Endocervical-like versus intestinal-type mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: a large retrospective series focusing on the clinicopathologic characteristics
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This retrospective analysis of 203 mucinous borderline ovarian tumor patients found that endocervical-like tumors differed from intestinal-type in clinical features and lower endometriosis association, though histologic subtype did not affect recurrence-free survival.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the clinical and pathologic features of patients with mucinous borderline tumor (MBT) of the ovary with special emphasis on the endocervical-like (EMBT) and intestinal-type (IMBT).
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with MBT who were diagnosed and treated between 1995 and 2009 at a single institution. The records were analyzed for the patients' clinicopathologic information. The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of a total of 203 patients with MBT, there were 56 (27.6%) with EMBTs and 147 (72.4%) with IMBTs. Patients with EMBTs were significantly more asymptomatic (58.9%), had higher CA125 and CA19-9 levels, larger tumors (mean 17.3 cm), less frequent bilateral occurrence (5.4%), and less relation to endometriosis (1.4%), compared with those with IMBTs (all p < 0.05). During the median follow-up of 57.3 months (range 6-158), a total of 8 recurrences were identified: 6 were borderline and 2 were invasive lesion. With regard to the recurrence, EMBT and IMBT showed a 7-year recurrence-free survival rate of 97.1 and 92.1%, respectively, with no significant difference.
CONCLUSION: EMBT and IMBT had different clinicopathological profiles, although the histologic distinction of MBT was not associated with the prognosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-01T06:12:48.306406+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:47.062786+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-01T06:29:04.589233+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine