[Pathological obstruction of the first portion of the tubal isthmus. An analysis of 50 microsurgical operations (author's transl)]

other public-domain-us
View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

This study analyzed 50 microsurgical operations for tubal isthmus obstruction, finding 61% patency and 16% pregnancy, with isthmo-uterine anastomosis yielding better results than isthmo-interstitial anastomosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The authors report a series of 50 cases of proximal tubal microsurgery with an interval of 11.8 months for isthmo-uterine anastomosis and 15 months for isthmo-interstitial anastomosis. The overall results are: 61 per cent of complete patency and 16 per cent of intra-uterine pregnancy. The technique of isthmo-uterine anastomosis after wide excision of the fibrous portion seems to be preferable since it gives an 81 per cent result of satisfactory patency as compared with 20 per cent when the anastomosis is between the isthmus and the interstitial portion of the tube. The fact that endometriosis was present in 34 out of 48 cases, which is a very high proportion, and the short follow-up, may explain the relatively poor results.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Fallopian Tube Diseases Microsurgery Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Pregnancy

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:10.897782+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine