Introduction
Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek
medical attention and is a major burden on the quality of life
for those who suffer and their caregivers. Chronic pain, de-
fined as pain that lasts or recurs for more than 3 to 6 months
[1], is estimated to affect up to 116 million adults in the USA
alone with hundreds of millions of dollars in lost productivity
annually [2]. While nociceptive pain, also known as “protec-
tive pain,” is important for survival, many forms of chronic
pain linger long after a healed injury and do not appear to
serve any useful purpose [ 3]. Current therapies used to treat
chronic pain are woefully inadequate with many dose-limiting
side effects. The difficulty in getting effective treatment for
chronic pain is thought to be a key factor in many patients also
developing severe psychiatric comorbidities, with 45% suffer-
ing from major depressive disorder (MDD) as opposed to 5%
in the general population [ 4]. Increased understanding of the
mechanisms that underlie chronic pain is needed to develop
new therapies with improved clinical outcomes.
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is well known as the prin-
cipal source of energy for cellular metabolism, but it was first
postulated in 1953 that ATP can also serve to modulate neu-
rotransmission. In a rabbit ear preparation, exogenously ap-
plied ATP caused antidromic vasodilation that was reduced
with the co-application of a cholinesterase inhibitor [ 5], al-
though at the time the receptors responsible for this effect were
not known. The advent of molecular cloning and heterologous
expression systems allowed researchers to fully characterize
what is now known as the purinergic receptor family.
Receptors that activate when exposed to ATP are called P2
receptors and can exist as ligand-gated ion channels (P2X1-
P2X7) [6, 7]a n dGp r o t e i n– coupled receptors (P2Y1, P2Y2,
P2Y4, P2Y6, P2Y11-P2Y14). Adenosine-responding recep-
tors, originally classified as P1 receptors, are now called A1,
A2A,A 2B, and A3. The nomenclature and pharmacology of
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00934-2) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
* Jeffrey L. Krajewski
[email protected]
1 Neuroscience Department, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00934-2
/ Published online: 2 October 2020
Neurotherapeutics (2020) 17:826–838
P2Y and A1 – A3 receptors are covered in several excellent
reviews [8– 13] and therefore will not be a focus here.
P2X receptor subunits form trimeric transmembrane com-
plexes consisting of homomeric and heteromeric ionotropic
receptors [ 7, 14]. Receptors that contain a P2X3 subunit
(P2X3 homomers and/or P2X2/3 heteromers) will be referred
to as P2X3-containing receptors. Confirmation of the forma-
tion of the P2X2/3 heteromer was verified by co-
immunoprecipitation experiments and patch-clamp electro-
physiology which possessed properties that match ATP-
generated currents in neurons [15, 16]. The exact stoichiome-
try of the P2X2/3 heteromer in native tissue remains to be
determined [17]. Experiments with heterologously expressed
rP2X2 receptor showed ATP-induced currents exhibited
strong cooperativity with a n H approximately 2, suggesting
that more than one ATP molecule must bind before the chan-
nel opens [ 18]. Recent structural data of the human P2X3
receptor reveal the key protein movements that occur upon
the binding of ATP to induce a conformational change which
leads to the opening of the ion pore [ 19]. When exposed to
ATP, P2X receptors open within milliseconds and are non-
selective cation channels, with significant permeability to cal-
cium [20]. Ion channel current properties (e.g., rate of inacti-
vation, tachyphylaxis) and pharmacology can vary dramati-
cally between P2X channels formed by different subunit com-
binations [6, 7, 20, 21].
P2X3 subunits are primarily expressed in peripheral nerves
that innervate a variety of tissues important for nociception
[22– 26], chemosensation [ 27], and tissue function such as
sensing the stretching of hollow organs (e.g., bladder) [ 28,
29]. Antagonists selective for P2X3-containing receptors
(homomeric or heteromeric) have demonstrated efficacy in a
wide range of preclinical models of micturition disorders
[30– 33], pulmonary hypertension [ 27], and cough [ 34, 35],
while selective antagonists to P2X3-containing receptors have
demonstrated clinical efficacy in chronic refractory cough
[36– 38]. A common feature of all these symptoms is a key
role for extracellular ATP that sensitizes sensory nerve end-
ings thereby driving a hyperexcitable state, primarily acting
through P2X3-containing receptors. This review will summa-
rize the importance of ATP as a modulator of nociception, the
preclinical evidence for a role of P2X3-containing receptors in
pain signaling, and the potential for clinical development of
antagonists selective for P2X3-containing receptors as a novel
mechanism for treating chronic pain.
ATP as a Modulator of Nociceptive Signaling
The critical role for ATP as a sensory signaling neurotrans-
mitter has been studied for over 50 years [ 39]. Evidence
pointing to a nociceptive role for ATP first came from clinical
studies where administration caused a painful reaction when
injected into a blister base [ 40] or when intracutaneously
injected into normal skin [ 41]. Hamilton et al. demonstrated
that iontophoretic application of ATP to the skin of human
volunteers caused a dose-dependent increase in pain similar to
a burning and stinging sensation [ 42]. Importantly, when ap-
plied acutely, ATP induced depolarizing currents in dissociat-
ed sensory neurons isolated from dorsal root ganglia (DRG)
[24, 43– 45] and nodose ganglia [ 46– 48], suggesting
purinergic receptors expressed in nociceptors might be medi-
ating the observed clinical effects.
Exogenously applied ATP is readily hydrolyzed in vivo
into ADP, which is then further metabolized to adenosine,
both of which are both bioactive and their downstream activ-
ities could confound interpretation of the effects ascribed to
ATP [ 8, 9, 11, 13]. The ATP analog α,β-methylene ATP
(α,β-MeATP) is more resistant to hydrolysis making it an
ideal tool to study the role of P2X receptors in vivo.I nr a t s ,
intraplantar administration ofα,β-MeATP causes nocifensive
behavior in a dose-dependent manner [49]. The flinching be-
havior can be prevented by desensitization via 30-min local
pretreatment with α,β-MeATP, whereas pretreatment with
α,β-MeATP does not influence nocifensive behavior caused
by intraplantar injection of bradykinin (1 nmol) or formalin
(0.5%, 0.1 ml). Interestingly, local pretreatment of the TRPV1
agonist capsaicin (100 micrograms) abolished nocifensive be-
havior caused by α,β-MeATP, bradykinin, and formalin, in-
dicating that receptors for each of these ligands are colocalized
with TRPV1 on sensory fibers [ 49]. Similar findings have
been observed in human psychophysical studies, where trans-
cutaneous iontophoresis of ATP produced an increase in pain
reporting and prior desensitization of skin with capsaicin
abolished the ATP-induced pain responses [ 42]. Direct eval-
uation of the effects of ATP analogs on nociceptor subtypes
can be done using an ex vivo skin-nerve prep in rodents or
microneurography in humans, which allows classification of
sensory fiber types based on conduction velocity and re-
sponses to thermal and mechanical stimuli. In naïve rodent
skin, application of α,β-MeATP to sensory nerve endings
generated an increase in activity in about 40% of the nocicep-
tive units, with 75% of those responders identified as C-
mechanical and heat sensitive (CMH or polymodal
nociceptors), and the remaining being C-
mechanonociceptors (CMs) [ 50]. Microneurography studies
in human volunteers demonstrate 64% of CM fibers and
63% C-mechanoinsensitive fibers (CM i) respond to acute
ATP injection. Thermal responses of the CM i fibers allow
further classification as mechanoinsensitive, heat responsive
(CH 9/11 units) and mechanoi nsensitive, he at insensitive
(CMiHi 5/11 units) [ 51]. Collectively, these studies demon-
strate that ATP, or ATP analogs, can elicit a painful response
through direct excitation of nociceptive fibers.
Further experimentation with local application of α,β-
MeATP showed a potentiation of nocifensive behavior under
P2X3-Containing Receptors as Targets for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 827
conditions where the tissue is injured or inflamed. The con-
centration threshold to detect a behavioral response to
intraplantar α,β-MeATP shifted 100-fold lower in skin
pretreated with dilute carrageenan solution compared to nor-
mal skin [ 52]. Additionally, intraplantar co-administration of
α,β-MeATP with PGE2 generated a nocifensive response
greater than that observed with administration of each agent
alone, indicating a synergistic relationship exists between pe-
ripheral purinergic and prostaglandin nociceptive signaling
[52]. Co-administration of α,β-MeATP with a low dose of
formalin dose-dependently enhanced the phase 2 response
(12– 60 min after application) but not phase 1 (0 – 10 min) im-
plying an enhancement of mechanisms that lead to central
sensitization [ 53]. In skin previously sensitized with carra-
geenan, activity in C-MH fibers were potentiated with α,β-
MeATP at a much lower concentration compared to naïve
skin, which temporally correlated with nociceptive behavior
in conscious rats highlighting a link between neuronal hyper-
excitability and pain-related behavior [ 50, 52]. A similar in-
crease in α,β-MeATP-induced sensitivity was observed in rat
skin pretreated with Complete Freund’ sA d j u v a n t( C F A )[54].
In healthy volunteers whose skin was sensitized with capsai-
cin or UVb irradiation, ATP-induced pain behavior was sig-
nificantly enhanced compared to naïve skin [ 42 ].
Interestingly, ATP alone is not sufficient to sensitize C-
nociceptors to thermal or mechanical stimuli [51], suggesting
that a co-factor which is released only under sensitized or
inflamed conditions may be needed to potentiate the signaling
of ATP in sensory fibers. Collectively, these studies demon-
strate that ATP, or ATP analogs, can elicit painful responses
through direct excitation of nociceptive fibers and potentiate
activity in these fibers under inflamed or sensitized conditions,
and that many of these findings are translatable to humans.
Expression and Function of P2X3-Containing
Receptors in Nociceptive Pathways
Considerable heterogeneity can be observed in ATP-
generated currents in sensory neurons, which can consist of
rapidly inactivating currents with pronounced tachyphylaxis
or those with more sustained current kinetics that do not ex-
hibit tachyphylaxis [ 24, 29, 44, 45, 56]. The percentage of
acutely isolated sensory neurons that generate ATP-sensitive
currents range from 40 to 95%, with the differences likely due
to the species tested and neuronal culture conditions [ 24,
43– 45]. Messenger-RNA localization and immunohistochem-
ical studies demonstrate that many sensory neurons express
both P2X2 and P2X3 subunits [ 45, 57, 58] in addition to
P2X1 [ 56, 59]; however, see [ 60]. Heterologous expression
of P2X3 [ 61] and electrophysiology studies in neurons from
P2X3−/− animals [ 28, 29, 62] have identified the P2X3
homomer as responsible for the rapid transient currents in
DRG, while co-expression of P2X2 with P2X3 can produce
heteromers [15, 16, 63] and yield currents with significantly
slower inactivation kinetics that resemble the sustained cur-
rents seen in DRG and nodose neurons [15, 58]. Expression of
P2X3 is enriched in small diameter nociceptors that co-
express isolectin B4 (IB4) and glial-derived neurotrophic fac-
tor (GDNF), indicating these neurons are non-peptidergic, as
well as in a subpopulation of A δ-fibers [24, 45, 64, 65]. In
mouse sensory neurons, P2X3 is also co-expressed with
MrgprD, which are classified as nociceptors due to the pres-
ence of TTX-resistant Na+ currents and Ca2+ currents that are
inhibited byμ-opioids [66, 67]. P2X3 subunits can also form a
cognate receptor with other structurally related Cys-loop re-
ceptors. Heterologous co-expression of P2X3 with ASIC3, an
important receptor for pain signaling in its own right [68, 69],
demonstrates cross-functional regulation of receptor activity
in a calcium-dependent manner [70]. P2X3 and ASIC3 can be
coimmunoprecipitated from rat DRG membranes demonstrat-
ing a close spatial association. In vivo studies demonstrate a
facilitation of α,β-MeATP-mediated nocifensive behavior
with low pH, an activator of ASIC3 receptors, when
coadministered intraplantar. Collectively, these data suggest
the P2X3/ASIC3 cognate receptor may be important for acidic
and purinergic-mediated nociceptive signaling in the periph-
ery [70]. P2X3 is also often co-expressed with the nociceptive
marker TRPV1 [ 22– 26]. The axons of TRPV1 +/ATP-sensi-
tive neurons project and terminate in lamina IIinner in the dor-
sal horn with P2X3 immunoreactivity concentrated in the cen-
tral terminals [ 28, 57, 71– 73]. Other neurons that are
TRPV1−/ATP-sensitive project deeper into lamina V, indicat-
ing distinct purinergic pathways exist with divergent sensory
signaling [25, 74]. Peripherally, P2X3 is expressed in sensory
nerve terminals found in several tissues, including skin and
hollow organs in the viscera such as bladder and endometrium
tissue [57, 71, 75, 76]. The proposed mechanism of peripheral
and presynaptic P2X3-containing receptors in modulating no-
ciceptive behavior will be a subject of further discussion later
in this review (see “Site of Action of P2X3-Containing
Receptor Modulation of Nociceptive Signaling”).
It is important to note that the expression profile of P2X3
and P2X2/3 in sensory neurons has important differences
when comparing preclinical species and primates. While
P2X3 homomers and P2X2/3 heteromers are both widely
expressed in rodent sensory neurons [ 24, 29, 44, 45, 56– 58],
neurons isolated form non-human primate and human DRG
show robust P2X3-subunit expression with undetectable
P2X2-subunit expression as determined with reverse tran-
scriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
[77]. This expression profile was confirmed using electro-
physiology in non-human primate DRGs where 256/256 neu-
rons have a transient α,β-MeATP-induced current and zero
neurons have slowly desensitizing currents consistent with a
lack of P2X2/3 receptors [77]. These findings may impact the
J. Krajewski828
translation of preclinical findings to clinical efficacy, particu-
larly when interrogating nociceptive mechanisms driven pri-
marily through P2X2/3 heteromers.
Preclinical Evidence Suggesting Therapeutic
Utility of P2X3 Receptor Antagonists
for Chronic Pain
Several lines of evidence point to P2X3-containing receptors
as an attractive target for the treatment of some types of chron-
ic pain: (a) elevated levels of the P2X agonist ATP are found
in injured or inflamed tissue [ 78– 80], (b) P2X3 subunits are
expressed in sensory neurons in both preclinical and clinical
tissue [57, 72, 77], (c) P2X3 expression in neurons demon-
strate plasticity ipsilateral to the site of nerve injury [ 71, 81,
82] and inflammation [ 83, 84], and, finally, (d) P2X3-
containing receptor agonists directly activate sensory C-
fibers and cause nocifensive behavior in both preclinical and
clinical studies [42, 50, 51].
Previous efforts to study P2X3-containing receptors and
the role they play in sensory transduction in vivo were ham-
pered by the lack of selective ligands (see Table 1)a n d
reviewed in [21, 85, 86].
One of the first non-nucleotide P2X ligands with potent
and selective inhibition of P2X3-containing channels was
5-[[[(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl][(1S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-
naphthalenyl]amino]carbonyl]-1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic ac-
id (A-317491), a selective P2X3-containing receptor antago-
nist with > 100-fold selectivity over other P2 receptors and
non-purinergic receptors [87]. When dosed systemically, A-
317491 was efficacious in the CFA model of inflammatory
pain (thermal hyperalgesia and allodynia endpoints), as well
as in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of nerve
injury (thermal hyperalgesia and allodynia). The in vivo effi-
cacy of A-317491 was likely due to its activity on P2X3-
containing receptors since an equivalent dose of the (R)-enan-
tiomer A-317344, which is significantly less active against
P2X3-containing receptors in vitro, was ineffective in revers-
ing hyperalgesia in these models [ 87]. Interestingly, A-
317491 was inactive in models of acute nociception with
noxious stimuli, including thermal, mechanical, and
intraplantar capsaicin. These data support earlier observations
of enhanced responsiveness to sensory ATP signaling only
under conditions where the tissue is previously sensitized or
injured [42, 51, 52]. More recently, structurally distinct antag-
onists of P2X3-containing receptors have demonstrated effi-
cacy in preclinical models of pain. Gefapixant (AF-219/MK-
7264), a selective P2X3-containing receptor antagonist [ 89],
was examined in two models of inflammation: CFA and
mono-iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis model
of the knee. Gefapixant showed robust reversal of hypersen-
sitivity when dosed orally at 30 mpk with paw withdrawal
threshold (Von Frey) and weight-bearing endpoints with effi-
cacy similar to naproxen in both models. In the spared nerve
injury (SNI) model of neuropathic pain, 30 mpk p.o.
gefapixant fully reversed mechanical hyperalgesia (Von
Frey) and weight-bearing endpoints with efficacy equivalent
to that of gabapentin [ 89]. Finally, two representative com-
pounds from a structurally distinct series of selective P2X3-
containing antagonists, MK-3901 [ 92], and MK-2548 [ 93],
demonstrated efficacy when dosed systemically in preclinical
chronic models of pain. Selective P2X3-containing receptor
antagonists have also been evaluated in preclinical models of
cancer pain. Chronic pain in patients suffering from bone can-
cer is one of the most commonly reported maladies and is also
one of the most difficult to manage [ 94, 95]. Evidence exists
that P2X3 expression is upregulated on nerve fibers in preclin-
ical models of bone cancer pain [ 96, 97]. In a mouse tumor
model, the concentration of extracellular ATP increased from
undetectable levels in tumor-free tissue to several hundred
micromolar in the tumor interstitium [ 98], which is high
enough to directly activate P2X3-containing receptors [ 20].
