Trapped in the web: network architectures spread coevolution and shape adaptation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Adaptation is critical for biodiversity to persist under global change. Within ecological communities, species often face trade-offs between adapting to shifting abiotic conditions and navigating the complex selective pressures imposed by interaction networks. We hypothesize that network architectures characterized by high interaction diversity and overlap constrain coevolutionary dynamics, with asymmetric outcomes for exploiters and victims. Specifically, we predict that exploiters, subject to spread and conflicting selection imposed by their victims, will evolve more slowly and show reduced capacity to track victims’ evolutionary responses, with these constraints strongest for generalist exploiters. In contrast, victims will show more variable dynamics depending on the coherence of selection (i.e., whether pressures from different exploiters push the victim’s trait in the same vs. different directions). To test this, we simulated trait evolution in coevolving communities of exploiters and victims across 91 empirical networks, and in artificial networks designed to isolate specific structural effects. Our results show that higher connectance, species richness, nestedness, and centrality homogenize biotic effects and increase fluctuations in trait matching, ultimately weakening coevolutionary coupling. Under these conditions, exploiters face conflicting selection that slows evolution, whereas victims either benefit from aligned selection that accelerates evolution or are constrained by multiple pressures. Together, our findings suggest that network architecture plays a fundamental role in shaping coevolution and adaptation, and raises broader questions about its influence on eco-evolutionary processes in more complex and environmentally variable systems.
Full text 1,871 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Adaptation is critical for biodiversity to persist under global change. Within ecological communities, species often face trade-offs between adapting to shifting abiotic conditions and navigating the complex selective pressures imposed by interaction networks. We hypothesize that network architectures characterized by high interaction diversity and overlap constrain coevolutionary dynamics, with asymmetric outcomes for exploiters and victims. Specifically, we predict that exploiters, subject to spread and conflicting selection imposed by their victims, will evolve more slowly and show reduced capacity to track victims’ evolutionary responses, with these constraints strongest for generalist exploiters. In contrast, victims will show more variable dynamics depending on the coherence of selection (i.e., whether pressures from different exploiters push the victim’s trait in the same vs. different directions). To test this, we simulated trait evolution in coevolving communities of exploiters and victims across 91 empirical networks, and in artificial networks designed to isolate specific structural effects. Our results show that higher connectance, species richness, nestedness, and centrality homogenize biotic effects and increase fluctuations in trait matching, ultimately weakening coevolutionary coupling. Under these conditions, exploiters face conflicting selection that slows evolution, whereas victims either benefit from aligned selection that accelerates evolution or are constrained by multiple pressures. Together, our findings suggest that network architecture plays a fundamental role in shaping coevolution and adaptation, and raises broader questions about its influence on eco-evolutionary processes in more complex and environmentally variable systems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00