Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom

Exploring the relationship between... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709" }, "headline": "Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy,...", "datePublished": "2025-07-18T13:29:45", "dateModified": "2025-10-10T16:07:03", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Lu Zhang" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Rawin Vongurai" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background With the growing mismatch between traditional academic training and the demands of the modern workforce, student-centered education has emerged as a key reform in higher education. This study examines the relationships among student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms at Chinese application-oriented universities. Methods Data were collected from 524 undergraduate students via online questionnaires and analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results The results indicate that both student-content and student-student interactions significantly enhance learning achievement, with self-efficacy playing a critical mediating role. Higher levels of self-efficacy were also directly associated with improved academic achievement, underscoring its central importance in student success. Conclusions These findings highlight the value of fostering interactive learning environments and promoting the development of self-efficacy to improve educational outcomes. Educators are encouraged to implement instructional strategies that facilitate meaningful engagement, thereby supporting both the cognitive and motivational dimensions of learning. This study provides empirical evidence to inform the design of effective student-centered teaching practices in higher education. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2", "name": "Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student..." } } ] } Home Browse Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Zhang L and Vongurai R. Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] Lu Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6632-1215 1 , Rawin Vongurai https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-0882 2 Lu Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6632-1215 1 , Rawin Vongurai https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-0882 2 PUBLISHED 10 Oct 2025 Author details Author details 1 Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650000, China 2 Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University, Bangkok, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand Lu Zhang Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Rawin Vongurai Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background With the growing mismatch between traditional academic training and the demands of the modern workforce, student-centered education has emerged as a key reform in higher education. This study examines the relationships among student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms at Chinese application-oriented universities. Methods Data were collected from 524 undergraduate students via online questionnaires and analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results The results indicate that both student-content and student-student interactions significantly enhance learning achievement, with self-efficacy playing a critical mediating role. Higher levels of self-efficacy were also directly associated with improved academic achievement, underscoring its central importance in student success. Conclusions These findings highlight the value of fostering interactive learning environments and promoting the development of self-efficacy to improve educational outcomes. Educators are encouraged to implement instructional strategies that facilitate meaningful engagement, thereby supporting both the cognitive and motivational dimensions of learning. This study provides empirical evidence to inform the design of effective student-centered teaching practices in higher education. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Student-content Interaction, Student-student Interaction, Self-efficacy, Learning Achievement Corresponding Author(s) Lu Zhang ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Lu Zhang Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2025 Zhang L and Vongurai R. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Zhang L and Vongurai R. Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.2 ) First published: 18 Jul 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.1 ) Latest published: 10 Oct 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.2 ) Revised Amendments from Version 1 In the "Literature Review" section, expand the scope of the most recent related studies and explain the reasons why this research is conducted using the relevant variables. These changes include a new Figure. In the "Literature Review" section, expand the scope of the most recent related studies and explain the reasons why this research is conducted using the relevant variables. These changes include a new Figure. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Zhi Liu See the authors' detailed response to the review by Mireya Mallén-Berdejo READ REVIEWER RESPONSES 1. Introduction With the development of society, the traditional academic skills fostered by universities are no longer aligned with the demands of the modern world, as evidenced by the employment challenges encountered by Chinese university graduates and the growing societal demand for highly skilled individuals and college students ( Zhao et al., 2018 ). Simultaneously, higher education transitioned from a teacher-centered educational model to a student-centered approach. While the former emphasizes the delivery of content, the latter focuses on what students can learn and apply ( Manzoor et al., 2017 ). This shift has prompted educational reforms worldwide, and countries such as Finland, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain are increasingly embracing non-zoning, open, and flexible learning environments to foster student autonomy, self-regulated learning, collaboration, and digital literacy ( Hartikainen et al., 2021 ). Meanwhile, there is an increasing number of application-oriented universities in China that aim to update the instructional content, teaching methods, and learning strategies to comprehensively enhance the standard of teaching and nurture high-quality, application-oriented talents with strong competitiveness and social adaptability to embody the concept of application within the educational framework ( Zhao et al., 2018 ). According to Coates (2005) , students engaged in various activities may achieve high-quality learning. Good interactive relationships, such as group work or instructive feedback, are important for students’ engagement in learning success ( Martin & Bolliger, 2018 ) and high student-student interaction in courses revealed the most favorable perceptions of engagement and learning achievements ( Tsai et al., 2021 ). In addition, compared to students with higher self-efficacy, those with lower initial self-efficacy also had lower emotional engagement ( Martin & Rimm-Kaufman, 2015 ) and positive interactive teaching could promote learners’ self-efficacy ( Li & Yang, 2021 ). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived teaching quality are the key determinants of university students’ achievements ( Lai et al., 2021 ). Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationships among student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom within the Faculty of Education at five application-oriented universities in Southwest China, most of whom will become teachers in the future. By investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy in the connection between interactive teaching strategies and students’ learning achievements, this study will assist educational practitioners in designing effective teaching methods that meet the developmental needs of students and enhance their achievements. 2. Literature review and research framework 2.1 Literature review To survey the current research landscape, the author conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection in October 2025, using “interaction”, “self-efficacy”, and “learning achievement” as Topic terms. This study retrieved 465 articles and extracted five research topic and 80 items with a word frequency of over ten time (see Figure 1 ) after the keyword items visualization analysis in VOSviewer ( Van Eck & Waltman, 2010 ). The research topics included (1) Factors Influencing Student Engagement and Satisfaction in Online Learning within Higher Education, (2) The Impact Mechanism of Motivation and Self-Regulation on Learning Achievement, (3) Factors Affecting Learning Achievement in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments, (4) Psychological Drivers and Assessment Feedback Mechanisms in University Students’ Learning Achievement, (5) The Influence of Motivation and Social Support on Student Learning Engagement. Figure 1. The keyword items visualization analysis of studies on Interaction, Self-efficacy and Learning Achievement. Within the specific context of China’s application-oriented universities, which are actively promoting student-centered educational reform, this study specifically focuses on the relationships between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement, aiming to provide insights into the effectiveness of interactive learning environments in fostering students’ learning achievements. 2.1.1 Student-content interaction Tuovinen (2000) points out that student-content interaction means that students engage with instructional materials and planned activities. The materials include textbooks, PowerPoint presentations, web pages, discussion forums, case studies, reports, and videos so on ( Su et al., 2005 ). Without it, there could be no education, because it is crucial progress through which the student can understand the subject of the study, interact with the content, gain opinions, and integrate cognitive structures ( Kennedy, 2020 ). In addition, strengthening student-content interaction has a significant impact on students’ achievements ( Bernard et al., 2009 ) and student achievement can be improved by providing customized learning materials ( Ipinnaiye & Risquez, 2024 ). Students with varying levels of self-efficacy showed different learning achievements, and those with high self-efficacy were more autonomous and engaged significantly more with the content than those with low self-efficacy ( Tseng et al., 2023 ). 