeoh CSL, Alrazihi LA, Wong ST, Wong SF (2025) Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and human health: a review of exposure routes and potential toxicities across the lifespan. Environ Toxicol Chem 44(10):2754–2786. https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf172 Rockström J, Gupta J, Qin D et al (2023) Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 619:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 Sunderland EM, Hu XC, Dassuncao C, Tokranov AK, Wagner CC, Allen JG (2019) A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29:131–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1 Richardson K, Steffen W, Lucht W et al (2023) Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci Adv 9:eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 Kim RE, Kotzé LJ (2021) Planetary boundaries at the intersection of earth system law, science and governance: a state-of-the-art review. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 30:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12383 Williams A, Perego P, Whiteman G (2025) Boundary conditions for organizations in the Anthropocene: a review of the planetary boundaries framework 10 years on. J Manag Stud 62:1811–1846. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13150 Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H et al (2022) A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 Costello MJ (2022) Climate change is not the biggest threat to freshwater biodiversity. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B9780128211397.002452 Oreskes N, Conway EM (2014) The collapse of western civilization: a view from the future. Columbia University, New York Rockström J (2025) Diagnosing earth’s tipping points: where we stand in the Anthropocene. Front Public Health 13:1653860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653860 Anderies JM, Barfuss W, Donges JF et al (2022) Conceptualizing world-earth system resilience: exploring transformation pathways towards a safe and just operating space for humanity. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.04471 Boyd W (2021) The poverty of theory: public problems, instrument choice, and the climate emergency. Colum J Environ Law 46. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v46i2.8401 Shokry G, Anguelovski I, Connolly JJT (2025) (Mis-)belonging to the climate-resilient city: making place in multi-risk communities of racialized urban America. J Urban Aff 47:121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339 Finnerty S, Piazza J, Levine M (2024) Between two worlds: the scientist’s dilemma in climate activism. npj Clim Action 3:77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00161-x Shaban MM, Alanazi MA, Mohammed HH et al (2024) Advancing sustainable healthcare: a concept analysis of eco-conscious nursing practices. BMC Nurs 23:660. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02197-0 Senior RA, Bagwyn R, Leng D et al (2024) Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity. Nature 630:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07498-7 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71 Keck F, Peller T, Alther R et al (2025) The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature 641:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2 Larigauderie A, O’Brien K, Garibaldi LA, Agrawal A (2025) Transformative change to address biodiversity loss is urgent and possible. PLoS Biol 23(9):e3003387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003387 Flores BM, Montoya E, Sakschewski B, Nascimento N, Staal A, Betts RA, Levis C, Lapola DM, Esquível-Muelbert A, Jakovac C et al (2024) Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system. Nature 626:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 Levy SA, Cammelli F, Munger J, Gibbs HK, Garrett RD (2023) Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon could be halved by scaling up the implementation of zero-deforestation cattle commitments. Glob Environ Change 80:102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102671 Contosta A, Arndt K, Baulch H, Casson N, Harpold A, Morelli T, Siren A, Templer P (2024) Threshold changes in winter temperature and precipitation drive threshold responses across nine global climate zones and associated biomes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110421-102101 McKenzie E, Dasgupta P (2021) The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. HM Treasury, London Murphy J, Breeze T, Willcox B, Kavanagh S, Stout J (2022) Globalisation and pollinators: pollinator declines are an economic threat to global food systems. People Nat 4:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10314 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2022) Mechanisms for planning, monitoring, reporting and review. CBD Secretariat, Montreal Geldmann J, Manica A, Burgess ND, Coad L, Balmford A (2019) A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:23209–23215. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908221116 OECD (2020) Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2020. OECD Publishing, Paris Beaudoin S, Chaloux A, Fequino L, Dauvergne P, Desmarais R (2026) Promising governance approaches for reversing biodiversity loss. Biol Conserv 313:111607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111607 Sze JS, Childs DZ, Carrasco LR, Edwards DP (2022) Indigenous lands in protected areas have high forest integrity across the tropics. Curr Biol 32:4949–4956e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.040 Sarkki S, Pihlajamäki M, Rasmus S, Eronen JT (2023) Rights for life scenario to reach biodiversity targets and social equity for Indigenous peoples and local communities. Biol Conserv 280:109958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958 Bandiaky-Badji S, Lovera S, Márquez GYH, Araos Leiva FJ, Robinson CJ, Smith MA, Currey K, Ross H, Agrawal A, White A (2023) Indigenous stewardship for habitat protection. One Earth 6:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.002 OECD (2023) Global plastics outlook: policy scenarios to 2060. OECD Publishing, Paris United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2021) From pollution to solution: a global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. UNEP, Nairobi Wayman C, Niemann H (2021) The fate of plastic in the ocean environment—a minireview. Environ Sci Process Impacts 23:198–212. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00446D Ahmed ASS, Billah MM, Ali MM, Bhuiyan MKA, Guo L, Mohinuzzaman M, Hossain MB, Rahman MS, Islam MS, Yan M, Cai W (2023) Microplastics in aquatic environments: a comprehensive review of toxicity, removal, and remediation strategies. Sci Total Environ 876:162414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162414 Ali N, Katsouli J, Auyang E, de la Bernardino J (2025) Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution and associated potential disease risks. Lancet Planet Health 9:101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101390 Liu L, Tu P, Niu H, Li X, Gong X, Chen Z, Xing M, Wu L, Lou X (2025) Cellular impact of micro(nano)plastics on human health: a review. Toxics 13:913. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110913 Kouvara K, Lazou-Laskaridis E, Xirotagarou P, Christodoulou D, Dimas X, Geraga M, Giovos I, Charitou A, Gerovasileiou V, Galgani F, Papatheodorou G (2025) Assessing marine litter and its ecological impact on the seafloor of Thermaikos Gulf (NE Mediterranean Sea, Greece): insights from ROV and diver surveys. Mar Pollut Bull 217:118109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118109 Leslie HA, van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, Vethaak AD, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Lamoree MH (2022) Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int 163:107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199 Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, Catalano P, Notarstefano V, Carnevali O, Papa F, Rongioletti MCA, Baiocco F, Draghi S et al (2021) Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int 146:106274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274 Lai H, Liu X, Qu M (2022) Nanoplastics and human health: hazard identification and biointerface. Nanomaterials 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12081298 Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) (2024) Towards a global treaty to end plastic pollution: ensuring meaningful and effective stakeholder involvement in the intergovernmental environmental negotiations. CIEL, Washington, DC Peti D, Dobránsky J, Michalík P (2025) Recent advances in polymer recycling: a review of chemical and biological processes for sustainable solutions. Polymers 17:603. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050603 Hammoud R, Massoud MA, Chalak A, Abiad MG (2025) Exploring the feasibility of extended producer responsibility for efficient waste management in Lebanon. Sci Rep 15:15444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00029-y Tumu K, Vorst K, Curtzwiler G (2023) Global plastic waste recycling and extended producer responsibility laws. J Environ Manag 348:119242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119242 Kibria MG, Masuk NI, Safayet R, Nguyen HQ, Mourshed M (2023) Plastic waste: challenges and opportunities to mitigate pollution and effective management. Int J Environ Res 17:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z ang KHD (2024) A review of the toxic effects of microplastics based on studies on mammals and mammalian cell lines. Environ Sci Adv 3:1669. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4va00227j Matavos-Aramyan S (2024) Addressing the microplastic crisis: a multifaceted approach to removal and regulation. Environ Adv 17:100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100579 Bamigboye O, Alfred MO, Bayode AA, Unuabonah EI, Omorogie MO (2024) The growing threats and mitigation of environmental microplastics. J Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 6:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.001 Sánchez-García E, Martínez-Falcó J, Marco-Lajara B, Manresa-Marhuenda E (2024) Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: a new era of sustainable progress. Environ Technol Innov 33:103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103509 Okogwu C, Agho M, Adeyinka M, Odulaja B, Eyo-Udo N, Daraojimba C, Banso A (2023) Exploring the integration of sustainable materials in supply chain management for environmental impact. Eng Sci Technol J 4:49–65. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v4i3.546 Huff A, Naess L (2022) Introduction: reframing climate and environmental justice. IDS Bull 53:1–8. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2022.135 Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abdollahi M, Abdollahpour I et al (2020) Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. Lancet 396:1223–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2 Roy R, D’Angiulli A (2024) Air pollution and neurological diseases: current state highlights. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1351721 . 18:1351721 World Health Organization (WHO) (2023) Air quality, energy and health. WHO, Geneva Health Effects Institute (HEI) (2022) State of global air 2022. HEI, Boston Lelieveld J, Pozzer A, Pöschl U, Fnais M, Haines A, Münzel T (2020) Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc Res 116:1910–1917. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa025 Reddington CL, Turnock ST, Conibear L, Forster PM, Lowe JA, Ford LB et al (2023) Inequalities in air pollution exposure and attributable mortality in a low carbon future. Earths Future 11:e2023EF003697. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003697 Shupler M, Mangeni J, Tawiah T, Sang E, Baame M, Anderson de Cuevas R, Nix E, Betang E, Saah J, Twumasi M et al (2021) Modelling of supply and demand-side determinants of liquefied petroleum gas consumption. Nat Energy 6:1198–1210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00933-3 Picciano P, Qiu M, Eastham SD, Yuan M, Reilly J, Selin NE (2023) Air quality related equity implications of U.S. decarbonization policy. Nat Commun 14:5543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41131-x Tong C, Dai Y, Cole M, Elliott RJR, Bartington SE, Liu B, Shi Z (2025) Further improvement in London’s air quality demands more than the ultra low emission zone policy. npj Clean Air 1:29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00030-9 Phillips D (2025) The potential health benefits of reduced PM2.5 exposure through a more rapid green transition of South Korea’s transport sector. Pollutants 5:35. https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants5040035 Gujral H, Damani O, Agarwal A, Becker C, Franklin M, Kramarz T, Sutaria R, Dey S, Easterbrook S (2026) Reimagining urban air-quality governance: a systems-thinking framework. Sci Total Environ 1010:181059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181059 Tavares MS, Rodrigues CT, de Menezes SLS, Moreno AM (2025) Health at risk: air pollution and urban vulnerability—perspectives in light of the 2030 agenda. Green Health 1:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/greenhealth1030021 Wee SY, Aris AZ (2023) Revisiting the forever chemicals, PFOA and PFOS exposure in drinking water. npj Clean Water 6:57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-023-00274-6 Dobrzyńska E, Wasilewski P, Pośniak M (2025) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs): a comprehensive review of environmental distribution, health impacts, and regulatory landscape. Appl Sci 15:11884. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211884 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2022) National report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. CDC, Atlanta Schrenk EFSA, Bignami D, Bodin M, Chipman L, del Mazo JK, Grasl-Kraupp J, Hogstrand B, Hoogenboom C, Leblanc L JC et al (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. EFSA J 18:e06223. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223 Cook Botelho J, Kato K, Wong LY, Calafat AM (2025) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in the U.S. population: NHANES 1999–March 2020. Environ Res 270:120916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.120916 European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (2023) Proposal to restrict PFAS in the European Union. ECHA, Helsinki Lendewig M, Marquez R, Franco J, Vera RE, Vivas KA, Forfora N, Venditti RA, Gonzalez R (2025) PFAS regulations and economic impact: a review of U.S. pulp and paper and textiles industries. Chemosphere 377:144301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144301 Mian MM, Zhu J, Jiang X et al (2025) Recent advances in activated carbon driven PFAS removal: structure-adsorption relationship and new adsorption mechanisms. Front Environ Sci Eng 19:78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1998-3 Ling AL, Stegner T, Thompson M, Viswanathan S, Pinkard BR, Wolohan KM, Richard DE, Ellis A (2025) Spent media management pathways for PFAS treatment applications. Water Environ Res 97(7):e70130. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70130 DiGuiseppi W, Newell C, Carey G, Kulkarni P, Xia Z, Stults J, Maher T, Houtz E, Mora R, Wice R et al (2024) Available and emerging liquid treatment technologies for PFASs. Remediation J 34:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21782 Mahinroosta R, Senevirathna L (2020) A review of the emerging treatment technologies for PFAS contaminated soils. J Environ Manage 255:109896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109896 Itumoh EJ, Data S, Chen JL-Y, Kah M, Padhye LP, Leitao EM (2024) Addressing the persistence of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Current challenges and potential solutions. RSC Sustain 2:3183–3201. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SU00152D Figuière R, Miaz LT, Savvidou E, Cousins IT (2025) An overview of potential alternatives for the multiple uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Environ Sci Technol 59:2031–2042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09088 Suffill E, White MP, Hale S, Pahl S (2024) Regulating forever chemicals: Social data are necessary for the successful implementation of the essential use concept. Environ Sci Europe 36:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00930-9 Rodgers KM, Swartz CH, Occhialini J, Bassignani P, McCurdy M, Schaider LA (2022) How well do product labels indicate the presence of PFAS in consumer items used by children and adolescents? Environ Sci Technol 56:6294–6304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05175 UNESCO (2024) United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for a Sustainable World. UNESCO, Paris Scheffran J (2025) Planetary boundaries, polycrisis and politics in the Anthropocene: Climate pathways, tipping cascades and transition to sustainable peace in integrative geography. In: Brauch HG (ed) Towards Rethinking Politics, Policy and Polity in the Anthropocene: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 339–444 United Nations Statistics Division (2024) : Sustainable Development Goals Report – Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation Rodina L (2024) The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. UN-Water/UNESCO Bolan S, Padhye LP, Jasemizad T, Govarthanan M, Karmegam N, Wijesekara H, Amarasiri D, Hou D, Zhou P, Biswal BK, Balasubramanian R, Wang H, Siddique KHM, Rinklebe J, Kirkham MB, Bolan N (2024) Impacts of climate change on the fate of contaminants through extreme weather events. Sci Total Environ 909:168388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168388 Ehtasham L, Sherani SH, Nawaz F (2024) Acceleration of the hydrological cycle and its impact on water availability over land: An adverse effect of climate change. Meteorol Hydrology Water Manage 12:1–21. https://doi.org/10.26491/mhwm/188920 Liu P-W, Famiglietti J, Purdy A, Adams KH, McEvoy A, Reager J, Bindlish R, Wiese D, David C, Rodell M (2022) Groundwater depletion in California’s Central Valley accelerates during megadrought. Nat Commun 13:7774. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35582-x Jasechko S, Seybold H, Perrone D et al (2024) Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 625:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06879-8 Ejiohuo O, Onyeaka H, Akinsemolu A, Nwabor OF, Siyanbola KF, Tamasiga P, Al-Sharify ZT (2025) Ensuring water purity: Mitigating environmental risks and safeguarding human health. Water Biology Secur 4:100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2024.100341 Ahmed M, Hayes M (2025) Waste to resource: A review of nitrate and phosphate removal from agricultural runoff using recycled byproducts. J Agric Food Res 24:102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102371 Parashar N, Mahanty B, Hait S (2023) Microplastics as carriers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aquatic environment: Interactions and ecotoxicological effects. Water Emerg Contaminants Nanoplastics 2:15. https://doi.org/10.20517/wecn.2023.25 Liddie JM, Schaider LA, Sunderland EM (2023) Sociodemographic factors are associated with the abundance of PFAS sources and detection in U.S. community water systems. Environ Sci Technol 57:7902–7912. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07255 Aib H, Parvez MS, Czédli HM (2025) Pharmaceuticals and microplastics in aquatic environments: A comprehensive review of pathways and distribution, toxicological and ecological effects. Int J Environ Res Public Health 22:799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050799 Verre F, Kumar K, Berndtsson R et al (2026) Redefining water scarcity through the integrated water strategic resilience index amid climate and conflict pressures. Sci Rep 16:9088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42170-2 Bani-Khaled M (2024) Atmospheric water harvesting technology: Review and future prospects. J Ecol Eng 25:114–124. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/182814 Apostolaki S (2025) Nature-based solutions: From flood defense to addressing water scarcity and climate change risks. Nature-Based Solutions 7:100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100233 Rosso R (2025) On seven principles of water governance. Water 17:896. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060896 Pichis-García R, and M.Cueva-Rodríguez (2026) Trends and Challenges in Water Governance Systematic Review and Bibliographic Study of Scientific Publications (2018–2025). World Water Policy12 no 2e70069. https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.70069 Alharbi S, Felemban A, Abdelrahim A, Al-Dakhil M (2024) Agricultural and technology-based strategies to improve water-use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas. Water 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131842 Terhaar J, Burger FA, Vogt L, Frölicher TL, Stocker TF (2025) Record sea surface temperature jump in 2023–2024 unlikely but not unexpected. Nature 639:942–946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08674-z Bohorquez J, Fine M, Grieco DI et al (2025) Coral reefs span borders, so must solutions: Transboundary conservation in complex political environments. npj Ocean Sustain 4:64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00166-x Pratchett MS, Heron SF, Mellin C, Cumming GS (2021) Recurrent mass-bleaching and the potential for ecosystem collapse on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. In: Canadell JG, Jackson RB (eds) Ecosystem Collapse and Climate Change. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 265–289 Li H, Lu J, Tong H, Liu Y (2024) Impact of high temperature heat waves on ocean carbon sinks: Based on literature analysis perspective. J Sea Res 198:102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2024.102487 Kwiatkowski L, Planchat A, Pyolle M, Torres O, Bouttes N, Comte A, Bopp L (2025) : Declining coral calcification to enhance twenty-first-century ocean carbon uptake by gigatonnes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 122, e2501562122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2501562122 Deschaseaux ESM, Dunne E, Schulz KG, Eyre BD, Harrison DP (2025) The central Great Barrier Reef as a net source of climatically relevant biogenic volatile organic compounds. J Geophys Research: Oceans 130:e2024JC021192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021192 Kwiatkowski L, Torres O, Bopp L, Aumont O, Chamberlain M, Christian JR, Dunne JP, Gehlen M, Ilyina T, John JG et al (2020) Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections. Biogeosciences 17:3439–3470. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020 Chaudhary C, Alfaro-Lucas JM, Simões MVP, Brandt A, Saeedi H (2023) Potential geographic shifts in the coral reef ecosystem under climate change. Prog Oceanogr 213:103001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103001 Yao W, Tian C, Teng Y, Diao F, Du X, Gu P, Zhou W (2025) Development of deep-sea mining and its environmental impacts: A review. Front Mar Sci 12:1598584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1598584 Lefaible N, Macheriotou L, Pape E, Molari M, Haeckel M, Zeppilli D, Vanreusel A (2024) Industrial mining trial for polymetallic nodules in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone indicates complex and variable disturbances of meiofaunal communities. Front Mar Sci 11:1380530. 10.3389/fmars.2024.1380530 Gazis I-Z, de Stigter H, Mohrmann J, Heger K, Diaz M, Gillard B, Baeye M, Veloso-Alarcón ME, Purkiani K, Haeckel M et al (2025) Monitoring benthic plumes, sediment redeposition and seafloor imprints caused by deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining. Nat Commun 16:1229. 10.1038/s41467-025-56311-0 MacMaster K (2023) Sustainable seabed mining—The phase 1 environmental draft standards and guidelines. Australian Year Book Int Law Online 41:37–73. 10.1163/26660229-04101014 Vonnahme TR, Molari M, Janssen F, Wenzhöfer F, Haeckel M, Titschack J, Boetius A (2020) Effects of a deep-sea mining experiment on seafloor microbial communities and functions after 26 years. Sci Adv 6:eaaz5922. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz5922 Wang Y, He Y, Gao X (2025) Synergizing renewable energy and circular economy strategies: Pioneering pathways to environmental sustainability. Sustainability 17:1801. 10.3390/su17051801 Maphosa F, Maphosa V (2024) Using the circular economy to mitigate the global electronic waste challenge: A systematic literature review approach. Eur J Social Impact Circular Econ. 10.13135/2704-9906/10799 Verma M (2023) Deep sea mining and the circular economy: Opportunities and challenges. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev 7:21–27 Haas B, Mackay M, Novaglio C, Fullbrook L, Murunga M, Sbrocchi C, McDonald J, McCormack PC, Alexander K, Fudge M et al (2022) The future of ocean governance. Rev Fish Biol Fish 32:253–270. 10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x Harden-Davies H, Humphries F, Maloney M, Wright G, Gjerde K, Vierros M (2020) Rights of nature: Perspectives for global ocean stewardship. Mar Policy 122:104059. 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104059 Rudolph TB, Ruckelshaus M, Swilling M, Allison EH, Österblom H, Gelcich S, Mbatha P (2020) A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nat Commun 11:3600. 10.1038/s41467-020-17410-2 Smith P, Poch RM, Lobb DA, Bhattacharyya R, Alloush G, Eudoxie GD, Anjos LHC, Castellano M, Ndzana GM, Chenu C et al (2024) Status of the world’s soils. Annu Rev Environ Resour 49:73–104. 10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629 Schiettecatte L-S, Tzamtzis I, Chotte J-L, Crumpler K, Proenca C, Salvatore M, Sinitambirivoutin M, Wiese L, Bernoux M (2025) Assessment of soil integration in nationally determined contributions and guidance for quantifying ex-ante soil organic carbon stock changes in national policies using IPCC default methodologies. CATENA 252:108805. 10.1016/j.catena.2025.108805 Cherlet M, Hutchinson C, Reynolds J, Hill J, Sommer S, von Maltitz G (2018) World atlas of desertification. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg Panettieri M, Lozano de Sosa L, Dominguez Nuñez M, Madejón E (2020) Long-term impacts of conservation tillage on Mediterranean agricultural soils: Shifts in microbial communities despite limited effects on chemical properties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 304:107144. 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107144 UNCCD (2023) Global land outlook 2: Land restoration for recovery and resilience. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Bonn Schreefel L, Schulte RPO, de Boer IJM, Schrijver AP, van Zanten HHE (2020) Regenerative agriculture—The soil is the base. Global Food Secur 26:100404. 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404 Sadiq FK, Anyebe O, Tanko F, Abdulkadir A, Manono BO, Matsika TA, Abubakar F, Bello SK (2025) Conservation agriculture for sustainable soil health management: A review of impacts, benefits and future directions. Soil Syst 9:103. 10.3390/soilsystems9030103 Patil M, Perumal C, Choudhari P et al (2025) Differential impacts of regenerative agriculture practices on soil organic carbon: A meta-analysis of studies from India. Sci Rep 15:33470. 10.1038/s41598-025-12149-6 Sacande M, Berrahmouni N (2016) Community participation and ecological criteria for selecting species and restoring natural capital with native species in the Sahel. Restor Ecol 24:479–488. 10.1111/rec.12337 Ogwu M, Kosoe E (2025) Integrating green infrastructure into sustainable agriculture to enhance soil health, biodiversity, and microclimate resilience. Sustainability 17:3838. 10.3390/su17093838 Amelung W, Bossio D, de Vries W, Kögel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Amundson R, Bol R, Collins C, Lal R, Leifeld J et al (2020) Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nat Commun 11:5427. 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7 Sahoo S, Singha C, Govind A, Moghimi A (2025) Review of climate-resilient agriculture for ensuring food security: Sustainability opportunities and challenges of India. Environ Sustain Indic 25:100544. 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100544 Gou F, Liang W, Liu Y, Fu B, Wang Z, Zhang W, Chen Z, Yan J, Li J, Lv Y (2025) Large-scale ecological infrastructures enhance the productivity of agro-socio-ecological systems by reducing soil erosion in the Loess Plateau. J Environ Manage 373:123751. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123751 Ding H, Markandya A, Feltran-Barbieri R, Calmon M, Cervera M, Duraisami M, Singh R, Warman J, Anderson W (2021) Repurposing agricultural subsidies to restore degraded farmland and grow rural prosperity. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 10.46830/wrirpt.20.00013 Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes Niinimäki K, Peters G, Dahlbo H, Perry P, Rissanen T, Gwilt A (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat Reviews Earth Environ 1:189–200. 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 Brooks A (2015) Clothing poverty: The hidden world of fast fashion and second-hand clothes. Zed Books, London WWF (2014) The impact of a cotton T-shirt. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland Frazier RM, Vivas KA, Azuaje I, Vera R, Pifano A, Forfora N, Jameel H, Ford E, Pawlak JJ, Venditti R et al (2024) Beyond cotton and polyester: An evaluation of emerging feedstocks and conversion methods for the future of fashion industry. J Bioresources Bioprod 9:130–159. 10.1016/j.jobab.2024.01.001 Henry B, Laitala K, Klepp IG (2019) Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Sci Total Environ 652:483–494. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166 Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry: An environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4:22–26. 10.4236/ns.2012.41004 Adamkiewicz J, Kochańska E, Adamkiewicz I, Łukasik RM (2022) Greenwashing and sustainable fashion industry. Curr Opin Green Sustainable Chem 38:100710. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100710 European Commission (2022) EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles. European Commission, Brussels Sandin G, Peters GM (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling—A review. J Clean Prod 184:353–365. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 Smith O, Brisman A (2021) Plastic waste and the environmental crisis industry. Crit Criminol 29:289–309. 10.1007/s10612-021-09562-4 Heinze L (2021) Wardrobe stories: Sustainability and the everyday aesthetics of fashion consumption. Continuum 35: 1–17. 10.1080/10304312.2021.1993571 Gazzola P, Pavione E, Hillebrand R, Vota V, Rosa R (2025) The circular economy and the role of technology in the fashion industry: A comparison of empirical evidence. Sustainability 17:3104. 10.3390/su17073104 Freitag C, Berners-Lee M, Widdicks K, Knowles B, Blair G, Friday A (2021) The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations. arXiv arXiv:2102.02622 Bieser JCT, Hintemann R, Hilty LM, Beucker S (2023) A review of assessments of the greenhouse gas footprint and abatement potential of information and communication technology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 99:107033. 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107033 Yuan R, Ma T, Jin Y (2025) Carbon footprints embodied in the value chain of multinational enterprises in the information and communication technology sector. Energy 320:135278. 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135278 Wang Q, Li Y, Li R (2024) Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanit Social Sci Commun 11:1043. 10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5 Istrate R, Tulus V, Grass RN, Vanbever L, Stark WJ, Guillén-Gosálbez G (2024) The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption. Nat Commun 15:3724. 10.1038/s41467-024-47621-w Freitag C, Berners-Lee M, Widdicks K, Knowles B, Blair GS, Friday A (2021) The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations. Patterns 2:100340. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340 International Energy Agency (IEA) (2025) Energy and AI: Impacts on global electricity demand. IEA, Paris Stringer LC, Mirzabaev A, Benjaminsen TA, Harris RMB, Jafari M, Lissner TK, Stevens N, Tirado-von der Pahlen C (2021) Climate change impacts on water security in global drylands. One Earth 4:851–864. 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.010 Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2022) Cambridge bitcoin electricity consumption index. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Kapengut E, Mizrach B (2023) An event study of the Ethereum transition to proof-of-stake. Commodities 2:96–110. 10.3390/commodities2020007 Asif R, Hassan S (2023) Shaping the future of Ethereum: Exploring energy consumption in proof-of-work and proof-of-stake consensus. Front Blockchain 6:1151724. 10.3389/fbloc.2023.1151724 Jung JW, Islam MM, In HP (2024) Proof of work with random selection (PoWR): An energy saving consensus algorithm with proof of work and the random selection function. Sustainability 16:9342. 10.3390/su16219342 Goel A, Masurkar S, Pathade GR (2024) An overview of digital transformation and environmental sustainability: Threats, opportunities, and solutions. Sustainability 16:11079. 10.3390/su162411079 Han YH, Cui XW, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Chen Z (2025) Environmental impacts of rare earth elements mining and strategies for sustainable management: A comprehensive review. J Hazard Mater 500:140400. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140400 Berthet E, Lavalley J, Anquetil-Deck C, Ballesteros F, Stadler K, Soytas U, Hauschild M, Laurent A (2024) Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Glob Environ Change 86:102841. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841 Diao H, Yang H, Tan T, Ren G, You M, Wu L, Yang M, Bai Y, Xia S, Song S (2024) Navigating the rare earth elements landscape: Challenges, innovations, and sustainability. Miner Eng 216:108889. 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108889 Forti V, Baldé C, Kuehr R, Bel G (2020) The global e-waste monitor 2020: Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential. United Nations University, Bonn Rajesh R, Kanakadhurga D, Prabaharan N (2022) Electronic waste: A critical assessment on the unimaginable growing pollutant, legislations and environmental impacts. Environ Challenges 7:100507. 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100507 George AS, Baskar T, Baskar D (2024) Repairing the future: The global fight for accessible fixes and sustainable tech. Zenodo Berthet E, Lavalley J, Anquetil-Deck C, Ballesteros F, Stadler K, Soytas U, Hauschild M, Laurent A (2024) Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Glob Environ Change 86:102841. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841 Mohsin SM, Maqsood T, Madani SA (2024) Towards energy efficient cloud: A green and intelligent migration of traditional energy sources. Energies 17:2787. 10.3390/en17112787 Renugadevi T, Geetha K, Muthukumar K, Geem ZW (2020) Optimized energy cost and carbon emission-aware virtual machine allocation in sustainable data centers. Sustainability 12:6383. 10.3390/su12166383 Carraro G, Dal Cin E, Rech S (2024) Integrating energy generation and demand in the design and operation optimization of energy communities. Energies 17:6358. 10.3390/en17246358 Castro V, Georgiou M, Jackson T, Hodgkinson IR, Jackson L, Lockwood S (2024) Digital data demand and renewable energy limits: Forecasting the impacts on global electricity supply and sustainability. Energy Policy 195:114404. 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114404 Bevanda V, Silveira C, Reis M (2022) Sustainability in software engineering: A design science research approach. Springer, Cham Paulillo A, Sanyé-Mengual E (2024) Approaches to incorporate planetary boundaries in life cycle assessment: A critical review. Resour Environ Sustain 17:100169. 10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169 Xiao T, Nerini FF, Matthews HD et al (2025) Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA. Nat Sustain 8:1541–1553. 10.1038/s41893-025-01681-y Chen X, Liu Y, Zhang Z (2024) Artificial intelligence and energy consumption: Trends and sustainability implications. Energy Rep 10:1200–1212 Ren S, Giang A (2024) Inequitable spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution of multiple environmental risks and benefits in Metro Vancouver. GeoHealth 8: e2024GH001157. 10.1029/2024GH001157 Nunez Y, Benavides J, Shearston JA et al (2024) An environmental justice analysis of air pollution emissions in the United States from 1970 to 2010. Nat Commun 15:268. 10.1038/s41467-023-43492-9 Islam MS (2024) Rethinking climate justice: Insights from environmental sociology. Climate 12:203. 10.3390/cli12120203 Cannon CEB (2024) Critical environmental injustice: A case study approach to understanding disproportionate exposure to toxic emissions. Toxics 12:295. 10.3390/toxics12040295 Pellow DN (2025) What is critical environmental justice? Wiley, Hoboken, NJ Donaghy TQ, Healy N, Jiang CY, Battle CP (2023) Fossil fuel racism in the United States: How phasing out coal, oil, and gas can protect communities. Energy Res Social Sci 100:103104. 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103104 Johnston J, Cushing L (2020) Chemical exposures, health, and environmental justice in communities living on the fenceline of industry. Curr Environ Health Rep 7:48–57. 10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8 Collins T, Grineski S, Shaker Y, Mullen C (2022) Communities of color are disproportionately exposed to long-term and short-term PM2.5 in metropolitan America. Environ Res 214:114038. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114038 Nair AA, Lin S, Luo G, Ryan I, Qi Q, Deng X, Yu F (2023) Environmental exposure disparities in ultrafine particles and PM2.5 by urbanicity and socio-demographics in New York State, 2013–2020. Environ Res 239:117246. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117246 Jbaily A, Zhou X, Liu J, Lee T-H, Kamareddine L, Verguet S, Dominici F (2022) Air pollution exposure disparities across US population and income groups. Nature 601:228–233. 10.1038/s41586-021-04190-y Terrell KA, Julien GS (2023) Discriminatory outcomes of industrial air permitting in Louisiana, United States. Environ Challenges 10:100672. 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100672 Mustansar T, van den Brekel L, Timmermans EJ, Agyemang C, Vaartjes I (2025) Air pollution exposure disparities among ethnic groups in high-income countries: A scoping review. Environ Res 267:120647. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120647 deSouza PN, Chaudhary E, Dey S et al (2023) An environmental justice analysis of air pollution in India. Sci Rep 13:16690. 10.1038/s41598-023-43628-3 Lin PY, Lo YY, Lin WY et al (2025) Urban–rural disparity for socioeconomic inequality regarding PM2.5 exposure. Aerosol Air Qual Res 25:30. 10.1007/s44408-025-00037-7 Chakraborty P, Syed KRR, Chandra JH, Hande S, Pokhrel S, Islam B, Miah E MAH (2025) Electronic waste recycling in South Asia: Overview of associated risks from a cocktail of micro-pollutants and recommendations for sustainable e-waste management. J Hazard Mater Adv 18:100715. 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100715 Abogunrin-Olafisoye OB, Adeyi O (2025) Environmental and health impacts of unsustainable waste electrical and electronic equipment recycling practices in Nigeria’s informal sector. Discover Chem 2:4. 10.1007/s44371-024-00075-x Bainton N, Kemp D, Lèbre E, Owen J, Marston G (2021) The energy-extractives nexus and the just transition. Sustain Dev 29:624–634. 10.1002/sd.2163 Hoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N (2020) The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: A study of 108 US urban areas. Climate 8:12. 10.3390/cli8010012 Ulibarri N, Perez Figueroa O, Grant A (2022) Barriers and opportunities to incorporating environmental justice in the National Environmental Policy Act. Environ Impact Assess Rev 97:106880. 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106880 Amorim-Maia AT, Anguelovski I, Chu E, Connolly J (2022) Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Clim 41:101053. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053 Kashwan P (2021) Climate justice in the Global North: An introduction. Case Stud Environ 5:1125003. 10.1525/cse.2021.1125003 Eisenhauer E, Williams K, Warren C, Thomas-Burton T, Julius S, Geller A (2021) New directions in environmental justice research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Incorporating recognitional and capabilities justice through health impact assessments. Environ Justice 14:322–331. 10.1089/env.2021.0019 Lalander R (2014) Rights of nature and the Indigenous peoples in Bolivia and Ecuador: A straitjacket for progressive development politics? Iberoamerican J Dev Stud 3:148–172. 10.2139/ssrn.2554291 Tănăsescu M, Macpherson E, Jefferson D, Torres Ventura J (2024) Rights of nature and rivers in Ecuador’s Constitutional Court. Int J Hum Rights 1–23. 10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536 Müllerová H, Balounová E, Ruppel OC, Houston LJH (2023) Building the concept of just transition in law: Reflections on its conceptual framing, structure and content. Environ Policy Law 53:275–288. 10.3233/EPL-230012 Miles M, Schindel A, Haq K, Aziz T (2025) Advancing environmental justice education: A critical review of research and practice. Environ Educ Res 31:1461–1480. 10.1080/13504622.2025.2483443 Meng S (2024) Environmental governance is critical for mitigating human displacement due to weather-related disasters. Commun Earth Environ 5:363. 10.1038/s43247-024-01528-y Burch S, Gupta A, Inoue CYA, Kalfagianni A, Persson Å, Gerlak AK, Ishii A, Patterson J, Pickering J, Scobie M et al (2019) New directions in Earth system governance research. Earth Syst Gov 1:100006. 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006 Renckens S, Elliott C (2026) Overlap and fragmentation in the global governance complex of sustainable finance. Rev Int Polit Econ 33:760–791. 10.1080/09692290.2025.2596161 Amaka C, Okeke G, Ndubuisi, Cletus E, Agbakhamen C, Okeke G (2025) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental agreements in promoting sustainable development and climate change mitigation. 10.5281/zenodo.15507229 Davila WL, Maarof RS, Debkumar CS, Coşkuner M, Tapia ET (2025) Enhancing environmental governance: A global comparative analysis of legal frameworks and best practices. Int J Environ Sci Kellner E, Petrovics D, Huitema D (2024) Polycentric climate governance: Emerging insights and a research agenda. Glob Environ Politics 24(3). 10.1162/glep_a_00753 Sebuliba S, Sammler KG (2025) Governing biodiversity: Ambiguity and fragmentation in the BBNJ agreement. Ocean Coastal Manage 270:107913. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107913 Lenton TM, Abrams JF, Bartsch A et al (2024) Remotely sensing potential climate change tipping points across scales. Nat Commun 15:343. 10.1038/s41467-023-44609-w Lausen JN, Buerkert JS (2025) Fragmentation revisited: Ocean governance implications. Nordic J Int Law 94:184–210. 10.1163/15718107-bja10098 Martin A, Gomez-Baggethun E, Quaas M, Rozzi R, Tauro A, Faith DP, Kumar R, O’Farrell P, Pascual U (2024) Plural values of nature help to understand contested pathways to sustainability. One Earth 7:806–819. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.003 Gifford L, Liverman D, Gupta J, Jacobson L (2024) Governing for a safe and just future with science-based targets: Opportunities and limitations. Climate Dev 16:860–869. 10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255 Sebuliba S, Sammler KG (2025) Governing biodiversity and ocean sustainability transitions. Mar Policy Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files PRISMA2020checklist.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9484645","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":627075688,"identity":"1b527ff8-80d9-4bde-9450-009afbae899e","order_by":0,"name":"Paola Angelini","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-1079","institution":"University of Perugia","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Paola","middleName":"","lastName":"Angelini","suffix":""},{"id":627075689,"identity":"627b2cf1-a1a1-49a1-af11-aa434ce2200e","order_by":1,"name":"Giancarlo Angeles Flores","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-9794","institution":"University of Perugia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giancarlo","middleName":"Angeles","lastName":"Flores","suffix":""},{"id":627075690,"identity":"038b49fa-a516-438d-b8b5-62a16f068d1c","order_by":2,"name":"Gaia Cusumano","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4216-4902","institution":"University of Perugia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gaia","middleName":"","lastName":"Cusumano","suffix":""},{"id":627075691,"identity":"6567f888-7327-4b78-b066-b38cef5ce002","order_by":3,"name":"Roberto Venanzoni","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-0468","institution":"University of Perugia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roberto","middleName":"","lastName":"Venanzoni","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-21 13:08:00","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":true,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":107492046,"identity":"601739eb-9e50-474a-ba8a-e075f1a9618a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-22 03:13:01","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":812570,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eConceptual framework of twelve interconnected environmental threats within the Earth system, highlighting key drivers, feedback loops, cascading risks, and pathways for transformation through governance, technological innovation, and societal change.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9484645/v1/45aac55070ad73c496f73ed2.png"},{"id":107705448,"identity":"b405b46a-3391-4907-88b3-7282fbf0e7dc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-24 09:12:46","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":71896,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process, showing the identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion of studies in the systematic review\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9484645/v1/7b78a59baf1fc65204dc5a83.png"},{"id":107708899,"identity":"323e4d53-7c61-41cd-980b-02008c0647d7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-24 09:33:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1605240,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9484645/v1/65b5cf2e-dc59-4b4c-8dc8-36a87054211d.pdf"},{"id":107492044,"identity":"a1a83059-c41e-4a73-aaac-d2fe7fa0a392","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-22 03:13:01","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":277419,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"PRISMA2020checklist.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9484645/v1/00847949109f7312aeaa7708.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterconnected Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene: A Systems-Based Review of Drivers, Feedbacks, and Governance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eHumanity is entering a phase of unprecedented planetary transformation, increasingly conceptualized as the Anthropocene, in which human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth system dynamics [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Accelerating climate change, biodiversity loss, widespread pollution, and large-scale resource depletion are no longer isolated environmental challenges, but deeply interconnected processes that collectively threaten the stability, resilience, and functioning of planetary systems [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR5 CR6\" citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOver recent decades, scientific research has made substantial progress in identifying, quantifying, and modelling individual environmental risks. Frameworks such as planetary boundaries and Earth system science have significantly advanced understanding of global thresholds, tipping dynamics, and systemic risks [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR12 CR13\" citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. However, much of the existing literature continues to address environmental challenges within disciplinary or sectoral boundaries, limiting the ability to fully capture their interdependencies, feedback mechanisms, and cumulative effects [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR9\" citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR16\" citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIncreasing evidence suggests that contemporary environmental crises are best understood as components of a tightly coupled socio-ecological system characterized by non-linear dynamics, cascading effects, and cross-scale interactions [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR19\" citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. These dynamics are driven by underlying structural factors, including unsustainable production and consumption patterns, global economic inequalities, and fragmented governance systems, which together reinforce systemic vulnerability and risk propagation across environmental domains [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the conceptual framework developed in this study, highlighting the interconnected nature of environmental threats, their shared drivers, and the feedback mechanisms that generate systemic risk across domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite growing recognition of these interconnections, integrative syntheses that explicitly link biophysical processes with governance structures and environmental justice remain limited. In particular, there is a need for analytical frameworks capable of capturing how diverse environmental threats co-evolve, interact across scales, and generate systemic risks within the Earth system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo address this gap, this study presents a structured interdisciplinary review of twelve major environmental threats shaping contemporary Earth system dynamics. Drawing on a systematic literature review and qualitative thematic analysis, the paper examines how these domains interact, identifies shared drivers and feedback mechanisms, and explores their implications for governance and sustainability transitions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn doing so, this study advances the current literature in three key ways. First, it provides a systematic and comparative synthesis of multiple environmental domains that are typically examined in isolation, explicitly identifying cross-domain interactions, feedback loops, and cascading risks within a unified analytical framework. Second, it integrates biophysical dynamics with governance structures and environmental justice considerations, bridging a critical gap between Earth system science and sustainability governance research [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Third, the paper develops a systems-oriented conceptual framework that highlights common structural drivers and identifies potential leverage points for intervention, offering a more holistic basis for understanding and addressing interconnected environmental risks in the Anthropocene.