Bowel obstruction due to Chlamydia trachomatis: a case report and review of literature

This patient was a 23-year-old woman who had acute abdominal pain. She had been treated for intrapelvic abscesses several times previously at another hospital. She also had a history of STD due to chlamydial infection. Computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage was performed, and the patient's symptoms improved. Bloody purulent fluid was noted, and Escherichia coli , but not Chlamydia , was detected by culture test. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using urine sample was negative for chlamydial infection when the patient was being treated for pelvic abscesses. In addition, a lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed to closely examine the source of infection, and intestinal findings suspected endometriosis. Endometriosis is a condition in which endometrium occurs in areas other than the uterus, such as the Douglas fossa, ovaries, intestinal tract, and pelvis. These areas may become infected, resulting in abscess formation. She also had recurrent pelvic abscess, which suggested endometriosis as the cause of the pelvic abscess [ 5 , 6 ]. While the patient was being medically treated for endometriosis, she had repeated pelvic abscesses. Thus, she was scheduled to be referred to the obstetrics and gynecology department in our institute for further investigation and treatment. Meanwhile, she had a relapse of abdominal pain and was taken to our hospital in an emergency. Palpation of the abdomen revealed localized tenderness below the umbilicus and peritoneal irritation symptoms. CT demonstrated a small bowel obstruction with closed loop (Fig.  1 a) and a small amount of intrapelvic abscess (Fig.  1 b). Contrast enhancement of the liver surface was also recognized. Laboratory results included white blood cell and platelet counts of 12,800/μL and 224,000/μL, respectively. The prothrombin time and international normalized ratio was 0.97. Total serum bilirubin, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein was 1.6 mg/dL, 4.3 g/dL, 22, 35, 239 U/L, and 0.71 mg/dL, respectively (Table. 1 ). Fig. 1 Abdominal CT and intraoperative findings. a arrow: Closed loop formed and dilated small intestine, arrowheads: Collapsed small intestine on the oral and anal sides of the closed loop, b ascites in the pelvis, c ascites in the pelvis and adhesion of the uterine appendages, and d adhesions that are translucent and considered to be in the active stage of chlamydial infection on the liver surface Table 1. Laboratory results Blood count Blood chemistry WBC 12,800/μL T-bil 1.6 mg/dL Plt 224,000/μL Alb 4.3 g/dL AST 22 U/L ALT 35 U/L Blood coagulation system ALP 239 U/L PT-INR 0.97 CRP 0.71 mg/dL Abdominal CT and intraoperative findings. a arrow: Closed loop formed and dilated small intestine, arrowheads: Collapsed small intestine on the oral and anal sides of the closed loop, b ascites in the pelvis, c ascites in the pelvis and adhesion of the uterine appendages, and d adhesions that are translucent and considered to be in the active stage of chlamydial infection on the liver surface Laboratory results Taking into consideration the patient’s history and clinical findings, the patient was suspected to have bowel obstruction due to pelvic abscesses caused endometriosis infection by Escherichia coli , but the diagnosis could not be preoperatively confirmed. Laparoscopic surgery was performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Fibrous adhesions from the liver to the pelvis was intraoperatively recognized. Adhesions in the lower part of the umbilicus formed a small bowel loop, and fibrous adhesions and ascites were also found in the pelvis (Fig.  1 c, d). The uterus could be confirmed, but not the ovaries due to adhesions in the pelvis. Adhesions causing the small bowel loop were found in the small bowel 100 cm from the Treitz ligament. In addition, multiple other adhesions and bands were found throughout the abdominal cavity. The band due to the adhesions was detached and the bowel obstruction was released. The entire small bowel was then checked and confirmed that there were no other abnormalities. The small bowel was edematous, but not necrotic, and bowel resection was not performed. Intraoperatively, ascitic fluid in the abdominal cavity, including in the pelvis, was aspirated and cleaned as much as possible. There was no obvious abscess formation. Chlamydia trachomatis antibody IgA was found to be positive, and IgG was negative as shown in the blood sample preoperatively submitted. Based on the typical intraoperative findings and the results of C. trachomatis antibody, she was finally diagnosed with small bowel obstruction caused by the adhesion of chlamydial infection. As for the antibiotics used for treatment, Levofloxacin was used for chlamydial infection. In the perioperative period, Cefmetazole and Clindamycin Phosphate were used for anaerobic infections such as Escherichia coli . Her symptoms improved by adhesion detachment. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 5 days after surgery.

