Plastic-hydrolytic enzyme classification using explainable deep learning

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The rapid accumulation of plastic waste has emerged as a critical environmental threat, driving the need for scalable and effective biodegradation solutions. Hydrolytic plastic-degrading enzymes (PDEs) offer a promising solution, yet their functional classification remains limited by insufficient annotations and enzymatic diversity. In this study, we present an explainable deep learning framework, PEPIC, to classify nine types of PDEs directly from protein sequences. Using a curated dataset of experimentally validated enzymes and an expanded homologous dataset, we built an explainable deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks (PEPIC) for plastic-degrading enzyme prediction. We benchmarked PEPIC’s performance against state-of-the-art approaches. First, PEPIC demonstrated statistically significant improvements in predictive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Second, PEPIC calculates contribution scores for each amino acid in the protein sequence, indicating their influence on the predictions. The model interpretation revealed that regions highlighted by high contribution scores matched conserved catalytic triads and substrate-binding clefts across PET-, PCL-, and PLA-degrading enzymes. Furthermore, structural modeling confirmed the trustworthiness of PEPIC’s predictions. Finally, PEPIC predicted an uncurated enzyme as a PET-degrading enzyme, which was biologically validated to hydrolyze bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET). These findings demonstrate that PEPIC provides accurate and trustworthy predictions of PDEs, facilitating the discovery of novel enzymes and supporting the development of sustainable plastic biodegradation technologies.
Full text 2,013 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The rapid accumulation of plastic waste has emerged as a critical environmental threat, driving the need for scalable and effective biodegradation solutions. Hydrolytic plastic-degrading enzymes (PDEs) offer a promising solution, yet their functional classification remains limited by insufficient annotations and enzymatic diversity. In this study, we present an explainable deep learning framework, PEPIC, to classify nine types of PDEs directly from protein sequences. Using a curated dataset of experimentally validated enzymes and an expanded homologous dataset, we built an explainable deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks (PEPIC) for plastic-degrading enzyme prediction. We benchmarked PEPIC’s performance against state-of-the-art approaches. First, PEPIC demonstrated statistically significant improvements in predictive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Second, PEPIC calculates contribution scores for each amino acid in the protein sequence, indicating their influence on the predictions. The model interpretation revealed that regions highlighted by high contribution scores matched conserved catalytic triads and substrate-binding clefts across PET-, PCL-, and PLA-degrading enzymes. Furthermore, structural modeling confirmed the trustworthiness of PEPIC’s predictions. Finally, PEPIC predicted an uncurated enzyme as a PET-degrading enzyme, which was biologically validated to hydrolyze bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET). These findings demonstrate that PEPIC provides accurate and trustworthy predictions of PDEs, facilitating the discovery of novel enzymes and supporting the development of sustainable plastic biodegradation technologies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵+ The first authors: Woo-Haeng Lee and Louis Dumontet W-HL: saint832{at}sunmoon.ac.kr LD: louis.dumontet{at}unlv.edu KMJ: rudals2366{at}sunmoon.ac.kr HL: mahyun91{at}sunmoon.ac.kr GT: thapagovinda{at}sunmoon.ac.kr

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00