Comprehensive Management of Endometriosis: Implementation from Research to Clinical Practice

Appendiceal endometriosis (AE) represents a clinically significant yet frequently overlooked manifestation of endometriosis that may contribute to persistent symptoms and suboptimal treatment outcomes. Multiple comprehensive reviews demonstrate that appendiceal involvement occurs in a notable percentage of women with endometriosis and can present with distinctive symptom patterns. Despite this growing body of evidence, routine appendiceal evaluation during surgical exploration for endometriosis remains inconsistently implemented across surgical practices. The failure to identify and treat AE may result in continued symptomatology despite otherwise successful endometriosis surgery, potentially necessitating additional interventions and compromising patient quality of life.

Endometriosis, Appendicitis, Appendiceal endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Primary dysmenorrhea, Implementation, Chronic pelvic pain Levine EM, Fernandez CM, Tam T. Comprehensive Management of Endometriosis: Implementation from Research to Clinical Practice. Arch Obstet Gynecol. 2025;6(2):82–84. Arch Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Volume 6, Issue 2 83 surgery may reduce the need for subsequent interventions and improve overall patient satisfaction by providing better symptom relief [9]. Review of Current Data Regarding Endometriosis and the Appendix An investigation involving the sonographic identification of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) also identified cases of AE. In this study, gynecologic physicians collaborated to verify the presence of DIE through sonographic, surgical, and histological assessments [10]. AE was coincidentally identified in five of the seven cases (71%) in which appendectomy was performed (total of 5% of the 100 cases of DIE examined), with endometriotic implants affecting the appendix in five cases, though ultrasound did not detect AE in any of those cases preoperatively. Histologic evidence of endometriosis depends on finding at least two of the three associated elements (i.e. endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin deposits) [11]. In each AE case from this series, all three elements were present but none of the operative reports indicated any specific signs of appendicitis. Multiple studies across diverse patient populations have documented significant rates of AE. Ross and colleagues examined 609 women with CPP who underwent appendectomy and found histopathologic evidence of AE in 14.9% of cases [4]. Similarly, Nikou et al. studied 135 patients with clinically diagnosed endometriosis who had concurrent appendectomy, revealing AE in 25% of cases despite the absence of consistent preoperative indicators [5]. Guo et al. reported that among 108 patients with Stage IV endometriosis, 35.8% of those who had an appendectomy had evidence of AE [6]. Centini et al. found a lower prevalence of 2.8% among 486 patients undergoing surgery for presumptive endometriosis [7]. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that AE occurs in 2.8% to 35.8% of cases, with prevalence rates varying according to patient selection criteria and disease severity. Additionally, Schrempf et al. evaluated 2,484 patients admitted for acute appendicitis without known endometriosis history and identified histologic evidence of AE in 0.7% of cases, suggesting that AE may occur even in the absence of recognized pelvic endometriosis [12]. This finding is supported by multiple case reports demonstrating that AE can present with acute symptomatology that closely mimics classic appendicitis, potentially leading to misdiagnosis [13– 15]. Importantly, Ross and colleagues emphasized that the detection rate of AE is significantly influenced by the rigor and methodology of histopathologic examination, suggesting that AE may be underdiagnosed when standard pathologic protocols are employed [16]. A comprehensive review and analysis of AE was provided by Mabrouk et al. [17] and by Allahqoli et al. [18], further highlighting the clinical relevance of AE. Surgical intervention for endometriosis occurs either for diagnostic confirmation when the diagnosis is uncertain or medical therapy has failed, or for definitive treatment of established disease. In diagnostic cases, histologic sampling of suspicious implants or deep infiltrating endometriosis is required, while therapeutic cases necessitate complete removal of all endometriotic tissue. Current evidence strongly supports concurrent appendectomy in both scenarios, as AE frequently lacks visual manifestations and can only be confirmed histologically. Multiple studies demonstrate that prophylactic appendectomy adds minimal morbidity during endometriosis surgery [5,6,18], with several authors advocating for this approach in all cases of suspected or confirmed endometriosis [7,15,16]. Endometriosis significantly impacts patients through dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility, yet diagnosis is frequently delayed by 5–12 years, contributing to patient dissatisfaction and physician mistrust [19–23]. Misdiagnosis or under-recognition of endometriosis’ various manifestations, including peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating disease, prolongs patient suffering and delays appropriate treatment. Comprehensive interdisciplinary management is essential [24] and should include recognition of frequently overlooked AE. Clinical Implications of Collected Data Recognizing and diagnosing AE is essential for ensuring that patients receive appropriate medical and/or surgical treatment to effectively alleviate associated symptoms. Criticism of the less-than-ideal transferring of research findings toward standard clinical practice has been previously offered, and the slowness of adoption of this comprehensive management of endometriosis may be a modern example of this failed implementation. A thorough analysis of other past scientific implementation problems was presented by Dr. Evans [25], which may be relevant to this clinical review. The delay in translating compelling scientific data into standard care protocols may perpetuate suboptimal treatment outcomes for patients with endometriosis. Conflicts of Interest The authors deny any conflicts of interest. Funding There was no funding for this investigation.

1. Olive DL, Schwartz LB. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 17;328(24):1759–69. 2. Practice bulletin no. 114: management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):223–36. Levine EM, Fernandez CM, Tam T. Comprehensive Management of Endometriosis: Implementation from Research to Clinical Practice. Arch Obstet Gynecol. 2025;6(2):82–84. Arch Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Volume 6, Issue 2 84 3. Chronic pelvic pain. Practice Bulletin, No. 218. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;135(3):e98-e109. 4. Ross WT, Chu A, Li L, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ, Deimling TA, et al. Appendectomy in the surgical management of women with endometriosis and pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;154(3):526–31. 5. Nikou AF, Tenzel NS, Hua P , Orbuch L, Orbuch IK. Appendectomy Should Be Performed During Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometriosis. JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1):e2020.00095. 6. Guo C, Chen MZ, Chiu T, Condous G, Barto W. The appendix in endometriosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;63(6):792–6. 7. Centini G, Ginetti A, Colombi I, Cannoni A, Giorgi M, Ferreira H, et al. Endometriosis of the appendix: prevalence, associated lesions, and proposal of pathogenetic hypotheses. A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1669–75. 8. Galaviz VD, Nguyen AD, Sticco PL, Downing KT. Appendectomy in endometriosis: an update on surgical indications and management of uncommon diseases. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug 1;35(4):377–82. 9. Tam T, Harkins G. Elective laparoscopic appendectomy in gynecologic surgery: When, why, and how. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 2013;25(3):42–9. 10. Fernandez CM, Levine EM, Shashoua A, Tam MT, Diaz L. The expanding role of sonography for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: Results of a large case series. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;166(1):326–32. 11. Camboni A, Marbaix E. Ectopic Endometrium: The Pathologist's Perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 11;22(20):10974. 12. Schrempf M, Kirmair MA, Mair A, Hoffmann M, Dannecker C, Anthuber M, et al. Incidence and clinical features of endometriosis in 2484 consecutive female patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected appendicitis-a retrospective analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 29;409(1):144. 13. Laskou S, Papavramidis TS, Cheva A, Michalopoulos N, Koulouris C, Kesisoglou I, et al. Acute appendicitis caused by endometriosis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011 Apr 11;5:144. 14. Al Oulaqi NS, Hefny AF, Joshi S, Salim K, Abu-Zidan FM. Endometriosis of the appendix. Afr Health Sci. 2008 Sep;8(3):196– 8. 15. St John BP , Snider AE, Kellermier H, Minhas S, Nottingham JM. Endometriosis of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis with unusual appearance. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;53:211–3. 16. Ross WT, Newell JM, Zaino R, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ, Benton AS. Appendiceal Endometriosis: Is Diagnosis Dependent on Pathology Evaluation? A Prospective Cohort Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1531–7. 17. Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Mastronardi M, Raimondo I, Del Forno S, Arena A, et al. Endometriosis of the Appendix: When to Predict and How to Manage-A Multivariate Analysis of 1935 Endometriosis Cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):100–6. 18. Allahqoli L, Mazidimoradi A, Momenimovahed Z, Günther V, Ackermann J, Salehiniya H, et al. Appendiceal Endometriosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 23;13(11):1827. 19. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):839–52. 20. Bontempo AC, Mikesell L. Patient perceptions of misdiagnosis of endometriosis: results from an online national survey. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 26;7(2):97–106. 21. Requadt E, Nahlik AJ, Jacobsen A, Ross WT. Patient experiences of endometriosis diagnosis: A mixed methods approach. BJOG. 2024 Jun;131(7):941–51. 22. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1244–56. 23. As-Sanie S, Mackenzie SC, Morrison L, Schrepf A, Zondervan KT, Horne AW, et al. Endometriosis: A Review. JAMA. 2025 Jul 1;334(1):64–78. 24. Carey ET, Wong JMK, Khan Z. Comprehensive Review of Endometriosis Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul 17;146(3):323–40. 25. Evans MI, Britt DW. Resistance to Change. Reprod Sci. 2023 Mar;30(3):835–53.