AF-353 (formally RO-4), a potent and selective antagonist
of P2X3-containing receptors [ 99], was tested in a model of
bone cancer pain established by the introduction of MRMT-1
mammary gland carcinoma cells onto the tibia of rats, a model
that generates an increase in tactile hypersensitivity approxi-
mately 10 days after implantation [100]. When dosed prophy-
lactically, AF-353 prevented the development of tactile hyper-
sensitivity and deficits in weight-bearing, although this did not
translate to improvements in bone density [ 101]. In another
Table 1 P2X3-containing
receptor antagonists Compound name P2X3 IC50 (nM) P2X2/3 IC 50 (nM) Reference
A-317491 100 100 [87]
AF-353 (RO-4) 10 80 [88]
AF-792 (compound 28, RO-5) 6 13 [88]
Gefapixant (AF-219/MK-7264) 150 220 [89]
Compound 15 h 280 >2500 [90]
TNP-ATP 1 7 [21]
PPADS 1000 1000 [91]
P2X3-Containing Receptors as Targets for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 829
paradigm, AF-353 significantly reversed tactile hypersensitiv-
ity when dosed at day 17 (peak-onset); however, weight-
bearing was unaffected. Mechanical stimulation of MRMT-1
cells in vitro leads to a 5-fold increase in ATP release; how-
ever, this was not affected with the co-incubation of 25 μM
AF-353 demonstrating the behavioral effects of AF-353 are
not due to changes in ATP release [101]. In a similar model of
cancer pain, A-317491 dose-dependently suppressed thermal
hyperalgesia produced by the intratibial inoculation of NCTC
2472 fibrosarcoma cells to C3H/HeJ mice [ 102]. However,
when 4T1 mammary carcinoma cells were co-inoculated with
NCTC 2472 fibrosarcoma cells, A-317491 did not demon-
strate a robust effect, indicating that pain signaling induced
only by specific tumor cell types may be sensitive to P2X3-
containing receptor antagonists [103]. Large molecule antag-
onists to P2X3-containing receptors have also been identified.
The monoclonal antibody 12D4, directed to the P2X3-sub-
unit, exhibits potent inhibition of P2X3 currents evoked by
α,β-MeATP in 1321N1 cells and in acutely dissociated rat
DRG neurons [104]. Short-term exposure of cells expressing
P2X2/3 show a potentiation of α,β-MeATP currents; howev-
er, longer exposures inhibit these currents. Interestingly, 12D4
appears to bind to the desensitized state of P2X3-containing
receptors, and prolonged incubations drive membrane inter-
nalization leading to a decrease in current density [ 104].
In vivo studies with 12D4 dosed 3 days prior to balloon dis-
tention demonstrate efficacy in the TNBS-induced colitis vis-
ceral pain model, although 12D4 was inactive in the formalin
model and in CFA with a thermal withdrawal endpoint with
the same dosing regimen [104]. Post hoc confirmation of suc-
cessful P2X3-receptor internalization on DRG neurons was
not presented in these in vivo studies; therefore, a potential
explanation for the limited efficacy profile is an insufficient
reduction in P2X3 surface expression with systemic dosing.
Further evidence supporting the role of P2X3-containing
receptors in nociceptive signaling comes from selective
knockdown of P2X3 and P2X2 subunits. Cockayne et al. con-
firmed selective knockdown of P2X3 by the absence of all
transient ATP and α,β-MeATP-induced currents in both
DRG and nodose ganglia and the elimination of P2X3 immu-
noreactivity in DRG and the central terminals of the spinal
cord [ 28, 29]. These P2X3 −/− mice had a reduced response
to intraplantar flinching in response to α,β-MeATP [ 28],
and in both acute and persistent phases of the formalin model
[28, 62]. Consistent with what has been observed with phar-
macological tools, P2X3 −/− mice had normal responses to
acute noxious stimuli, including hot plate, paw flick, and tail
pressure when compared to wild type [62]. Interestingly, anes-
thetized P2X3−/− mice demonstrated a deficit in the coding for
innocuous warmth as measured using in vivo spinal cord re-
cordings, although mechanical coding remained intact [ 62].
However, conscious P2X3−/− animals exhibited an enhanced
thermal avoidance behavior, indicating compensatory
changes may contribute to the P2X3 −/− phenotype [ 105].
Selective knockdown of P2X3 using intrathecally delivered
antisense confirmed many of these findings, showing signifi-
cant blockade of acute behavior associated with intraplantar
injections of α,β-MeATP and formalin, as well as in models
of chronic pain [ 106, 107]. Furthermore, acute thermal
hyperalgesia post-carrageenan with P2X3 antisense was not
different than control which is consistent with findings in ex-
periments with P2X3 −/− mice [ 62]. P2X3 antisense knock-
down also reversed mechanical allodynia in the partial sciatic
ligation (PSL) [ 106] and SNL neuropathic injury models
[107]. These findings are particularly interesting, as previous
studies demonstrated a significant decrease in P2X3 expres-
sion in small diameter neurons in L5-L6 DRG ipsilateral to the
site of injury, but an increase in P2X3 expression in large
diameter neurons [ 108], consistent with findings in sciatic
nerve axotomy [ 71, 82]. Taken together, these data suggest
that increased P2X3-receptor activity on large diameter neu-
rons may play a significant role in the transmission of mechan-
ical allodynia associated with nerve injury and neuropathic
pain. P2X2 −/− mice, where P2X3 homomers are intact and
P2X2/3 heteromeric receptors are absent, demonstrate a phe-
notype distinct from that of the P2X3 −/− counterparts. For
example, intraplantar injection ofα,β-MeATP generated sim-
ilar nocifensive responses in P2X2−/− mice compared to wild
type, indicating P2X3 homomers are likely responsible for the
acute behavior seen with α,β-MeATP [29]. Of particular in-
terest, P2X2−/− mice exhibited acute flinching behavior simi-
lar to that of wild type after formalin injection while the per-
sistent phase was unaffected [28, 29, 62]. These data contrast
with P2X3−/− animals, with both P2X3 homomers and P2X2/
3 heteromers absent, which showed a deficit in both the acute
and persistent phases. The use of selective knockdown of
P2X3 and P2X2 subunits suggests that P2X3 homomers have
a key role in acute peripheral sensory transmission while
P2X2/3 receptors may contribute to the mechanisms that un-
derlie central sensitization. This topic will be explored further
in more detail in the next section.
Site of Action of P2X3-Containing Receptor
Modulation of Nociceptive Signaling
Sensory nerves are pseudounipolar, with axons extending
from the soma that receive signals from the periphery and
relay this information to the central nervous system via central
terminals innervating the spinal cord [ 109 ].
Immunohistochemical evidence of sensory nerves demon-
strate that P2X3-subunits are concentrated in both peripheral
and central terminals as well as the cell bodies of the primary
sensory afferents [57, 72, 75, 110, 111], which place P2X3-
containing receptors in key locations to initiate and modulate
nociceptive activity.
J. Krajewski830
In the periphery, there are several sources of ATP that
could initiate P2X3-mediated signaling. It is estimated that
the cytosolic concentration of ATP is approximately 1 –
10 mM [112]; therefore, large amounts of ATP can be released
upon tissue injury. Indeed, in a human incision model, levels
of extracellular ATP increased from 0.18 to 14 μM3 – 5m i n
post injury to the skin [ 78], concentrations high enough to
directly activate P2X3-containing receptors [7, 20]. Utilizing
an in vitro model of tissue injury, lysis of skin cells adjacent to
cultured DRG neurons induced depolarizing currents that
were abolished with enzymatic degradation of ATP, prior de-
sensitization with ATP, or pharmacologic blockade of P2X
receptors [113]. Peripherally, ATP can be released from in-
flammatory cells via active vesicular release as an “injury”
signal [114] that can directly act on P2X3-containing recep-
tors on peripheral nerves thereby initiating a nociceptive re-
sponse [75, 113]. Synaptic release of ATP has also been stud-
ied in peripheral sympathetic nerves. Pioneering work by
Geoffrey Burnstock demonstrated that ATP is a cotransmitter
with noradrenaline (NA) in sympathetic nerves that innervate
guinea pig vas deferens which control vascular tone [ 115].
Experiments in healthy volunteers demonstrated purinergic
antagonists delivered via microdialysis significantly inhibited
vasoconstriction induced by whole-body cooling [ 116].
Primary afferent sensitization can also be subject to modula-
tion via sympathetic efferent activity through P2X3-mediated
mechanisms. Recording from single fibers, intraplantar capsa-
icin enhanced the response of Aδ- and C-fibers to mechanical
stimuli only in animals with intact sympathetic post-
ganglionic efferents [ 117]. Further experimentation showed
that the P2X3-containing receptor antagonist pyridoxal-phos-
phate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulfonic acid (PPADS [ 21]) could
prevent the capsaicin-enhanced mechanical sensitivity in
these fibers in sham sympathectomized animals and pretreat-
ment with α,β-MeATP could restore this sensitivity in sym-
pathectomized rats [118]. In naïve animals, capsaicin-induced
sensitization of primary afferents also led to an increase of
TRPV1 and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) expres-
sion in sensory neurons, which was not observed in sympa-
thectomized rats. In these sympathectomized rats, the addition
of α,β-MeATP facilitated the capsaicin-induced neuronal up-
regulation of TRPV1 and CGRP in sensory neurons.
Application of uridine triphosphate (UTP), a P2Y-prefering
partial agonist, was not effective thereby highlighting the im-
portance of P2X3-containing receptors in this mechanism of
plasticity [119].
In addition to peripheral mechanisms, synaptic release of
ATP from the central terminals of primary afferents has a
significant role in modulating nociceptive signals in the spinal
cord. Evidence supporting presynaptic release of ATP comes
from experiments using spinal cord synaptosomes which
show elevated levels of ATP upon evoked release [ 120].
Furthermore, evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials
(EPSCs) in a transverse spinal cord slice generate a current
in lamina II sensitive to suramin, a P2X antagonist [ 121].
Exogenously applied ATP has been demonstrated to influence
glutamate signaling in the spinal cord. When recording from
the superficial dorsal horn (substantia gelatinosa), bath-
applied ATP elicits fast inward glutamate currents that were
inhibited by P2X antagonists [122, 123]. Gu and MacDermott
showed that in a DRG-dorsal horn coculture, ATP can in-
crease the frequency of miniature evoked postsynaptic cur-
rents (mEPSCs) that were inhibited by NMDA antagonists,
indicating an increase in presynaptic glutamate release [124].
Direct application of ATP to isolated dorsal horn neurons did
not potentiate glutamate currents, evidence that ATP is likely
exerting its effects presynaptically. In a spinal cord slice, ap-
plication of α,β-MeATP increased glutamatergic transient ac-
tivity in lamina II and long-lasting activity in lamina V [ 73].
Selective ablation of IB4-containing neurons eliminated both
the presynaptic P2X3 immunoreactivity in lamina II and the
transient α,β-MeATP-induced signaling while leaving the
long-lasting modulation in lamina V intact, evidence that
P2X3-containing receptors are primarily responsible for the
modulatory effects of ATP in lamina II [ 73]. In total, these
studies indicate that release of ATP from primary afferent
central terminals can act presynaptically on P2X3-containing
receptors facilitating glutamate release which could influence
nociceptive signaling. Data supporting this hypothesis comes
from studies with intrathecal delivery of α,β-MeATP which
caused a dose-dependent increase in thermal hyperalgesia that
was blocked by co-administration of PPADS and 2 ′,3′-
O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) adenosine 5 ′-triphosphate (TNP-
ATP), a P2X3-containing receptor antagonist [21, 125]. This
effect was not seen with the P2X1 preferring agonist β, γ-
methylene-L-ATP demonstrating the specific contribution of
P2X3-containing receptors to this effect.
The site of action where P2X3-containing receptors
play a key role in behavioral responses has been evalu-
ated pharmacologically using local administration of an-
tagonists. In the CFA model of inflammatory pain,
intraplantar TNP-ATP caused a partial reversal of me-
chanical hyperalgesia [ 126]. Spinal, but not intraplantar,
administration of A-317491 produced robust reversal of
mechanical allodynia in CCI and L5-L6 spinal nerve li-
gation nerve injury models [ 127]. Both routes of admin-
istration of A-317491 demonstrated efficacy in the acute
and persistent phases of the formalin model; however,
the reversal of flinching behavior was more robust when
dosed intrathecally. In models of inflammation,
intraplantar A-317491 elicite d a partial dose-dependent
reversal of thermal hyperalgesia in the CFA model but
was ineffective in acute carrageenan with the same end-
point consistent with earlier reports using antisense P2X3
a n di nP 2 X 3−/− mice [ 62, 107]. Data supporting periph-
eral P2X3-containing receptors playing a key role in
P2X3-Containing Receptors as Targets for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 831
mechanical allodynia in chr onic inflammation is support-
ed in rat skin-nerve preparations where A-317491
completely blocked mechanical sensitization of C-fibers
caused by α,β-MeATP in CFA-treated skin [ 54]. In vivo
studies using selective antagonists to P2X3 homomers
have also shed light on the specific role of these recep-
tors in nociceptive signaling. Cantin et al. reported that
systemically dosed compoun d 15 h, reportedly > 10-fold
selective for P2X3 homomers over P2X2/3 heteromers,
dose-dependently reverses mechanical hyperalgesia 96 h
post-CFA using a mechani cal endpoint with free plasma
exposures approximately equal to the rat P2X3 IC 50 at
the highest dose tested [ 90]. In contrast to A-317491,
local spinal delivery of compound 15 h was ineffective
in CFA while both compounds were effective when
dosed intraplantar [ 90, 127]. Several notable differences
between the studies using compound 15 h and A-317491
may account for the discrepancies, such as duration post-
CFA when compounds were tested (96 h vs. 48 h), mea-
sured endpoints (mechanical allodynia vs. thermal
hyperalgesia), and P2X3/P2X2/3 pharmacology (> 10-
fold selective for P2X3 homo mers vs. non-selective).
Assuming local delivery of compound 15 h achieved
concentrations that enabled selective inhibition P2X3
homomers over P2X2/3 heteromers, which was 5 mM
at the top dose, peripheral P2X3 receptors appear to play
a primary role over P2X2/3 in mechanical inflammatory
pain and efficacy is possible with peripherally restricted
compounds. On the other hand, these data also suggest
that P2X3 homomers expressed in the central terminals
may play a minor role compared to P2X2/3 heteromers
in modulating nociceptive s ignaling due to mechanical
inflammatory pain. However, interpreting in vivo results
with local delivery of compounds (e.g., intraplantar and
intrathecal) is hampered by poor control of compound
exposures, therefore potentia lly engaging other targets
important for nociception which can confound interpre-
tations. Experiments with sys temically delivered com-
pounds with well understood pharmacokinetics and target
pharmacology will be needed to understand if engaging
P2X3-containing receptors on central terminals provides
added efficacy compared to pe ripherally restricted com-
pounds. It is also not yet known whether selective inhi-
bition of P2X3 homomers will demonstrate efficacy in
preclinical neuropathic pain models as is observed with
the non-selective P2X3/P2X2/3 antagonists, or if efficacy
with selective inhibition of P2X3 homomers is limited to
inflammatory conditions. Given the low expression of
P2X2/3 receptors in primate sensory neurons [ 77], this
is an area where additional investigation is needed as
both selective P2X3 homomer antagonists and non-
selective P2X3/P2X2/3 antagonists are in clinical
development.
Clinical Programs Investigating
P2X3-Containing Receptor Antagonists
in Chronic Pain
Sensory afferents that innervate the urinary bladder originate
from the pelvic nerves and primarily consist of A δ-a n dC -
fibers, along with sympathetic efferents from the thoraco-
lumbar spinal cord [ 31], and respond in a graded manner to
distension of the bladder [128]. Hydrostatic extension of rab-
bit bladder induced the release of ATP which occurred in the
presence of intraluminal TTX and required an intact epithelial
layer, indicating that a non-vesicular mechanism is involved
[129, 130]. The physiologic role of P2X3-containing recep-
tors in this signaling pathway was investigated using P2X3−/−
and P2X2−/− mice. Immunohistochemical staining in bladder
tissue identified P2X3 expression in the subepithelial plexus
which was absent in P2X3 −/− mice while the overall organi-
zation of the tissue remained unchanged [ 28 , 131 ].
Intraluminal ATP release in response to bladder distension
of P2X3−/− mice was indistinguishable from wild type [ 131];
however, pelvic afferents showed an attenuated response to
bladder distension indicating P2X3-containing receptors are
important for downstream purinergic signaling and not ATP
release [29, 131]. Cystometry studies can measure the repeti-
tive urinary muscle contractions of the micturition reflex in
response to slow intravesical infusion of saline. Compared to
wild-type animals, both P2X3−/− and P2X2−/− mice show an
increase in the volume of saline required to initiate the reflex,
and a decrease in the number of evoked contractions [28, 29].
Local inhibition of P2X3-containing receptors via desensiti-
zation with intravesical infusion of α,β-MeATP [132], or in-
hibition with the antagonists TNP-ATP or PPADS [131], sup-
pressed bladder afferent activity in response to distension.
Spinal administration of the selective P2X3-containing recep-
tor antagonist AF-792 (form ally RO-5) dramatically sup-
pressed bladder contractions to a slow intravesical infusion
of saline [ 91]. Therefore, as in somatosensory nociception,
P2X3-containing receptors play a key role in bladder signal-
ing pathways at both a peripheral and spinal level. Evidence
supporting a role for P2X3-containing receptors in human
bladder pathology comes from studies using tissue isolated
from patients. In vitro investigation of bladder urothelial cells
(BUCs) from healthy volunteers and patients suffering from
interstitial cystitis (IC) demonstrates greater ATP release in
response to stretching in IC BUCs [133] which correlated with
a significant increase in P2X3 immunoreactivity [ 134].
Additionally, tissue biopsies taken from patients suffering
from intractable detrusor overactivity (DO) demonstrated a
significant decrease in PGP9.5(+) P2X3-immunoreactivity af-
ter intravesical treatment with botulinum neurotoxin type A
(BoNT/A), which correlated with reduction of urgency epi-
sodes at 4 and 16 weeks [135]. Although BoNT/A has known
effects on presynaptic neurotransmitter release [ 136], the
J. Krajewski832
effect on decreasing the number of P2X3-containing sensory
fibers and associated downstream purinergic signaling in the
bladder may also contribute to the clinical benefit [137, 138].
Based on the evidence supporting a role for P2X3-containing
receptors in bladder pathophysiology, a phase 2a study with
gefapixant was initiated in patients suffering from interstitial
cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) [139, 140]. Women
aged 18– 80 years of age who were diagnosed with IC/BPS for
more than 6 months and moderate to severe pain measured by
the mean daily Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were en-
tered into the study. The trial design was a 4-week double-
blind treatment with 74 female patients (38 placebo and 36
gefapixant). Patients taking g efapixant were dose titrated
starting from 50 mg BID and increased 50 mg daily to a
maximum dose of 300 mg BID. After the 4-week treatment,
gefapixant-treated patients had a decrease in the NPRS score
from 6.2 at baseline to 3.3 compared to 6.5 to 4.5 in placebo-
treated patients (p = 0.019). Patients in the treatment arm also
had significant improvements in urge to urinate and in both
Patient’ s and Clinician’ s Global Impression of Change com-
pared to placebo ( p = 0.038). The most frequent reported ad-
verse event in treated patients was dysgeusia/hypogeusia
[139].
Several studies have demonstrated a link between in-
creased levels of ATP in synovial fluid (SF) and joint pain
associated with arthritis. For example, SF analyzed from pa-
tients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) with knee pain
showed elevated levels of ATP compared to SF from patients
that had recovered from knee pain [ 79]. After 5 weeks of
treatment with intraarticular injections of the viscosupplement
high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HA), the OA patient
group had a significant reduction in SF ATP levels that strong-
ly correlated with a reduction in the Visual Analog Scale
(VAS) score [ 79]. In preclinical studies, elevated SF ATP
concentrations were also observed in the stifle joints of dogs
with urate-induced synovitis and also in dogs with naturally
occurring OA compared to normal joints [ 80]. In the rat, a
subpopulation of C- and A δ-fibers that innervate the knee
joint demonstrates increased excitation upon intraarticular in-
jection of α,β-MeATP and ATP which is prevented with co-
application of PPADS [ 55]. Also in rats, intraarticular co-
administration of A-317491 with carrageenan dose-
dependently prevents the development of hyperalgesia which
temporally correlates with lower joint inflammatory cytokine
levels and neutrophil infiltration, evidence supporting a role
for P2X3-containing receptors in joint pain associated with
inflammation [141]. In light of the preclinical evidence and
human biology, gefapixant was evaluated in a phase 2 clinical
study in patients suffering from pain associated with OA [142,
143]. Patient inclusion criteria included having OA of ≥ 6-
month duration and required baseline average daily pain be-
tween 5 and 9 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The
primary endpoint was change from baseline (week 4) of
weekly average daily NPRS. A total of 134 patients completed
4 weeks treatment (gefapixant n = 56, placebo n =7 8 ) .
Patients in the gefapixant treatment arm demonstrated a reduc-
tion in NRPS over placebo at all time points, with the greatest
effects seen at week 2 (p = 0.04). Placebo patients took signif-
icantly more rescue medication over all 4 weeks [ 142]. No
serious adverse events were noted, and most common adverse
finding in the gefapixant treatment arm was dysgeusia/
hypogeusia.
P2X3 subunit expression is found in vagal sensory neurons
that innervate the viscera [ 144– 146] which can transmit
mechanosensory signals and nociception [ 147]. A major
source for visceral pain is associated with endometriosis, de-
fined as the presence of functional endometrium outside the
uterine cavity which can result in dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia,
infertility, and severe pelvic pain [ 148, 149]. Although the
mechanism behind the pain is not clear, biopsies from patients
suffering from endometriosis-related pain (ERP) show an in-
crease in the density of sensory nerve fibers innervating the
endometriotic lesions [150– 152], including those expressing
the nociceptive marker CGRP [ 153]. In endometriotic biop-
sies, the expression level of P2X3 was greater in patients
compared to age-matched controls and positively correlated
with pain severity [ 76]. Consistent with the human biology
data, systemic delivery of an enhanced formulation of A-
317491 effectively reversed both mechanical and thermal
hyperalgesia in a preclinical rodent model of ERP [ 154].
According to publicly available information, several compa-
nies have active clinical programs to test antagonists to P2X3-
containing receptors in patients suffering from ERP [ 155,
156].
It is important to note that structurally diverse com-
pounds in clinical development with varying degrees of
P2X3/P2X2/3 receptor selectivity have reported alter-
ations in taste that, in some cases, overlap with clinical
efficacy [ 36, 37, 139, 142]. Care must be taken to pro-
ceed with clinical exposures that minimize the risk for
potentially unblinding the p atient to treatment, which
could inadvertently affect clinical outcomes that use a
subjective endpoint like patient-reported outcomes com-
m o n l yu s e di np a i nt r i a l s .
References
1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. 2nd ed
Seattle: IASP Press. 1994.
2. Institute of Medicine. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for
Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. The
National Academies Press; Washington; 2011.
3. Crofford LJ. Chronic Pain: Where the Body Meets the Brain.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:167-83.
4. Cheatle MD, Gallagher RM. Chronic pain and comorbid mood
and substance use disorders: a biopsychosocial treatment ap-
proach. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006;8(5):371-6.
5. Holton FA, Holton P. The possibility that ATP is a transmitter at
sensory nerve endings. J Physiol. 1953;119(4):50P-1P.
6. North RA, Surprenant A. Pharmacology of cloned P2X receptors.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;40:563-80.
7. Jarvis MF, Khakh BS. ATP-gated P2X cation-channels.
Neuropharmacology. 2009;56(1):208-15.
8. Fredholm BB, Abbracchio MP, Burnstock G, Dubyak GR,
Harden TK, Jacobson KA, et al. Towards a revised nomenclature
for P1 and P2 receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18(3):79-82.
9. Khakh BS, Burnstock G, Kennedy C, King BF, North RA,
Seguela P, et al. International union of pharmacology. XXIV.
Current status of the nomenclature and properties of P2X recep-
tors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(1):107-18.
10. Alexander SP, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to Receptors and
Channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164 Suppl
1:S1-324.
11. Junger WG. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic sig-
nalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(3):201-12.
12. Jacobson KA, Muller CE. Medicinal chemistry of adenosine, P2Y
and P2X receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2016;104:31-49.
13. Borea PA, Gessi S, Merighi S, Vincenzi F, Varani K.
Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art.
Physiol Rev. 2018;98(3):1591-625.
14. Egan TM, Cox JA, Voigt MM. Molecular structure of P2X recep-
tors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4(8):821-9.
15. Lewis C, Neidhart S, Holy C, North RA, Buell G, Surprenant A.
Coexpression of P2X2 and P2X3 receptor subunits can account
for ATP-gated currents in sensory neurons. Nature.
1995;377(6548):432-5.
16. Radford KM, Virginio C, Surprenant A, North RA, Kawashima E.
Baculovirus expression provides direct evidence for heteromeric
assembly of P2X2 and P2X3 receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17(17):
6529-33.
17. Kowalski M, Hausmann R, Schmid J, Dopychai A, Stephan G,
Tang Y, et al. Flexible subunit stoichiometry of functional human
P2X2/3 heteromeric receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2015;99:
115-30.
18. Brake AJ, Wagenbach MJ, Julius D. New structural motif for
ligand-gated ion channels defined by an ionotropic ATP receptor.
Nature. 1994;371(6497):519-23.
19. Mansoor SE, Lu W, Oosterheert W, Shekhar M, Tajkhorshid E,
Gouaux E. X-ray structures define human P2X(3) receptor gating
cycle and antagonist action. Nature. 2016;538(7623):66-71.
20. Egan TM, Khakh BS. Contribution of calcium ions to P2X chan-
nel responses. J Neurosci. 2004;24(13):3413-20.
21. Gum RJ, Wakefield B, Jarvis MF. P2X receptor antagonists for
pain management: examination of binding and physicochemical
properties. Purinergic Signal. 2012;8(Suppl 1):41-56.
22. Guo A, Vulchanova L, Wang J, Li X, Elde R.
Immunocytochemical localization of the vanilloid receptor 1
(VR1): relationship to neuropeptides, the P2X3 purinoceptor
and IB4 binding sites. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11(3):946-58.
23. Ueno S, Tsuda M, Iwanaga T, Inoue K. Cell type-specific ATP-
activated responses in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Br J
Pharmacol. 1999;126(2):429-36.
24. Petruska JC, Cooper BY, Johnson RD, Gu JG. Distribution pat-
terns of different P2x receptor phenotypes in acutely dissociated
dorsal root ganglion neurons of adult rats. Exp Brain Res.
2000;134(1):126-32.
25. Nakatsuka T, Gu JG. ATP P2X receptor-mediated enhancement
of glutamate release and evoked EPSCs in dorsal horn neurons of
the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2001;21(17):6522-31.
26. Nakatsuka T, Furue H, Yoshimura M, Gu JG. Activation of cen-
tral terminal vanilloid receptor-1 receptors and alpha beta-
methylene-ATP-sensitive P2X receptors reveals a converged syn-
aptic activity onto the deep dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord.
J Neurosci. 2002;22(4):1228-37.
27. Pijacka W, Moraes DJ, Ratcliffe LE, Nightingale AK, Hart EC, da
Silva MP, et al. Purinergic receptors in the carotid body as a new
drug target for controlling hypertension. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):
1151-9.
28. Cockayne DA, Hamilton SG, Zhu QM, Dunn PM, Zhong Y,
Novakovic S, et al. Urinary bladder hyporeflexia and reduced
pain-related behaviour in P2X3-deficient mice. Nature.
2000;407(6807):1011-5.
29. Cockayne DA, Dunn PM, Zhong Y, Rong W, Hamilton SG,
Knight GE, et al. P2X2 knockout mice and P2X2/P2X3 double
knockout mice reveal a role for the P2X2 receptor subunit in
mediating multiple sensory effects of ATP. J Physiol.
2005;567(Pt 2):621-39.
30. Ford AP, Gever JR, Nunn PA, Zhong Y, Cefalu JS, Dillon MP,
et al. Purinoceptors as therapeutic targets for lower urinary tract
dysfunction. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147 Suppl 2:S132-43.
