Revisiting the Twin Deficit Hypothesis in South Asia: Investigating the Role of the Crowding-Out Effect and Capital Flow Dynamics

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Despite extensive research on the Twin Deficit Hypothesis (TDH), its relevance to South Asia remains underexplored. This study examines the fiscal-external balance nexus in eight South Asian economies from 1990–2024, with particular attention to the moderating roles of capital flows and global crises. It addresses two key questions: how remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI) shape the transmission of fiscal deficits to current account balances, and whether crises intensify this linkage. Three hypotheses are tested: (H₁) fiscal deficits worsen current accounts, (H₂) remittances provide stronger mitigation than FDI, and (H₃) debt-vulnerable economies face amplified effects during crises, especially post-2008. Using panel ARDL and Driscoll-Kraay estimators, the results reveal three main insights. First, remittances consistently stabilize current accounts, with a 1% of GDP increase improving balances by 0.25–1.31 percentage points, regardless of fiscal stance. Second, fiscal deficits significantly worsen external balances only under crisis conditions, with COVID-19 amplifying the fiscal effect by 37%, indicating a nonlinear, crisis-contingent TDH. Third, while FDI inflows initially strain current accounts through import-intensive investments, this effect neutralizes over time. These findings challenge Ricardian equivalence in South Asia and highlight the importance of strengthening remittance channels, screening FDI for export linkages, and adopting crisis-responsive fiscal frameworks.
Full text 11,073 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Revisiting the Twin Deficit Hypothesis in South Asia: Investigating the Role of the Crowding-Out Effect and Capital Flow Dynamics | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Short Report Revisiting the Twin Deficit Hypothesis in South Asia: Investigating the Role of the Crowding-Out Effect and Capital Flow Dynamics Md. Rony Masud, Mafiz Rahman This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Despite extensive research on the Twin Deficit Hypothesis (TDH), its relevance to South Asia remains underexplored. This study examines the fiscal-external balance nexus in eight South Asian economies from 1990–2024, with particular attention to the moderating roles of capital flows and global crises. It addresses two key questions: how remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI) shape the transmission of fiscal deficits to current account balances, and whether crises intensify this linkage. Three hypotheses are tested: (H₁) fiscal deficits worsen current accounts, (H₂) remittances provide stronger mitigation than FDI, and (H₃) debt-vulnerable economies face amplified effects during crises, especially post-2008. Using panel ARDL and Driscoll-Kraay estimators, the results reveal three main insights. First, remittances consistently stabilize current accounts, with a 1% of GDP increase improving balances by 0.25–1.31 percentage points, regardless of fiscal stance. Second, fiscal deficits significantly worsen external balances only under crisis conditions, with COVID-19 amplifying the fiscal effect by 37%, indicating a nonlinear, crisis-contingent TDH. Third, while FDI inflows initially strain current accounts through import-intensive investments, this effect neutralizes over time. These findings challenge Ricardian equivalence in South Asia and highlight the importance of strengthening remittance channels, screening FDI for export linkages, and adopting crisis-responsive fiscal frameworks. Twin deficit hypothesis South Asia Panel ARDL remittance and FDI Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Tables are available in the Supplementary Files section. Supplementary Files 5.Table.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7488478","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Short Report","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":511787294,"identity":"6acdf1f9-2c9f-405b-9d0d-844ee2646586","order_by":0,"name":"Md. Rony Masud","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangladesh Bank","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Md.","middleName":"Rony","lastName":"Masud","suffix":""},{"id":511787295,"identity":"888839db-a748-4fc8-850a-b069a16c7b59","order_by":1,"name":"Mafiz Rahman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Southern Queensland","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mafiz","middleName":"","lastName":"Rahman","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-29 12:08:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106006984,"identity":"e8706f59-684c-4656-97f0-a9ac2d26b87c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-02 10:57:48","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":578984,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"1.ManuscriptTDHF.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7488478/v1_covered_ae82d0ca-c38d-4426-83ba-24ef315f7f46.pdf"},{"id":91081757,"identity":"f53e20b6-02c9-4387-8bcc-12629f1a2aec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-11 11:45:54","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":70819,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"5.Table.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7488478/v1/6a68c52c3320fa561fa8f295.docx"}],"financialInterests":"\u003cp\u003eNo competing interests reported.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTables are available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e","formattedTitle":"Revisiting the Twin Deficit Hypothesis in South Asia: Investigating the Role of the Crowding-Out Effect and Capital Flow Dynamics","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Twin deficit hypothesis, South Asia, Panel ARDL remittance and FDI","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDespite extensive research on the Twin Deficit Hypothesis (TDH), its relevance to South Asia remains underexplored. This study examines the fiscal-external balance nexus in eight South Asian economies from 1990\u0026ndash;2024, with particular attention to the moderating roles of capital flows and global crises. It addresses two key questions: how remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI) shape the transmission of fiscal deficits to current account balances, and whether crises intensify this linkage. Three hypotheses are tested: (H₁) fiscal deficits worsen current accounts, (H₂) remittances provide stronger mitigation than FDI, and (H₃) debt-vulnerable economies face amplified effects during crises, especially post-2008. Using panel ARDL and Driscoll-Kraay estimators, the results reveal three main insights. First, remittances consistently stabilize current accounts, with a 1% of GDP increase improving balances by 0.25\u0026ndash;1.31 percentage points, regardless of fiscal stance. Second, fiscal deficits significantly worsen external balances only under crisis conditions, with COVID-19 amplifying the fiscal effect by 37%, indicating a nonlinear, crisis-contingent TDH. Third, while FDI inflows initially strain current accounts through import-intensive investments, this effect neutralizes over time. These findings challenge Ricardian equivalence in South Asia and highlight the importance of strengthening remittance channels, screening FDI for export linkages, and adopting crisis-responsive fiscal frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Revisiting the Twin Deficit Hypothesis in South Asia: Investigating the Role of the Crowding-Out Effect and Capital Flow Dynamics","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-11 11:45:50","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7488478/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"88384199-8c78-4379-935d-95ae6c20f356","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-02T10:57:16+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-11 11:45:50","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7488478","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7488478","identity":"rs-7488478","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00