Human-supervised Agentic AI for Hypothesis Generation and Experimental Assistance in Drug Repurposing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,775 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Computational drug repurposing has largely been focused on rapid hypothesis generation, yet real-world applications span a far broader lifecycle, from drug candidate suggestion to designing experiments, analyzing assay data, and iteratively refining candidates. Here, we demonstrate that agentic AI can fulfill this entire scope. To this end, we developed RepurAgent, a hierarchical multi-agent AI system comprising a supervisor agent and a planning agent that coordinate four specialized sub-agents — research, prediction, data, and report — through a human-in-the-loop design, with episodic memory and retrieval-augmented generation. The system is grounded in data, tools, and standard operating procedures specific for drug repurposing, developed within the REMEDi4ALL consortium. We validated the agentic system across three scenarios spanning the various stages within the repurposing lifecycle: in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, RepurAgent recovered up to 97% of disease-relevant pathways identified by Google Co-Scientist, completing the workflow within 60 minutes; in a retrospective COVID-19 antiviral screen, RepurAgent acted as an adaptive experimental collaborator, prioritizing compounds with AUC-ROC up to 0.98 without predefined thresholds and flagging confounders missed in manual review; and for Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency, it prioritized 82 high-confidence candidates from 5000 compounds, which were further corroborated by domain experts. These results demonstrate that agentic AI can support across the full drug repurposing lifecycle, from hypothesis generation to experimental analysis. RepurAgent is open source and deployed at https://repuragent.serve.scilifelab.se/. Competing Interest Statement J.C.P. and O.S. declare ownership in Pixl Bio AB.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00