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy advancing a systems-based and integrative perspective, this work contributes to the environmental studies and sustainability science literature by providing a transparent and transferable framework for analysing complex environmental crises, bridging disciplinary boundaries, and informing pathways for transformative change toward sustainability and equity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Study Design and Scope\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study adopts a structured and interdisciplinary systematic review design aimed at synthesizing twelve critical domains of environmental risk that collectively define key frontiers in planetary health (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The review is guided by a systems-thinking perspective and follows a transparent and reproducible approach to identify major trends, shared drivers, and cross-scale interactions across environmental domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e] and was not prospectively registered. Rather than providing an exhaustive technical assessment of each domain, the study applies a comparative analytical strategy to detect recurring patterns, feedback mechanisms, and interdependencies. The objective is to bridge disciplinary silos and develop a coherent, systems-oriented understanding of converging environmental crises in the Anthropocene.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Literature Search Strategy and Selection Criteria\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA structured literature search was conducted across major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, covering publications from 2014 to early 2026 to capture recent developments in environmental research. The search was updated in April 2026 to include the most recent studies. A structured literature search was conducted across major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, covering publications from 2014 to early 2025 to capture recent developments in environmental research. This was complemented by a targeted review of grey literature from key international organizations, including UNEP, IPCC, WHO, and WWF, to incorporate policy-relevant and global assessment reports. Search strings were developed for each thematic domain using combinations of keywords (e.g., \u0026ldquo;climate tipping points\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;PFAS exposure\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;deep-sea mining impacts\u0026rdquo;), and were adapted to the syntax of each database. Full search strategies are reported in Appendix A.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (i) relevance to one or more of the twelve environmental domains considered; (ii) focus on environmental drivers, impacts, or systemic interactions; (iii) publication in peer-reviewed journals or authoritative institutional reports; and (iv) availability in English. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking empirical or analytical relevance to the research objectives or focusing on highly localized phenomena without broader systemic implications. The selection process followed a multi-stage screening procedure. An initial pool of over 500 records was identified. After removal of duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, followed by full-text assessment. This process resulted in a final dataset of approximately 218 sources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Data Extraction and Thematic Coding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure analytical consistency, the selected studies were examined through a qualitative thematic analysis. Each source was systematically coded according to predefined analytical dimensions, including: (i) primary environmental drivers; (ii) observed impacts; (iii) cross-system interactions and feedback mechanisms; and (iv) governance implications and policy responses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe coding framework was applied iteratively to identify recurring patterns and systemic linkages across the twelve environmental domains. Where necessary, coding categories were refined during the analysis to better capture emerging themes and cross-domain dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Data Sources and Validation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative indicators\u0026mdash;including emissions trajectories, biodiversity loss metrics, public health burdens, and resource use projections\u0026mdash;were derived from authoritative international datasets. Key sources included the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, and national statistical agencies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhere possible, data were cross-validated using independent repositories, such as the Global Carbon Atlas and EarthStat, to enhance robustness and consistency. All data reflect the most recent values available at the time of writing (early 2025).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Analytical Framework\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analytical framework was applied systematically across all selected studies to synthesize findings into an integrated systems perspective. By combining thematic coding with cross-domain comparison, the analysis identifies key feedback loops, cascading risks, and interdependencies linking environmental domains. This approach enables the construction of an integrative conceptual framework (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) that captures the systemic nature of environmental risks and highlights shared drivers and potential leverage points for intervention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Limitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis review is subject to several limitations. Although a structured and transparent approach was adopted, the breadth of topics addressed required balancing analytical depth with integrative synthesis. Some emerging or region-specific evidence may not have been fully captured, particularly in rapidly evolving research areas. In addition, the integration of heterogeneous sources, including peer-reviewed articles and grey literature, introduces variability in methodological approaches and levels of evidence. While efforts were made to ensure consistency through systematic coding, the synthesis inevitably involves an interpretative component, particularly in identifying cross-domain interactions and systemic patterns. Despite these limitations, the review provides a robust and transparent framework for understanding interconnected environmental risks and supports comparative and interdisciplinary analysis across scientific and policy domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.7 Study Selection Process\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study selection process was conducted in multiple stages, including title and abstract screening followed by full-text assessment. Screening was performed by two reviewers independently, with discrepancies resolved through discussion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.8 Data Collection Process\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData extraction was conducted using a standardized approach. Two reviewers independently collected and cross-checked the data to ensure consistency.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.9 Data Items\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExtracted data included environmental drivers, impacts, cross-system interactions, governance implications, study type, and geographic scope.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.10 Risk of Bias Assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA formal risk of bias assessment was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of sources. However, priority was given to authoritative and peer-reviewed sources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.11 Effect Measure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo quantitative effect measures were applied, as the study is based on qualitative synthesis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.12 Synthesis Methods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData were synthesized through qualitative thematic analysis and cross-domain comparison across the twelve environmental domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.13 Reporting Bias Assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReporting bias was not formally assessed, although the inclusion of grey literature aimed to reduce publication bias.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.14 Certainty Assessment\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCertainty of evidence was not formally evaluated but is supported by the consistency of findings across multiple sources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverview of the twelve environmental threats, summarizing their key characteristics, drivers, and systemic interactions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Domain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Environmental Issues\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystemic relevance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBibliographic References\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3. Sixth Mass Extinction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRapid biodiversity loss, habitat destruction; species extinction; ecosystem fragmentation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUndermines ecosystem stability and resilience,\u0026nbsp;weakening essential life-support systems and amplifying climate feedbacks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR25 CR26 CR27 CR28 CR29 CR30 CR31 CR32 CR33 CR34 CR35 CR36 CR37 CR38\" citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4. Plastic Pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicro- and nanoplastics; marine litter; accumulation in food chains; inadequate waste management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRepresents a persistent and global pollutant linking production systems, environmental contamination, and human health risks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR41 CR42 CR43 CR44 CR45 CR46 CR47 CR48 CR49 CR50 CR51 CR52 CR53 CR54 CR55 CR56 CR57 CR58 CR59\" citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5. Air Pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePM2.5 and ozone exposure; industrial and transport emissions; indoor air pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActs as a cross-cutting driver of public health crises and climate interactions, with immediate and uneven socio-spatial impacts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR62 CR63 CR64 CR65 CR66 CR67 CR68 CR69 CR70 CR71\" citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e72\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6. PFAS Contamination\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePersistent environmental contamination; bioaccumulation; widespread human exposure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIllustrates systemic failures in chemical governance and the long-term persistence of industrial pollutants across ecosystems and human populations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR74 CR75 CR76 CR77 CR78 CR79 CR80 CR81 CR82 CR83 CR84 CR85 CR86\" citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e73\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e87\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7. Water Scarcity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater stress; groundwater depletion; declining water quality; unequal access\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinks climate change, resource use, and socio-economic inequality, acting as a critical constraint on food security and human development\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR89 CR90 CR91 CR92 CR93 CR94 CR95 CR96 CR97 CR98 CR99 CR100 CR101 CR102 CR103 CR104 CR105\" citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e88\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR106\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e106\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8. Ocean Degradation and Deep-Sea Mining\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCoral bleaching; ocean warming; acidification; deep-sea ecosystem disturbance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDisrupts global biogeochemical cycles and climate regulation, while exposing tensions between conservation and resource extraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR108 CR109 CR110 CR111 CR112 CR113 CR114 CR115 CR116 CR117 CR118 CR119 CR120 CR121 CR122 CR123 CR124\" citationid=\"CR107\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e107\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR125\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e125\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9. Soil Degradation and Desertification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eErosion; nutrient depletion; desertification; loss of soil organic matter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReduces ecosystem productivity and carbon sequestration capacity, undermining food systems and climate mitigation potential\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR127 CR128 CR129 CR130 CR131 CR132 CR133 CR134 CR135 CR136 CR137 CR138\" citationid=\"CR126\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e126\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR139\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e139\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10. Fast Fashion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTextile waste; high water and energy use; chemical pollution; microfibre release\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmbodies unsustainable production and consumption patterns, driving resource depletion, pollution, and global waste flows\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR141 CR142 CR143 CR144 CR145 CR146 CR147 CR148 CR149 CR150 CR151\" citationid=\"CR140\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e140\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR152\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e152\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11. ICT Environmental Impacts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh energy consumption; e-waste generation; rare earth extraction; short device lifespans\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHighlights the material and energy footprint of digital systems, linking technological growth to resource extraction and climate pressures\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR154 CR155 CR156 CR157 CR158 CR159 CR160 CR161 CR162 CR163 CR164 CR165 CR166 CR167 CR168 CR169 CR170 CR171 CR172 CR173 CR174 CR175 CR176 CR177 CR178 CR179\" citationid=\"CR153\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e153\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR180\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e180\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12. Environmental Injustice\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnequal exposure to pollution; environmental health disparities; marginalized communities at risk\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReveals structural inequalities in the distribution of environmental risks and benefits, shaping vulnerability and governance outcomes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR182 CR183 CR184 CR185 CR186 CR187 CR188 CR189 CR190 CR191 CR192 CR193 CR194 CR195 CR196 CR197 CR198 CR199 CR200 CR201 CR202 CR203 CR204 CR205 CR206\" citationid=\"CR181\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e181\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR207\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e207\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13. Governance and Ecological Collapse\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy fragmentation; weak enforcement; lack of coordination; institutional inefficiencies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRepresents the systemic inability of current governance structures to manage interconnected environmental risks and ensure sustainability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR209 CR210 CR211 CR212 CR213 CR214 CR215 CR216 CR217\" citationid=\"CR208\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e208\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR218\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e218\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Study Selection and Overview of Included Studies","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe literature search identified over 500 records. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, a subset of studies was selected for full-text review. This process resulted in a final dataset of 218 sources included in the analysis. The study selection process is summarized in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. The Sixth Mass Extinction: Drivers, Impacts, and Systemic Implications","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe ongoing biodiversity crisis, increasingly framed as the Sixth Mass Extinction, represents one of the most critical manifestations of systemic environmental change in the Anthropocene [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Unlike previous extinction events driven by natural processes, current biodiversity loss is primarily the result of interacting anthropogenic pressures operating at unprecedented rates and across global scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. As such, it cannot be understood as an isolated ecological phenomenon, but rather as a core component of a tightly coupled Earth system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent assessments by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) indicate that up to one million species are at risk of extinction, with current extinction rates far exceeding background levels [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR29\" citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. However, beyond these headline figures, the biodiversity crisis is best understood in terms of its underlying systemic drivers and cross-domain interactions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLand-use change, particularly deforestation and agricultural expansion, remains the dominant driver of biodiversity loss, reshaping ecosystems and reducing habitat connectivity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. Climate change is increasingly amplifying these pressures by altering species distributions, disrupting ecological interactions, and increasing the frequency of extreme events [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Additional drivers\u0026mdash;including overexploitation, pollution, and invasive species\u0026mdash;interact in non-linear ways, generating cumulative and often irreversible ecological impacts [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR35\" citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a systems perspective, biodiversity loss both influences and is influenced by other environmental domains through reinforcing feedback mechanisms. The degradation of forests, wetlands, and other carbon-rich ecosystems reduces the capacity of natural systems to sequester carbon, thereby accelerating climate change [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. In turn, climate change further intensifies biodiversity decline, creating feedback loops that amplify systemic instability within the Earth system. Similar cross-domain interactions link biodiversity loss to soil degradation, water scarcity, and marine ecosystem disruption, highlighting its central role within broader environmental dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe impacts of biodiversity loss extend beyond ecological boundaries, affecting the provision of essential ecosystem services such as pollination, water regulation, soil fertility, and climate stabilization [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. These disruptions have direct consequences for food security, public health, and economic systems, particularly in regions where livelihoods are closely dependent on natural resources. As such, biodiversity loss represents not only an environmental crisis, but also a socio-economic and governance challenge.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, the distribution of biodiversity loss and its impacts is highly uneven. Indigenous peoples and local communities, who often rely directly on ecosystem services, are disproportionately affected despite contributing least to its drivers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. This highlights the intersection between biodiversity loss and environmental justice, emphasizing the need to integrate equity considerations into conservation and governance strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a governance perspective, current approaches remain largely fragmented and insufficient to address the systemic nature of biodiversity decline. Conservation strategies have traditionally focused on protected areas, often neglecting broader landscape-level processes, socio-economic drivers, and cross-scale interactions. Emerging approaches, including nature-based solutions and integrated land-use planning, offer more holistic pathways by simultaneously addressing biodiversity conservation, climate mitigation, and human well-being.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, the Sixth Mass Extinction exemplifies how environmental crises in the Anthropocene are embedded within interconnected socio-ecological systems characterized by feedback loops, cross-scale dynamics, and governance constraints. Addressing biodiversity loss therefore requires a shift from isolated conservation efforts toward systemic transformation, aligning ecological processes with economic systems and institutional frameworks to enhance resilience and sustainability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Plastic Pollution: Sources, Impacts, and Emerging Risks","content":"\u003cp\u003ePlastic pollution has emerged as a pervasive and rapidly intensifying environmental risk in the Anthropocene, reflecting deeper structural dynamics of contemporary production and consumption systems. Global plastic production exceeded 460\u0026nbsp;million tonnes in 2024, driven by linear economic models that prioritize disposability, short product lifecycles, and low-cost materials [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e]. Rather than representing an isolated pollution issue, plastic accumulation illustrates how material flows are embedded within broader socio-economic and industrial systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a systems perspective, plastic pollution operates across multiple environmental domains through interconnected pathways. Each year, an estimated 11\u0026nbsp;million tonnes of plastic waste enter marine environments, where fragmentation processes generate micro- and nanoplastics with increasing mobility and bioavailability [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR42 CR43 CR44\" citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. These particles interact with ecological systems at multiple scales, affecting marine food webs, altering biogeochemical processes, and enabling the transfer of contaminants across trophic levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, plastic pollution is characterized by feedback mechanisms that reinforce systemic risk. The persistence and accumulation of plastics in ecosystems contribute to long-term environmental degradation, which in turn reduces ecosystem resilience and amplifies vulnerability to other stressors such as climate change and biodiversity loss. For example, microplastic contamination can affect primary producers and marine organisms, with cascading effects on ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling processes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlastic pollution is also closely linked to fossil fuel-based production systems, highlighting a critical intersection with climate change. The expansion of plastic production, increasingly tied to petrochemical industries, creates reinforcing linkages between material consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental contamination. These dynamics illustrate how environmental risks propagate across domains, rather than remaining confined within sectoral boundaries.