Abstract
Background Attrition among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy is a significant problem that can lead to serious health consequences, including uncontrolled blood pressure. Several factors underlie attrition, so healthcare providers must address them to prevent treatment discontinuation and ensure optimal outcomes. Attrition and associated factors was assessed among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital between January 2020 and December 2022.
Methods
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. The quantitative study was a retrospective cohort study design using files of 1215 hypertensive patients. The qualitative study employed an explanatory descriptive design among 16 patients. A data abstraction tool and an interview guide were used for data collection. Attrition was defined as patients lost to follow-up after missing ≥2 consecutive clinic appointments. Extended Cox regression was used to determine the factors associated with time to attrition at 5% level of significance and qualitative data analysis employed a thematic analysis codebook.
Results
The attrition rate was 56.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54.0-59.7) with most patients getting lost to follow-up in 2020 (64.9%) and fewest in 2021 (54.7%). Age (hazard ratio (HR)=0.904, 95% CI 0.877-0.932), female Sex (HR=0.713, 95% CI 0.602-0.845), residence outside Kampala (Capital City) (HR=1.311, 95%CI 1.121-1.533), last visit systolic blood pressure (HR=1.013, 95% CI 1.008-1.017), and last visit diastolic blood pressure (HR=0.957,95% CI 0.925-0.990) were associated with time to attrition. Loss to follow-up was driven by structural and contextual barriers, health system challenges, and illness perceptions and health-related limitations.
Conclusion
Hypertensive patient attrition rate at Mulago hospital is high, considerably below the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 80% retention target. This calls for innovative retention strategies, and targeted support for high-risk groups like the male patients and those distant from the health facility. Patient-centered approaches addressing structural and health system barriers are essential to improving retention in hypertension care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (SOMREC) of Makerere University, College of Health Sciences gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.