2.1.2 Student-student interaction According to Moore (1989) , student-student interaction means that one interacts with another student or group members through peer cooperation, discussion, and group presentation to finish the teaching task, through which they could enhance their self-management level and encourage the development of their expertise. Elizondo and Gallardo (2020) suggested that student-student interaction referred to group activities, and peer feedback improved by incorporating factors such as social involvement, level of expertise, anonymity, training, and scoring the feedback. In addition, student-student interaction can have a direct and positive impact on learning outcomes, which subsequently affects academic achievement ( Cardoso, et al., 2011 ) and student-student interaction is correlated with self-efficacy and achievement ( Miller, 2015 ). Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between student satisfaction and student-student interaction ( Ahoto et al., 2022 ). 2.1.3 Self-efficacy Self-efficacy is defined as a set of specific beliefs that influence a person’s ability to execute action plans in future situations, including efficacy and outcome expectations ( Bandura, 1977 ). According to Wang et al. (2022) , self-efficacy and academic emotions mediate the relationship between interaction (learner-content and learner-learner) and learning engagement. University students can enhance their self-efficacy in designing active learning environments, which may lead to higher expectations and improved academic performance ( Latorre-Cosculluela et al., 2022 ). Additionally, the combined influence of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning has a substantial impact on students’ academic achievement ( Rafiola et al., 2020 ). Active teaching and academic self-efficacy are positive predictors of course grades, and academic self-efficacy positively influences course persistence and boosts students’ expectations of success ( Andres, 2020 ). H1: Student- Content Interaction has a significant impact on Self-Efficacy. H2: Student-Student Interaction has a significant impact on Self-Efficacy. 2.1.4 Learning achievements Learning achievement refers to the skills and abilities acquired as a result of the learning process. They play a crucial role in education, particularly by providing teachers with insights into students’ progress in meeting learning objectives through their engagement in educational activities ( Liliana et al., 2020 ). Learning achievements encompass three key areas: skills and habits (psychomotor), knowledge and understanding (cognitive), and attitude (affective). Each of these can be addressed and developed based on the content provided in the school curriculum ( Rahayu et al., 2018 ). According to Agwu and Nmadu (2023) , interactive teaching methods enhance students’ academic achievement and self-concept more effectively than traditional methods, and learner-centered activity-based strategies foster cooperative and collaborative learning, which supports students’ academic achievement and self-confidence. In addition, there is a significant positive relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic achievement among Chinese college students ( Luo et al., 2023 ), and self-efficacy has a positive influence on students’ academic achievement in Egypt and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ( Rafiola et al., 2020 ). H3: Student-Content Interaction has a significant impact on Learning Achievement. H4: Student-Student Interaction has a significant impact on Learning Achievement. H5: Self-Efficacy has a significant impact on Learning Achievements. 2.2 Research framework The theoretical and conceptual frameworks outline the study’s direction, establish foundational theory, and define variables. The main objective was to enhance the relevance of the study’s findings, link them to theoretical constructs in research, and support generalization ( Adom et al., 2018 ). The conceptual framework shown in Figure 2 was developed by studying the theoretical framework of this research. It displays all causal relationships among variables, including student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement. Figure 2. Conceptual framework. 3. Methodology The researcher adapted a quantitative method to conduct this study. The questionnaire was distributed using WJX, an online questionnaire tool, to students from the Faculty of Education at five application-oriented universities in China. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants via an online form embedded on the first page of the questionnaire. The consent statement clearly explained the study’s objectives, voluntary participation, anonymity, data confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time. Only participants who provided consent were able to proceed with the questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part included screening questions to identify the respondents. The second part included demographic factors based on respondents’ gender, age, internship duration, ethnic group, and birth order. The third part consists of 5-point Likert scales to measure four different variables, ranging from extreme disagreement (1) to strong agreement (5) for the analysis of all hypotheses. In the pilot test, 30 questionnaires were distributed to assess their reliability. The researchers used Cronbach’s alpha to verify the reliability of the test. Hair et al. (2010) suggest that the alpha value should be 0.07 threshold. As a result, the questionnaire was considered reliable, as the alpha results were all above 0.07. After the reliability test, the questionnaire was distributed to 550 target respondents, and 524 responses were considered. The measurement models were designed to evaluate the validity of the variables and explore their relationships. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to assess the convergent validity within the measurement model. Finally, a Structural Equation Model (SEM) was employed to examine the overall model and analyze the effects of the variables. 3.1 Population and sample size The study population consisted of university students from the Faculty of Education at five application-oriented universities in China. Most of these students are future teachers; therefore, it is meaningful to examine the relationships among interactive teaching strategies, self-efficacy, and learning achievement. On one hand, the findings can provide valuable suggestions for university instructors; on the other hand, the students themselves can apply interactive teaching strategies in their future classrooms. These students had been studying theoretical knowledge and practical curricula for at least two semesters and had already completed internships. The researcher used the a priori sample size calculator for Structural Equation Model (SEM) from Danielsoper’s website to refer to the recommended minimum sample size ( Soper, n.d. ). There were 4 latent variables and 21 observed variables, with a probability level of 0.05. The minimum recommended sample size was 342 respondents. In this study, the questionnaire was distributed among students from three different categories at five universities, with respondents evenly allocated across each category. A total of 550 participants were randomly selected, of which 524 were ultimately considered. 3.2 Sampling technique In this study, the questionnaire was distributed using two methods: stratified random sampling, a probability method, and purposive sampling, a non-probability method. First, students in the Faculty of Education at five application-oriented universities fall into three categories: those from junior college (a three-year program), those who have upgraded from junior college to undergraduates (a 3+2-year program), and undergraduates (a four-year program). To select samples that allowed for the representation of the population, a proportional stratified sampling technique was applied to calculate the number of targeted respondents in each group (as shown in Table 1 ). This technique enables the representation of the sample for a group with a vast population ( Singh and Mangat, 1996 ). Purposive sampling was employed to select the respondents based on the proportionate representation of each group. The questionnaire was distributed online and included screening questions to ensure that respondents were from the Faculty of Education, had studied theoretical and practical courses for at least two semesters, and had already completed internships. Table 1. Research population and sample size. The students in the faculty of education The target students Research sample size Junior college students (a three-year program) 2407 183 Students upgraded from junior college to undergraduates (a 3+2-year program) 2083 158 Undergraduates (a four-year program) 2743 209 Total 7233 550 4. Results and discussion 4.1 Demographic factors As shown in Table 2 , the sample consisted of 524 valid respondents, with the data presented in terms of frequency and percentage, as detailed below: Table 2. Demographic profile. Demographic factors (N=524) Frequency Percent Gender Male 211 40.27% Female 313 59.73% Age 18-19 10 1.91% 19-20 134 25.57% 20-21 301 57.44% 21-22 71 13.55% Above 22 8 1.53% Internship Duration Less than 1 month 61 11.64% 2 months 33 6.30% 3 months 309 58.97% More than 4 months 121 23.09% Ethnic group Han 336 64.12% Minority Groups 188 35.88% Birth order 1 263 50.19% 2 159 30.34% 3 53 10.11% 4 49 9.35% Others 0 0.00% According to Table 2 , in terms of gender distribution, the majority of participants were female, comprising 59.73%, while males accounted for 40.27%. Most participants fell within the 19-21 age range, with 25.57% aged 19-20 and 57.44% aged 20-21. Smaller proportions were observed for those aged 18-19 (1.91%), 21-22 (13.55%), and above 22 (1.53%). Regarding the internship duration, the majority had completed a 3-month internship, representing 58.97% of the sample. This was followed by 23.09% who had internships lasting more than 4 months, 11.64% with internships of less than 1 month, and 6.30% with 2-month internships. The sample’s ethnic composition was primarily Han, making up 64.12%, while minority groups constituted 35.88%. In terms of birth order, participants were most commonly first-born, accounting for 50.19%, followed by second-born at 30.34%, third-born at 10.11%, and fourth-born at 9.35%. 4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), a statistical method used to validate data consistent with the conceptual models employed in this study, was initially employed to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measurement model ( Jöreskog, 1969 ), using factor loading, Composite Reliability (CR), and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) as the determining criteria. The guidelines suggested by Hair et al. (2006) were used to determine the significance of each item’s factor loading and acceptable thresholds for evaluating goodness of fit. The factor loadings exceeded 0.50, with p-values less than 0.05. Additionally, in accordance with Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) recommendations, the CR surpasses the 0.7 threshold, and the AVE exceeds the 0.5 benchmark, as shown in Table 3 . Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis result, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE). Variables Source of questionnaire (Measurement Indicator) No. of item Cronbach’s Alpha Factors loading CR AVE Student-Content Interaction (SCI) Abou-Khalil et al. (2021) 4 0.863 0.734-0.823 0.863 0.612 Student-Student Interaction (SSI) Abou-Khalil et al. (2021) 6 0.858 0.666-0.751 0.861 0.508 Self-Efficacy (SE) Xiang (2020) 5 0.932 0.801-0.890 0.934 0.739 Learning Achievement (LA) Xiang (2020) 6 0.938 0.753-0.882 0.939 0.719 The square root of the average variance extracted in Table 4 shows that all the correlation values exceed the corresponding correlations for each variable. Additionally, GFI, AGFI, CFI, NFI, and RMSEA were employed as indicators of good model fit in the CFA testing. Convergent and discriminant validity are confirmed, as the values reported in Table 5 surpass the acceptable thresholds. Consequently, this study’s convergent and discriminant validity was established. Furthermore, these measurement results provide evidence of discriminant validity and support the validity of subsequent structural model estimation. Table 4. Discriminant validity. Factor correlations Variables SCI SSI SE LA SCI 0.782 SSI 0.652 0.713 SE 0.529 0.523 0.859 LA 0.592 0.578 0.750 0.848 Table 5. Goodness of fit. Index Acceptable values Values CMIN/DF 0.90 ( Hooper et al., 2008 ) 0.914 NFI ≥ 0.90 ( Arbuckle, 1995 ) 0.958 CFI ≥ 0.90 ( Hair et al., 2006 ) 0.976 TLI ≥ 0.90 ( Hair et al., 2006 ) 0.969 RMSEA < 0.05 ( Browne & Cudeck, 1993 ) 0.049 RMR < 0.05 ( Hair et al., 2006 ) 0.027 4.3 Structural Equation Model (SEM) Jöreskog and Sörbom (1993) described Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) as a method that employs parameters from both observed and latent variable analyses. The results for the overall model fit indices are presented in Table 5 . The model fit measurement should not exceed a chi-square/degrees-of-freedom (CMIN/DF) ratio of 3, and the GFI and CFI should be higher than 0.9, as recommended by Hair et al. (2006) . After running the SEMs and modifying the model using SPSS AMOS version 26, the goodness-of-fit indices were as follows: CMIN/DF = 2.270, GFI = 0.938, AGFI = 0.914, NFI = 0.958, CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.969, RMSEA = 0.049, and RMR = 0.027 ( Table 5 ). 4.4 Research hypothesis testing results The significance of each variable in the research model was evaluated based on the regression coefficients and R 2 variances. The results presented in Table 6 indicate that all hypotheses were confirmed, with significance at p = 0.05. Table 6. Hypotheses testing result of the structural model. Hypotheses Paths Standardized path coefficients (β) S.E. T-value Tests result H1 SE<---SCI 0.462 0.117 5.363 *** Supported H2 SE<---SSI 0.197 0.099 2.344 * Supported H3 LA<---SCI 0.139 0.056 2.183 * Supported H4 LA<---SSI 0.164 0.046 2.705 ** Supported H5 LA<---SE 0.647 0.032 12.935 *** Supported * =p-value<0.05. ** = p-value<0.01. *** = p-value<0.001. H1: Student–content interaction has a significant impact on self-efficacy (β=0.462, SE=0.117, p<0.001). This indicates that when students actively engage with learning materials, they develop stronger beliefs about their abilities, aligning with prior research by Bernard et al. (2009) and Tseng et al. (2023) . H2: Student–student interaction has a significant impact on self-efficacy (β=0.197, SE=0.099, p<0.05). This finding supports the theories of Miller (2015) and Ahoto et al. (2022) , who demonstrated that collaborative learning environments boost students’ confidence in their capabilities. H3: Student–content interaction has a significant impact on learning achievement (β=0.139, SE=0.056, p<0.05). Engaging with content-rich materials has facilitated improved academic performance, consistent with research by Ipinnaiye and Risquez (2024) . H4: Student–student interaction has a significant impact on learning achievement (β=0.164, SE=0.046, p<0.01). This supports the findings of Cardoso et al. (2011) , who highlight the critical role of peer collaboration in achieving academic success. H5: Self-efficacy has a significant impact on learning achievements (β=0.647, SE=0.032, p<0.001), affirming Bandura’s (1977) theoretical frameworks and Luo et al.’s (2023) empirical studies. Students with higher self-efficacy demonstrate greater motivation and academic success. 4.5 Direct, indirect and total effects of relationships The relationship structure among variables was analyzed using the AMOS software to assess direct, indirect, and total effects. A direct effect represents the link between the two variables, without any mediators involved in the model. An indirect effect includes at least one mediating variable that influences the relationship between two variables ( Raykov & Marcoulides, 2000 ). In this study, there were four variables: two independent variables, one mediator, and the dependent variable. The results of all relationships are as follows: As Table 7 shows, student-content interaction has a significant direct positive effect on self-efficacy (β=0.462), meaning that increased interaction with content positively influences students’ self-efficacy. Student-student interaction has a weaker direct effect on students’ self-efficacy (β=0.197), indicating that interaction with peers also positively affects self-efficacy, but to a lesser extent. The R 2 value of 0.396 for self-efficacy shows that 39.6% of its variance is explained by student-content and student-student interactions. Self-efficacy had a strong direct positive effect on learning achievement, indicating that higher self-efficacy significantly contributed to improved learning achievement. Table 7. Direct, indirect and total effects of relationships. Variables Self-Efficacy (SE) Learning Achievement (LA) Direct effect Indirect effect Total effect R 2 Direct effect Indirect effect Total effect R 2 Standardized path coefficients (β) Standardized path coefficients (β) Student- Content Interaction (SCI) 0.462 - 0.462 0.396 0.139 0.299 0.438 0.732 Student-Student Interaction (SSI) 0.197 - 0.197 0.164 0.127 0.292 Self-Efficacy (SE) - - - 0.647 - 0.647 In addition, student-content interaction affects learning achievement indirectly and is mediated by self-efficacy, with an indirect effect coefficient of 0.299 and a direct effect of 0.139, showing that student-content interaction impacts learning achievement through both direct and indirect paths. Student-student interaction also impacts learning achievement indirectly via self-efficacy, with an indirect effect of 0.127 and a direct effect of 0.164, indicating both direct and mediated influences on learning. The R 2 value of 0.732 for learning achievement means that 73.2% of its variance is explained by student-content interaction, student-student interaction, and self-efficacy. This suggests that self-efficacy has a significant mediation effect, and that these factors collectively have a substantial influence on learning achievement. 5. Conclusion, recommendation and limitation 5.1 Conclusion This study investigates the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom. Hypotheses were developed based on the conceptual framework to examine how these interactions influence students’ learning outcomes, with self-efficacy acting as a mediating factor. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to assess the validity and reliability of the research model, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the relationships among the variables. The findings of this study are summarized as follows. First, the student-content interaction had a significant direct impact on self-efficacy (β=0.462, p<0.001) and learning achievement (β=0.139, p<0.05). This indicates that when students actively engage with learning materials, they develop stronger beliefs about their abilities, which in turn enhances their academic performance. These findings align with prior research by Bernard et al. (2009) and Tseng et al. (2023) , which emphasize the importance of meaningful content engagement in fostering academic success. Second, student-student interaction also significantly influenced self-efficacy (β=0.197, p<0.05) and learning achievement (β=0.164, p<0.01). Collaborative learning environments such as group projects and peer discussions boost students’ confidence in their capabilities and contribute to improved academic outcomes. This supports Miller’s (2015) and Ahoto et al.’s (2022) theories, which highlight the critical role of peer collaboration in achieving academic success. Third, self-efficacy emerged as a crucial mediator between interactive teaching strategies and learning achievement with a strong direct effect on learning outcomes (β=0.647, p<0.001). Students possessing stronger self-efficacy exhibited increased motivation and superior academic performance, supporting Bandura’s (1977) theoretical models and the empirical findings of Luo et al. (2023) . The total effects analysis showed that self-efficacy explained 73.2% of the variance in learning achievement, underscoring its significant mediating role. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the mechanisms through which interactive learning strategies can enhance academic achievement. By fostering self-efficacy and promoting active engagement, educators can create more effective and inclusive learning environments that cater to students’ diverse needs. To maximize these benefits, educators are encouraged to adopt strategies, such as collaborative projects, peer reviews, personalized learning materials, and technology-enhanced tools, to stimulate meaningful interactions ( Rajaram & Rajaram, 2021 ). Creating a supportive learning atmosphere in which students can share ideas, receive constructive feedback, and reflect on their learning processes further strengthens their self-efficacy and academic performance ( Affuso et al., 2023 ). Universities should also invest in professional development programs that equip educators with interactive teaching skills to ensure their effective implementation across diverse educational settings. The validated model, supported by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), provides a robust framework for designing educational interventions that promote academic success through interactive learning practices. 5.2 Recommendation First, educational institutions should implement interactive teaching strategies such as collaborative projects, problem-based learning, and peer-led discussions. These methods stimulate active participation and deeper cognitive engagement by encouraging students to share their knowledge, apply concepts, and engage in critical thinking. Research supports this approach, demonstrating that interactive learning materials significantly enhance learning achievements by fostering learner autonomy and engagement while balancing self-directed learning with structured guidance ( Tseng, Chen, & Lin, 2023 ). Professional development programs for educators should focus on equipping educators with the skills required to design and facilitate interactive learning experiences. Second, as self-efficacy significantly influences academic outcomes, educators should foster supportive environments that build students’ confidence in their abilities. This can be achieved through regular constructive feedback, personalized learning goals, and the recognition of student achievements ( Luo et al., 2023 ; Wang et al., 2022 ). Creating a classroom culture in which students feel valued and empowered can enhance both motivation and academic performance, as demonstrated by recent studies on the role of teacher support in fostering self-efficacy and academic success ( Wang et al., 2022) . Third, the use of digital tools, such as learning management systems, online forums, and virtual collaboration platforms, can enhance interactions between students and course content ( Almeida & Simoes, 2023 ; Khan & Ahmed, 2023 ). Universities should invest in modern educational technologies and provide training to both students and teachers. Incorporating multimedia content, gamification, and interactive simulations can further enrich the learning experience, as demonstrated by recent studies of the positive impact of these tools on student engagement and academic performance ( Khan & Ahmed, 2023 ). Finally, educational strategies should be tailored to fit learners’ cultural and contextual characteristics. Customized learning materials and culturally relevant teaching methods can help bridge cultural gaps and increase student engagement, as culturally responsive pedagogies (CRP) emphasize the importance of leveraging students’ diverse backgrounds to enhance learning outcomes ( Price et al., 2020 ). Conducting cross-cultural research and fostering international collaboration can further inform the development of context-sensitive educational practices, ensuring that teaching methods are both inclusive and globally informed. 5.3 Limitation and further study This study has certain limitations that should be explored in future research. First, the findings are based on a specific sample size and population, which limits the generalizability of the results to other educational contexts. Future research could incorporate larger and more diverse samples across different departments and cultural settings to enhance the applicability of these conclusions. Second, the study focused on a limited set of variables, including interactive learning strategies and self-efficacy, while excluding other potentially influential factors, such as motivation, emotional intelligence, and learning environment characteristics. Therefore, future research should examine these additional variables as potential moderators of interactive learning environments. Moreover, longitudinal studies can provide deeper insights into the long-term impact of interactive teaching strategies on academic success. Collaboration among researchers, educators, and policymakers can further support the development of evidence-based best practices in higher education. The statement of ethical approval and consent This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Working Group of the Academic and Research Department, Yunnan Technology and Business University, China on January 4, 2024 (Reference Number: 2023042). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants via an online form embedded on the first page of the questionnaire. The consent statement clearly explained the study’s objectives, voluntary participation, anonymity, data confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time. Only participants who provided consent were able to proceed with the questionnaire. Data availability statement The data supporting this study are openly available in Figshare at http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29319401 ( Zhang, L. & Vongurai, R., 2025 ). Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). References Abou-Khalil V, Helou S, Khalifé E, et al. : Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Educ. Sci. 2021; 11 (1): 24. Publisher Full Text Adom D, Hussein EK, Agyem JA: Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2018; 7 (1): 438–441. Affuso G, Zannone A, Esposito C, et al. : The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2023; 38 (1): 1–23. Publisher Full Text Agwu UD, Nmadu J: Students’ interactive engagement, academic achievement, and self-concept in chemistry: An evaluation of cooperative learning pedagogy. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2023; 24 (2): 688–705. Publisher Full Text Ahoto AT, Mbaye MB, Anyigbah E: The impacts of learner-instructor interaction, learner-learner, learner-content interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning on satisfaction of online education of African medical students. Open Access Library Journal. 2022; 09 (9): 1–24. Publisher Full Text Almeida F, Simoes J: The role of digital tools in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in higher education. Comput. Educ. 2023; 201 : 104812. Publisher Full Text Andres H: The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance. J. Int. Educ. Bus. 2020; 13 (2): 221–238. Publisher Full Text Arbuckle J: AMOS: Analysis of moment structures user’s guide. Small Waters; 1995. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977; 84 (2): 191–215. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Borokhovski E, et al. : A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev. Educ. Res. 2009; 79 (3): 1243–1289. Publisher Full Text Browne MW, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Sage; 1993; pp. 136–162. Cardoso AP, Ferreira M, Abrantes JL, et al. : Personal and pedagogical interaction factors as determinants of academic achievement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011; 29 : 1596–1605. Publisher Full Text Coates H: The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Qual. High. Educ. 2005; 11 (1): 25–36. Publisher Full Text Elizondo-Garcia J, Gallardo K: Peer feedback in learner-learner interaction practices: Mixed methods study on an xMOOC. Electron. J. e-Learn. 2020; 18 (2): 122–135. Publisher Full Text Fornell C, Larcker DF: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981; 18 (1): 39–50. Publisher Full Text Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. : Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed.Prentice-Hall; 2010. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, et al. : Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed.Pearson Education; 2006. Hartikainen J, Poikkeus AM, Haapala EA, et al. : Associations of classroom design and classroom-based physical activity with behavioral and emotional engagement among primary school students. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (14): 8116. Publisher Full Text Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M: Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods. 2008; 6 (1): 53–60. Ipinnaiye O, Risquez A: Exploring adaptive learning, learner-content interaction, and student performance in undergraduate economics classes. Comput. Educ. 2024; 215 : 105047. Publisher Full Text Jöreskog KG: A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1969; 34 : 183–202. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D: LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International; 1993. Kennedy G: What is student engagement in online learning and how do I know when it is there? Melbourne CSHE Discussion Papers. 2020; 1–6. Khan A, Ahmed S: The impact of gamification and virtual collaboration platforms on student motivation and academic performance. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2023; 26 (2): 112–125. Publisher Full Text Lai HM, Hsieh PJ, Uden L, et al. : A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Comput. Educ. 2021; 175 : 104318. Publisher Full Text Latorre-Cosculluela C, Suárez C, Quiroga S, et al. : Facilitating self-efficacy in university students: An interactive approach with flipped classroom. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2022; 41 (5): 1603–1617. Publisher Full Text Li L, Yang S: Exploring the influence of teacher-student interaction on university students’ self-efficacy in the flipped classroom. J. Educ. Learn. 2021; 10 (2): 84–90. Publisher Full Text Liliana RA, Raharjo W, Jauhari I, et al. : Effects of the online interactive learning media on student’s achievement and interest in physics. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 2020; 8 (3B): 59–68. Publisher Full Text Luo Q, Chen L, Yu D, et al. : The mediating role of learning engagement between self-efficacy and academic achievement among Chinese college students. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2023; 16 : 1533–1543. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Manzoor A, Aziz H, Jahanzaib M, et al. : Transformational model for engineering education from content-based to outcome-based education. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. and Life-Long Learning. 2017; 27 (4): 266–286. Publisher Full Text Martin DP, Rimm-Kaufman SE: Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? J. Sch. Psychol. 2015; 53 (5): 359–373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Martin F, Bolliger DU: Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning. 2018; 22 (1): 205–222. Publisher Full Text Miller G: Associations between learner interaction and achievement in an online course: A longitudinal study. NACTA J. 2015; 59 (3): 197–201. Moore MG: Editorial: Three types of interaction. Am. J. Dist. Educ. 1989; 3 (2): 1–7. Publisher Full Text Price D, Green D, Memon N, et al. : Richness of complexity within diversity: Educational engagement and achievement of diverse learners through culturally responsive pedagogies. Soc. Educ. 2020; 38 (1): 42–53. Publisher Full Text Rafiola RH, Setyosari P, Radjah CL, et al. : The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020; 15 (8): 71–82. Publisher Full Text Rahayu AB, Hadi S, Istyadji M, et al. : Development of guided inquiry-based learning devices to improve student learning outcomes in science materials in middle school. Eur. J. Alt. Educ. Stud. 2018. Rajaram K, Rajaram K: Learning interventions: Collaborative learning, critical thinking and assessing participation real-time. Evidence-based teaching for the 21st century classroom and beyond: Innovation-driven learning strategies. Springer; 2021; pp. 77–120. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA: A first course in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. Singh R, Mangat NS: Stratified sampling. Elements of survey sampling. Springer; 1996; pp. 102–144. Soper DS: A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Free Statistics Calculators.n.d. October 14, 2024. Reference Source Su B, Bonk CJ, Magjuka RJ, et al. : The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. J. Interact. Online Learn. 2005; 4 (1): 1–19. Tsai C-L, Ku H-Y, Campbell A: Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Educ. 2021; 42 (1): 106–125. Publisher Full Text Tseng Y-C, Chen M-RA, Lin Y-H: An investigation of the effects of EFL students’ self-efficacy in an asynchronous online course with interactive contents. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2023; 26 (4): 1–13. Publisher Full Text Tuovinen JE: Multimedia distance education interactions. Educ. Media Int. 2000; 37 (1): 16–24. Publisher Full Text Van Eck NJ, Waltman L: Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010; 84 : 523–538. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Wang Y, Cao Y, Gong S, et al. : Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2022; 94 : 102128. Publisher Full Text Xiang Q: The construction and empirical research of a student engagement model in a blended learning environment. [Master’s thesis, Yangtze University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (if applicable). 2020. Zhao X, Tan F, Liu L, et al. : How to cultivate application-oriented undergraduates – The growth path of an outstanding graduate on e-commerce major. Educ. Q. Rev. 2018; 1 (2): 153–167. Publisher Full Text Zhang L, Vongurai R: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom. [Data set]. Figshare. 2025. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650000, China 2 Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University, Bangkok, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand Lu Zhang Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Rawin Vongurai Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 10 Oct 2025, 14:709 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.2 version 1 Published: 18 Jul 2025, 14:709 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.1 Copyright © 2025 Zhang L and Vongurai R. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Zhang L and Vongurai R. Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.165290.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Oct 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Liu Z. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r422490 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-422490 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 22 Jan 2026 Zhi Liu , Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r422490 While I appreciate the amendments made regarding the literature scope and the inclusion of the visualization figure, I feel that the depth of the theoretical discussion—particularly regarding the mechanisms of student-student interaction—has not yet been fully optimized to meet the ... Continue reading READ ALL While I appreciate the amendments made regarding the literature scope and the inclusion of the visualization figure, I feel that the depth of the theoretical discussion—particularly regarding the mechanisms of student-student interaction—has not yet been fully optimized to meet the previous reviewer's suggestions. To further elevate the paper's academic contribution, please consider the following points: Although the structural model confirms the relationships, the discussion on why student-student interaction yielded a weaker effect on self-efficacy compared to student-content interaction remains somewhat surface-level; could you provide a deeper sociocognitive explanation for this specific finding within your discussion section? The current recommendations for educators (e.g., "implement collaborative projects") are still quite generic; could you refine these into more specific, evidence-based strategies that address the unique constraints of application-oriented universities in China? Regarding the sampling method, while the stratified approach is described, the rationale for combining it with purposive sampling needs clearer justification to address potential concerns about selection bias and generalizability. To strengthen the theoretical framework regarding interaction mechanisms, I strongly recommend integrating recent studies that link social engagement to cognitive outcomes. specifically, citing "Students’ Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective" (Educational Technology & Society, 2023) would provide a crucial theoretical basis for understanding how social interactions influence cognitive engagement, and "Exploring the relationships between students’ network characteristics, discussion topics and learning outcomes in a course discussion forum" (Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2023) would offer necessary empirical support for connecting interaction patterns directly to learning achievements. The cultural context of Chinese application-oriented universities is mentioned, but how specifically do local educational habits (such as high-stakes testing culture or teacher-authority reliance) mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and interaction? In the "Limitations and Future Study" section, it would be better to explicitly mention the lack of behavioral process data (such as log data or discussion analysis) which could corroborate the self-reported survey results. References 1. Liu S, Kang L, Liu Z, Zhao L, et al.: Exploring the relationships between students’ network characteristics, discussion topics and learning outcomes in a course discussion forum. Journal of Computing in Higher Education . 2023; 35 (3): 487-520 Publisher Full Text 2. Liu, Z., Zhang, N., Peng, X., Liu, S., & Yang, Z.: Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective. ducational Technology & Society . 2023. Reference Source Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: learning engagement; educational technology; online learning; blended learning; learning analytics I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Liu Z. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r422490 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-422490 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Mallén-Berdejo M. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430043 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430043 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 06 Jan 2026 Mireya Mallén-Berdejo , University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430043 This study examines the relationships between student–content interaction, student–student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms within Chinese application-oriented universities. Using survey data from 524 undergraduate students, the authors apply Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling ... Continue reading READ ALL This study examines the relationships between student–content interaction, student–student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms within Chinese application-oriented universities. Using survey data from 524 undergraduate students, the authors apply Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test a mediation model in which self-efficacy plays a central role. The findings indicate that both forms of interaction positively influence learning achievement, directly and indirectly through self-efficacy, which emerges as a strong mediator. The topic is relevant and timely, particularly in the context of student-centered reforms in higher education and teacher education. The dataset is substantial, the analytical approach is appropriate, and the article demonstrates technical competence in the use of CFA and SEM. Clarity of presentation and use of literature: The manuscript is generally well structured and clearly written, with a logical progression from introduction to conclusions. Key constructs are identifiable, and tables reporting CFA and SEM results are clearly presented. The study cites a substantial body of relevant literature, including foundational and recent empirical work. However, the literature review remains largely descriptive rather than analytical. While many relevant studies are cited, there is limited synthesis of contrasting findings or explicit positioning of the study within current theoretical debates on engagement and interaction. In addition, although some recent references are included, the integration of the most up-to-date literature (2024–2025), particularly on technology-enhanced and AI-supported learning environments, could be strengthened to enhance the manuscript’s contemporary relevance. Study design and technical soundness: The quantitative research design is appropriate for the stated aims. The conceptual framework is theoretically grounded, drawing primarily on interaction theory and Bandura’s self-efficacy framework. The sample size is adequate and statistically justified for SEM, and the use of CFA prior to structural modeling is methodologically sound. Overall, the study is technically robust and free from major design flaws. One aspect that would benefit from further clarification is the combination of stratified random sampling and purposive sampling, as this has implications for generalizability that are not fully addressed in the manuscript. Methods and replicability: The methods section provides a clear overview of the participants, instruments, data collection procedures, and analytical techniques. Reliability and validity are reported using appropriate indices (Cronbach’s alpha, CR, AVE), and model fit indices are comprehensively presented. That said, some methodological details remain insufficiently specified to fully ensure replication. For example, further clarification on instrument adaptation and validation within the Chinese educational context (e.g., translation procedures or cultural adaptation) would strengthen transparency. Minor inaccuracies (such as the reporting of the Cronbach’s alpha threshold) should also be corrected to avoid confusion. Statistical analysis and interpretation: The statistical analyses are appropriate and competently conducted. CFA and SEM results are clearly reported, and model fit indices fall within accepted thresholds. Hypotheses are tested systematically, and the mediation role of self-efficacy is supported by both direct and indirect effects. Interpretations are generally consistent with the statistical results. However, the discussion could benefit from deeper engagement with the magnitude of effects (practical significance), rather than focusing primarily on statistical significance. Data availability and reproducibility: All source data underlying the results are openly available via Figshare under a CC-BY license. This ensures transparency and allows for full reproducibility, which is a clear strength of the manuscript. Conclusions and support from results: The conclusions are broadly supported by the reported findings and accurately reflect the tested model. The emphasis on self-efficacy as a key mediating mechanism is well justified by the results. However, the conclusions tend to reiterate the findings rather than critically reflecting on their theoretical contribution, contextual limitations, or broader implications. A clearer distinction between empirical findings, theoretical contributions, and practical recommendations would strengthen the closing section. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Educational research; higher education; student engagement and learning processes; quantitative research methods in education (SEM); teacher education and student-centered learning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Mallén-Berdejo M. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430043 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430043 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Jan 2026 lu zhang , Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China 10 Jan 2026 Author Response Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Jan 2026 lu zhang , Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China 10 Jan 2026 Author Response Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Kamran M. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430042 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430042 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 22 Nov 2025 Muhammad Kamran , University of Loralai, Bolachistan, Pakistan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430042 The paper is clear. All the Psychometrics and SEM are clearly explained. The model fit indices are in excellent ranges. Confirmatory factor analysis result, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) are clearly explained. Discriminant validity is well documented. Goodness of fit ... Continue reading READ ALL The paper is clear. All the Psychometrics and SEM are clearly explained. The model fit indices are in excellent ranges. Confirmatory factor analysis result, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) are clearly explained. Discriminant validity is well documented. Goodness of fit model has been explained well. Structural Equation Model (SEM) has been portrayed well. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Psychometric Properties such EFA, CEA, SEM, Construct Validity, Discriminant Validity, and IRT. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Kamran M. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430042 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430042 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2025 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: HOQUE KE. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r407900 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-407900 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 02 Sep 2025 KAZI ENAMUL HOQUE , University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r407900 1. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? The manuscript is generally clear, well-structured, and accurately presented. Introduction-conclusion flow is reasonable. Literature review is descriptive in nature instead of analytical, and while ... Continue reading READ ALL 1. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? The manuscript is generally clear, well-structured, and accurately presented. Introduction-conclusion flow is reasonable. Literature review is descriptive in nature instead of analytical, and while there are many relevant references provided (2018–2023), latest research (2024–2025) is not adequately referenced. Recommendation: Update the literature review by synthesizing conflicting findings and incorporating more recent references, especially on digital and AI-assisted learning. Ensure consistency of reference formatting. 2. Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit? Assessment: Yes. The study has a good quantitative design with SEM and CFA, which is appropriate for the test of the hypothesized relationship. The conceptual framework theory basis is adequate (Bandura's model of self-efficacy, interaction theory). The sample size is sufficient and statistically sufficiently justified (N=524). My recommendation is Clarifying the rationale for combining stratified random sampling and purposive sampling because such a combination could affect generalizability. 3. Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Generally, yes. The procedures are clearly set out (sampling process, instrument development, reliability testing, ethical clearance, SEM procedures). This should facilitate replication. Gross typographical mistakes (e.g., Cronbach's alpha criterion misspelled as 0.07 instead of 0.70) reduce readability. I suggest correcting typographical mistakes, and state whether the instruments were validated within the Chinese education environment (translation/back-translation, cultural modification). 4. If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes. CFA and SEM analyses were conducted correctly with clear reporting of factor loadings, CR, AVE, and model fit indices. Statistical interpretation is satisfactory, and all hypotheses are evidence-based with p-values and coefficients. I suggest displaying mediation effects more graphically (e.g., path diagram with standardized coefficients) to facilitate interpretability. Expand the discussion to include reasons for why student-content interaction had bigger effects than student-student interaction. 5. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes. The dataset has been made available on Figshare under a CC-BY license to ensure transparency and reproducibility. 6. Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes. The conclusions align with the findings and highlight the mediating role of self-efficacy. The conclusion part, however, in its duplication of some findings rather than identifying unique contributions is to be minimized, focus on theoretical contribution (application-oriented Chinese universities and teacher education), and differentiate practical implications from empirical findings clearly. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Education Management and Leadership I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT HOQUE KE. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r407900 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-407900 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Liu Z. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r405561 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-405561 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 02 Sep 2025 Zhi Liu , Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r405561 This study provides a valuable empirical investigation into the relationships between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms. The research design is methodologically sound, employing CFA and SEM to validate the proposed model. However, the manuscript ... Continue reading READ ALL This study provides a valuable empirical investigation into the relationships between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms. The research design is methodologically sound, employing CFA and SEM to validate the proposed model. However, the manuscript would benefit from deeper theoretical framing, updated literature reviews, and more nuanced discussions of contextual factors. Below are specific recommendations to enhance the rigor, relevance, and contribution of this work to the related field. The study can strengthen the theoretical grounding by explicitly linking student-content/student-student interactions to contemporary engagement frameworks (e.g., Community of Inquiry model) by citing recent meta-analyses. The authors may explicitly position their study within contemporary social-cognitive and learning engagement theories. The current framing relies heavily on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory but overlooks recent advancements in social-cognitive engagement frameworks (e.g., Liu et al., 2023, Educational Technology & Society ). The sample is limited to Chinese application-oriented universities. The authors should address how cultural and institutional factors (e.g., high-stakes testing cultures) may mediate the observed relationships. The manuscript briefly mentions "technology-enhanced tools" but does not engage with recent research on AI-supported collaborative learning (e.g., Kong et al., 2025, Internet and Higher Education ), the study may discuss how AI tools (e.g., chatbots, virtual labs) might amplify or disrupt the observed relationships, citing Kong et al.’s (2025) findings on AI’s role in scaffolding discussions. The recommendations for educators are generic (e.g., "use collaborative projects"). Ground them in evidence-based frameworks. Standardize terms (e.g., "learning achievement" vs. "academic performance") and define key constructs (e.g., "student-content interaction") using recent literature. The study can report full psychometric properties (factor loadings, CR, AVE) for all survey items in an appendix. Add a participant recruitment flowchart showing response rates and exclusions per STROBE guidelines. Specify exact Likert scale wording. Supplement p-values with Cohen's d or η² for all path coefficients to assess practical significance. Compare effect sizes to benchmarks in recent meta-analyses of educational interventions. Develop specific, evidence-based teaching strategies (e.g., "structured peer feedback protocols") rather than generic recommendations, such as some ground suggestions in some small teaching approaches. Highlight the need for temporal analysis given self-efficacy's developmental nature by discussing longitudinal studies on efficacy trajectories. The manuscript can add a limitations subsection acknowledging the lack of behavioral data (e.g., forum logs). -read for hyphen consistency (e.g., "student centered" → "student-centered"). There are some other minor suggestions to be considered: Add a conceptual diagram visualizing the mediation model with standardized coefficients Include a table comparing findings with prior studies in similar contexts Discuss potential negative effects of excessive peer interaction (e.g., social loafing) propose specific faculty development programs for implementing the strategies Address potential equity issues in access to interactive learning technologies Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: learning engagement; educational technology; online learning; blended learning I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Liu Z. Reviewer Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r405561 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-405561 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 09 Oct 2025 lu zhang , Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China 09 Oct 2025 Author Response Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week ... Continue reading Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week classroom intervention study that successfully used interactive activities to enhance student engagement (as confirmed by paired-sample t-tests), the current research aims to explore whether and how different forms of interaction and self-efficacy continue to impact learning achievement. The findings will subsequently inform the design of a targeted instructional intervention program to further optimize teaching and learning effectiveness in this specific educational setting. Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week classroom intervention study that successfully used interactive activities to enhance student engagement (as confirmed by paired-sample t-tests), the current research aims to explore whether and how different forms of interaction and self-efficacy continue to impact learning achievement. The findings will subsequently inform the design of a targeted instructional intervention program to further optimize teaching and learning effectiveness in this specific educational setting. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 09 Oct 2025 lu zhang , Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China 09 Oct 2025 Author Response Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week ... Continue reading Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week classroom intervention study that successfully used interactive activities to enhance student engagement (as confirmed by paired-sample t-tests), the current research aims to explore whether and how different forms of interaction and self-efficacy continue to impact learning achievement. The findings will subsequently inform the design of a targeted instructional intervention program to further optimize teaching and learning effectiveness in this specific educational setting. Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week classroom intervention study that successfully used interactive activities to enhance student engagement (as confirmed by paired-sample t-tests), the current research aims to explore whether and how different forms of interaction and self-efficacy continue to impact learning achievement. The findings will subsequently inform the design of a targeted instructional intervention program to further optimize teaching and learning effectiveness in this specific educational setting. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 4 Version 2 (revision) 10 Oct 25 read read read Version 1 18 Jul 25 read read Zhi Liu , Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China KAZI ENAMUL HOQUE , University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Muhammad Kamran , University of Loralai, Bolachistan, Pakistan Mireya Mallén-Berdejo , University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Liu Z. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 22 Jan 2026 | for Version 2 Zhi Liu , Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China 0 Views copyright © 2026 Liu Z. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions While I appreciate the amendments made regarding the literature scope and the inclusion of the visualization figure, I feel that the depth of the theoretical discussion—particularly regarding the mechanisms of student-student interaction—has not yet been fully optimized to meet the previous reviewer's suggestions. To further elevate the paper's academic contribution, please consider the following points: Although the structural model confirms the relationships, the discussion on why student-student interaction yielded a weaker effect on self-efficacy compared to student-content interaction remains somewhat surface-level; could you provide a deeper sociocognitive explanation for this specific finding within your discussion section? The current recommendations for educators (e.g., "implement collaborative projects") are still quite generic; could you refine these into more specific, evidence-based strategies that address the unique constraints of application-oriented universities in China? Regarding the sampling method, while the stratified approach is described, the rationale for combining it with purposive sampling needs clearer justification to address potential concerns about selection bias and generalizability. To strengthen the theoretical framework regarding interaction mechanisms, I strongly recommend integrating recent studies that link social engagement to cognitive outcomes. specifically, citing "Students’ Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective" (Educational Technology & Society, 2023) would provide a crucial theoretical basis for understanding how social interactions influence cognitive engagement, and "Exploring the relationships between students’ network characteristics, discussion topics and learning outcomes in a course discussion forum" (Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2023) would offer necessary empirical support for connecting interaction patterns directly to learning achievements. The cultural context of Chinese application-oriented universities is mentioned, but how specifically do local educational habits (such as high-stakes testing culture or teacher-authority reliance) mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and interaction? In the "Limitations and Future Study" section, it would be better to explicitly mention the lack of behavioral process data (such as log data or discussion analysis) which could corroborate the self-reported survey results. References 1. Liu S, Kang L, Liu Z, Zhao L, et al.: Exploring the relationships between students’ network characteristics, discussion topics and learning outcomes in a course discussion forum. Journal of Computing in Higher Education . 2023; 35 (3): 487-520 Publisher Full Text 2. Liu, Z., Zhang, N., Peng, X., Liu, S., & Yang, Z.: Students' Social-Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: An Integrated Analysis Perspective. ducational Technology & Society . 2023. Reference Source Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise learning engagement; educational technology; online learning; blended learning; learning analytics I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Liu Z. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r422490) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-422490 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Mallén-Berdejo M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 06 Jan 2026 | for Version 2 Mireya Mallén-Berdejo , University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain 0 Views copyright © 2026 Mallén-Berdejo M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This study examines the relationships between student–content interaction, student–student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms within Chinese application-oriented universities. Using survey data from 524 undergraduate students, the authors apply Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test a mediation model in which self-efficacy plays a central role. The findings indicate that both forms of interaction positively influence learning achievement, directly and indirectly through self-efficacy, which emerges as a strong mediator. The topic is relevant and timely, particularly in the context of student-centered reforms in higher education and teacher education. The dataset is substantial, the analytical approach is appropriate, and the article demonstrates technical competence in the use of CFA and SEM. Clarity of presentation and use of literature: The manuscript is generally well structured and clearly written, with a logical progression from introduction to conclusions. Key constructs are identifiable, and tables reporting CFA and SEM results are clearly presented. The study cites a substantial body of relevant literature, including foundational and recent empirical work. However, the literature review remains largely descriptive rather than analytical. While many relevant studies are cited, there is limited synthesis of contrasting findings or explicit positioning of the study within current theoretical debates on engagement and interaction. In addition, although some recent references are included, the integration of the most up-to-date literature (2024–2025), particularly on technology-enhanced and AI-supported learning environments, could be strengthened to enhance the manuscript’s contemporary relevance. Study design and technical soundness: The quantitative research design is appropriate for the stated aims. The conceptual framework is theoretically grounded, drawing primarily on interaction theory and Bandura’s self-efficacy framework. The sample size is adequate and statistically justified for SEM, and the use of CFA prior to structural modeling is methodologically sound. Overall, the study is technically robust and free from major design flaws. One aspect that would benefit from further clarification is the combination of stratified random sampling and purposive sampling, as this has implications for generalizability that are not fully addressed in the manuscript. Methods and replicability: The methods section provides a clear overview of the participants, instruments, data collection procedures, and analytical techniques. Reliability and validity are reported using appropriate indices (Cronbach’s alpha, CR, AVE), and model fit indices are comprehensively presented. That said, some methodological details remain insufficiently specified to fully ensure replication. For example, further clarification on instrument adaptation and validation within the Chinese educational context (e.g., translation procedures or cultural adaptation) would strengthen transparency. Minor inaccuracies (such as the reporting of the Cronbach’s alpha threshold) should also be corrected to avoid confusion. Statistical analysis and interpretation: The statistical analyses are appropriate and competently conducted. CFA and SEM results are clearly reported, and model fit indices fall within accepted thresholds. Hypotheses are tested systematically, and the mediation role of self-efficacy is supported by both direct and indirect effects. Interpretations are generally consistent with the statistical results. However, the discussion could benefit from deeper engagement with the magnitude of effects (practical significance), rather than focusing primarily on statistical significance. Data availability and reproducibility: All source data underlying the results are openly available via Figshare under a CC-BY license. This ensures transparency and allows for full reproducibility, which is a clear strength of the manuscript. Conclusions and support from results: The conclusions are broadly supported by the reported findings and accurately reflect the tested model. The emphasis on self-efficacy as a key mediating mechanism is well justified by the results. However, the conclusions tend to reiterate the findings rather than critically reflecting on their theoretical contribution, contextual limitations, or broader implications. A clearer distinction between empirical findings, theoretical contributions, and practical recommendations would strengthen the closing section. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Educational research; higher education; student engagement and learning processes; quantitative research methods in education (SEM); teacher education and student-centered learning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Jan 2026 lu zhang, Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China Thank you for your supportive suggestions. I will be sure to incorporate the points you've mentioned in my future research. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Mallén-Berdejo M. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430043) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430043 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Kamran M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 22 Nov 2025 | for Version 2 Muhammad Kamran , University of Loralai, Bolachistan, Pakistan 0 Views copyright © 2025 Kamran M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The paper is clear. All the Psychometrics and SEM are clearly explained. The model fit indices are in excellent ranges. Confirmatory factor analysis result, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) are clearly explained. Discriminant validity is well documented. Goodness of fit model has been explained well. Structural Equation Model (SEM) has been portrayed well. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Psychometric Properties such EFA, CEA, SEM, Construct Validity, Discriminant Validity, and IRT. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Kamran M. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189510.r430042) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2#referee-response-430042 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 HOQUE K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 02 Sep 2025 | for Version 1 KAZI ENAMUL HOQUE , University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 0 Views copyright © 2025 HOQUE K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? The manuscript is generally clear, well-structured, and accurately presented. Introduction-conclusion flow is reasonable. Literature review is descriptive in nature instead of analytical, and while there are many relevant references provided (2018–2023), latest research (2024–2025) is not adequately referenced. Recommendation: Update the literature review by synthesizing conflicting findings and incorporating more recent references, especially on digital and AI-assisted learning. Ensure consistency of reference formatting. 2. Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit? Assessment: Yes. The study has a good quantitative design with SEM and CFA, which is appropriate for the test of the hypothesized relationship. The conceptual framework theory basis is adequate (Bandura's model of self-efficacy, interaction theory). The sample size is sufficient and statistically sufficiently justified (N=524). My recommendation is Clarifying the rationale for combining stratified random sampling and purposive sampling because such a combination could affect generalizability. 3. Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Generally, yes. The procedures are clearly set out (sampling process, instrument development, reliability testing, ethical clearance, SEM procedures). This should facilitate replication. Gross typographical mistakes (e.g., Cronbach's alpha criterion misspelled as 0.07 instead of 0.70) reduce readability. I suggest correcting typographical mistakes, and state whether the instruments were validated within the Chinese education environment (translation/back-translation, cultural modification). 4. If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes. CFA and SEM analyses were conducted correctly with clear reporting of factor loadings, CR, AVE, and model fit indices. Statistical interpretation is satisfactory, and all hypotheses are evidence-based with p-values and coefficients. I suggest displaying mediation effects more graphically (e.g., path diagram with standardized coefficients) to facilitate interpretability. Expand the discussion to include reasons for why student-content interaction had bigger effects than student-student interaction. 5. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes. The dataset has been made available on Figshare under a CC-BY license to ensure transparency and reproducibility. 6. Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes. The conclusions align with the findings and highlight the mediating role of self-efficacy. The conclusion part, however, in its duplication of some findings rather than identifying unique contributions is to be minimized, focus on theoretical contribution (application-oriented Chinese universities and teacher education), and differentiate practical implications from empirical findings clearly. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Education Management and Leadership I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) HOQUE KE. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r407900) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-407900 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Liu Z. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 02 Sep 2025 | for Version 1 Zhi Liu , Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China 0 Views copyright © 2025 Liu Z. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This study provides a valuable empirical investigation into the relationships between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievement in student-centered classrooms. The research design is methodologically sound, employing CFA and SEM to validate the proposed model. However, the manuscript would benefit from deeper theoretical framing, updated literature reviews, and more nuanced discussions of contextual factors. Below are specific recommendations to enhance the rigor, relevance, and contribution of this work to the related field. The study can strengthen the theoretical grounding by explicitly linking student-content/student-student interactions to contemporary engagement frameworks (e.g., Community of Inquiry model) by citing recent meta-analyses. The authors may explicitly position their study within contemporary social-cognitive and learning engagement theories. The current framing relies heavily on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory but overlooks recent advancements in social-cognitive engagement frameworks (e.g., Liu et al., 2023, Educational Technology & Society ). The sample is limited to Chinese application-oriented universities. The authors should address how cultural and institutional factors (e.g., high-stakes testing cultures) may mediate the observed relationships. The manuscript briefly mentions "technology-enhanced tools" but does not engage with recent research on AI-supported collaborative learning (e.g., Kong et al., 2025, Internet and Higher Education ), the study may discuss how AI tools (e.g., chatbots, virtual labs) might amplify or disrupt the observed relationships, citing Kong et al.’s (2025) findings on AI’s role in scaffolding discussions. The recommendations for educators are generic (e.g., "use collaborative projects"). Ground them in evidence-based frameworks. Standardize terms (e.g., "learning achievement" vs. "academic performance") and define key constructs (e.g., "student-content interaction") using recent literature. The study can report full psychometric properties (factor loadings, CR, AVE) for all survey items in an appendix. Add a participant recruitment flowchart showing response rates and exclusions per STROBE guidelines. Specify exact Likert scale wording. Supplement p-values with Cohen's d or η² for all path coefficients to assess practical significance. Compare effect sizes to benchmarks in recent meta-analyses of educational interventions. Develop specific, evidence-based teaching strategies (e.g., "structured peer feedback protocols") rather than generic recommendations, such as some ground suggestions in some small teaching approaches. Highlight the need for temporal analysis given self-efficacy's developmental nature by discussing longitudinal studies on efficacy trajectories. The manuscript can add a limitations subsection acknowledging the lack of behavioral data (e.g., forum logs). -read for hyphen consistency (e.g., "student centered" → "student-centered"). There are some other minor suggestions to be considered: Add a conceptual diagram visualizing the mediation model with standardized coefficients Include a table comparing findings with prior studies in similar contexts Discuss potential negative effects of excessive peer interaction (e.g., social loafing) propose specific faculty development programs for implementing the strategies Address potential equity issues in access to interactive learning technologies Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise learning engagement; educational technology; online learning; blended learning I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 09 Oct 2025 lu zhang, Faculty of Education, Yunnan Technology and Business University, Kunming, 650000, China Dear editor, Based on the student-centered educational context in Chinese application-oriented universities, this paper investigates how classroom interaction and self-efficacy jointly influence students' learning achievement. Building upon a prior 12-week classroom intervention study that successfully used interactive activities to enhance student engagement (as confirmed by paired-sample t-tests), the current research aims to explore whether and how different forms of interaction and self-efficacy continue to impact learning achievement. The findings will subsequently inform the design of a targeted instructional intervention program to further optimize teaching and learning effectiveness in this specific educational setting. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Liu Z. Peer Review Report For: Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction, student-student interaction, self-efficacy, and learning achievements in a student-centered classroom [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :709 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181904.r405561) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v1#referee-response-405561 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Exploring the relationship between student-content...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Zhang L and Vongurai R'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709", templates : { twitter : "Exploring the relationship between student-content interaction,.... Zhang L and Vongurai R, published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/14-709/v2" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/165290/189510") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "189510"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "411038": 0, "411039": 0, "411036": 0, "411037": 0, "411034": 0, "411035": 0, "411033": 0, "411042": 0, "411040": 0, "411041": 0, "402870": 0, "405558": 0, "402871": 0, "405559": 0, "402868": 0, "402869": 0, "405557": 0, "402867": 0, "405566": 0, "402876": 0, "405564": 0, "405565": 0, "402874": 0, "405562": 0, "402875": 0, "405563": 0, "402872": 0, "405560": 0, "402873": 0, "405561": 13, "427470": 0, "427471": 0, "427468": 0, "427469": 0, "427466": 0, "427467": 0, "427465": 0, "430039": 0, "427474": 0, "427472": 0, "427473": 0, "407902": 0, "430046": 0, "407903": 0, "430047": 0, "407900": 14, "430044": 0, "407901": 0, "430045": 0, "407898": 0, "430042": 5, "422490": 2, "407899": 0, "422491": 0, "430043": 5, "430040": 0, "430041": 0, "407906": 0, "407907": 0, "407904": 0, "430048": 0, "407905": 0, "480108": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "8699f2e9-d1ed-4ad7-a410-76667d9f4a92"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });