Neural and behavioral correlates of evidence accumulation in human click-based echolocation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Echolocation enables blind individuals to perceive and navigate their environment by emitting clicks and interpreting their returning echoes. While expert blind echolocators demonstrate remarkable spatial accuracy, the behavioral and neural mechanisms supporting the temporal integration of spatial echoacoustic cues remain less explored. Here, we investigated the temporal dynamics of spatial information accumulation in human click-based echolocation using EEG. Blind expert echolocators and novice sighted participants localized virtual spatialized echoes derived from realistic synthesized mouth clicks, with trials presenting trains of 2–11 clicks. Behavioral results showed that blind expert echolocators significantly outperformed sighted controls in spatial localization. For these experts, localization thresholds decreased with more clicks, indicating cumulative integration of spatial cues across repeated samples. EEG decoding analyses revealed that neural representations significantly distinguished echo laterality and predicted overall spatial localization performance from the first click alone. Additionally, brain responses relative to the first click evolved systematically over successive clicks, paralleling psychophysical performance in blind echolocators and providing a possible index of perceptual information accumulation. These findings provide, to our knowledge, the first fine-grained account of temporal neural dynamics underlying click-based echolocation, directly linked to behavioral performance over multiple samples. They reveal how successive echoes are integrated over time into coherent spatial representations. Together, these results advance our understanding of the perceptual and neural mechanisms underlying echolocation and demonstrate adaptive sensory processing in the absence of vision.
Full text 2,016 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Echolocation enables blind individuals to perceive and navigate their environment by emitting clicks and interpreting their returning echoes. While expert blind echolocators demonstrate remarkable spatial accuracy, the behavioral and neural mechanisms supporting the temporal integration of spatial echoacoustic cues remain less explored. Here, we investigated the temporal dynamics of spatial information accumulation in human click-based echolocation using EEG. Blind expert echolocators and novice sighted participants localized virtual spatialized echoes derived from realistic synthesized mouth clicks, with trials presenting trains of 2–11 clicks. Behavioral results showed that blind expert echolocators significantly outperformed sighted controls in spatial localization. For these experts, localization thresholds decreased with more clicks, indicating cumulative integration of spatial cues across repeated samples. EEG decoding analyses revealed that neural representations significantly distinguished echo laterality and predicted overall spatial localization performance from the first click alone. Additionally, brain responses relative to the first click evolved systematically over successive clicks, paralleling psychophysical performance in blind echolocators and providing a possible index of perceptual information accumulation. These findings provide, to our knowledge, the first fine-grained account of temporal neural dynamics underlying click-based echolocation, directly linked to behavioral performance over multiple samples. They reveal how successive echoes are integrated over time into coherent spatial representations. Together, these results advance our understanding of the perceptual and neural mechanisms underlying echolocation and demonstrate adaptive sensory processing in the absence of vision. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00