Chlamydial infection is a type of sexually transmitted disease (STD) that occurs mainly in young people, and its diagnosis is often difficult due to high frequency of asymptomatic infections [ 1 ]. Chlamydial infection can cause pelvic infection disease (PID), ovarian tube abscess, and involves liver capsule inflammation associated with PID [ 2 ]. These have been reported as possible causes of adhesion, bowel obstruction, and infertility [ 2 – 4 ]. Although there are few reports of laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery may be useful in its diagnosis and may make treatment less invasive [ 1 , 2 ]. We present a patient who successfully underwent laparoscopic surgery for adherent bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection.

The strains of C. trachomatis are divided into three biovars and are further subtyped by serovars. Of those, the genital tract biovar (serovars D–K) is associated with the most prevalent STD [ 7 ]. In women, 70–80% of genital tract infections with C. trachomatis are asymptomatic, but 15–40% ascend to the upper genital tract, which can lead to serious sequelae, including PID, tubo-ovarian abscess, perihepatitis (Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome, FHC), infertility, and ectopic pregnancy [ 8 , 9 ]. Also, it has been reported that genital tract infections with C. trachomatis can cause adhesions and bowel obstruction [ 1 , 9 , 10 ]. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a characteristically dense subhepatic staining in the early phase. A fibrous adhesion, known as violin string adhesion, is a typical intra-abdominal finding of FHCS [ 2 ]. And the positive rate of chlamydial intra-abdominal infection in the presence of violin string adhesion has been reported to be more than 80% [ 11 ]. In our case, we also observed a contrast enhancement of the liver surface on CT and characteristic intra-abdominal findings such as violin string adhesion on the liver. A slightly purulent ascites in the pelvis was also observed, although the cause was not clear at the point of operation. In this case, IgA was positive and IgG was negative, so the antibody test indicates that the patient was in the active stage of chlamydial infection, which may be early enough for fibrotic adhesions to occur. The intraoperative findings of translucent membranous tissue of perihepatic violin string adhesion and other intra-abdominal adhesions suggest that the patient was still in the active stage. On the other hand, it is also suggested that bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection can occur even in the active stage, as in this case. Although the possibility that the IgG was false negative and the time of the negative IgG coincided with the early stage of IgA-positive infection were also considered, we comprehensively judged that the bowel obstruction, including the intraoperative findings, was caused by active chlamydial infection [ 7 ]. Adhesions (74%), Crohn’s disease (7%), neoplasia (5%), hernia (2%), radiation (1%), and miscellaneous (11%), are the etiology of bowel obstruction [ 12 ]. Among them, bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection is extremely rare, and preoperative diagnosis is considered difficult. Bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection was first described in 1899, and, so far, only seven cases including our case have been reported in the English literature (Table. 2 ). Including our case, surgery was performed in five cases for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, suggesting the difficulty of preoperative diagnosis. On the other hand, two cases improved with conservative treatment with antibiotics and drainage, including a gastric tube [ 13 , 14 ]. Only one case obtained preoperative diagnosis as bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection because the CT showed findings of suspected FHC on the liver surface [ 3 ]. Table 2 Previous reports of bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection No Year Author Age Sex Chief complaint History of laparotomy Chlamydia antibody etc CT or X-ray Preoperative diagnosis Treatments 1 1990 McCormick M 26 Female Abdominal pain ND Positive Colonic Obstruction Antibiotics