Management of chronic pelvic pain additional to tubal sterilization

Ellen Hiemstra, Philomeen Weijenborg, Frank Willem Jansen
In: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2008 · vol. 29(3) , pp. 155–158 · doi:10.1080/01674820801921218 · PMID:18608819 · W2014529962
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This case series explored the management of chronic pelvic pain in women who had undergone tubal sterilization with Filshie Clips, finding laparoscopic removal beneficial for four of five patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A case series is presented to illustrate the dilemma in management of women with Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) additional to a tubal sterilization. METHODS: Between January 1999 and June 2007, five women consulted the Department of Gynecology for CPP additional to tubal sterilization with Filshie Clips (FCs). A biopsychosocial approach of the complaint was offered and laparoscopic removal of the clips was performed in all cases. The effectiveness of this management was assessed by a personal interview and a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Two of the five patients refused an exploration of psychosocial factors possibly contributing to or maintaining the pain. During laparoscopic removal of the Filshie Clips no additional pathology was noted. At follow-up four women declared to have benefited from the removal procedure. CONCLUSION: If women present with CPP additional to sterilization with FCs in the absence of obvious pathology, gynecologists have to pay attention to the possibility of underlying psychosocial factors to this complaint. However, this attention can be in conflict with the woman's conviction that only removal of the clips will alleviate her pain. In that case, laparoscopic removal might be a component of the management.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:07:10.637958+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK