No group-level changes in corticospinal excitability following low-intensity theta-burst ultrasound stimulation of the primary motor hand area

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,868 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a novel non-invasive brain-stimulation technique offering high spatial precision and depth penetrance. Theta burst TUS (tbTUS), featuring a temporal theta burst stimulation pattern, has been reported to facilitate corticomotor excitability, when applied to the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND). However, replication attempts have yielded inconsistent results.

Methods

Fifteen healthy human participants underwent neuronavigated tbTUS targeting the left M1-HAND in the anterior wall of the precentral sulcus, as well as anterior and posterior active control sites. The three tbTUS conditions were applied in counterbalanced order on separate days. Corticospinal excitability was assessed via motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded before and 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after tbTUS, and analyzed using an rmANOVA.

Results

None of the tbTUS conditions produced consistent group-level changes in MEP amplitude at any time point. Both intra- and inter-subject variability were high, and individual MEP changes following precentral tbTUS did not correlate with changes after control-site stimulation.

Conclusions

We did not observe reliable modulatory effects of neuronavigated tbTUS on corticospinal excitability. Methodological and hardware differences may account for discrepancies across studies. Our findings align with recent reports questioning the robustness of tbTUS-induced facilitation. Competing Interest Statement Hartwig R. Siebner has received honoraria as speaker and consultant from Lundbeck AS, Denmark, and as editor (Neuroimage Clinical) from Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. He has received royalties as book editor from Springer Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, and from Gyldendal Publishers, Copenha-gen, Denmark.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00