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the human scale, emerging evidence of micro- and nanoplastic presence in biological systems\u0026mdash;including blood, lung tissue, and placental samples\u0026mdash;points to a diffuse and persistent exposure pathway with uncertain but potentially significant health implications [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR48\" citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. This highlights the integration of environmental and public health risks within a shared system of exposure and vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a governance perspective, plastic pollution reflects systemic failures in managing production, consumption, and waste at global scales. Current responses, often focused on downstream waste management, are insufficient to address upstream drivers embedded in economic structures and global supply chains. Initiatives such as the development of a legally binding global plastics treaty under the United Nations Environment Assembly represent important steps toward more coordinated governance [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. However, their effectiveness will depend on the ability to address structural drivers, including production growth and unequal waste management capacities across regions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddressing plastic pollution therefore requires a systemic transition from linear to circular material flows, combined with regulatory frameworks that integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This includes reducing material throughput, redesigning products, and strengthening global governance mechanisms capable of managing transboundary environmental risks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, plastic pollution exemplifies how environmental challenges in the Anthropocene are embedded within interconnected systems characterized by feedback loops, cross-scale interactions, and governance constraints. Understanding these dynamics is essential for identifying effective leverage points and developing more integrated responses to complex sustainability challenges [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR55 CR56 CR57 CR58 CR59\" citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. Air Pollution: Sources, Exposure, and Human Health Impacts","content":" \u003cp\u003eAir pollution remains one of the most pervasive and significant environmental threats to human health in the twenty-first century. It is estimated to contribute to approximately 6.7\u0026nbsp;million premature deaths annually worldwide, exceeding the combined mortality from HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e]. The primary pollutants of concern, fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) and ground-level ozone, are strongly associated with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and are increasingly linked to neurological, developmental, and metabolic disorders [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 99% of the global population is exposed to air quality levels that exceed recommended guidelines, highlighting the near-universal nature of this risk [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e]. However, both the sources and intensity of air pollution vary significantly across regions. In rapidly industrializing countries such as India and South Africa, coal combustion remains a dominant source of PM₂.₅ emissions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e], while in many European urban areas, transport-related emissions\u0026mdash;particularly from diesel vehicles\u0026mdash;are the primary contributors. In sub-Saharan Africa, biomass burning for cooking and heating continues to degrade both indoor and outdoor air quality, especially during dry seasons [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExposure to air pollution is highly uneven and reflects broader patterns of socio-economic inequality. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and low-income communities, are disproportionately affected, often experiencing pollutant concentrations significantly higher than those observed in more affluent areas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e]. This unequal exposure contributes to substantial public health burdens, including increased morbidity, reduced life expectancy, and long-term socio-economic impacts such as diminished productivity and educational attainment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnological interventions have demonstrated considerable potential in reducing emissions and improving air quality. Electrified public transport systems, clean cooking technologies, and industrial emission control measures have all contributed to measurable health benefits in various contexts [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the effectiveness and scalability of these solutions depend heavily on policy design and governance capacity. Real-time air quality monitoring systems can enhance transparency and accountability, while targeted fiscal instruments\u0026mdash;such as pollutant-specific taxation on diesel and coal\u0026mdash;can incentivize cleaner alternatives [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e]. Legal mechanisms, including environmental justice litigation, also play an important role in empowering affected communities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUrban policy interventions provide evidence of the effectiveness of integrated approaches. For example, London\u0026rsquo;s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) has led to significant reductions in nitrogen dioxide concentrations in roadside environments within a relatively short timeframe [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, Seoul\u0026rsquo;s Green Transport Zone has demonstrated improvements in both particulate pollution levels and respiratory health outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e]. These cases highlight the potential of targeted, context-specific measures when embedded within broader regulatory frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite these advances, air pollution remains a largely invisible and often normalized environmental threat. This invisibility contributes to policy inertia and public complacency, allowing environmental externalities from industry, transport, and energy systems to persist. Reframing clean air as a fundamental human right, rather than a byproduct of economic development, is therefore essential for driving more equitable and effective policy responses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the context of rapid urbanization and intensifying climate change, ensuring access to clean air must become a central priority of environmental governance. Addressing air pollution requires integrating technological innovation with social equity considerations, placing the health of vulnerable populations at the forefront of policy design. Clean air should not be treated as an externality of progress, but as a fundamental precondition for sustainable and inclusive development [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e71\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e72\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"7. PFAS Contamination: Persistence, Exposure, and Health Risks","content":"\u003cp\u003ePer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as \u0026ldquo;forever chemicals,\u0026rdquo; represent a paradigmatic case of persistent and systemic environmental contamination in the Anthropocene. Their widespread use across industrial processes and consumer products\u0026mdash;driven by desirable chemical properties such as thermal stability and resistance to degradation\u0026mdash;has resulted in their global dispersion across environmental compartments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e73\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e74\u003c/span\u003e]. As such, PFAS contamination exemplifies how technological innovation, when decoupled from precautionary governance, can generate long-term and transboundary environmental risks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA defining characteristic of PFAS is their extreme environmental persistence, largely due to the strength of the carbon\u0026ndash;fluorine bond. This persistence enables their accumulation across air, soil, and water systems, as well as within biological organisms, leading to widespread and chronic exposure [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR76\" citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e75\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e77\u003c/span\u003e]. From a systems perspective, PFAS contamination operates through interconnected pathways that link environmental media, food systems, and human health, illustrating the diffusion of risk across domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHuman exposure to PFAS occurs through multiple and interacting pathways, including contaminated drinking water, food consumption, inhalation, and contact with consumer products. Once absorbed, PFAS can bioaccumulate in the human body, with long biological half-lives and potential adverse health effects, including immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and increased risks of certain cancers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. These dynamics highlight the integration of environmental and public health risks within a shared system of exposure and vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, PFAS contamination is characterized by temporal feedbacks and path dependency. Their persistence means that past production and use continue to generate present and future risks, creating a legacy effect that constrains current governance responses. This temporal dimension distinguishes PFAS from many other pollutants and underscores the long-term implications of delayed regulatory action.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a governance perspective, PFAS contamination reveals structural shortcomings in existing regulatory frameworks. Traditional approaches to chemical regulation, which often assess substances individually, have proven inadequate for addressing large classes of persistent compounds with similar properties. This has led to regulatory lag, widespread environmental contamination, and significant remediation challenges [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e78\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e79\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnological solutions for PFAS removal, including granular activated carbon, ion exchange resins, and emerging advanced treatment technologies, offer partial mitigation but are often costly, energy-intensive, and generate secondary waste streams [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR81 CR82\" citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e80\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e83\u003c/span\u003e]. These limitations reinforce the need to shift from downstream remediation toward upstream prevention, including restrictions on non-essential uses, improved chemical transparency, and the development of safer alternatives [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e84\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e85\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePFAS contamination also illustrates broader systemic linkages with other environmental domains. It intersects with water scarcity through contamination of drinking water sources, with pollution through cumulative chemical exposure, and with environmental injustice, as vulnerable communities are often disproportionately affected by contaminated environments and limited access to remediation resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, PFAS represent not only a chemical pollution issue, but a systemic governance challenge rooted in the interaction between industrial production systems, regulatory frameworks, and long-term environmental persistence. Addressing PFAS contamination requires a shift toward precautionary, group-based regulatory approaches and more integrated governance mechanisms capable of managing persistent and transboundary environmental risks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e86\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e87\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"8. Water Scarcity: Drivers, Impacts, and Governance Challenges","content":"\u003cp\u003eWater scarcity is increasingly recognized as a systemic environmental risk in the Anthropocene, emerging from the interaction of climatic, ecological, and socio-economic processes. As of 2024, approximately 2.4\u0026nbsp;billion people live in regions experiencing high water stress, a figure projected to rise under the combined pressures of population growth, economic development, and climate change [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e88\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e89\u003c/span\u003e]. Rather than reflecting a simple imbalance between supply and demand, water scarcity represents a complex and multi-dimensional challenge embedded within interconnected socio-ecological systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a systems perspective, water scarcity is shaped by interacting drivers operating across scales. Climate change is altering hydrological cycles, leading to shifts in precipitation patterns, increased frequency and intensity of droughts, and reduced snowpack in critical regions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e92\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR93\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e93\u003c/span\u003e]. At the same time, unsustainable water use\u0026mdash;particularly in agriculture, which accounts for approximately 70% of global freshwater withdrawals\u0026mdash;places significant pressure on already stressed water systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e94\u003c/span\u003e]. These dynamics are further intensified by urbanization, industrial expansion, and demographic growth, creating cumulative pressures on water availability and quality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater scarcity is closely linked to other environmental domains through cross-sectoral interactions, often conceptualized as the water\u0026ndash;energy\u0026ndash;food nexus. For instance, agricultural water use directly affects food production systems, while energy production\u0026mdash;particularly thermoelectric power generation and hydropower\u0026mdash;depends heavily on water availability. These interdependencies generate feedback loops in which stress in one sector propagates across others, amplifying systemic vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGroundwater depletion represents a critical manifestation of these dynamics. In key agricultural regions such as California\u0026rsquo;s Central Valley and the Indo-Gangetic Basin, aquifers are being depleted at rates exceeding natural recharge, creating long-term risks for both food security and water availability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e95\u003c/span\u003e]. This overextraction reflects not only physical scarcity, but also governance failures related to regulation, pricing, and resource allocation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater quality degradation further compounds scarcity, illustrating the interconnected nature of environmental risks. Agricultural runoff, industrial pollution, and emerging contaminants\u0026mdash;including PFAS and microplastics\u0026mdash;reduce the availability of safe water, effectively shrinking usable freshwater resources [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR97 CR98 CR99\" citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e96\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR100\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e100\u003c/span\u003e]. These processes link water scarcity to broader pollution dynamics and highlight how multiple environmental stressors interact within shared systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe impacts of water scarcity are unevenly distributed, reflecting underlying socio-economic inequalities and governance disparities. Vulnerable populations, particularly in low-income regions, face disproportionate challenges in accessing safe and reliable water resources, increasing exposure to health risks, economic instability, and social conflict [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e101\u003c/span\u003e]. This underscores the strong intersection between water scarcity and environmental justice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a governance perspective, water scarcity illustrates the limitations of fragmented and sector-specific management approaches. Traditional water governance systems often fail to account for cross-scale interactions, competing demands, and long-term sustainability considerations. Addressing these challenges requires integrated water resource management, the incorporation of economic instruments such as tiered pricing, and the adoption of nature-based solutions, including watershed restoration and green infrastructure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR102\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e102\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR103\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e103\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, water scarcity is not solely a biophysical constraint, but a systemic governance challenge rooted in how water is allocated, valued, and managed within interconnected socio-ecological systems. Addressing it requires coordinated, multi-scalar governance approaches that integrate climate adaptation, resource efficiency, and social equity. Without such integration, water scarcity risks becoming a key amplifier of broader environmental and socio-economic instability in the Anthropocene [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR105\" citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e104\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR106\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e106\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"9. Ocean Degradation: Climate Change Impacts and Deep-Sea Mining Risks","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe world\u0026rsquo;s oceans, long regarded as vast and resilient, are increasingly exhibiting signs of systemic stress under the combined pressures of climate change and expanding industrial activities. In recent years, global sea surface temperatures have reached record levels, contributing to widespread ecological disruption and altering the functioning of marine ecosystems at multiple scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR107\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e107\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR108\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e108\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne of the most visible manifestations of ocean degradation is the widespread bleaching of coral reef systems. The Great Barrier Reef, a cornerstone of global marine biodiversity, has experienced repeated mass bleaching events, with some regions approaching ecological collapse [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR109\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e109\u003c/span\u003e]. These changes are part of a broader pattern driven by ocean warming, acidification, and deoxygenation, which together are reshaping marine ecosystems and reducing their resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR113\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e113\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR114\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e114\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeyond biodiversity loss, ocean degradation has significant implications for the global carbon cycle. Marine ecosystems, including phytoplankton, seagrasses, and coastal wetlands, play a crucial role in carbon sequestration. However, the degradation of these systems reduces their capacity to act as carbon sinks and may, in some cases, transform them into net sources of carbon emissions, thereby amplifying climate feedbacks [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR111\" citationid=\"CR110\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e110\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR112\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e112\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the same time, the deep ocean is emerging as a new frontier of resource extraction. Deep-sea mining, particularly targeting polymetallic nodules rich in cobalt, nickel, and manganese, is being promoted as a means to support the transition to low-carbon technologies, including batteries and renewable energy systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR115\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e115\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR116\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e116\u003c/span\u003e]. Pilot projects in regions such as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone indicate that industrial-scale seabed mining may soon become operational [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR117\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e117\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, the ecological risks associated with deep-sea mining remain substantial and poorly understood. Mining activities generate sediment plumes that can smother benthic ecosystems, disrupt biogeochemical cycles, and affect species far beyond the immediate extraction site. Additional impacts include noise pollution, light disturbance, and habitat destruction in environments characterized by slow biological processes and limited recovery capacity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR115\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e115\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGovernance frameworks for deep-sea mining are still evolving. The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is currently developing regulatory mechanisms to manage mining activities in international waters [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR118\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e118\u003c/span\u003e]. However, concerns persist regarding the adequacy of environmental safeguards, the lack of baseline ecological data, and the limited enforcement capacity of existing governance structures [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR119\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e119\u003c/span\u003e]. In response, several countries and scientific bodies have called for precautionary moratoria or temporary bans until the environmental risks are better understood.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlternative strategies are increasingly being explored to reduce dependence on deep-sea resource extraction. Circular economy approaches, including the recovery of critical minerals from electronic waste, improved recycling systems, and the development of longer-lasting battery technologies, offer pathways to decouple technological advancement from new extractive pressures [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR121\" citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e120\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR122\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e122\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOcean degradation thus reflects a broader tension within the global sustainability transition. Efforts to decarbonize energy systems, while essential, risk reproducing extractive paradigms in new environmental domains. Addressing this challenge requires a shift toward precautionary governance, ecosystem-based management, and long-term stewardship of marine resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, the health of ocean systems is fundamental to planetary stability. Protecting marine ecosystems is not only a matter of biodiversity conservation, but also a prerequisite for climate regulation, food security, and the resilience of socio-economic systems that depend on ocean resources [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR124\" citationid=\"CR123\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e123\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR125\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e125\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"10. Soil Degradation and Desertification: Drivers, Impacts, and Restoration Pathways","content":"\u003cp\u003eSoil, often described as the Earth\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;living skin,\u0026rdquo; is a critical component of terrestrial ecosystems, underpinning food production, biodiversity, and climate regulation. However, this essential resource is being degraded at an alarming rate. Current estimates indicate that over 33% of the world\u0026rsquo;s soils are moderately to severely degraded, with erosion occurring up to 100 times faster than natural soil formation in intensively managed systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR126\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e126\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe drivers of soil degradation are multiple and interconnected. Unsustainable land-use practices, including intensive tillage, monocropping, overgrazing, and excessive application of chemical inputs, contribute to the loss of soil structure, organic matter, and nutrient balance [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR127\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e127\u003c/span\u003e]. These pressures are further exacerbated by climate change, which intensifies droughts, alters precipitation patterns, and accelerates desertification processes, particularly in already vulnerable regions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegional examples highlight the scale of the challenge. In the Sahel, the combined effects of climatic variability, population pressure, and land mismanagement have led to widespread land degradation and reduced agricultural productivity. Similarly, in the Mediterranean Basin, prolonged drought conditions and unsustainable agricultural practices have resulted in declining soil fertility, increased erosion, and land abandonment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR128\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e128\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR129\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e129\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe impacts of soil degradation extend far beyond agricultural productivity. Degraded soils reduce crop yields, undermine food security, and increase vulnerability to climate extremes. At the same time, the loss of soil organic carbon diminishes the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to act as carbon sinks, thereby contributing to climate change. The Global Land Outlook 2 identifies land degradation as a key risk multiplier associated with forced migration, resource conflicts, and economic instability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR130\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e130\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn response, a range of restoration and sustainable land