A domain-general neural signature of serial order memory across action and perception

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Remembering events in the correct order, and generating ordered sequences of actions, are fundamental abilities across species. Behavioral studies, and theoretical work, raise the possibility that the brain represents serial order by a domain-general neural code, following the principle of Competitive Queuing. However, direct neurophysiological evidence for Competitive Queuing exists only in the motor domain. When humans and non-human primates prepare for a series of movements, several of the upcoming movements are represented in parallel, with their representational strength reflecting ordinal position in the sequence. We test the generalizability of this so-called primacy gradient across motor sequences and memorized auditory sequences. Using a multivariate decoding approach, Experiment 1 replicated the presence of a Competitive Queuing primacy gradient in magnetoencephalography (MEG) data of young healthy adults (n = 23) when they prepared a sequence of finger movements from memory. Importantly, we observed a similar primacy gradient when participants anticipated a sequence of tones they had learned before, in the absence of any movement. In Experiment 2 (n = 23; naïve cohort), we rule out the possibility that this primacy gradient in auditory memory is explained by any learnt association between tones and movements, or by MEG signal fluctuations that are unrelated to discrete sequential events. In sum, we find a similar neural signature of serial order coding when humans prepare a sequence of movements, and when they anticipate a sequence of sounds. This lends support to the generalizability of Competitive Queuing.
Full text 1,733 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Remembering events in the correct order, and generating ordered sequences of actions, are fundamental abilities across species. Behavioral studies, and theoretical work, raise the possibility that the brain represents serial order by a domain-general neural code, following the principle of Competitive Queuing. However, direct neurophysiological evidence for Competitive Queuing exists only in the motor domain. When humans and non-human primates prepare for a series of movements, several of the upcoming movements are represented in parallel, with their representational strength reflecting ordinal position in the sequence. We test the generalizability of this so-called primacy gradient across motor sequences and memorized auditory sequences. Using a multivariate decoding approach, Experiment 1 replicated the presence of a Competitive Queuing primacy gradient in magnetoencephalography (MEG) data of young healthy adults (n = 23) when they prepared a sequence of finger movements from memory. Importantly, we observed a similar primacy gradient when participants anticipated a sequence of tones they had learned before, in the absence of any movement. In Experiment 2 (n = 23; naïve cohort), we rule out the possibility that this primacy gradient in auditory memory is explained by any learnt association between tones and movements, or by MEG signal fluctuations that are unrelated to discrete sequential events. In sum, we find a similar neural signature of serial order coding when humans prepare a sequence of movements, and when they anticipate a sequence of sounds. This lends support to the generalizability of Competitive Queuing. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00