Comparison of goal achievement during an early, intensive nutrition intervention delivered to people with upper gastrointestinal cancer by telephone compared with mobile application
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore whether the mode of nutrition intervention delivery affected participant goal achievement in a three-arm randomised controlled trial of early and intensive nutrition intervention delivered to upper gastrointestinal cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed upper gastrointestinal cancer patients were recruited from four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants in the intervention groups received a regular nutrition intervention for 18 weeks from an experienced dietitian via telephone or mobile application (app) using behaviour change techniques to assist in goal achievement. Univariate and multiple regression models using STATA determined goal achievement, dose, and frequency of contact between groups. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The telephone group (n=38) had 1.99 times greater frequency of contact with the research dietitian (95% CI: 1.67 to 2.36, p<0.001) and 2.37 times higher frequency of goal achievement (95% CI: 1.1 to 5.11, p=0.03) compared with the mobile app group (n=36). The higher dose (RR 0.03) of intervention in the telephone group compared with the mobile app group positively impacted on participant goal achievement (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.04, p<0.001). Conclusion Telephone nutrition intervention delivery led to higher frequency of goal achievement compared to the mobile app intervention. There was also a higher number of behaviour change techniques employed which may have facilitated the greater goal achievement. Mobile app based delivery may have poorer acceptance in this population with high levels of withdrawal. Practice Implications We need to ensure that specifically designed technologies for our target populations are fit for purpose, efficacious, acceptable to both patients and healthcare providers. Trial registration: 27th January 2017 Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12617000152325).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00