FDG-PET/CT as a molecular biomarker in ovarian cancer.

OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-07

This review outlines the advantages and limitations of FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing and managing ovarian malignancies, noting its utility in staging and disease recurrence detection.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In the clinical setting the vast majority of positron emission tomography (PET) procedures use the glucose analogue F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to visualize the increased glucose consumption of malignant lesions. Co-registered PET/CT has improved the diagnostic accuracy compared to either imaging procedure alone, particularly in ovarian cancer. FDG-PET/CT demonstrates primary malignant ovarian tumors; however, it is often unable to accurately differentiate between benign and malignant pelvic masses and to visualize borderline ovarian tumors. FDG-PET/CT has a suggested role for staging, by improving treatment planning in individual cases, but it is particularly helpful in the setting of disease recurrence when CA125 tumor marker levels are rising and conventional imaging (CT or MR) is inconclusive or negative. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the value of FDG-PET-CT in diagnosis and management of patients with ovarian malignancies, outlining its advantages and limitations.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:27:14.670421+00:00