management strategies has emerged. Practices such as conservation agriculture, no-till farming, cover cropping, and diversified crop rotations can improve soil structure, enhance water retention, and promote biodiversity within agricultural systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR131\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e131\u003c/span\u003e]. The application of biochar has also shown potential in increasing soil fertility while contributing to long-term carbon sequestration [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR132\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e132\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge-scale restoration initiatives demonstrate that degradation can be reversed under appropriate conditions. The rehabilitation of China\u0026rsquo;s Loess Plateau, through integrated approaches including terracing, reforestation, and community-based land management, has led to significant improvements in ecosystem functioning and local livelihoods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR133\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e133\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, the African Great Green Wall initiative aims to restore 100\u0026nbsp;million hectares of degraded land, contributing to climate mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and socio-economic resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR134\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e134\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite these promising developments, significant barriers remain. These include insecure land tenure, limited access to financial resources and technical knowledge, and policy frameworks that often prioritize short-term productivity over long-term sustainability. Global agricultural subsidies, which frequently support input-intensive practices, can further exacerbate soil degradation rather than promote regenerative approaches [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, soil degradation and desertification are not only environmental challenges, but systemic issues linked to how land is valued, managed, and governed. Addressing them requires integrating soil protection into climate policy, agricultural systems, and economic decision-making. Recognizing soils as dynamic and finite ecological systems is essential to ensuring long-term food security, ecosystem resilience, and planetary stability [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR136 CR137 CR138\" citationid=\"CR135\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e135\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR139\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e139\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"11. Fast Fashion: Environmental Impacts and Circular Economy Challenges","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe global fashion industry has undergone a structural transformation over recent decades, shifting from seasonal production models to a system characterized by accelerated production cycles, high-volume output, and declining product lifespans. This transition, commonly described as \u0026ldquo;fast fashion,\u0026rdquo; has significantly increased material throughput and consumption intensity, generating substantial environmental and socio-economic externalities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne of the most critical consequences of this model is the rapid expansion of textile waste streams. Global clothing production has doubled over the past 15 years, while average garment utilization has declined markedly [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR140\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e140\u003c/span\u003e]. As a result, an estimated one truckload of textiles is landfilled or incinerated every second, underscoring the systemic inefficiency of current consumption patterns [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR141\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e141\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, large volumes of post-consumer clothing are exported from high-income countries to regions such as sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where they frequently overwhelm local waste management systems and disrupt domestic textile economies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR142\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e142\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe environmental footprint of textile production is equally significant. The sector is highly resource-intensive, placing substantial pressure on water, energy, and raw material systems. Cotton cultivation, for example, is associated with high water consumption and pesticide use, while synthetic fibers\u0026mdash;particularly polyester, which accounts for over 60% of global production\u0026mdash;are derived from fossil fuels and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR143\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e143\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR144\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e144\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, the laundering of synthetic textiles releases microplastic fibers into aquatic systems, contributing to the broader problem of microplastic pollution discussed in Section \u003cspan refid=\"Sec18\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR145\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e145\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChemical pollution represents another critical dimension. Textile manufacturing processes involve a wide range of dyes, solvents, and finishing agents that can contaminate water bodies, particularly in major production hubs in Asia. These pollutants pose risks not only to aquatic ecosystems but also to the health of workers and surrounding communities, highlighting the intersection between environmental degradation and occupational exposure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR146\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e146\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite increasing awareness, current sustainability initiatives within the fashion industry remain limited in their transformative potential. Voluntary certification schemes, recycled materials, and corporate sustainability commitments often coexist with continued growth in production volumes, raising concerns about greenwashing and the absence of standardized metrics for environmental performance [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e147\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddressing the environmental impacts of fast fashion requires systemic change grounded in circular economy principles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes can shift accountability toward producers, incentivizing more durable, repairable, and recyclable products. At the policy level, initiatives such as the European Union Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles aim to establish eco-design requirements, improve product durability, and restrict the destruction of unsold goods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR148\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e148\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnological innovation also plays a role in enabling circularity. Advances in textile-to-textile recycling, including chemical and enzymatic processes, offer potential pathways to recover fibers and reduce dependence on virgin materials [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR150 CR151\" citationid=\"CR149\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e149\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR152\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e152\u003c/span\u003e]. However, scaling these technologies remains constrained by economic, technical, and design-related challenges, particularly the complexity of blended fabrics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, fast fashion exemplifies a broader linear economic model characterized by resource extraction, short product lifecycles, and waste generation. Transitioning toward more sustainable systems will require not only technological and regulatory interventions, but also shifts in consumption patterns.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"12. ICT Environmental Impacts: Energy Use, Resource Demand, and E-Waste Challenges","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe rapid expansion of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has fundamentally reshaped modern societies, enabling unprecedented levels of connectivity, data processing, and technological innovation. However, this digital transformation is accompanied by significant and often underestimated environmental impacts. The ICT sector is currently estimated to account for between 2% and 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with projections indicating continued growth driven by increasing digitalization and data demand [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR154 CR155 CR156 CR157\" citationid=\"CR153\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e153\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR158\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e158\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA major component of this footprint is the energy consumption associated with digital infrastructure. Data centers, which underpin cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and online services, consumed approximately 460 terawatt-hours of electricity globally in 2022, representing around 2% of total electricity demand [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e159\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR160\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e160\u003c/span\u003e]. While improvements in energy efficiency have reduced energy use per unit of data processed, the rapid expansion of digital services has led to increasing absolute consumption, reflecting a rebound effect.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmerging digital technologies further intensify these pressures. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain systems, particularly those based on energy-intensive consensus mechanisms such as proof-of-work, require substantial computational resources. For example, Bitcoin mining alone has been estimated to consume over 120 terawatt-hours annually, exceeding the electricity consumption of several medium-sized countries [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR161\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e161\u003c/span\u003e]. Although alternative models, such as proof-of-stake, significantly reduce energy requirements, their adoption remains uneven [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR163\" citationid=\"CR162\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e162\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR164\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e164\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeyond energy use, ICT systems exert considerable pressure on material resources. The production of electronic devices relies on critical raw materials, including rare earth elements, cobalt, lithium, and precious metals. The extraction and processing of these materials are associated with environmental degradation, habitat destruction, and significant social impacts, particularly in regions with weak regulatory frameworks [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR166 CR167\" citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e165\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR168\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e168\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eElectronic waste (e-waste) represents one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally. In 2019, approximately 53.6\u0026nbsp;million metric tons of e-waste were generated, yet less than 20% was formally collected and recycled [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR169\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e169\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR170\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e170\u003c/span\u003e]. Informal recycling practices, common in parts of the Global South, expose workers and communities to hazardous substances, including heavy metals and toxic chemicals, highlighting the intersection between environmental degradation and environmental injustice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDesign practices within the ICT sector further exacerbate environmental pressures. Many electronic devices are characterized by limited repairability, short lifespans, and proprietary components that hinder reuse and refurbishment. Planned obsolescence and rapid product turnover contribute to increasing waste generation and resource demand. In response, policy initiatives such as \u0026ldquo;right-to-repair\u0026rdquo; legislation are emerging to extend product lifecycles and promote circularity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR171\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e171\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR172\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e172\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddressing the environmental impacts of ICT requires a combination of technological, regulatory, and behavioral changes. Transitioning data centers toward renewable energy sources, improving hardware efficiency, and developing circular electronics systems based on durability, modularity, and recyclability are critical steps [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR174 CR175\" citationid=\"CR173\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e173\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR176\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e176\u003c/span\u003e]. At the same time, the concept of \u0026ldquo;digital sobriety\u0026rdquo; emphasizes the need to reduce unnecessary data flows, optimize software efficiency, and encourage more sustainable patterns of digital consumption [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR177\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e177\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite these efforts, a fundamental tension persists between the rapid expansion of digital technologies and the finite limits of planetary resources. The perception of digital systems as immaterial obscures their substantial physical and environmental footprint, which includes energy-intensive infrastructure, global supply chains, and growing waste streams [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR178\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e178\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR179\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e179\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, aligning digital transformation with sustainability objectives requires rethinking the design, governance, and use of ICT systems. Without such a shift, the environmental benefits of digitalization risk being offset by its material and energy demands. Ensuring that digital innovation contributes to, rather than undermines, environmental sustainability is therefore a central challenge for the coming decades [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR180\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e180\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"13. Environmental Injustice: Unequal Exposure and Socio-Ecological Impacts","content":"\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental degradation is not experienced uniformly across populations, but is distributed unevenly along socio-economic, geographic, and political lines. Environmental injustice, therefore, represents a systemic dimension of environmental risk in the Anthropocene, reflecting structural inequalities embedded within economic systems, governance frameworks, and historical processes [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR182\" citationid=\"CR181\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e181\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR183\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e183\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a systems perspective, environmental injustice is not merely an outcome of environmental change, but a co-produced feature of interconnected socio-ecological systems. Environmental risks\u0026mdash;such as air and water pollution, hazardous waste exposure, and climate-related impacts\u0026mdash;are disproportionately concentrated in communities characterized by socio-economic vulnerability, including low-income populations, Indigenous groups, and marginalized ethnic minorities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR184\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e184\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR185\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e185\u003c/span\u003e]. These patterns are reinforced by feedback mechanisms in which vulnerability, exposure, and limited adaptive capacity interact to amplify systemic risk.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmpirical evidence across regions highlights the persistence of these dynamics. In high-income countries, disadvantaged communities are more likely to be located near sources of environmental hazard, including industrial facilities, landfills, and transport corridors [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR187\" citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e186\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR188\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e188\u003c/span\u003e]. Exposure to air pollution, for instance, is significantly higher among marginalized populations, even when controlling for income, reflecting structural inequalities in urban planning and environmental governance [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR190\" citationid=\"CR189\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e189\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR191\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e191\u003c/span\u003e]. Similar patterns are observed globally, where socio-economic status, ethnicity, and political marginalization shape proximity to environmental risks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR193\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e193\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR194\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e194\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental injustice is also embedded within global production and consumption systems. High-income countries frequently externalize environmental costs to lower-income regions through global supply chains, including the export of electronic waste and the extraction of critical raw materials [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR196 CR197\" citationid=\"CR195\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e195\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR198\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e198\u003c/span\u003e]. These transboundary dynamics illustrate how environmental risks are redistributed across space, linking local exposure to global economic structures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimate change further intensifies these inequalities by disproportionately affecting populations with limited adaptive capacity. Extreme heat, flooding, drought, and food insecurity tend to impact those who have contributed least to greenhouse gas emissions, reinforcing existing socio-economic disparities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR199\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e199\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR200\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e200\u003c/span\u003e]. Urban heat islands, for example, disproportionately affect low-income neighborhoods, where limited access to green space exacerbates exposure to climate extremes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a governance perspective, environmental injustice reveals fundamental limitations in existing institutional frameworks. Traditional approaches often focus on aggregate outcomes, neglecting distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions of justice. Addressing these challenges requires integrating equity into environmental governance, including ensuring meaningful participation in decision-making processes and recognizing diverse knowledge systems, particularly those of Indigenous peoples [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR202\" citationid=\"CR201\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e201\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR203\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e203\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmerging policy initiatives, such as targeted environmental investments and the recognition of rights of nature, represent important steps toward more equitable governance [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR204\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e204\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR205\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e205\u003c/span\u003e]. However, implementation remains uneven, and many initiatives risk remaining symbolic without structural changes in power relations and resource distribution.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, environmental injustice highlights that environmental risks are inseparable from questions of power, governance, and inequality. It serves as a cross-cutting dimension that shapes exposure, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity across all environmental domains considered in this study. Addressing interconnected environmental risks therefore requires not only ecological and technological solutions, but also systemic transformations that confront underlying social and institutional inequalities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR206\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e206\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR207\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e207\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"14. Conclusions: Ecological Crisis as a Challenge of Governance and Transformation","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study demonstrates that contemporary environmental crises cannot be understood or effectively addressed in isolation, but instead emerge as interconnected expressions of a tightly coupled Earth system shaped by shared structural drivers and reinforced through complex feedback mechanisms [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR215\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e215\u003c/span\u003e]. By synthesizing evidence across twelve environmental domains, this review highlights the limitations of fragmented, sector-specific approaches and underscores the need for integrated, systems-oriented frameworks that more accurately reflect the complexity of real-world sustainability challenges [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR209\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e209\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR210\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e210\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR214\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e214\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR216\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e216\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA central contribution of this work lies in explicitly linking environmental processes with governance structures and environmental justice, showing that systemic risks are not only biophysical, but also deeply embedded in institutional arrangements, socio-economic inequalities, and value systems [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR182 CR183 CR184\" citationid=\"CR181\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e181\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR185\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e185\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR211\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e211\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR217\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e217\u003c/span\u003e]. This integrated perspective reveals that environmental degradation and social inequity are co-produced and mutually reinforcing, requiring coordinated responses that address both ecological and societal dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings suggest that incremental and reactive policy responses are unlikely to be sufficient. Addressing interconnected environmental risks requires transformative change, including the redesign of governance systems, the alignment of economic activities with ecological limits, and the integration of equity, participation, and inclusiveness as core principles of sustainability transitions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR212\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e212\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR213\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e213\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR218\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e218\u003c/span\u003e]. In this context, key leverage points include strengthening cross-sectoral governance coordination, embedding long-term system thinking into policy processes, and promoting circular and regenerative economic models that reduce systemic pressures on natural systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis highlights the need to move beyond fragmented policy approaches toward integrated governance architectures capable of addressing cross-domain interactions and systemic risks. Further research is needed to operationalize the identification of cross-domain interactions, quantify cascading risks, and evaluate the effectiveness of governance interventions across scales. Advancing these directions will be essential for translating systems-based insights into actionable strategies. Ultimately, the challenge of sustainability extends beyond mitigating environmental degradation to reconfiguring the relationship between human and natural systems in ways that are resilient, equitable, and compatible with planetary boundaries. Navigating this transition will require not only technological innovation and policy reform, but also a fundamental shift in how societies understand, value, and govern their interactions with the Earth system [Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelationships among environmental threats, highlighting key interactions, cascading risks, and implications for sustainability governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMain Drivers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Impacts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystemic Interactions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGovernance Implications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSixth Mass Extinction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLand-use change; climate change; overexploitation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiodiversity loss; ecosystem instability; loss of ecosystem services\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReinforces climate change via carbon sink loss; interacts with land, food, and water systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegrated biodiversity governance; ecosystem-based management; nature-based solutions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlastic Pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFossil fuel-based production; linear consumption models\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine pollution; bioaccumulation; human health risks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinks fossil fuel systems, marine ecosystems, and food chains; enables cross-scale exposure pathways\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCircular economy policies; production reduction; global treaty frameworks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAir Pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndustrial emissions; transport; fossil fuel combustion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRespiratory diseases; premature mortality; environmental degradation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInteracts with climate via short-lived pollutants; exacerbates socio-economic inequalities\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmission standards; clean energy transition; urban air quality policies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePFAS Contamination\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePersistent chemicals; industrial production; regulatory gaps\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBioaccumulation; long-term contamination; health risks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-media contamination (water, soil, air); links pollution, health, and food systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGroup-based regulation; precautionary approaches; upstream chemical governance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater Scarcity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimate change; overextraction; inefficient use\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater stress; reduced agricultural yields; socio-economic instability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWater\u0026ndash;energy\u0026ndash;food nexus; links climate variability, agriculture, and energy systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegrated water governance; efficiency measures; equitable allocation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOcean Degradation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimate change; overfishing; pollution; seabed mining\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiodiversity loss; ecosystem disruption; reduced carbon sinks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinks climate regulation, biodiversity loss, and resource extraction systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine governance; precautionary approaches; ecosystem-based management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSoil Degradation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntensive agriculture; deforestation; erosion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLoss of fertility; reduced productivity; desertification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReduces carbon sequestration; links climate, food, and land systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegenerative agriculture; soil conservation; land restoration policies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFast Fashion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverproduction; global supply chains; fast consumption cycles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTextile waste; pollution; resource depletion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinks water use, chemical pollution, and microplastic release\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCircular textiles; sustainable production policies; extended producer responsibility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eICT Environmental Impacts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital expansion; energy demand; resource extraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh energy use; e-waste; resource depletion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinks energy systems, rare earth extraction, and global waste flows\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGreen IT policies; energy efficiency; circular electronics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Injustice\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocio-economic inequality; governance failures; spatial disparities\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnequal exposure; health disparities; vulnerability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-cuts all domains; shapes exposure, risk distribution, and adaptive capacity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEquity-focused governance; inclusive policies; justice frameworks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eConflicts of interest/Competing interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis research received no external funding.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eConceptualization: P.A.; Methodology: P.A., G.A.F.; Formal analysis: P.A., G.C.; Investigation: P.A., G.A.F., G.C.; Writing \u0026ndash; original draft: P.A.; Writing \u0026ndash; review \u0026amp; editing: all authors; Supervision: R.V.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSvenning JC, Kerr MR, Mungi NA, Ordonez A, Riede F (2024) Defining the Anthropocene as a geological epoch captures human impacts\u0026rsquo; triphasic nature to empower science and action. One Earth 7(10):1678\u0026ndash;1681. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuwae M, Yokoyama Y, Tims S, Froehlich M, Fifield LK, Aze T, Tsugeki N, Doi H, Saito Y (2024) Toward defining the Anthropocene onset using a rapid increase in anthropogenic fingerprints in global geological archives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121(41):e2313098121. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313098121\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.2313098121\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePersson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML et al (2022) Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ Sci Technol 56:1510\u0026ndash;1521. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/acs.est.1c04158\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRockstr\u0026ouml;m J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson \u0026Aring;, Chapin FS, Lambin EF et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472\u0026ndash;475. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/461472a\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/461472a\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSteffen W, Richardson K, Rockstr\u0026ouml;m J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.1259855\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIPCC (2023) Climate change 2023: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL\u0026uuml;thi D, Le Floch M, Bereiter B, Blunier T, Barnola JM, Siegenthaler U et al (2008) High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000\u0026ndash;800,000 years before present. Nature 453:379\u0026ndash;382. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nature06949\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWWF, Frederiksberg (2022) Living Planet Report 2022: Building a Nature-Positive Society. WWF. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/embargo_13_10_2022_lpr_2022_full_report_single_page_1.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/embargo_13_10_2022_lpr_2022_full_report_single_page_1.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYeoh CSL, Alrazihi LA, Wong ST, Wong SF (2025) Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and human health: a review of exposure routes and potential toxicities across the lifespan. Environ Toxicol Chem 44(10):2754\u0026ndash;2786. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf172\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf172\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRockstr\u0026ouml;m J, Gupta J, Qin D et al (2023) Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 619:102\u0026ndash;111. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSunderland EM, Hu XC, Dassuncao C, Tokranov AK, Wagner CC, Allen JG (2019) A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29:131\u0026ndash;147. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRichardson K, Steffen W, Lucht W et al (2023) Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci Adv 9:eadh2458. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/sciadv.adh2458\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim RE, Kotz\u0026eacute; LJ (2021) Planetary boundaries at the intersection of earth system law, science and governance: a state-of-the-art review. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 30:3\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12383\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/reel.12383\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams A, Perego P, Whiteman G (2025) Boundary conditions for organizations in the Anthropocene: a review of the planetary boundaries framework 10 years on. J Manag Stud 62:1811\u0026ndash;1846. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13150\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/joms.13150\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H et al (2022) A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:42539\u0026ndash;42559. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCostello MJ (2022) Climate change is not the biggest threat to freshwater biodiversity. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/B9780128211397.002452\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/B9780128211397.002452\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOreskes N, Conway EM (2014) The collapse of western civilization: a view from the future. Columbia University, New York\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRockstr\u0026ouml;m J (2025) Diagnosing earth\u0026rsquo;s tipping points: where we stand in the Anthropocene. Front Public Health 13:1653860. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653860\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653860\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnderies JM, Barfuss W, Donges JF et al (2022) Conceptualizing world-earth system resilience: exploring transformation pathways towards a safe and just operating space for humanity. arXiv. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.04471\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.48550/arXiv.2204.04471\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBoyd W (2021) The poverty of theory: public problems, instrument choice, and the climate emergency. \u003cem\u003eColum J Environ Law\u003c/em\u003e 46. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v46i2.8401\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.52214/cjel.v46i2.8401\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShokry G, Anguelovski I, Connolly JJT (2025) (Mis-)belonging to the climate-resilient city: making place in multi-risk communities of racialized urban America. J Urban Aff 47:121\u0026ndash;141. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFinnerty S, Piazza J, Levine M (2024) Between two worlds: the scientist\u0026rsquo;s dilemma in climate activism. npj Clim Action 3:77. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00161-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s44168-024-00161-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShaban MM, Alanazi MA, Mohammed HH et al (2024) Advancing sustainable healthcare: a concept analysis of eco-conscious nursing practices. BMC Nurs 23:660. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02197-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12912-024-02197-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSenior RA, Bagwyn R, Leng D et al (2024) Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e630:387\u0026ndash;391. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07498-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-024-07498-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePage MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKeck F, Peller T, Alther R et al (2025) The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature 641:395\u0026ndash;400. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLarigauderie A, O\u0026rsquo;Brien K, Garibaldi LA, Agrawal A (2025) Transformative change to address biodiversity loss is urgent and possible. PLoS Biol 23(9):e3003387. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003387\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003387\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFlores BM, Montoya E, Sakschewski B, Nascimento N, Staal A, Betts RA, Levis C, Lapola DM, Esqu\u0026iacute;vel-Muelbert A, Jakovac C et al (2024) Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system. Nature 626:555\u0026ndash;564. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLevy SA, Cammelli F, Munger J, Gibbs HK, Garrett RD (2023) Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon could be halved by scaling up the implementation of zero-deforestation cattle commitments. Glob Environ Change 80:102671. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102671\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102671\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eContosta A, Arndt K, Baulch H, Casson N, Harpold A, Morelli T, Siren A, Templer P (2024) Threshold changes in winter temperature and precipitation drive threshold responses across nine global climate zones and associated biomes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 55. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110421-102101\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110421-102101\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcKenzie E, Dasgupta P (2021) The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. HM Treasury, London\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurphy J, Breeze T, Willcox B, Kavanagh S, Stout J (2022) Globalisation and pollinators: pollinator declines are an economic threat to global food systems. People Nat 4:1\u0026ndash;13. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10314\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/pan3.10314\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConvention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2022) Mechanisms for planning, monitoring, reporting and review. CBD Secretariat, Montreal\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGeldmann J, Manica A, Burgess ND, Coad L, Balmford A (2019) A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:23209\u0026ndash;23215. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908221116\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1908221116\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOECD (2020) Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2020. OECD Publishing, Paris\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeaudoin S, Chaloux A, Fequino L, Dauvergne P, Desmarais R (2026) Promising governance approaches for reversing biodiversity loss. Biol Conserv 313:111607. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111607\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111607\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSze JS, Childs DZ, Carrasco LR, Edwards DP (2022) Indigenous lands in protected areas have high forest integrity across the tropics. Curr Biol 32:4949\u0026ndash;4956e3. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.040\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.040\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSarkki S, Pihlajam\u0026auml;ki M, Rasmus S, Eronen JT (2023) Rights for life scenario to reach biodiversity targets and social equity for Indigenous peoples and local communities. Biol Conserv 280:109958. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBandiaky-Badji S, Lovera S, M\u0026aacute;rquez GYH, Araos Leiva FJ, Robinson CJ, Smith MA, Currey K, Ross H, Agrawal A, White A (2023) Indigenous stewardship for habitat protection. One Earth 6:68\u0026ndash;72. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOECD (2023) Global plastics outlook: policy scenarios to 2060. OECD Publishing, Paris\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2021) From pollution to solution: a global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. UNEP, Nairobi\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWayman C, Niemann H (2021) The fate of plastic in the ocean environment\u0026mdash;a minireview. Environ Sci Process Impacts 23:198\u0026ndash;212. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00446D\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1039/D0EM00446D\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed ASS, Billah MM, Ali MM, Bhuiyan MKA, Guo L, Mohinuzzaman M, Hossain MB, Rahman MS, Islam MS, Yan M, Cai W (2023) Microplastics in aquatic environments: a comprehensive review of toxicity, removal, and remediation strategies. Sci Total Environ 876:162414. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162414\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162414\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAli N, Katsouli J, Auyang E, de la Bernardino J (2025) Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution and associated potential disease risks. Lancet Planet Health 9:101390. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101390\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101390\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu L, Tu P, Niu H, Li X, Gong X, Chen Z, Xing M, Wu L, Lou X (2025) Cellular impact of micro(nano)plastics on human health: a review. Toxics 13:913. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13110913\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/toxics13110913\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKouvara K, Lazou-Laskaridis E, Xirotagarou P, Christodoulou D, Dimas X, Geraga M, Giovos I, Charitou A, Gerovasileiou V, Galgani F, Papatheodorou G (2025) Assessing marine litter and its ecological impact on the seafloor of Thermaikos Gulf (NE Mediterranean Sea, Greece): insights from ROV and diver surveys. Mar Pollut Bull 217:118109. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118109\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118109\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeslie HA, van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, Vethaak AD, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Lamoree MH (2022) Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int 163:107199. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRagusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, Catalano P, Notarstefano V, Carnevali O, Papa F, Rongioletti MCA, Baiocco F, Draghi S et al (2021) Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int 146:106274. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLai H, Liu X, Qu M (2022) Nanoplastics and human health: hazard identification and biointerface. \u003cem\u003eNanomaterials\u003c/em\u003e 12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/nano12081298\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/nano12081298\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCenter for International Environmental Law (CIEL) (2024) Towards a global treaty to end plastic pollution: ensuring meaningful and effective stakeholder involvement in the intergovernmental environmental negotiations. CIEL, Washington, DC\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeti D, Dobr\u0026aacute;nsky J, Michal\u0026iacute;k P (2025) Recent advances in polymer recycling: a review of chemical and biological processes for sustainable solutions. Polymers 17:603. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050603\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/polym17050603\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHammoud R, Massoud MA, Chalak A, Abiad MG (2025) Exploring the feasibility of extended producer responsibility for efficient waste management in Lebanon. Sci Rep 15:15444. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00029-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-025-00029-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTumu K, Vorst K, Curtzwiler G (2023) Global plastic waste recycling and extended producer responsibility laws. J Environ Manag 348:119242. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119242\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119242\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKibria MG, Masuk NI, Safayet R, Nguyen HQ, Mourshed M (2023) Plastic waste: challenges and opportunities to mitigate pollution and effective management. Int J Environ Res 17:20. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eang KHD (2024) A review of the toxic effects of microplastics based on studies on mammals and mammalian cell lines. Environ Sci Adv 3:1669. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1039/d4va00227j\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1039/d4va00227j\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMatavos-Aramyan S (2024) Addressing the microplastic crisis: a multifaceted approach to removal and regulation. Environ Adv 17:100579. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100579\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100579\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBamigboye O, Alfred MO, Bayode AA, Unuabonah EI, Omorogie MO (2024) The growing threats and mitigation of environmental microplastics. J Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 6:259\u0026ndash;268. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS\u0026aacute;nchez-Garc\u0026iacute;a E, Mart\u0026iacute;nez-Falc\u0026oacute; J, Marco-Lajara B, Manresa-Marhuenda E (2024) Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: a new era of sustainable progress. Environ Technol Innov 33:103509. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103509\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eti.2023.103509\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOkogwu C, Agho M, Adeyinka M, Odulaja B, Eyo-Udo N, Daraojimba C, Banso A (2023) Exploring the integration of sustainable materials in supply chain management for environmental impact. Eng Sci Technol J 4:49\u0026ndash;65. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v4i3.546\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.51594/estj.v4i3.546\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuff A, Naess L (2022) Introduction: reframing climate and environmental justice. IDS Bull 53:1\u0026ndash;8. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2022.135\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.19088/1968-2022.135\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abdollahi M, Abdollahpour I et al (2020) Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990\u0026ndash;2019. Lancet 396:1223\u0026ndash;1249. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoy R, D\u0026rsquo;Angiulli A (2024) Air pollution and neurological diseases: current state highlights. Front Neurosci. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1351721\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fnins.2024.1351721\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. 18:1351721\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization (WHO) (2023) Air quality, energy and health. WHO, Geneva\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHealth Effects Institute (HEI) (2022) State of global air 2022. HEI, Boston\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLelieveld J, Pozzer A, P\u0026ouml;schl U, Fnais M, Haines A, M\u0026uuml;nzel T (2020) Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc Res 116:1910\u0026ndash;1917. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa025\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/cvr/cvaa025\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReddington CL, Turnock ST, Conibear L, Forster PM, Lowe JA, Ford LB et al (2023) Inequalities in air pollution exposure and attributable mortality in a low carbon future. Earths Future 11:e2023EF003697. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003697\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1029/2023EF003697\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShupler M, Mangeni J, Tawiah T, Sang E, Baame M, Anderson de Cuevas R, Nix E, Betang E, Saah J, Twumasi M et al (2021) Modelling of supply and demand-side determinants of liquefied petroleum gas consumption. Nat Energy 6:1198\u0026ndash;1210. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00933-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41560-021-00933-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePicciano P, Qiu M, Eastham SD, Yuan M, Reilly J, Selin NE (2023) Air quality related equity implications of U.S. decarbonization policy. Nat Commun 14:5543. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41131-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-023-41131-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTong C, Dai Y, Cole M, Elliott RJR, Bartington SE, Liu B, Shi Z (2025) Further improvement in London\u0026rsquo;s air quality demands more than the ultra low emission zone policy. npj Clean Air 1:29. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00030-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s44407-025-00030-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePhillips D (2025) The potential health benefits of reduced PM2.5 exposure through a more rapid green transition of South Korea\u0026rsquo;s transport sector. Pollutants 5:35. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants5040035\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/pollutants5040035\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGujral H, Damani O, Agarwal A, Becker C, Franklin M, Kramarz T, Sutaria R, Dey S, Easterbrook S (2026) Reimagining urban air-quality governance: a systems-thinking framework. Sci Total Environ 1010:181059. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181059\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181059\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTavares MS, Rodrigues CT, de Menezes SLS, Moreno AM (2025) Health at risk: air pollution and urban vulnerability\u0026mdash;perspectives in light of the 2030 agenda. Green Health 1:21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/greenhealth1030021\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/greenhealth1030021\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWee SY, Aris AZ (2023) Revisiting the forever chemicals, PFOA and PFOS exposure in drinking water. npj Clean Water 6:57. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-023-00274-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41545-023-00274-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDobrzyńska E, Wasilewski P, Pośniak M (2025) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs): a comprehensive review of environmental distribution, health impacts, and regulatory landscape. Appl Sci 15:11884. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/app152211884\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/app152211884\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2022) National report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. CDC, Atlanta\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchrenk EFSA, Bignami D, Bodin M, Chipman L, del Mazo JK, Grasl-Kraupp J, Hogstrand B, Hoogenboom C, Leblanc L JC et al (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. EFSA J 18:e06223. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCook Botelho J, Kato K, Wong LY, Calafat AM (2025) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in the U.S. population: NHANES 1999\u0026ndash;March 2020. Environ Res 270:120916. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.120916\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envres.2025.120916\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEuropean Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (2023) Proposal to restrict PFAS in the European Union. ECHA, Helsinki\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLendewig M, Marquez R, Franco J, Vera RE, Vivas KA, Forfora N, Venditti RA, Gonzalez R (2025) PFAS regulations and economic impact: a review of U.S. pulp and paper and textiles industries. Chemosphere 377:144301. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144301\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144301\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMian MM, Zhu J, Jiang X et al (2025) Recent advances in activated carbon driven PFAS removal: structure-adsorption relationship and new adsorption mechanisms. Front Environ Sci Eng 19:78. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1998-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11783-025-1998-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLing AL, Stegner T, Thompson M, Viswanathan S, Pinkard BR, Wolohan KM, Richard DE, Ellis A (2025) Spent media management pathways for PFAS treatment applications. Water Environ Res 97(7):e70130. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70130\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/wer.70130\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDiGuiseppi W, Newell C, Carey G, Kulkarni P, Xia Z, Stults J, Maher T, Houtz E, Mora R, Wice R et al (2024) Available and emerging liquid treatment technologies for PFASs. Remediation J 34:5\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21782\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/rem.21782\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahinroosta R, Senevirathna L (2020) A review of the emerging treatment technologies for PFAS contaminated soils. J Environ Manage 255:109896. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109896\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109896\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eItumoh EJ, Data S, Chen JL-Y, Kah M, Padhye LP, Leitao EM (2024) Addressing the persistence of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Current challenges and potential solutions. RSC Sustain 2:3183\u0026ndash;3201. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1039/D4SU00152D\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1039/D4SU00152D\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFigui\u0026egrave;re R, Miaz LT, Savvidou E, Cousins IT (2025) An overview of potential alternatives for the multiple uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Environ Sci Technol 59:2031\u0026ndash;2042. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09088\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/acs.est.4c09088\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSuffill E, White MP, Hale S, Pahl S (2024) Regulating forever chemicals: Social data are necessary for the successful implementation of the essential use concept. Environ Sci Europe 36:111. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00930-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12302-024-00930-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRodgers KM, Swartz CH, Occhialini J, Bassignani P, McCurdy M, Schaider LA (2022) How well do product labels indicate the presence of PFAS in consumer items used by children and adolescents? Environ Sci Technol 56:6294\u0026ndash;6304. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05175\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/acs.est.1c05175\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNESCO (2024) United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for a Sustainable World. UNESCO, Paris\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eScheffran J (2025) Planetary boundaries, polycrisis and politics in the Anthropocene: Climate pathways, tipping cascades and transition to sustainable peace in integrative geography. In: Brauch HG (ed) Towards Rethinking Politics, Policy and Polity in the Anthropocene: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 339\u0026ndash;444\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnited Nations Statistics Division (2024) : \u003cem\u003eSustainable Development Goals Report \u0026ndash; Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRodina L (2024) The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. UN-Water/UNESCO\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBolan S, Padhye LP, Jasemizad T, Govarthanan M, Karmegam N, Wijesekara H, Amarasiri D, Hou D, Zhou P, Biswal BK, Balasubramanian R, Wang H, Siddique KHM, Rinklebe J, Kirkham MB, Bolan N (2024) Impacts of climate change on the fate of contaminants through extreme weather events. Sci Total Environ 909:168388. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168388\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168388\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEhtasham L, Sherani SH, Nawaz F (2024) Acceleration of the hydrological cycle and its impact on water availability over land: An adverse effect of climate change. Meteorol Hydrology Water Manage 12:1\u0026ndash;21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.26491/mhwm/188920\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.26491/mhwm/188920\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu P-W, Famiglietti J, Purdy A, Adams KH, McEvoy A, Reager J, Bindlish R, Wiese D, David C, Rodell M (2022) Groundwater depletion in California\u0026rsquo;s Central Valley accelerates during megadrought. Nat Commun 13:7774. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35582-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-022-35582-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJasechko S, Seybold H, Perrone D et al (2024) Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 625:715\u0026ndash;721. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06879-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-023-06879-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEjiohuo O, Onyeaka H, Akinsemolu A, Nwabor OF, Siyanbola KF, Tamasiga P, Al-Sharify ZT (2025) Ensuring water purity: Mitigating environmental risks and safeguarding human health. Water Biology Secur 4:100341. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2024.100341\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.watbs.2024.100341\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed M, Hayes M (2025) Waste to resource: A review of nitrate and phosphate removal from agricultural runoff using recycled byproducts. J Agric Food Res 24:102371. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102371\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102371\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParashar N, Mahanty B, Hait S (2023) Microplastics as carriers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aquatic environment: Interactions and ecotoxicological effects. Water Emerg Contaminants Nanoplastics 2:15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.20517/wecn.2023.25\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.20517/wecn.2023.25\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiddie JM, Schaider LA, Sunderland EM (2023) Sociodemographic factors are associated with the abundance of PFAS sources and detection in U.S. community water systems. Environ Sci Technol 57:7902\u0026ndash;7912. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07255\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/acs.est.2c07255\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAib H, Parvez MS, Cz\u0026eacute;dli HM (2025) Pharmaceuticals and microplastics in aquatic environments: A comprehensive review of pathways and distribution, toxicological and ecological effects. Int J Environ Res Public Health 22:799. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050799\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph22050799\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVerre F, Kumar K, Berndtsson R et al (2026) Redefining water scarcity through the integrated water strategic resilience index amid climate and conflict pressures. Sci Rep 16:9088. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42170-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-026-42170-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBani-Khaled M (2024) Atmospheric water harvesting technology: Review and future prospects. J Ecol Eng 25:114\u0026ndash;124. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/182814\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.12911/22998993/182814\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eApostolaki S (2025) Nature-based solutions: From flood defense to addressing water scarcity and climate change risks. Nature-Based Solutions 7:100233. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100233\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100233\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRosso R (2025) On seven principles of water governance. Water 17:896. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/w17060896\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/w17060896\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePichis-Garc\u0026iacute;a R, and M.Cueva-Rodr\u0026iacute;guez (2026) Trends and Challenges in Water Governance Systematic Review and Bibliographic Study of Scientific Publications (2018\u0026ndash;2025). World Water Policy12 no 2e70069. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.70069\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/wwp2.70069\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlharbi S, Felemban A, Abdelrahim A, Al-Dakhil M (2024) Agricultural and technology-based strategies to improve water-use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas. Water 16. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/w16131842\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/w16131842\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTerhaar J, Burger FA, Vogt L, Fr\u0026ouml;licher TL, Stocker TF (2025) Record sea surface temperature jump in 2023\u0026ndash;2024 unlikely but not unexpected. Nature 639:942\u0026ndash;946. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08674-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-025-08674-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBohorquez J, Fine M, Grieco DI et al (2025) Coral reefs span borders, so must solutions: Transboundary conservation in complex political environments. npj Ocean Sustain 4:64. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00166-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s44183-025-00166-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePratchett MS, Heron SF, Mellin C, Cumming GS (2021) Recurrent mass-bleaching and the potential for ecosystem collapse on Australia\u0026rsquo;s Great Barrier Reef. In: Canadell JG, Jackson RB (eds) Ecosystem Collapse and Climate Change. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 265\u0026ndash;289\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi H, Lu J, Tong H, Liu Y (2024) Impact of high temperature heat waves on ocean carbon sinks: Based on literature analysis perspective. J Sea Res 198:102487. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2024.102487\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.seares.2024.102487\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKwiatkowski L, Planchat A, Pyolle M, Torres O, Bouttes N, Comte A, Bopp L (2025) : Declining coral calcification to enhance twenty-first-century ocean carbon uptake by gigatonnes. \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA\u003c/em\u003e 122, e2501562122. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2501562122\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.2501562122\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeschaseaux ESM, Dunne E, Schulz KG, Eyre BD, Harrison DP (2025) The central Great Barrier Reef as a net source of climatically relevant biogenic volatile organic compounds. J Geophys Research: Oceans 130:e2024JC021192. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021192\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1029/2024JC021192\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKwiatkowski L, Torres O, Bopp L, Aumont O, Chamberlain M, Christian JR, Dunne JP, Gehlen M, Ilyina T, John JG et al (2020) Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections. Biogeosciences 17:3439\u0026ndash;3470. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChaudhary C, Alfaro-Lucas JM, Sim\u0026otilde;es MVP, Brandt A, Saeedi H (2023) Potential geographic shifts in the coral reef ecosystem under climate change. Prog Oceanogr 213:103001. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYao W, Tian C, Teng Y, Diao F, Du X, Gu P, Zhou W (2025) Development of deep-sea mining and its environmental impacts: A review. Front Mar Sci 12:1598584. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1598584\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmars.2025.1598584\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLefaible N, Macheriotou L, Pape E, Molari M, Haeckel M, Zeppilli D, Vanreusel A (2024) Industrial mining trial for polymetallic nodules in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone indicates complex and variable disturbances of meiofaunal communities. Front Mar Sci 11:1380530. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmars.2024.1380530\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmars.2024.1380530\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGazis I-Z, de Stigter H, Mohrmann J, Heger K, Diaz M, Gillard B, Baeye M, Veloso-Alarc\u0026oacute;n ME, Purkiani K, Haeckel M et al (2025) Monitoring benthic plumes, sediment redeposition and seafloor imprints caused by deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining. Nat Commun 16:1229. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-025-56311-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-025-56311-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMacMaster K (2023) Sustainable seabed mining\u0026mdash;The phase 1 environmental draft standards and guidelines. Australian Year Book Int Law Online 41:37\u0026ndash;73. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1163/26660229-04101014\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1163/26660229-04101014\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVonnahme TR, Molari M, Janssen F, Wenzh\u0026ouml;fer F, Haeckel M, Titschack J, Boetius A (2020) Effects of a deep-sea mining experiment on seafloor microbial communities and functions after 26 years. Sci Adv 6:eaaz5922. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/sciadv.aaz5922\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/sciadv.aaz5922\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang Y, He Y, Gao X (2025) Synergizing renewable energy and circular economy strategies: Pioneering pathways to environmental sustainability. Sustainability 17:1801. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su17051801\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su17051801\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaphosa F, Maphosa V (2024) Using the circular economy to mitigate the global electronic waste challenge: A systematic literature review approach. Eur J Social Impact Circular Econ. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.13135/2704-9906/10799\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.13135/2704-9906/10799\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVerma M (2023) Deep sea mining and the circular economy: Opportunities and challenges. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev 7:21\u0026ndash;27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaas B, Mackay M, Novaglio C, Fullbrook L, Murunga M, Sbrocchi C, McDonald J, McCormack PC, Alexander K, Fudge M et al (2022) The future of ocean governance. Rev Fish Biol Fish 32:253\u0026ndash;270. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarden-Davies H, Humphries F, Maloney M, Wright G, Gjerde K, Vierros M (2020) Rights of nature: Perspectives for global ocean stewardship. Mar Policy 122:104059. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104059\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104059\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRudolph TB, Ruckelshaus M, Swilling M, Allison EH, \u0026Ouml;sterblom H, Gelcich S, Mbatha P (2020) A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nat Commun 11:3600. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-020-17410-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-020-17410-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith P, Poch RM, Lobb DA, Bhattacharyya R, Alloush G, Eudoxie GD, Anjos LHC, Castellano M, Ndzana GM, Chenu C et al (2024) Status of the world\u0026rsquo;s soils. Annu Rev Environ Resour 49:73\u0026ndash;104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchiettecatte L-S, Tzamtzis I, Chotte J-L, Crumpler K, Proenca C, Salvatore M, Sinitambirivoutin M, Wiese L, Bernoux M (2025) Assessment of soil integration in nationally determined contributions and guidance for quantifying ex-ante soil organic carbon stock changes in national policies using IPCC default methodologies. CATENA 252:108805. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.catena.2025.108805\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108805\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCherlet M, Hutchinson C, Reynolds J, Hill J, Sommer S, von Maltitz G (2018) World atlas of desertification. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePanettieri M, Lozano de Sosa L, Dominguez Nu\u0026ntilde;ez M, Madej\u0026oacute;n E (2020) Long-term impacts of conservation tillage on Mediterranean agricultural soils: Shifts in microbial communities despite limited effects on chemical properties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 304:107144. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.agee.2020.107144\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.agee.2020.107144\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNCCD (2023) Global land outlook 2: Land restoration for recovery and resilience. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Bonn\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchreefel L, Schulte RPO, de Boer IJM, Schrijver AP, van Zanten HHE (2020) Regenerative agriculture\u0026mdash;The soil is the base. Global Food Secur 26:100404. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSadiq FK, Anyebe O, Tanko F, Abdulkadir A, Manono BO, Matsika TA, Abubakar F, Bello SK (2025) Conservation agriculture for sustainable soil health management: A review of impacts, benefits and future directions. Soil Syst 9:103. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/soilsystems9030103\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/soilsystems9030103\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatil M, Perumal C, Choudhari P et al (2025) Differential impacts of regenerative agriculture practices on soil organic carbon: A meta-analysis of studies from India. Sci Rep 15:33470. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41598-025-12149-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-025-12149-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSacande M, Berrahmouni N (2016) Community participation and ecological criteria for selecting species and restoring natural capital with native species in the Sahel. Restor Ecol 24:479\u0026ndash;488. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/rec.12337\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/rec.12337\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOgwu M, Kosoe E (2025) Integrating green infrastructure into sustainable agriculture to enhance soil health, biodiversity, and microclimate resilience. Sustainability 17:3838. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su17093838\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su17093838\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmelung W, Bossio D, de Vries W, K\u0026ouml;gel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Amundson R, Bol R, Collins C, Lal R, Leifeld J et al (2020) Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nat Commun 11:5427. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSahoo S, Singha C, Govind A, Moghimi A (2025) Review of climate-resilient agriculture for ensuring food security: Sustainability opportunities and challenges of India. Environ Sustain Indic 25:100544. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.indic.2024.100544\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100544\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGou F, Liang W, Liu Y, Fu B, Wang Z, Zhang W, Chen Z, Yan J, Li J, Lv Y (2025) Large-scale ecological infrastructures enhance the productivity of agro-socio-ecological systems by reducing soil erosion in the Loess Plateau. J Environ Manage 373:123751. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123751\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123751\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDing H, Markandya A, Feltran-Barbieri R, Calmon M, Cervera M, Duraisami M, Singh R, Warman J, Anderson W (2021) Repurposing agricultural subsidies to restore degraded farmland and grow rural prosperity. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.46830/wrirpt.20.00013\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.46830/wrirpt.20.00013\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEllen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNiinim\u0026auml;ki K, Peters G, Dahlbo H, Perry P, Rissanen T, Gwilt A (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat Reviews Earth Environ 1:189\u0026ndash;200. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrooks A (2015) Clothing poverty: The hidden world of fast fashion and second-hand clothes. Zed Books, London\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWWF (2014) The impact of a cotton T-shirt. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFrazier RM, Vivas KA, Azuaje I, Vera R, Pifano A, Forfora N, Jameel H, Ford E, Pawlak JJ, Venditti R et al (2024) Beyond cotton and polyester: An evaluation of emerging feedstocks and conversion methods for the future of fashion industry. J Bioresources Bioprod 9:130\u0026ndash;159. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jobab.2024.01.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jobab.2024.01.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHenry B, Laitala K, Klepp IG (2019) Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Sci Total Environ 652:483\u0026ndash;494. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry: An environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4:22\u0026ndash;26. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.4236/ns.2012.41004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4236/ns.2012.41004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdamkiewicz J, Kochańska E, Adamkiewicz I, Łukasik RM (2022) Greenwashing and sustainable fashion industry. Curr Opin Green Sustainable Chem 38:100710. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100710\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100710\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEuropean Commission (2022) EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles. European Commission, Brussels\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSandin G, Peters GM (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling\u0026mdash;A review. J Clean Prod 184:353\u0026ndash;365. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith O, Brisman A (2021) Plastic waste and the environmental crisis industry. Crit Criminol 29:289\u0026ndash;309. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s10612-021-09562-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10612-021-09562-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHeinze L (2021) Wardrobe stories: Sustainability and the everyday aesthetics of fashion consumption. \u003cem\u003eContinuum\u003c/em\u003e35: 1\u0026ndash;17. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/10304312.2021.1993571\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10304312.2021.1993571\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGazzola P, Pavione E, Hillebrand R, Vota V, Rosa R (2025) The circular economy and the role of technology in the fashion industry: A comparison of empirical evidence. Sustainability 17:3104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su17073104\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su17073104\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFreitag C, Berners-Lee M, Widdicks K, Knowles B, Blair G, Friday A (2021) The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations. arXiv arXiv:2102.02622\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBieser JCT, Hintemann R, Hilty LM, Beucker S (2023) A review of assessments of the greenhouse gas footprint and abatement potential of information and communication technology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 99:107033. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYuan R, Ma T, Jin Y (2025) Carbon footprints embodied in the value chain of multinational enterprises in the information and communication technology sector. Energy 320:135278. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.energy.2025.135278\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135278\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang Q, Li Y, Li R (2024) Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanit Social Sci Commun 11:1043. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIstrate R, Tulus V, Grass RN, Vanbever L, Stark WJ, Guill\u0026eacute;n-Gos\u0026aacute;lbez G (2024) The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption. Nat Commun 15:3724. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-024-47621-w\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-024-47621-w\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFreitag C, Berners-Lee M, Widdicks K, Knowles B, Blair GS, Friday A (2021) The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations. Patterns 2:100340. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Energy Agency (IEA) (2025) Energy and AI: Impacts on global electricity demand. IEA, Paris\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStringer LC, Mirzabaev A, Benjaminsen TA, Harris RMB, Jafari M, Lissner TK, Stevens N, Tirado-von der Pahlen C (2021) Climate change impacts on water security in global drylands. One Earth 4:851\u0026ndash;864. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.010\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.010\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2022) Cambridge bitcoin electricity consumption index. University of Cambridge, Cambridge\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKapengut E, Mizrach B (2023) An event study of the Ethereum transition to proof-of-stake. Commodities 2:96\u0026ndash;110. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/commodities2020007\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/commodities2020007\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAsif R, Hassan S (2023) Shaping the future of Ethereum: Exploring energy consumption in proof-of-work and proof-of-stake consensus. Front Blockchain 6:1151724. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fbloc.2023.1151724\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fbloc.2023.1151724\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJung JW, Islam MM, In HP (2024) Proof of work with random selection (PoWR): An energy saving consensus algorithm with proof of work and the random selection function. Sustainability 16:9342. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su16219342\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su16219342\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoel A, Masurkar S, Pathade GR (2024) An overview of digital transformation and environmental sustainability: Threats, opportunities, and solutions. Sustainability 16:11079. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su162411079\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su162411079\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHan YH, Cui XW, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Chen Z (2025) Environmental impacts of rare earth elements mining and strategies for sustainable management: A comprehensive review. J Hazard Mater 500:140400. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140400\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140400\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerthet E, Lavalley J, Anquetil-Deck C, Ballesteros F, Stadler K, Soytas U, Hauschild M, Laurent A (2024) Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Glob Environ Change 86:102841. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDiao H, Yang H, Tan T, Ren G, You M, Wu L, Yang M, Bai Y, Xia S, Song S (2024) Navigating the rare earth elements landscape: Challenges, innovations, and sustainability. Miner Eng 216:108889. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108889\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108889\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eForti V, Bald\u0026eacute; C, Kuehr R, Bel G (2020) The global e-waste monitor 2020: Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential. United Nations University, Bonn\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRajesh R, Kanakadhurga D, Prabaharan N (2022) Electronic waste: A critical assessment on the unimaginable growing pollutant, legislations and environmental impacts. Environ Challenges 7:100507. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envc.2022.100507\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envc.2022.100507\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGeorge AS, Baskar T, Baskar D (2024) Repairing the future: The global fight for accessible fixes and sustainable tech. \u003cem\u003eZenodo\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerthet E, Lavalley J, Anquetil-Deck C, Ballesteros F, Stadler K, Soytas U, Hauschild M, Laurent A (2024) Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Glob Environ Change 86:102841. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMohsin SM, Maqsood T, Madani SA (2024) Towards energy efficient cloud: A green and intelligent migration of traditional energy sources. Energies 17:2787. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/en17112787\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/en17112787\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRenugadevi T, Geetha K, Muthukumar K, Geem ZW (2020) Optimized energy cost and carbon emission-aware virtual machine allocation in sustainable data centers. Sustainability 12:6383. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/su12166383\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su12166383\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarraro G, Dal Cin E, Rech S (2024) Integrating energy generation and demand in the design and operation optimization of energy communities. Energies 17:6358. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/en17246358\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/en17246358\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCastro V, Georgiou M, Jackson T, Hodgkinson IR, Jackson L, Lockwood S (2024) Digital data demand and renewable energy limits: Forecasting the impacts on global electricity supply and sustainability. Energy Policy 195:114404. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114404\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114404\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBevanda V, Silveira C, Reis M (2022) Sustainability in software engineering: A design science research approach. Springer, Cham\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePaulillo A, Sany\u0026eacute;-Mengual E (2024) Approaches to incorporate planetary boundaries in life cycle assessment: A critical review. Resour Environ Sustain 17:100169. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXiao T, Nerini FF, Matthews HD et al (2025) Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA. Nat Sustain 8:1541\u0026ndash;1553. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41893-025-01681-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41893-025-01681-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen X, Liu Y, Zhang Z (2024) Artificial intelligence and energy consumption: Trends and sustainability implications. Energy Rep 10:1200\u0026ndash;1212\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRen S, Giang A (2024) Inequitable spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution of multiple environmental risks and benefits in Metro Vancouver. \u003cem\u003eGeoHealth\u003c/em\u003e 8: e2024GH001157. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1029/2024GH001157\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1029/2024GH001157\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNunez Y, Benavides J, Shearston JA et al (2024) An environmental justice analysis of air pollution emissions in the United States from 1970 to 2010. Nat Commun 15:268. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-023-43492-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-023-43492-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIslam MS (2024) Rethinking climate justice: Insights from environmental sociology. Climate 12:203. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/cli12120203\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/cli12120203\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCannon CEB (2024) Critical environmental injustice: A case study approach to understanding disproportionate exposure to toxic emissions. Toxics 12:295. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/toxics12040295\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/toxics12040295\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePellow DN (2025) What is critical environmental justice? Wiley, Hoboken, NJ\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDonaghy TQ, Healy N, Jiang CY, Battle CP (2023) Fossil fuel racism in the United States: How phasing out coal, oil, and gas can protect communities. Energy Res Social Sci 100:103104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.erss.2023.103104\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.erss.2023.103104\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohnston J, Cushing L (2020) Chemical exposures, health, and environmental justice in communities living on the fenceline of industry. Curr Environ Health Rep 7:48\u0026ndash;57. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCollins T, Grineski S, Shaker Y, Mullen C (2022) Communities of color are disproportionately exposed to long-term and short-term PM2.5 in metropolitan America. Environ Res 214:114038. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envres.2022.114038\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envres.2022.114038\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNair AA, Lin S, Luo G, Ryan I, Qi Q, Deng X, Yu F (2023) Environmental exposure disparities in ultrafine particles and PM2.5 by urbanicity and socio-demographics in New York State, 2013\u0026ndash;2020. Environ Res 239:117246. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envres.2023.117246\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envres.2023.117246\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJbaily A, Zhou X, Liu J, Lee T-H, Kamareddine L, Verguet S, Dominici F (2022) Air pollution exposure disparities across US population and income groups. Nature 601:228\u0026ndash;233. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41586-021-04190-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-021-04190-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTerrell KA, Julien GS (2023) Discriminatory outcomes of industrial air permitting in Louisiana, United States. Environ Challenges 10:100672. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envc.2022.100672\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envc.2022.100672\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMustansar T, van den Brekel L, Timmermans EJ, Agyemang C, Vaartjes I (2025) Air pollution exposure disparities among ethnic groups in high-income countries: A scoping review. Environ Res 267:120647. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envres.2024.120647\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envres.2024.120647\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003edeSouza PN, Chaudhary E, Dey S et al (2023) An environmental justice analysis of air pollution in India. Sci Rep 13:16690. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41598-023-43628-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-023-43628-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin PY, Lo YY, Lin WY et al (2025) Urban\u0026ndash;rural disparity for socioeconomic inequality regarding PM2.5 exposure. Aerosol Air Qual Res 25:30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s44408-025-00037-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s44408-025-00037-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChakraborty P, Syed KRR, Chandra JH, Hande S, Pokhrel S, Islam B, Miah E MAH (2025) Electronic waste recycling in South Asia: Overview of associated risks from a cocktail of micro-pollutants and recommendations for sustainable e-waste management. J Hazard Mater Adv 18:100715. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100715\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100715\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbogunrin-Olafisoye OB, Adeyi O (2025) Environmental and health impacts of unsustainable waste electrical and electronic equipment recycling practices in Nigeria\u0026rsquo;s informal sector. Discover Chem 2:4. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s44371-024-00075-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s44371-024-00075-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBainton N, Kemp D, L\u0026egrave;bre E, Owen J, Marston G (2021) The energy-extractives nexus and the just transition. Sustain Dev 29:624\u0026ndash;634. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/sd.2163\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/sd.2163\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N (2020) The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: A study of 108 US urban areas. Climate 8:12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/cli8010012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/cli8010012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUlibarri N, Perez Figueroa O, Grant A (2022) Barriers and opportunities to incorporating environmental justice in the National Environmental Policy Act. Environ Impact Assess Rev 97:106880. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106880\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106880\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmorim-Maia AT, Anguelovski I, Chu E, Connolly J (2022) Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Clim 41:101053. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKashwan P (2021) Climate justice in the Global North: An introduction. Case Stud Environ 5:1125003. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1525/cse.2021.1125003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1525/cse.2021.1125003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEisenhauer E, Williams K, Warren C, Thomas-Burton T, Julius S, Geller A (2021) New directions in environmental justice research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Incorporating recognitional and capabilities justice through health impact assessments. Environ Justice 14:322\u0026ndash;331. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1089/env.2021.0019\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/env.2021.0019\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLalander R (2014) Rights of nature and the Indigenous peoples in Bolivia and Ecuador: A straitjacket for progressive development politics? Iberoamerican J Dev Stud 3:148\u0026ndash;172. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.2139/ssrn.2554291\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2139/ssrn.2554291\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTănăsescu M, Macpherson E, Jefferson D, Torres Ventura J (2024) Rights of nature and rivers in Ecuador\u0026rsquo;s Constitutional Court. Int J Hum Rights 1\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM\u0026uuml;llerov\u0026aacute; H, Balounov\u0026aacute; E, Ruppel OC, Houston LJH (2023) Building the concept of just transition in law: Reflections on its conceptual framing, structure and content. Environ Policy Law 53:275\u0026ndash;288. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3233/EPL-230012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3233/EPL-230012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMiles M, Schindel A, Haq K, Aziz T (2025) Advancing environmental justice education: A critical review of research and practice. Environ Educ Res 31:1461\u0026ndash;1480. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/13504622.2025.2483443\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13504622.2025.2483443\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeng S (2024) Environmental governance is critical for mitigating human displacement due to weather-related disasters. Commun Earth Environ 5:363. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s43247-024-01528-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s43247-024-01528-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBurch S, Gupta A, Inoue CYA, Kalfagianni A, Persson \u0026Aring;, Gerlak AK, Ishii A, Patterson J, Pickering J, Scobie M et al (2019) New directions in Earth system governance research. Earth Syst Gov 1:100006. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRenckens S, Elliott C (2026) Overlap and fragmentation in the global governance complex of sustainable finance. Rev Int Polit Econ 33:760\u0026ndash;791. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/09692290.2025.2596161\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/09692290.2025.2596161\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmaka C, Okeke G, Ndubuisi, Cletus E, Agbakhamen C, Okeke G (2025) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental agreements in promoting sustainable development and climate change mitigation. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.5281/zenodo.15507229\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5281/zenodo.15507229\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDavila WL, Maarof RS, Debkumar CS, Coşkuner M, Tapia ET (2025) Enhancing environmental governance: A global comparative analysis of legal frameworks and best practices. Int J Environ Sci\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKellner E, Petrovics D, Huitema D (2024) Polycentric climate governance: Emerging insights and a research agenda. Glob Environ Politics 24(3). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1162/glep_a_00753\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1162/glep_a_00753\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSebuliba S, Sammler KG (2025) Governing biodiversity: Ambiguity and fragmentation in the BBNJ agreement. Ocean Coastal Manage 270:107913. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107913\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107913\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLenton TM, Abrams JF, Bartsch A et al (2024) Remotely sensing potential climate change tipping points across scales. Nat Commun 15:343. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-023-44609-w\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-023-44609-w\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLausen JN, Buerkert JS (2025) Fragmentation revisited: Ocean governance implications. Nordic J Int Law 94:184\u0026ndash;210. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1163/15718107-bja10098\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1163/15718107-bja10098\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartin A, Gomez-Baggethun E, Quaas M, Rozzi R, Tauro A, Faith DP, Kumar R, O\u0026rsquo;Farrell P, Pascual U (2024) Plural values of nature help to understand contested pathways to sustainability. One Earth 7:806\u0026ndash;819. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGifford L, Liverman D, Gupta J, Jacobson L (2024) Governing for a safe and just future with science-based targets: Opportunities and limitations. Climate Dev 16:860\u0026ndash;869. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSebuliba S, Sammler KG (2025) Governing biodiversity and ocean sustainability transitions. Mar Policy\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"University of Perugia","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Sustainability science, systems thinking, environmental governance, environmental risks, planetary boundaries, Anthropocene, socio-ecological systems, environmental justice","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIn the Anthropocene, environmental risks are increasingly interconnected, forming complex systems characterized by feedback loops, cascading effects, and cross-scale interactions. This study presents a structured interdisciplinary review of twelve major environmental domains, examining how climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, resource depletion, and environmental injustice interact within a tightly coupled Earth system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA systematic literature review was conducted across major scientific databases and complemented by key institutional reports, resulting in a dataset of 218 sources analyzed through qualitative thematic coding. The analysis identifies shared structural drivers\u0026mdash;including unsustainable production and consumption patterns, technological development trajectories, and governance fragmentation\u0026mdash;that generate and amplify systemic environmental risks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings show that environmental challenges are not isolated phenomena but interconnected components of a dynamic system in which impacts propagate across domains, reinforcing vulnerability and accelerating the transgression of planetary boundaries. By integrating biophysical processes with governance structures and environmental justice considerations, this study develops a systems-oriented conceptual framework that highlights feedback mechanisms and identifies potential leverage points for intervention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results underscore the need for integrated, adaptive, and equitable governance strategies capable of addressing interconnected environmental risks. Advancing sustainability in the Anthropocene requires moving beyond fragmented approaches toward systemic and transformative responses that align ecological limits with socio-economic systems.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Interconnected Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene: A Systems-Based Review of Drivers, Feedbacks, and Governance","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-22 03:12:52","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9484645/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8630aed7-4be3-48b5-9faf-6fdc2374f643","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 22nd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-22T03:12:53+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-22 03:12:52","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9484645","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9484645","identity":"rs-9484645","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}