Dogs and humans share biomarkers of mortality

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,765 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract There is growing interest in the use of molecular features as predictors of age, age-related disease risk and age-related mortality. A major shortcoming of this field, however, is the lack of suitable translational research models to identify and understand the underlying mechanisms of these predictive biomarkers in human populations. In particular, we lack a system which, like humans, is genetically variable, lives in diverse environments, and experiences aging-related chronic conditions treated in the context of a sophisticated health care system. Here, we present results from our analysis of data from the Dog Aging Project, a long-term longitudinal study of aging in more than 50,000 companion dogs. In particular, using longitudinal survival models, we present the striking finding of a strong, highly significant positive correlation between the effect of individual metabolites on all-cause mortality in humans, and the association of those same metabolites on all-cause mortality in dogs. We also find that across these independent human studies, the biomarkers identified are also highly correlated, strongly suggesting a general signature of mortality within the plasma metabolome across humans, and now in dogs as well. Given the many similarities between dogs and humans with respect to genetics, environment, disease, and disease treatment, and the fact that dogs are so much shorter lived than humans, we argue that dogs represent an extremely valuable translational model in our ongoing effort to understand the underlying molecular causes and consequences of age-related morbidity and mortality in humans. Competing Interest Statement Daniel Promislow is a consultant for WndrHLTH, Inc. Footnotes ↵e consortium{at}dogagingproject.org

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00