31. Ford AP, Cockayne DA. ATP and P2X purinoceptors in urinary
tract disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011(202):485-526.
32. Ferguson AC, Sutton BW, Boone TB, Ford AP, Munoz A.
Inhibition of urothelial P2X3 receptors prevents desensitization
of purinergic detrusor contractions in the rat bladder. BJU Int.
2015;116(2):293-301.
33. Salazar BH, Hoffman KA, Zhang C, Zhang YC, Cruz Y, Boone
TB, et al. Modulatory effects of intravesical P2X2/3 purinergic
receptor inhibition on lower urinary tract electromyographic prop-
erties and voiding function of female rats with moderate or severe
spinal cord injury. Bju International. 2019;123(3):538-47.
34. Garceau D, Chauret N. BLU-5937: A selective P2X3 antagonist
with potent anti-tussive effect and no taste alteration. Pulm
Pharmacol Ther. 2019;56:56-62.
35. Pelleg A, Xu F, Zhuang J, Undem B, Burnstock G. DT-0111: a
novel drug-candidate for the treatment of COPD and chronic
cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019;13:1753466619877960.
36. Abdulqawi R, Dockry R, Holt K, Layton G, McCarthy BG, Ford
AP, et al. P2X3 receptor antagonist (AF-219) in refractory chronic
cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2
study. Lancet. 2015;385(9974):1198-205.
37. Niimi A, Ishihara H, Hida H, Miyazaki S. Late Breaking Abstract
- Phase 2a randomised, double- blind, placebo-controlled,
J. Krajewski834
crossover study of a novel P2X3 receptor antagonist S-600918 in
patients with refractory chronic cough. European Respiratory
Journal. 2019;54(suppl 63):RCT452.
38. Smith JA, Kitt MM, Morice AH, Birring SS, McGarvey LP, Sher
MR, et al. Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treat-
ment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised,
double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial. Lancet
Respir Med. 2020.
39. Burnstock G. Purinergic Mechanisms and Pain. Adv Pharmacol.
2016;75:91-137.
40. Bleehen T, Keele CA. Observations on the algogenic actions of
adenosine compounds on the human blister base preparation. Pain.
1977;3(4):367-77.
41. Coutts AA, Jorizzo JL, Eady RA, Greaves MW, Burnstock G.
Adenosine triphosphate-evoked vascular changes in human skin:
mechanism of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 1981;76(4):391-401.
42. Hamilton SG, Warburton J, Bhattacharjee A, Ward J, McMahon
SB. ATP in human skin elicits a dose-related pain response which
is potentiated under conditions of hyperalgesia. Brain. 2000;123 (
Pt 6):1238-46.
43. Bean BP. Pharmacology and Electrophysiology of Atp-Activated
Ion Channels. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 1992;13(3):
87-90.
44. Grubb BD, Evans RJ. Characterization of cultured dorsal root
ganglion neuron P2X receptors. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11(1):149-
54.
45. Petruska JC, Napaporn J, Johnson RD, Gu JG, Cooper BY.
Subclassified acutely dissociated cells of rat DRG: histochemistry
and patterns of capsaicin-, proton-, and ATP-activated currents. J
Neurophysiol. 2000;84(5):2365-79.
46. Virginio C, North RA, Surprenant A. Calcium permeability and
block at homomeric and heteromeric P2X2 and P2X3 receptors,
and P2X receptors in rat nodose neurones. J Physiol. 1998;510 ( Pt
1):27-35.
47. Virginio C, Robertson G, Surprenant A, North RA.
Trinitrophenyl-substituted nucleotides are potent antagonists se-
lective for P2X1, P2X3, and heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors. Mol
Pharmacol. 1998;53(6):969-73.
48. Undem BJ, Chuaychoo B, Lee MG, Weinreich D, Myers AC,
Kollarik M. Subtypes of vagal afferent C-fibres in guinea-pig
lungs. J Physiol. 2004;556(Pt 3):905-17.
49. Bland-Ward PA, Humphrey PP. Acute nociception mediated by
hindpaw P2X receptor activation in the rat. Br J Pharmacol.
1997;122(2):365-71.
50. Hamilton SG, McMahon SB, Lewin GR. Selective activation of
nociceptors by P2X receptor agonists in normal and inflamed rat
skin. J Physiol. 2001;534(Pt. 2):437-45.
51. Hilliges M, Weidner C, Schmelz M, Schmidt R, Orstavik K,
Torebjork E, et al. ATP responses in human C nociceptors. Pain.
2002;98(1-2):59-68.
52. Hamilton SG, Wade A, McMahon SB. The effects of inflamma-
tion and inflammatory mediators on nociceptive behaviour in-
duced by ATP analogues in the rat. Br J Pharmacol.
1999;126(1):326-32.
53. Sawynok J, Reid A. Peripheral adenosine 5'-triphosphate en-
hances nociception in the formalin test via activation of a
purinergic p2X receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;330(2-3):115-21.
54. Wu G, Whiteside GT, Lee G, Nolan S, Niosi M, Pearson MS, et al.
A-317491, a selective P2X3/P2X2/3 receptor antagonist, reverses
inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia through action at peripher-
al receptors in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;504(1-2):45-53.
55. Dowd E, McQueen DS, Chessell IP, Humphrey PP. P2X receptor-
mediated excitation of nociceptive afferents in the normal and
arthritic rat knee joint. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;125(2):341-6.
56. Petruska JC, Cooper BY, Gu JG, Rau KK, Johnson RD.
Distribution of P2X1, P2X2, and P2X3 receptor subunits in rat
primary afferents: relation to population markers and specific cell
types. J Chem Neuroanat. 2000;20(2):141-62.
57. Vulchanova L, Riedl MS, Shuster SJ, Buell G, Surprenant A,
North RA, et al. Immunohistochemical study of the P2X2 and
P2X3 receptor subunits in rat and monkey sensory neurons and
their central terminals. Neuropharmacology. 1997;36(9):1229-42.
58. Brederson JD, Jarvis MF. Homomeric and heteromeric P2X3 re-
ceptors in peripheral sensory neurons. Curr Opin Investig Drugs.
2008;9(7):716-25.
59. Petruska JC, Mena N, Nakatsuka T, Cooper BY, Johnson RD, Gu
JG. P2X1 receptor subunit immunoreactivity and ATP-evoked
fast currents in adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons.
Neuroreport. 2000;11(16):3589-92.
60. Kobayashi K, Fukuoka T, Yamanaka H, Dai Y, Obata K,
Tokunaga A, et al. Differential expression patterns of mRNAs
for P2X receptor subunits in neurochemically characterized dorsal
root ganglion neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2005;481(4):
377-90.
61. Rae MG, Rowan EG, Kennedy C. Pharmacological properties of
P2X3-receptors present in neurones of the rat dorsal root ganglia.
Br J Pharmacol. 1998;124(1):176-80.
62. Souslova V, Cesare P, Ding Y, Akopian AN, Stanfa L, Suzuki R,
et al. Warm-coding deficits and aberrant inflammatory pain in
mice lacking P2X3 receptors. Nature. 2000;407(6807):1015-7.
63. Kowalski M, Hausmann R, Dopychai A, Grohmann M, Franke H,
Nieber K, et al. Conformational flexibility of the agonist binding
jaw of the human P2X3 receptor is a prerequisite for channel
opening. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(22):5093-112.
64. Chen CC, Akopian AN, Sivilotti L, Colquhoun D, Burnstock G,
Wood JN. A P2X purinoceptor expressed by a subset of sensory
neurons. Nature. 1995;377(6548):428-31.
65. Burnstock G. P2X receptors in sensory neurones. Br J Anaesth.
2000;84(4):476-88.
66. Dussor G, Zylka MJ, Anderson DJ, McCleskey EW. Cutaneous
sensory neurons expressing the Mrgprd receptor sense extracellu-
lar ATP and are putative nociceptors. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99(4):
1581-9.
67. Dussor G, Koerber HR, Oaklander AL, Rice FL, Molliver DC.
Nucleotide signaling and cutaneous mechanisms of pain transduc-
tion. Brain Res Rev. 2009;60(1):24-35.
68. Sluka KA, Gregory NS. The dichotomized role for acid sensing
ion channels in musculoskeletal pain and inflammation.
Neuropharmacology. 2015;94:58-63.
69. Deval E, Lingueglia E. Acid-Sensing Ion Channels and
nociception in the peripheral and central nervous systems.
Neuropharmacology. 2015;94:49-57.
70. Stephan G, Huang L, Tang Y, Vilotti S, Fabbretti E, Yu Y, et al.
The ASIC3/P2X3 cognate receptor is a pain-relevant and ligand-
gated cationic channel. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1354.
71. Bradbury EJ, Burnstock G, McMahon SB. The expression of
P2X3 purinoreceptors in sensory neurons: effects of axotomy
and glial-derived neurotrophic factor. Mol Cell Neurosci.
1998;12(4-5):256-68.
72. Vulchanova L, Riedl MS, Shuster SJ, Stone LS, Hargreaves KM,
Buell G, et al. P2X3 is expressed by DRG neurons that terminate
in inner lamina II. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10(11):3470-8.
73. Nakatsuka T, Tsuzuki K, Ling JX, Sonobe H, Gu JG. Distinct
roles of P2X receptors in modulating glutamate release at different
primary sensory synapses in rat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol.
