Outcomes of Charcot Arthropathy Limb Salvage with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cage and Dynamic Hindfoot Fusion Nail Combination Fixation

Outcomes of Charcot Arthropathy Limb Salvage with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cage and Dynamic Hindfoot Fusion Nail Combination Fixation | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Outcomes of Charcot Arthropathy Limb Salvage with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cage and Dynamic Hindfoot Fusion Nail Combination Fixation Michael Kim, Tara Mann, Cambre Kelly, Ryan Palmer, Bijan Abar, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background The challenge of surgical treatment of hindfoot collapse can be exacerbated by host conditions that may limit healing potential and increase the risk of infection. Many patients with neuropathy, Charcot joint, or end-stage arthritis that undergo tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with bulk allograft progress to nonunion and often require amputation. 3D-printed titanium implants provide benefits that may improve outcomes of limb salvage within this population, but long-term outcomes of these implants have not yet been reported, given their relatively recent development. This study reports mid-term outcomes of patients with Charcot arthropathy or end-stage arthritis who received 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail combination fixation for limb salvage. Methods This study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a combination of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail by a single surgeon at a single institution. The primary outcome was to establish the safety of the 3D-printed cage in a medically complicated population. Medical records were reviewed for adverse events, including subsequent surgical intervention and implant survivorship. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed cage, as evaluated by patient-reported pre- and post-operative 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, ambulation status, and satisfaction. Deformity correction was evaluated by radiograph. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a Kaplan-Meier curve of all-cause reoperation was produced. Results This study evaluated 13 cases with at least one year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 3.72 years (range 2.67–4.60 years). As of the most recent follow-up, 11 of 13 cages remain implanted, with two cages having been explanted in the setting of amputations indicated by conditions unrelated to the cage itself. Patients reported a mean pre-operative NRS pain of 6.6 ± 2.9 points. At the last follow-up, mean NRS pain was 2.0 ± 1.7 points. Pre-operatively, six of 13 patients reported the ability to ambulate independently without an assistive device. Post-operatively, 11 of 13 patients were able to ambulate independently. Conclusion This study reports mid-term outcomes of TTC arthrodesis with a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail in patients with Charcot arthropathy or non-traumatic arthritis. The results demonstrate no implant-related complications and promising outcomes in terms of fusion, deformity correction, and patient satisfaction, which are especially remarkable in the setting of Charcot arthropathy. While this data is promising as a technique for limb salvage in this patient population, further experimental studies are required to demonstrate superiority. Level of Evidence : Level IV Orthopedic Surgery Charcot arthropathy limb salvage custom implant patient-specific 3D-printed cage dynamic hindfoot fusion Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 INTRODUCTION Charcot arthropathy results from a progressive systemic disease that causes poor micro-circulation and neuropathy. These host conditions complicate the surgical management of Charcot arthropathy as poor circulation and neuropathy limit healing and bone growth potential and increase the risk of infection. 1 , 2 As a result, surgery to address hindfoot collapse in the setting of Charcot arthropathy, most commonly tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with bulk femoral head allograft, has demonstrated limited success. 3 Many patients fail to achieve TTC fusion, necessitating further surgery, which may include prolonged external fixation requiring multiple surgeries or, ultimately, amputation. 4 A study of 23 patients who underwent TTC fusion with bulk femoral head allograft reported a fusion rate of 63%. 3 A separate study of the same procedure in 32 patients reported an overall fusion rate of 50% and 0% fusion among the subgroup of nine patients with diabetes. 5 Even in cases where fusion is achieved, graft collapse may contribute to a loss of deformity correction. 5 , 6 Early studies have shown that 3D-printed titanium implants offer benefits that may promote fusion in the setting of challenging systemic disease. 7 A non-biologic implant is beneficial as it obviates the risk of donor site morbidity, graft collapse, and immune response. There is also evidence to suggest a decreased risk of infection. 7 , 8 3D-printed titanium implants are typically designed with a porous structure that also enables packing with biologic agents (i.e., auto or allograft) that promote osseointegration and are designed to accommodate other implants such as intramedullary nails providing fixation. 9 , 10 3D-printed titanium implants may also be produced with patient-specific dimensions, which can improve fit, simplify surgical technique, and reduce operative time. 10 These implants may also provide durable, large deformity correction in a single-stage procedure. Single-stage surgery is desirable due to the avoidance of risks inherent to multiple surgeries, such as increased risk of infection or anesthesia-related complications, and due to faster rehabilitation and return to work, which may reduce financial strain and improve quality of life. While there have been increasing reports of 3D-printed implants for orthopaedic indications, the use of these implants in the setting of systemic disease and for the treatment of particularly challenging conditions such as Charcot arthropathy is understudied. Given the inadequacy of current treatment options for these patients, it is critical to continue the development of new technologies that may provide superior and sustainable outcomes. This study aimed to report the mid-term safety and efficacy outcomes of consecutive patients who received a 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail combination fixation for limb salvage in the setting of Charcot arthropathy. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a combination of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail by a single surgeon was performed. Additional inclusion criteria were a minimum of one-year follow-up and a minimum age of 18 years at the time of surgery. There were no exclusion criteria. This study was conducted at a single academic center and received an exemption from the IRB. Cages were provided under the FDA 520(b) Custom Device Exemption by a single manufacturer, restor3d (Durham, NC). Beyond patient-specific dimensions and anatomic profile, cage design was consistent across cases consisting of titanium 3D-printed in a triply periodic minimal surface structure with a central canal to accommodate an intramedullary nail. A characteristic example is pictured in Fig. 1 . The primary outcome was to establish the safety of the 3D-printed cage. Medical records were reviewed for adverse events including subsequent surgical intervention, and implant survivorship. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed cage. Pain was measured with the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Patients also reported pre- and post-operative ambulation status and satisfaction. Radiographs were reviewed to assess post-operative deformity correction and the maintenance of correction at last follow-up. Demographic data were also collected, including age, smoking status, work status, and medical history. RESULTS Thirteen sequential surgical cases were identified, and all met the inclusion criteria. Surgeries occurred between October 2018 and October 2020. Patients had a mean age of 63 years (range 39–80 years). All were non-smokers at the time of surgery. The most common relevant medical condition and indication was Charcot arthropathy, which was present in 10 of 13 patients. Seven of 13 patients were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Other common indications included arthritis (6 of 13 cases) and failed prior surgery (4 of 13 cases). Demographics and indications are summarized in Table 1 . Mean follow-up was 3.72 years (range 2.67–4.60 years). Table 1 : Demographics and Indications for Surgery Case (#) Age at Time of Surgery (Years) Comorbidities Neuropathy/Charcot Arthropathy (Yes/No) History of Prior Surgery (Yes/No) End-Stage Arthritis (Yes/No) Instability (Yes/No) Cyst Formation (Yes/No) Avascular Necrosis (Yes) Subchondral Collapse (Yes/No) Pre-operative Ambulation Status Post-operative Ambulation Status 1 80 A-fib, CHF, Gout, HLD, Hx of DVT, Lymphoma Yes Yes No Yes No No No Assistive Device Assistive Device 2 68 RA Yes Yes No No No No No Independent Independent 3 73 CAD, DM, HLD, HTN, Lupus, Sjogren Yes No Yes No Yes No No Assistive Device Independent 4 47 DM, HLD, HTN, Obesity Yes No Yes No No No No Assistive Device Independent 5 64 A-Fib, DM, Hx of PE, Hx of PJI, Fibromyalgia, RA Yes No No No No No No Assistive Device Assistive Device 6 70 Gout, HTN, OSA No No Yes No No Yes Yes Assistive Device Independent 7 48 DM, HTN, Obesity Yes No No No No No No Assistive Device Independent 8 60 Hypothyroidism No No Yes No No No No Assistive Device Independent 9 67 DM, HLD, HTN Yes No No No No No No Independent Independent 10 39 CMT, HLD, HTN Yes Yes No Yes No No No Independent Independent 11 67 DM, ESRD, HTN Yes Yes No No No No No Independent Independent 12 63 A-fib, DM, HLD, HTN Yes No Yes No No No No Independent Independent 13 71 ESRD, FVL, HTN, Hx of TIA, Liver cysts, Lung nodules, Prostate cancer No No Yes No No No No Independent Independent Abbreviations: A-fib, atrial fibrillation; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; CMT, Charcot-Marie-Tooth; DM, diabetes mellitus; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; FVL, Factor V Leiden; HLD, hyperlipidemia; HTN, hypertension; Hx, history; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PE, pulmonary embolism; PJI, periprosthetic joint infection; RA, rheumatoid arthritis, TIA, transient ischemic attack Regarding the primary outcome, four patients experienced an adverse event, all requiring a subsequent surgical intervention. The average time to subsequent surgical intervention was 1.95 years after the index procedure. In two cases, the dynamic intramedullary nail was removed due to loosening or interlock screw failure, but the cage remained intact and implanted. In the other two cases, the patients healed their surgical wound from the index procedure but went on to develop an unrelated infection that ultimately indicated below-knee amputation (BKA). None (0 of 4 events) of the adverse events were related to the 3D-printed cage. As of the most recent follow-up, 11 of 13 cages remain implanted, with two cages having been explanted in the setting of the aforementioned BKAs. Adverse events are summarized in Table 2 . Implant survivorship is presented in Fig. 2 . Table 2 Summary of Safety Events Case (#) Days to Reoperation Description Outcome Device Related? (Yes/No) 2 1347 Patient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequently developing a superficial wound infection in an unrelated traumatic injury. The patient underwent wound debridement during which a distal interlock screw was found to have failed allowing distal migration of the intramedullary nail. The original nail was removed and replaced with a static nail. The 3D-printed cage remained implanted. Revision to static intramedullary nail No 4 582 Patient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation with sepsis due to an unrelated infection, which progressed to and redness, warmth, and swelling of the lower extremity that had undergone the index procedure. Patient ultimately underwent below-knee amputation. Amputation No 5 680 Patient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation with pain on ambulation and was found to have loosening of the intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail was removed. The ankle cage was found to be intact and to have successfully fused and therefore remained implanted. Removal of hardware (intramedullary nail) No 9 231 Patient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation status post a ground-level fall and traumatic laceration of the ankle, which had become infected. Patient underwent below-knee amputation. Amputation No Regarding the secondary outcome, survey data were collected from all patients. Patients reported a mean pre-operative pain score of 6.6 ± 2.9 points. At the last follow-up, the mean pain score was 2.0 ± 1.7 points. Pain scores are summarized in Table 3 . Six of 13 patients reported the ability to ambulate independently without an assistive device pre-operatively. Post-operatively, 11 of 13 patients were able to ambulate independently. At the last follow-up, patients were also queried for willingness to undergo the same treatment after experiencing the procedure and recovery. Patients who required subsequent surgical intervention were queried regarding preference after the subsequent intervention. All patients responded they would pursue the same treatment and would not have preferred BKA as the index procedure. Table 3 Pain Scores Case (#) Pre-Operative Pain (11-points NRS) Post-Operative Pain (11-point NRS) 1 8 3 2 9 2 3 9 1 4 6 3 5 3 1 6 5 2 7 9 6 8 7 2 9 9 4 10 5 2 11 0 0 12 6 0 13 10 0 Mean 6.6 2.0 Regarding deformity correction, mean initial coronal correction was 25 degrees, and the mean initial sagittal correction was 6 degrees. At last follow-up, the mean loss of coronal correction was 0.5 degrees, and the mean loss of sagittal correction was 2 degrees. All patients demonstrated adequate fusion. Correction is tabulated by patient in Table 4 . Table 4 Initial Deformity Correction and Correction Maintenance Case Initial Correction (degrees) Maintenance (loss of degrees) AP Lateral AP Lateral 1 22 13 1 1 2 25 10 0 6 3 6 3 1 1 4 18 12 N/A N/A 5 25 8 0 