Avoiding Poor Skull Areas Improves Heating Efficiency in MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Therapy

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) is an effective and safe treatment for drug-resistant symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. In some patients, MRgFUS is difficult to perform because the temperature in the target area does not easily increase. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of avoiding the sonication of skull regions with poor conditions and redistributing energy to relatively good-quality regions. We retrospectively analyzed MRgFUS data at our facility. In some patients, when it was considered difficult to achieve the required temperature in the target area and thermal coagulation after starting treatment, the ultrasound transducer elements that passed through areas with poor conditions, considered as such on the basis of the skull density ratio and skull thickness, were turned off. A linear regression model was created for all ultrasound sonications in all patients, with heating efficiency as the objective variable and various treatment and patient factors, including whether cranial areas with poor conditions were excluded from the sonication field, as explanatory variables. In total, 213 patients underwent MRgFUS treatment, with 1,891 sonications. Eleven patients had 30 sonications excluding skull areas with poor conditions. The median number of excluded elements was 37.5 (maximum 74, minimum 6). Linear regression analysis showed that excluding cranial regions with poor conditions from the sonication field significantly improved the heating efficiency ( P = 0.0125, R 2 = 0.769). The regression coefficient was 0.286°C/kJ, which means that for every additional 10,000 J of sonication energy, the temperature increases by 2.86°C. The difficulty of controlling coagulation foci and the number of adverse events were not obviously increased using this method. When sonication was conducted while avoiding areas with a low skull density ratio and a thick skull, the heating efficiency of MRgFUS significantly improved. Using this approach, even difficult-to-treat cases may be successfully managed.
Full text 3,803 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) is an effective and safe treatment for drug-resistant symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. In some patients, MRgFUS is difficult to perform because the temperature in the target area does not easily increase. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of avoiding the sonication of skull regions with poor conditions and redistributing energy to relatively good-quality regions. We retrospectively analyzed MRgFUS data at our facility. In some patients, when it was considered difficult to achieve the required temperature in the target area and thermal coagulation after starting treatment, the ultrasound transducer elements that passed through areas with poor conditions, considered as such on the basis of the skull density ratio and skull thickness, were turned off. A linear regression model was created for all ultrasound sonications in all patients, with heating efficiency as the objective variable and various treatment and patient factors, including whether cranial areas with poor conditions were excluded from the sonication field, as explanatory variables. In total, 213 patients underwent MRgFUS treatment, with 1,891 sonications. Eleven patients had 30 sonications excluding skull areas with poor conditions. The median number of excluded elements was 37.5 (maximum 74, minimum 6). Linear regression analysis showed that excluding cranial regions with poor conditions from the sonication field significantly improved the heating efficiency (P = 0.0125, R2 = 0.769). The regression coefficient was 0.286°C/kJ, which means that for every additional 10,000 J of sonication energy, the temperature increases by 2.86°C. The difficulty of controlling coagulation foci and the number of adverse events were not obviously increased using this method. When sonication was conducted while avoiding areas with a low skull density ratio and a thick skull, the heating efficiency of MRgFUS significantly improved. Using this approach, even difficult-to-treat cases may be successfully managed. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (Approval No. 23-108). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data availability The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Dryad repository, accessible via https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqs7. []

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00