2003;89(6):3243-52.
74. Tsuda M, Koizumi S, Kita A, Shigemoto Y, Ueno S, Inoue K.
Mechanical allodynia caused by intraplantar injection of P2X re-
ceptor agonist in rats: involvement of heteromeric P2X2/3 recep-
tor signaling in capsaicin-insensitive primary afferent neurons. J
Neurosci. 2000;20(15):RC90.
P2X3-Containing Receptors as Targets for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 835
75. Cook SP, Vulchanova L, Hargreaves KM, Elde R, McCleskey
EW. Distinct ATP receptors on pain-sensing and stretch-sensing
neurons. Nature. 1997;387(6632):505-8.
76. Ding S, Zhu L, Tian Y, Zhu T, Huang X, Zhang X. P2X3 receptor
involvement in endometriosis pain via ERK signaling pathway.
PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184647.
77. Serrano A, Mo G, Grant R, Pare M, O'Donnell D, Yu XH, et al.
Differential expression and pharmacology of native P2X receptors
in rat and primate sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 2012;32(34):
11890-6.
78. Born GVR, Kratzer MAA. S ource and Concentration of
Extracellular Adenos ine-Triphosphate during Hemostasis in
Rats, Rabbits and Man. J Physiol-London. 1984;354(Sep):419-
29.
79. Kumahashi N, Naitou K, Nishi H, Oae K, Watanabe Y, Kuwata S,
et al. Correlation of changes in pain intensity with synovial fluid
adenosine triphosphate levels after treatment of patients with os-
teoarthritis of the knee with high-molecular-weight hyaluronic
acid. Knee. 2011;18(3):160-4.
80. Torres BT, Jimenez DA, Budsberg SC. Elevated synovial fluid
concentration of adenosine triphosphate in dogs with osteoarthritis
or sodium urate-induced synovitis of the stifle. Vet Comp Orthop
Traumatol. 2016;29(4):344-6.
81. Novakovic SD, Kassotakis LC, Oglesby IB, Smith JA, Eglen RM,
Ford AP, et al. Immunocytochemical localization of P2X3
purinoceptors in sensory neurons in naive rats and following neu-
ropathic injury. Pain. 1999;80(1-2):273-82.
82. Tsuzuki K, Kondo E, Fukuoka T, Yi D, Tsujino H, Sakagami M,
et al. Differential regulation of P2X(3) mRNA expression by pe-
ripheral nerve injury in intact and injured neurons in the rat sen-
sory ganglia. Pain. 2001;91(3):351-60.
83. Xu GY, Huang LY. Peripheral inflammation sensitizes P2X
receptor-mediated responses in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons.
J Neurosci. 2002;22(1):93-102.
84. Shinoda M, Ozaki N, Asai H, Nagamine K, Sugiura Y. Changes in
P2X3 receptor expression in the trigeminal ganglion following
monoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint in rats. Pain.
2005;116(1-2):42-51.
85. North RA, Jarvis MF. P2X receptors as drug targets. Mol
Pharmacol. 2013;83(4):759-69.
86. Marucci G, Dal Ben D, Buccioni M, Marti Navia A, Spinaci A,
Volpini R, et al. Update on novel purinergic P2X3 and P2X2/3
receptor antagonists and their potential therapeutic applications.
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2019;29(12):943-63.
87. Jarvis MF, Burgard EC, McGaraughty S, Honore P, Lynch K,
Brennan TJ, et al. A-317491, a novel potent and selective non-
nucleotide antagonist of P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors, reduces
chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(26):17179-84.
88. Carter DS, Alam M, Cai H, Dillon MP, Ford AP, Gever JR, et al.
Identification and SAR of novel diaminopyrimidines. Part 1: The
discovery of RO-4, a dual P2X(3)/P2X(2/3) antagonist for the
treatment of pain. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(6):1628-31.
89. Richards D, Gever JR, Ford AP, Fountain SJ. Action of MK-7264
(gefapixant) at human P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors and in vivo
efficacy in models of sensitisation. Br J Pharmacol.
2019;176(13):2279-91.
90. Cantin LD, Bayrakdarian M, Buon C, Grazzini E, Hu YJ,
Labrecque J, et al. Discovery of P2X3 selective antagonists for
the treatment of chronic pain. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22(7):
2565-71.
91. Kaan TK, Yip PK, Grist J, Cefalu JS, Nunn PA, Ford AP, et al.
Endogenous purinergic control of bladder activity via presynaptic
P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors in the spinal cord. J Neurosci.
2010;30(12):4503-7.
92. Burgey CS. Discovery of P2X3 receptor antagonists for the treat-
ment of chronic pain. In: 241st ACS national meeting & exposi-
tion, Anaheim, CA, 27– 31 March MEDI-15. 2011.
93. Burgey CS. Discovery of the 2nd Generation P2X3 Receptor
Antagonist, MK-2548, for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. In:
18th SCI/RSC Medicinal Chemistry Symposium, Cambridge,
UK, September 14th, 2015. 2015.
94. Mantyh PW. Bone cancer pain: from mechanism to therapy. Curr
Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014;8(2):83-90.
95. Neufeld NJ, Elnahal SM, Alvarez RH. Cancer pain: a review of
epidemiology, clinical quality and value impact. Future Oncol.
2017;13(9):833-41.
96. Gilchrist LS, Cain DM, Harding-Rose C, Kov AN,
Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Kennedy WR, et al. Re-organization
of P2X3 receptor localization on epidermal nerve fibers in a mu-
rine model of cancer pain. Brain Res. 2005;1044(2):197-205.
97. Nagamine K, Ozaki N, Shinoda M, Asai H, Nishiguchi H,
Mitsudo K, et al. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia
induced by experimental squamous cell carcinoma of the lower
gingiva in rats. J Pain. 2006;7(9):659-70.
98. Pellegatti P, Raffaghello L, Bianchi G, Piccardi F, Pistoia V, Di
Virgilio F. Increased level of extracellular ATP at tumor sites:
in vivo imaging with plasma membrane luciferase. PLoS One.
2008;3(7):e2599.
99. Gever JR, Soto R, Henningsen RA, Martin RS, Hackos DH,
Panicker S, et al. AF-353, a novel, potent and orally bioavailable
P2X3/P2X2/3 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160(6):
1387-98.
100. Medhurst SJ, Walker K, Bowes M, Kidd BL, Glatt M, Muller M,
et al. A rat model of bone cancer pain. Pain. 2002;96(1-2):129-40.
101. Kaan TK, Yip PK, Patel S, Davies M, Marchand F, Cockayne DA,
et al. Systemic blockade of P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors attenuates
bone cancer pain behaviour in rats. Brain. 2010;133(9):2549-64.
102. Gonzalez-Rodriguez S, Pevida M, Roques BP, Fournie-Zaluski
MC, Hidalgo A, Menendez L, et al. Involvement of enkephalins
in the inhibition of osteosarcoma-induced thermal hyperalgesia
evoked by the blockade of peripheral P2X3 receptors. Neurosci
Lett. 2009;465(3):285-9.
103. Hansen RR, Nasser A, Falk S, Baldvinsson SB, Ohlsson PH, Bahl
JM, et al. Chronic administration of the selective P2X3, P2X2/3
receptor antagonist, A-317491, transiently attenuates cancer-
induced bone pain in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;688(1-3):27-
34.
104. Shcherbatko A, Foletti D, Poulsen K, Strop P, Zhu G, Hasa-
Moreno A, et al. Modulation of P2X3 and P2X2/3 Receptors by
Monoclonal Antibodies. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(23):12254-70.
105. Shimizu I, Iida T, Guan Y, Zhao C, Raja SN, Jarvis MF, et al.
Enhanced thermal avoidance in mice lacking the ATP receptor
P2X3. Pain. 2005;116(1-2):96-108.
106. Barclay J, Patel S, Dorn G, Wotherspoon G, Moffatt S, Eunson L,
et al. Functional downregulation of P2X3 receptor subunit in rat
sensory neurons reveals a significant role in chronic neuropathic
and inflammatory pain. J Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8139-47.
107. Honore P, Kage K, Mikusa J, Watt AT, Johnston JF, Wyatt JR,
et al. Analgesic profile of intrathecal P2X(3) antisense oligonucle-
otide treatment in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain
states in rats. Pain. 2002;99(1-2):11-9.
108. Kage K, Niforatos W, Zhu CZ, Lynch KJ, Honore P, Jarvis MF.
Alteration of dorsal root ganglion P2X3 receptor expression and
function following spinal nerve ligation in the rat. Exp Brain Res.
2002;147(4):511-9.
109. Kandel ER, Schwartz J, Mack TMJ. Principles of Neural Science
(4th ed.). Cambridge: McGrawHill. 2000.
110. Llewellyn-Smith IJ, Burnstock G. Ultrastructural localization of
P2X3 receptors in rat sensory neurons. Neuroreport. 1998;9(11):
2545-50.
J. Krajewski836
111. Burgard EC, Niforatos W, van Biesen T, Lynch KJ, Touma E,
Metzger RE, et al. P2X receptor-mediated ionic currents in dorsal
root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82(3):1590-8.
112. Beis I, Newsholme EA. The contents of adenine nucleotides,
phosphagens and some glycolytic intermediates in resting muscles
from vertebrates and invertebrates. Biochem J. 1975;152(1):23-
32.