5 6 13 0 2 0 7 57 7 0 5 8 12 5 1 1 9 29 5 N/A N/A 10 19 7 0 0 11 38 2 0 2 12 47 9 1 3 13 15 0 0 1 Mean 25.1 6.2 0.5 2.3 DISCUSSION This case series reports mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a patient-specific, 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail as a limb-sparing surgery. A majority of patients in this study had a history of diabetes complicated by neuropathy and Charcot arthropathy (10 of 13 patients). The other primary indication was severe arthritis (3 of 13 patients). Overall, pre-operatively, patients in this study suffered foot and ankle degeneration, resulting in high pain scores, compromised ability to ambulate independently, and comorbidities suggestive of poor wound healing potential and higher risk for infection. Recent studies have reported promising outcomes from the use of 3D-printed cages in ankle fusion. Though previously reported populations are small, potential benefits include fusion rates ranging from 75–93%, correction within a single surgery, reduced infection rates ranging from 0–15%, and deformity correction that is durable through mid-term follow-up, all of which contribute to improved functional outcomes. 7 , 11 – 14 The results of this study were also promising with 13 patients achieving fusion and 11 of 13 patients benefiting from successful limb salvage. There were also substantial improvements in pain scores and ambulatory status and high patient satisfaction. Reported outcomes of TTC fusion typically range from 86–100%. 5,15 However, fusion rates drop precipitously in the setting of Charcot arthropathy, non-traumatic osteoarthritis, or large bone defects with reported fusion rates commonly under 60% and infection rates commonly over 30%. 5,15,16 Bulk femoral allograft is often used to augment TTC fusion in the setting of critical-sized defects but also suffers from low fusion rates, increased risk of infection, and graft collapse that compromises the correction. 11 , 17 In a systematic review of 175 cases of TTC arthrodesis with structural allograft in a general population, Cifaldi et al. reported a union rate of 67% and a complication rate of 27%, of which the most common were infection, allograft fracture or failure, stress fracture, and painful hardware. 17 This study reports a similar complication rate (4 of 13 patients). However, no complications were directly associated with the 3D-printed titanium cage and all patients demonstrated good surgical wound healing and fusion following the index procedure. Additionally, in regard to the two cases of infection that indicated re-operation for BKA, the infections were attributed to trauma that occurred after complete healing of the surgical site and are not related to the study device or procedure. Overall, achieving union in 13 of 13 patients and limb salvage for 11 of 13 patients is remarkable in this population and is within the 71–93% limb salvage rate reported by studies of TTC arthrodesis with structural allograft in a healthier general population. 5 , 17 This study demonstrates the benefits of a non-biologic, 3D-printed implant and underscores the challenges of treating a medically complex, neuropathic population prone to trauma and infection. This promising safety profile, with only two of 13 3D-printed cages being explanted in the setting of BKA, corroborates previous reports of 3D-printed foot and ankle cages such as those by Abar et al. and Steele et al. 7 , 11 Besides the utility of 3D-printed cages in limb salvage, the 3D-printed cages used in this study as provided a powerful means of durable deformity correction, though future studies are necessary to assess this effect in particular. Finally, patients were also highly satisfied with this procedure, benefiting from substantial reductions in pain and improved ability to ambulate independently. This satisfaction is further supported by the fact that all patients, including the two patients who progressed to BKA, stated they would attempt the procedure again. This study is limited due to its design, lack of comparison group, and small sample size. Due to the small number of patients reviewed, only descriptive statistics were calculated. This in combination with the lack of a comparison group prevents the determination of causal relationships. CONCLUSION This study reports mid-term outcomes of TTC arthrodesis with a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail for limb salvage in patients with Charcot arthropathy or non-traumatic arthritis. The results demonstrate no implant-related complications and promising outcomes in terms of patient reported pain, postoperative ambulation, radiographic fusion, deformity correction, and patient satisfaction. The data build on previous reports of good safety and efficacy of 3D-printed cages in ankle fusion and similarly demonstrate good safety and efficacy in a more challenging patient population where delayed healing and higher infection rates often result in limb loss. While these data are promising, further studies are required to demonstrate long-term outcomes. References Hofbauer LC, Busse B, Eastell R et al (2022) Bone fragility in diabetes: novel concepts and clinical implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Mar 10(3):207–220. 10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00347-8 Jeffcoate WJ, Game F, Cavanagh PR (2005) The role of proinflammatory cytokines in the cause of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (acute Charcot foot) in diabetes. Lancet Dec 10 366(9502):2058–2061. 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67029-8 Rogero R, Tsai J, Fuchs D, Shakked R, Raikin SM (2020) Midterm Results of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes After Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft. Foot Ankle Spec Aug 13(4):315–323. 10.1177/1938640019863260 DeVries JG, Berlet GC, Hyer CF (2013) Predictive risk assessment for major amputation after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int Jun 34(6):846–850. 10.1177/1071100712472488 Jeng CL, Campbell JT, Tang EY, Cerrato RA, Myerson MS (2013) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft for salvage of large defects in the ankle. Foot Ankle Int Sep 34(9):1256–1266. 10.1177/1071100713488765 Bussewitz B, DeVries JG, Dujela M, McAlister JE, Hyer CF, Berlet GC (2014) Retrograde Intramedullary Nail With Femoral Head Allograft for Large Deficit Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2014/07/01(7):706–711. 10.1177/1071100714531231 Abar B, Kwon N, Allen NB et al (2022) Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle. Foot Ankle Int Jun 43(6):750–761. 10.1177/10711007221077113 Kowalski C, Stauch C, Callahan R et al (2020) Prognostic risk factors for complications associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a nail. Foot Ankle Surg Aug 26(6):708–711. 10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.015 Kelly CN, Miller AT, Hollister SJ, Guldberg RE, Gall K (2018) Design and Structure-Function Characterization of 3D Printed Synthetic Porous Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater Apr 7(7):e1701095. 10.1002/adhm.201701095 Kelly CN, Lin AS, Leguineche KE et al (2021) Functional repair of critically sized femoral defects treated with bioinspired titanium gyroid-sheet scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Apr 116:104380. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104380 Steele JR, Kadakia RJ, Cunningham DJ, Dekker TJ, Kildow BJ, Adams SB (2020) Comparison of 3D Printed Spherical Implants versus Femoral Head Allografts for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg Nov-Dec 59(6):1167–1170. 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.015 Dekker TJ, Steele JR, Federer AE, Hamid KS, Adams SB (2018) Jr. Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Complex Foot and Ankle Limb Salvage, Deformity Correction, and Arthrodesis Procedures. Foot Ankle Int Aug 39(8):916–921. 10.1177/1071100718770133 Bejarano-Pineda L, Sharma A, Adams SB, Parekh SG (2021) Three-Dimensional Printed Cage in Patients With Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: Early Outcomes. Foot Ankle Spec Oct 14(5):401–409. 10.1177/1938640020920947 Raikin SM, Moncman TG, Raikin J (2022) Improved Pain and Function After TTC Fusion With a Custom Cage. Foot Ankle Int Nov 43(11):1410–1418. 10.1177/10711007221115182 Ford SE, Kwon JY, Ellington JK (2019) Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing a Titanium Intramedullary Nail With an Internal Pseudoelastic Nitinol Compression Element: A Retrospective Case Series of 33 Patients. J Foot Ankle Surg Mar 58(2):266–272. 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.046 Pitts C, Alexander B, Washington J et al (2020) Factors affecting the outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. Bone Joint J Mar 102–b(3):345–351. 10.1302/0301-620x.102b3.Bjj-2019-1325.R1 Cifaldi A, Thompson M, Abicht B (2022) Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg Jul-Aug 61(4):900–906. 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.003 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4096092","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":279358068,"identity":"c32a76b0-6b4e-49c9-9fc9-62396e4e92de","order_by":0,"name":"Michael Kim","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-5851","institution":"Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michael","middleName":"","lastName":"Kim","suffix":""},{"id":279358069,"identity":"58070c9b-f60d-438a-848e-77deda6bb637","order_by":1,"name":"Tara Mann","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"restor3d","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tara","middleName":"","lastName":"Mann","suffix":""},{"id":279358070,"identity":"3d0622a3-4c7a-45da-b413-4695cd6238e9","order_by":2,"name":"Cambre Kelly","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"restor3d","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cambre","middleName":"","lastName":"Kelly","suffix":""},{"id":279358072,"identity":"13eead43-ded8-4b6b-bf84-3393f10a9dbf","order_by":3,"name":"Ryan Palmer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ryan","middleName":"","lastName":"Palmer","suffix":""},{"id":279358074,"identity":"1f792ed2-958f-475c-8aaa-fbeb3d44701f","order_by":4,"name":"Bijan Abar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Duke School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bijan","middleName":"","lastName":"Abar","suffix":""},{"id":279358077,"identity":"845c9aea-9383-4151-ad69-5af43ad49b3d","order_by":5,"name":"Hui Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Aurora Health Care","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hui","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":279358079,"identity":"d390f208-da04-41e5-be0f-47f0910d031c","order_by":6,"name":"Gerard Cush","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"SUN Orthopaedics of Evangelical","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gerard","middleName":"","lastName":"Cush","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-13 22:44:19","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":true,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":52782624,"identity":"c6df715d-cbc9-4743-80a8-de52dd344fa1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-15 17:36:43","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":513987,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCharacteristic Implant Construct\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharacteristic examples of a 3D-printed implant (A, B) and post-operative radiograph (C).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4096092/v1/e4853828476c6220d9836dc7.png"},{"id":52782625,"identity":"fd85d530-8e03-436c-a64d-e4d125fccac8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-15 17:36:43","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":148577,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eKaplan-Meier Curve for All-Cause Reoperation\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4096092/v1/fd1fc5fdae932a11186cd07e.jpeg"},{"id":52782968,"identity":"a19ead76-3d6e-4bfa-8d1b-a20b3b3af95e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-15 17:44:43","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":998916,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4096092/v1/55c19423-e213-4b7f-adf4-f0634b5ebf19.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eOutcomes of Charcot Arthropathy Limb Salvage with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cage and Dynamic Hindfoot Fusion Nail Combination Fixation\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eCharcot arthropathy results from a progressive systemic disease that causes poor micro-circulation and neuropathy. These host conditions complicate the surgical management of Charcot arthropathy as poor circulation and neuropathy limit healing and bone growth potential and increase the risk of infection.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e As a result, surgery to address hindfoot collapse in the setting of Charcot arthropathy, most commonly tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with bulk femoral head allograft, has demonstrated limited success.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Many patients fail to achieve TTC fusion, necessitating further surgery, which may include prolonged external fixation requiring multiple surgeries or, ultimately, amputation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A study of 23 patients who underwent TTC fusion with bulk femoral head allograft reported a fusion rate of 63%.\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e A separate study of the same procedure in 32 patients reported an overall fusion rate of 50% and 0% fusion among the subgroup of nine patients with diabetes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Even in cases where fusion is achieved, graft collapse may contribute to a loss of deformity correction.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEarly studies have shown that 3D-printed titanium implants offer benefits that may promote fusion in the setting of challenging systemic disease.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A non-biologic implant is beneficial as it obviates the risk of donor site morbidity, graft collapse, and immune response. There is also evidence to suggest a decreased risk of infection.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e 3D-printed titanium implants are typically designed with a porous structure that also enables packing with biologic agents (i.e., auto or allograft) that promote osseointegration and are designed to accommodate other implants such as intramedullary nails providing fixation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e 3D-printed titanium implants may also be produced with patient-specific dimensions, which can improve fit, simplify surgical technique, and reduce operative time.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e These implants may also provide durable, large deformity correction in a single-stage procedure. Single-stage surgery is desirable due to the avoidance of risks inherent to multiple surgeries, such as increased risk of infection or anesthesia-related complications, and due to faster rehabilitation and return to work, which may reduce financial strain and improve quality of life.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile there have been increasing reports of 3D-printed implants for orthopaedic indications, the use of these implants in the setting of systemic disease and for the treatment of particularly challenging conditions such as Charcot arthropathy is understudied. Given the inadequacy of current treatment options for these patients, it is critical to continue the development of new technologies that may provide superior and sustainable outcomes. This study aimed to report the mid-term safety and efficacy outcomes of consecutive patients who received a 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail combination fixation for limb salvage in the setting of Charcot arthropathy.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"METHODS","content":"\u003cp\u003eA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a combination of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail by a single surgeon was performed. Additional inclusion criteria were a minimum of one-year follow-up and a minimum age of 18 years at the time of surgery. There were no exclusion criteria. This study was conducted at a single academic center and received an exemption from the IRB. Cages were provided under the FDA 520(b) Custom Device Exemption by a single manufacturer, restor3d (Durham, NC). Beyond patient-specific dimensions and anatomic profile, cage design was consistent across cases consisting of titanium 3D-printed in a triply periodic minimal surface structure with a central canal to accommodate an intramedullary nail. A characteristic example is pictured in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe primary outcome was to establish the safety of the 3D-printed cage. Medical records were reviewed for adverse events including subsequent surgical intervention, and implant survivorship. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed cage. Pain was measured with the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Patients also reported pre- and post-operative ambulation status and satisfaction. Radiographs were reviewed to assess post-operative deformity correction and the maintenance of correction at last follow-up. Demographic data were also collected, including age, smoking status, work status, and medical history.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cp\u003eThirteen sequential surgical cases were identified, and all met the inclusion criteria. Surgeries occurred between October 2018 and October 2020. Patients had a mean age of 63 years (range 39\u0026ndash;80 years). All were non-smokers at the time of surgery. The most common relevant medical condition and indication was Charcot arthropathy, which was present in 10 of 13 patients. Seven of 13 patients were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Other common indications included arthritis (6 of 13 cases) and failed prior surgery (4 of 13 cases). Demographics and indications are summarized in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. Mean follow-up was 3.72 years (range 2.67\u0026ndash;4.60 years).\u003c/p\u003e \n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1\u003c/strong\u003e: Demographics and Indications for Surgery\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCase (#)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge at Time of Surgery (Years)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eComorbidities\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNeuropathy/Charcot Arthropathy (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHistory of Prior Surgery (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnd-Stage Arthritis (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInstability (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCyst Formation (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAvascular Necrosis (Yes)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSubchondral Collapse (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePre-operative Ambulation Status\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePost-operative Ambulation Status\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA-fib, CHF, Gout, HLD, Hx of DVT, Lymphoma\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCAD, DM, HLD, HTN, Lupus, Sjogren\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDM, HLD, HTN, Obesity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA-Fib, DM, Hx of PE, Hx of PJI, Fibromyalgia, RA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGout, HTN, OSA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDM, HTN, Obesity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHypothyroidism\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAssistive Device\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDM, HLD, HTN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCMT, HLD, HTN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDM, ESRD, HTN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA-fib, DM, HLD, HTN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9542143600416235%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.411030176899064%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.192507804370447%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eESRD, FVL, HTN, Hx of TIA, Liver cysts, Lung nodules, Prostate cancer\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.342351716961499%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.012486992715921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.451612903225806%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.555671175858481%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.075962539021853%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.636836628511967%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.053069719042664%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.261186264308012%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbbreviations: A-fib, atrial fibrillation; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; CMT, Charcot-Marie-Tooth; DM, diabetes mellitus; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; FVL, Factor V Leiden; HLD, hyperlipidemia; HTN, hypertension; Hx, history; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PE, pulmonary embolism; PJI, periprosthetic joint infection; RA, rheumatoid arthritis, TIA, transient ischemic attack\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRegarding the primary outcome, four patients experienced an adverse event, all requiring a subsequent surgical intervention. The average time to subsequent surgical intervention was 1.95 years after the index procedure. In two cases, the dynamic intramedullary nail was removed due to loosening or interlock screw failure, but the cage remained intact and implanted. In the other two cases, the patients healed their surgical wound from the index procedure but went on to develop an unrelated infection that ultimately indicated below-knee amputation (BKA). None (0 of 4 events) of the adverse events were related to the 3D-printed cage. As of the most recent follow-up, 11 of 13 cages remain implanted, with two cages having been explanted in the setting of the aforementioned BKAs. Adverse events are summarized in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. Implant survivorship is presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSummary of Safety Events\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase (#)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDays to Reoperation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOutcome\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDevice Related? (Yes/No)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1347\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequently developing a superficial wound infection in an unrelated traumatic injury. The patient underwent wound debridement during which a distal interlock screw was found to have failed allowing distal migration of the intramedullary nail. The original nail was removed and replaced with a static nail. The 3D-printed cage remained implanted.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRevision to static intramedullary nail\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e582\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation with sepsis due to an unrelated infection, which progressed to and redness, warmth, and swelling of the lower extremity that had undergone the index procedure. Patient ultimately underwent below-knee amputation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmputation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e680\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation with pain on ambulation and was found to have loosening of the intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail was removed. The ankle cage was found to be intact and to have successfully fused and therefore remained implanted.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemoval of hardware (intramedullary nail)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e231\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatient demonstrated good interval healing of the surgical wound before subsequent presentation status post a ground-level fall and traumatic laceration of the ankle, which had become infected. Patient underwent below-knee amputation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmputation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding the secondary outcome, survey data were collected from all patients. Patients reported a mean pre-operative pain score of 6.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.9 points. At the last follow-up, the mean pain score was 2.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.7 points. Pain scores are summarized in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. Six of 13 patients reported the ability to ambulate independently without an assistive device pre-operatively. Post-operatively, 11 of 13 patients were able to ambulate independently. At the last follow-up, patients were also queried for willingness to undergo the same treatment after experiencing the procedure and recovery. Patients who required subsequent surgical intervention were queried regarding preference after the subsequent intervention. All patients responded they would pursue the same treatment and would not have preferred BKA as the index procedure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePain Scores\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase (#)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-Operative Pain (11-points NRS)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost-Operative Pain (11-point NRS)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding deformity correction, mean initial coronal correction was 25 degrees, and the mean initial sagittal correction was 6 degrees. At last follow-up, the mean loss of coronal correction was 0.5 degrees, and the mean loss of sagittal correction was 2 degrees. All patients demonstrated adequate fusion. Correction is tabulated by patient in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial Deformity Correction and Correction Maintenance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial Correction\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(degrees)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaintenance\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(loss of degrees)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLateral\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLateral\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e57\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e47\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis case series reports mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a patient-specific, 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail as a limb-sparing surgery. A majority of patients in this study had a history of diabetes complicated by neuropathy and Charcot arthropathy (10 of 13 patients). The other primary indication was severe arthritis (3 of 13 patients). Overall, pre-operatively, patients in this study suffered foot and ankle degeneration, resulting in high pain scores, compromised ability to ambulate independently, and comorbidities suggestive of poor wound healing potential and higher risk for infection. Recent studies have reported promising outcomes from the use of 3D-printed cages in ankle fusion. Though previously reported populations are small, potential benefits include fusion rates ranging from 75\u0026ndash;93%, correction within a single surgery, reduced infection rates ranging from 0\u0026ndash;15%, and deformity correction that is durable through mid-term follow-up, all of which contribute to improved functional outcomes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR12 CR13\" citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The results of this study were also promising with 13 patients achieving fusion and 11 of 13 patients benefiting from successful limb salvage. There were also substantial improvements in pain scores and ambulatory status and high patient satisfaction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReported outcomes of TTC fusion typically range from 86\u0026ndash;100%.\u003csup\u003e5,15\u003c/sup\u003e However, fusion rates drop precipitously in the setting of Charcot arthropathy, non-traumatic osteoarthritis, or large bone defects with reported fusion rates commonly under 60% and infection rates commonly over 30%.\u003csup\u003e5,15,16\u003c/sup\u003e Bulk femoral allograft is often used to augment TTC fusion in the setting of critical-sized defects but also suffers from low fusion rates, increased risk of infection, and graft collapse that compromises the correction.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In a systematic review of 175 cases of TTC arthrodesis with structural allograft in a general population, Cifaldi et al. reported a union rate of 67% and a complication rate of 27%, of which the most common were infection, allograft fracture or failure, stress fracture, and painful hardware.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This study reports a similar complication rate (4 of 13 patients). However, no complications were directly associated with the 3D-printed titanium cage and all patients demonstrated good surgical wound healing and fusion following the index procedure. Additionally, in regard to the two cases of infection that indicated re-operation for BKA, the infections were attributed to trauma that occurred after complete healing of the surgical site and are not related to the study device or procedure. Overall, achieving union in 13 of 13 patients and limb salvage for 11 of 13 patients is remarkable in this population and is within the 71\u0026ndash;93% limb salvage rate reported by studies of TTC arthrodesis with structural allograft in a healthier general population.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study demonstrates the benefits of a non-biologic, 3D-printed implant and underscores the challenges of treating a medically complex, neuropathic population prone to trauma and infection. This promising safety profile, with only two of 13 3D-printed cages being explanted in the setting of BKA, corroborates previous reports of 3D-printed foot and ankle cages such as those by Abar et al. and Steele et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Besides the utility of 3D-printed cages in limb salvage, the 3D-printed cages used in this study as provided a powerful means of durable deformity correction, though future studies are necessary to assess this effect in particular. Finally, patients were also highly satisfied with this procedure, benefiting from substantial reductions in pain and improved ability to ambulate independently. This satisfaction is further supported by the fact that all patients, including the two patients who progressed to BKA, stated they would attempt the procedure again.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study is limited due to its design, lack of comparison group, and small sample size. Due to the small number of patients reviewed, only descriptive statistics were calculated. This in combination with the lack of a comparison group prevents the determination of causal relationships.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study reports mid-term outcomes of TTC arthrodesis with a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail for limb salvage in patients with Charcot arthropathy or non-traumatic arthritis. The results demonstrate no implant-related complications and promising outcomes in terms of patient reported pain, postoperative ambulation, radiographic fusion, deformity correction, and patient satisfaction. The data build on previous reports of good safety and efficacy of 3D-printed cages in ankle fusion and similarly demonstrate good safety and efficacy in a more challenging patient population where delayed healing and higher infection rates often result in limb loss. While these data are promising, further studies are required to demonstrate long-term outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHofbauer LC, Busse B, Eastell R et al (2022) Bone fragility in diabetes: novel concepts and clinical implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Mar 10(3):207\u0026ndash;220. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00347-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00347-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJeffcoate WJ, Game F, Cavanagh PR (2005) The role of proinflammatory cytokines in the cause of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (acute Charcot foot) in diabetes. Lancet Dec 10 366(9502):2058\u0026ndash;2061. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67029-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67029-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRogero R, Tsai J, Fuchs D, Shakked R, Raikin SM (2020) Midterm Results of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes After Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft. Foot Ankle Spec Aug 13(4):315\u0026ndash;323. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1938640019863260\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1938640019863260\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeVries JG, Berlet GC, Hyer CF (2013) Predictive risk assessment for major amputation after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int Jun 34(6):846\u0026ndash;850. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1071100712472488\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1071100712472488\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJeng CL, Campbell JT, Tang EY, Cerrato RA, Myerson MS (2013) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft for salvage of large defects in the ankle. Foot Ankle Int Sep 34(9):1256\u0026ndash;1266. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1071100713488765\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1071100713488765\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBussewitz B, DeVries JG, Dujela M, McAlister JE, Hyer CF, Berlet GC (2014) Retrograde Intramedullary Nail With Femoral Head Allograft for Large Deficit Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2014/07/01(7):706\u0026ndash;711. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1071100714531231\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1071100714531231\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbar B, Kwon N, Allen NB et al (2022) Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle. Foot Ankle Int Jun 43(6):750\u0026ndash;761. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/10711007221077113\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/10711007221077113\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKowalski C, Stauch C, Callahan R et al (2020) Prognostic risk factors for complications associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a nail. Foot Ankle Surg Aug 26(6):708\u0026ndash;711. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.015\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.015\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKelly CN, Miller AT, Hollister SJ, Guldberg RE, Gall K (2018) Design and Structure-Function Characterization of 3D Printed Synthetic Porous Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater Apr 7(7):e1701095. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/adhm.201701095\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/adhm.201701095\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKelly CN, Lin AS, Leguineche KE et al (2021) Functional repair of critically sized femoral defects treated with bioinspired titanium gyroid-sheet scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Apr 116:104380. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104380\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104380\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSteele JR, Kadakia RJ, Cunningham DJ, Dekker TJ, Kildow BJ, Adams SB (2020) Comparison of 3D Printed Spherical Implants versus Femoral Head Allografts for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg Nov-Dec 59(6):1167\u0026ndash;1170. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.015\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.015\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDekker TJ, Steele JR, Federer AE, Hamid KS, Adams SB (2018) Jr. Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Complex Foot and Ankle Limb Salvage, Deformity Correction, and Arthrodesis Procedures. Foot Ankle Int Aug 39(8):916\u0026ndash;921. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1071100718770133\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1071100718770133\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBejarano-Pineda L, Sharma A, Adams SB, Parekh SG (2021) Three-Dimensional Printed Cage in Patients With Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: Early Outcomes. Foot Ankle Spec Oct 14(5):401\u0026ndash;409. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1938640020920947\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1938640020920947\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRaikin SM, Moncman TG, Raikin J (2022) Improved Pain and Function After TTC Fusion With a Custom Cage. Foot Ankle Int Nov 43(11):1410\u0026ndash;1418. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/10711007221115182\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/10711007221115182\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFord SE, Kwon JY, Ellington JK (2019) Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing a Titanium Intramedullary Nail With an Internal Pseudoelastic Nitinol Compression Element: A Retrospective Case Series of 33 Patients. J Foot Ankle Surg Mar 58(2):266\u0026ndash;272. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.046\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.046\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePitts C, Alexander B, Washington J et al (2020) Factors affecting the outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. Bone Joint J Mar 102\u0026ndash;b(3):345\u0026ndash;351. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1302/0301-620x.102b3.Bjj-2019-1325.R1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1302/0301-620x.102b3.Bjj-2019-1325.R1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCifaldi A, Thompson M, Abicht B (2022) Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg Jul-Aug 61(4):900\u0026ndash;906. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Geisinger Medical Center","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Charcot arthropathy, limb salvage, custom implant, patient-specific, 3D-printed, cage, dynamic, hindfoot fusion","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe challenge of surgical treatment of hindfoot collapse can be exacerbated by host conditions that may limit healing potential and increase the risk of infection. Many patients with neuropathy, Charcot joint, or end-stage arthritis that undergo tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with bulk allograft progress to nonunion and often require amputation. 3D-printed titanium implants provide benefits that may improve outcomes of limb salvage within this population, but long-term outcomes of these implants have not yet been reported, given their relatively recent development. This study reports mid-term outcomes of patients with Charcot arthropathy or end-stage arthritis who received 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail combination fixation for limb salvage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent hindfoot arthrodesis with a combination of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic hindfoot fusion nail by a single surgeon at a single institution. The primary outcome was to establish the safety of the 3D-printed cage in a medically complicated population. Medical records were reviewed for adverse events, including subsequent surgical intervention and implant survivorship. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed cage, as evaluated by patient-reported pre- and post-operative 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, ambulation status, and satisfaction. Deformity correction was evaluated by radiograph. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a Kaplan-Meier curve of all-cause reoperation was produced.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study evaluated 13 cases with at least one year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 3.72 years (range 2.67–4.60 years). As of the most recent follow-up, 11 of 13 cages remain implanted, with two cages having been explanted in the setting of amputations indicated by conditions unrelated to the cage itself. Patients reported a mean pre-operative NRS pain of 6.6 ± 2.9 points. At the last follow-up, mean NRS pain was 2.0 ± 1.7 points. Pre-operatively, six of 13 patients reported the ability to ambulate independently without an assistive device. Post-operatively, 11 of 13 patients were able to ambulate independently.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study reports mid-term outcomes of TTC arthrodesis with a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage and dynamic intramedullary nail in patients with Charcot arthropathy or non-traumatic arthritis. The results demonstrate no implant-related complications and promising outcomes in terms of fusion, deformity correction, and patient satisfaction, which are especially remarkable in the setting of Charcot arthropathy. While this data is promising as a technique for limb salvage in this patient population, further experimental studies are required to demonstrate superiority.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLevel of Evidence\u003c/strong\u003e: Level IV\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Outcomes of Charcot Arthropathy Limb Salvage with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cage and Dynamic Hindfoot Fusion Nail Combination Fixation","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-15 17:36:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4096092/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a417d886-a4cc-413c-9ed2-2502cae7da25","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 15th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":29475316,"name":"Orthopedic Surgery"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-03-15T17:36:38+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-15 17:36:38","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4096092","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4096092","identity":"rs-4096092","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}