Anorectal drain 2 1990 Pegg DJ 18 Female Abdominal pain Vomiting ND ND Bowel Obstruction Bowel Obstruction Bowel obstruction release 3 2003 Harel Z 19 Female Abdominal pain Vomiting None Vaginal Culture Positive Small bowel Obstruction Antibiotics Gastric tube 4 2006 Oh SN 60 Female Abdominal pain Vomiting None Positive Small bowel Obstruction FHC Chilaiditi syndrome Small bowel Obstruction FHC Chilaiditi syndrome Small bowel resection 5 2015 Cusimano A 40 Female Abdominal pain None PCR Positive Bowel Obstruction Intestinal Mal-rotation Bowel Obstruction Intestinal Mal-rotation Laparoscopy Bowel obstruction release 6 2019 Haumann A 27 Female Abdominal pain Vomiting None PCR Positive Small bowel Obstruction Small bowel Obstruction Laparoscopy 7 2019 Our case 24 Female Abdominal pain None Positive Small bowel Obstruction Small bowel Obstruction Laparoscopy Bowel obstruction release ND no date, FHC Fitz-Hugh–Curtis Syndrome, PCR Polymerase chain reaction Previous reports of bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection Antibiotics Anorectal drain Abdominal pain Vomiting Abdominal pain Vomiting Antibiotics Gastric tube Abdominal pain Vomiting Small bowel Obstruction FHC Chilaiditi syndrome Small bowel Obstruction FHC Chilaiditi syndrome Bowel Obstruction Intestinal Mal-rotation Bowel Obstruction Intestinal Mal-rotation Laparoscopy Bowel obstruction release Abdominal pain Vomiting Laparoscopy Bowel obstruction release ND no date, FHC Fitz-Hugh–Curtis Syndrome, PCR Polymerase chain reaction As shown in Table 1 , laparoscopic surgery has been performed in three cases with bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection. In one case of the two open surgery, small bowel resection was performed [ 3 , 4 ]. However, in laparoscopic cases, only a band resection was performed to release the bowel obstruction, and no small bowel resection was performed. Recently, laparoscopic surgery tends to be performed for patients with intestinal obstruction resistant to conservative treatment, especially for with unknown cause [ 1 ]. In our case, fibrous cordage could be dissected by laparoscopic surgery, and the bowel obstruction was resolved. Furthermore, the findings of PID were confirmed in the pelvis and on the liver surface. The advantages of choosing laparoscopic surgery may not only be because of its less invasiveness but also because of its suitability for adequate intraperitoneal observation. The methods of testing for C. trachomatis include cell culture methods using cervical abrasion or urine samples from the affected area, antigen tests (e.g., enzyme immunoassay), genetic tests (e.g., PCR), and serum antibody tests. Cell culture is reported as the standard for testing, but the condition of the facility, the skill, and the cost should be considered. A combination of antigen and genetic tests are generally used to diagnose the current infection [ 15 ]. Serum antibody testing should be used as an adjunct because antibodies may not be elevated early in the course of infection [ 16 ]. However, serum antibody testing may be useful in cases where specimen collection is difficult (e.g., pelvic infections and pregnant women) and for infertility screening [ 17 ]. In our case, neither cell culture from the abscess nor PCR-detected C. trachomatis because timing of the chlamydial infection was subclinical. With regard to adhesive bowel obstruction caused by chlamydial infection, a history of infection proven by serum antibody testing, as well as the current infection, may be useful for diagnosis. Both these intraoperative findings and the positivity of C. trachomatis antibody IgA, that was proved postoperatively, led to the diagnosis of bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection. Testing should be considered to differentiate chlamydial infection for cases with bowel obstructions with unknown cause in women. Chlamydial infection may be suspected, especially in young women, as in this case, or if CT findings indicate that the site of obstruction is slightly above the pelvis.

We performed laparoscopic surgery for bowel obstruction due to chlamydial infection. Chlamydial infection must be considered for patients with bowel obstruction of undetermined origin.