113. Cook SP, McCleskey EW. Cell damage excites nociceptors
through release of cytosolic ATP. Pain. 2002;95(1-2):41-7.
114. Kato Y, Hiasa M, Ichikawa R, Hasuzawa N, Kadowaki A,
Iwatsuki K, et al. Identification of a vesicular ATP release inhib-
itor for the treatment of neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(31):E6297-E305.
115. Burnstock G. Noradrenaline and ATP as cotransmitters in sympa-
thetic nerves. Neurochem Int. 1990;17(2):357-68.
116. Lang JA, Krajek AC, Smaller KA. Evidence for a functional va-
soconstrictor role for ATP in the human cutaneous microvascula-
ture. Exp Physiol. 2017;102(6):684-93.
117. Ren Y, Zou X, Fang L, Lin Q. Sympathetic modulation of activity
in Adelta- and C-primary nociceptive afferents after intradermal
injection of capsaicin in rats. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(1):365-77.
118. Ren Y, Zou X, Fang L, Lin Q. Involvement of peripheral
purinoceptors in sympathetic modulation of capsaicin-induced
sensitization of primary afferent fibers. J Neurophysiol.
2006;96(5):2207-16.
119. Xu X, Wang P, Zou X, Li D, Fang L, Gong K, et al. The effects of
sympathetic outflow on upregulation of vanilloid receptors
TRPV(1) in primary afferent neurons evoked by intradermal cap-
saicin. Exp Neurol. 2010;222(1):93-107.
120. Sawynok J, Downie JW, Reid AR, Cahill CM, White TD. ATP
release from dorsal spinal cord synaptosomes: characterization
and neuronal origin. Brain Res. 1993;610(1):32-8.
121. Bardoni R, Goldstein PA, Lee CJ, Gu JG, MacDermott AB. ATP
P2X receptors mediate fast synaptic transmission in the dorsal
horn of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1997;17(14):5297-304.
122. Li J, Perl ER. ATP modulation of synaptic transmission in the
spinal substantia gelatinosa. J Neurosci. 1995;15(5 Pt 1):3357-65.
123. Li P, Calejesan AA, Zhuo M. ATP P2x receptors and sensory
synaptic transmission between primary afferent fibers and spinal
dorsal horn neurons in rats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80(6):3356-60.
124. Gu JG, MacDermott AB. Activation of ATP P2X receptors elicits
glutamate release from sensory neuron synapses. Nature.
1997;389(6652):749-53.
125. Tsuda M, Ueno S, Inoue K. In vivo pathway of thermal
hyperalgesia by intrathecal administration of alpha,beta-methy-
lene ATP in mouse spinal cord: involvement of the glutamate-
NMDA receptor system. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;127(2):449-56.
126. Dai Y, Fukuoka T, Wang H, Yamanaka H, Obata K, Tokunaga A,
et al. Contribution of sensitized P2X receptors in inflamed tissue to
the mechanical hypersensitivity revealed by phosphorylated ERK
in DRG neurons. Pain. 2004;108(3):258-66.
127. McGaraughty S, Wismer CT, Zhu CZ, Mikusa J, Honore P, Chu
KL, et al. Effects of A-317491, a novel and selective P2X3/P2X2/
3 receptor antagonist, on neuropathic, inflammatory and
chemogenic nociception following intrathecal and intraplantar ad-
ministration. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;140(8):1381-8.
128. Janig W, Morrison JF. Functional properties of spinal visceral
afferents supplying abdominal and pelvic organs, with special
emphasis on visceral nociception. Prog Brain Res. 1986;67:87-
114.
129. Ferguson DR, Kennedy I, Burton TJ. ATP is released from rabbit
urinary bladder epithelial cells by hydrostatic pressure changes– a
possible sensory mechanism? J Physiol. 1997;505 ( Pt 2):503-11.
130. Burnstock G. Release of vasoactive substances from endothelial
cells by shear stress and purinergic mechanosensory transduction.
J Anat. 1999;194 ( Pt 3):335-42.
131. Vlaskovska M, Kasakov L, Rong W, Bodin P, Bardini M,
Cockayne DA, et al. P2X3 knock-out mice reveal a major sensory
role for urothelially released ATP. J Neurosci. 2001;21(15):5670-
7.
132. Namasivayam S, Eardley I, Morrison JF. Purinergic sensory neu-
rotransmission in the urinary bladder: an in vitro study in the rat.
BJU Int. 1999;84(7):854-60.
133. Sun Y, Chai TC. Augmented extracellular ATP signaling in blad-
der urothelial cells from patients with interstitial cystitis. Am J
Physiol-Cell Ph. 2006;290(1):C27-C34.
134. Sun Y, Chai TC. Up-regulation of P2X3 receptor during stretch of
bladder urothelial cells from patients with interstitial cystitis. J
Urol. 2004;171(1):448-52.
135. Apostolidis A, Popat R, Yiangou Y, Cockayne D, Ford AP, Davis
JB, et al. Decreased sensory receptors P2X3 and TRPV1 in
suburothelial nerve fibers following intradetrusor injections of bot-
ulinum toxin for human detrusor overactivity. J Urol.
2005;174(3):977-82; discussion 82-3.
136. Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A. Neurophysiological effects of botu-
linum toxin type A. Neurotox Res. 2006;9(2-3):109-14.
137. Sahai A, Khan MS, Gregson N, Smith K, Dasgupta P, Group
GKTBS. Botulinum toxin for detrusor overactivity and symptoms
of overactive bladder: where we are now and where we are going.
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4(7):379-86.
138. Lawrence GW, Aoki KR, Dolly JO. Excitatory cholinergic and
purinergic signaling in bladder are equally susceptible to botuli-
num neurotoxin a consistent with co-release of transmitters from
efferent fibers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334(3):1080-6.
139. Moldwin R KM, Mangel J, Beyer R, Hanno P, Buterra P, Ford A.
A PHASE 2 STUDY IN WOMEN WITH INTERSTITIAL
CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME (IC/BPS) OF THE
NOVEL P2X3 ANTAGONIST AF-219. [abstract No 23] In: 45th
International Continence Society (ICS) Annual Meeting; 2015 Oct
6-9; Montreal, Canada Bristol (United Kingdom). 2015.
140. NCT01569438 Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ .
Accessed 6 May 2020.
141. Teixeira JM, Bobinski F, Parada CA, Sluka KA, Tambeli CH.
P2X3 and P2X2/3 Receptors Play a Crucial Role in Articular
Hyperalgesia Development Through Inflammatory Mechanisms
in the Knee Joint Experimental Synovitis. Mol Neurobiol.
2017;54(8):6174-86.
142. Strand V KM, Kivitz A, Ford A, Butera P, McCarthy B. An
Exploratory 4-Week Study of a P2X3 Antagonist AF-219 in the
Treatment of Patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee. ACR/
ARHP Annual Meeting, Abstract 2240. 2014.
143. NCT01554579 Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov .
Accessed 6 May 2020.
144. Papka RE, Hafemeister J, Storey-Workley M. P2X receptors in the
rat uterine cervix, lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia, and spinal cord
during pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;321(1):35-44.
145. Chaban VV. Visceral sensory neurons that innervate both uterus
and colon express nociceptive TRPv1 and P2X3 receptors in rats.
Ethn Dis. 2008;18(2 Suppl 2):S2-20-4.
146. Kollarik M, Ru F, Undem BJ. Phenotypic distinctions between the
nodose and jugular TRPV1-positive vagal sensory neurons in the
cynomolgus monkey. Neuroreport. 2019;30(8):533-7.
147. Burnstock G. Purinergic mechanosensory transduction and viscer-
al pain. Mol Pain. 2009;5:69.
148. Strathy JH, Molgaard CA, Coulam CB, Melton LJ, 3rd.
Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometri-
osis among fertile and infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(6):
667-72.
149. Bloski T, Pierson R. Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain:
Unraveling the Mystery Behind this Complex Condition. Nurs
Womens Health. 2008;12(5):382-95.
P2X3-Containing Receptors as Targets for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 837
150. Wang G, Tokushige N, Markham R, Fraser IS. Rich innervation of
deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(4):827-34.
151. Zhang X, Lu B, Huang X, Xu H, Zhou C, Lin J. Innervation of
endometrium and myometrium in women with painful
adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):730-7.
152. Arnold J, Barcena de Arellano ML, Ruster C, Vercellino GF,
Chiantera V, Schneider A, et al. Imbalance between sympathetic
and sensory innervation in peritoneal endometriosis. Brain Behav
Immun. 2012;26(1):132-41.
153. Barcena de Arellano ML, Munch S, Arnold J, Helbig S, Schneider
A, Mechsner S. Calcium-binding protein expression in peritoneal
endometriosis-associated nerve fibres. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(10):
1425-37.
154. Yuan M, Ding S, Meng T, Lu B, Shao S, Zhang X, et al. Effect of
A-317491 delivered by glycolipid-like polymer micelles on endo-
metriosis pain. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:8171-83.
155. NCT03654326 Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ .
Accessed 6 May 2020.
156. Available from: https://pharma.bayer.com/p2x3-antagonists .
Accessed 6 May 2020.
Publisher’sN o t eSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
J. Krajewski838