Unveiling the cell dynamics during the final shape formation of the tarsus in Drosophila adult leg by live imaging

Unveiling the cell dynamics during the final shape formation of the tarsus in Drosophila adult leg by live imaging | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Unveiling the cell dynamics during the final shape formation of the tarsus in Drosophila adult leg by live imaging Shotaro Hiraiwa, Shumpei Takeshita, Tensho Terano, Ryuhei Hayashi, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Jul, 2024 Read the published version in Discover Developmental Biology → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Organisms display a remarkable diversity in their shapes. Although substantial progress has been made in unravelling the mechanisms that govern cell fate determination during development, the mechanisms by which fate-determined cells give rise to the final shapes of organisms remain largely unknown. This study describes in detail the process of the final shape formation of the tarsus, which is near the distal tip of the adult leg, during the pupal stage in Drosophila melanogaster . Days-long live imaging revealed unexpectedly complicated cellular dynamics. The epithelial cells transiently form the intriguing structure, which we named the Parthenon-like structure. The basal surface of the epithelial cells and localization of the basement membrane protein initially show a mesh-like structure and rapidly shrink into the membranous structure during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure. Furthermore, macrophage-like cells are observed moving around actively in the Parthenon-like structure and engulfing epithelial cells. The findings in this research are expected to significantly contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms involved in shaping the final structure of the adult tarsus. Drosophila melanogaster tarsus live imaging cell dynamics hemocyte basement membrane Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Introduction Organisms exhibit a tremendous variety in their shapes. Understanding the mechanisms forming the various organismal shapes has been one of the important subjects in biology. Over the past several decades, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the mechanisms that determine cell fate during development. This has led us to understand that the basic mechanisms of cell fate determination are conserved among closely related species. In contrast to the mechanisms of fate determination, how fate-determined cells form final shapes remains elusive. Since shapes can differ dramatically between closely related species that are expected to share the basic mechanisms of cell fate determination, differences in final shape formation processes should greatly contribute to making the shape differences. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of final shape formation is of great importance to understand the mechanisms of formation and diversification of organismal shapes. Insects account for more than half of living species and show extreme diversity in their shapes (Snodgrass 1935 ; Grimaldi and Engel 2005 ). This makes insects attract the attention of many researchers. Insect legs have also evolved into various shapes to adapt to various environments. Generally, they consist of several segments, which are the coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, tarsus, and pretarsus, in a proximal to distal direction. Among these segments, the tarsus, located near the tip of the leg, is unique in that it is further subdivided into several segments called tarsal segments or tarsomeres. The number of tarsal segments varies between species and ranges from one to five. Even within the same individual, it sometimes varies depending on the developmental stage and on the body segments in which the leg is formed (Angelini et al. 2012 ). In addition to the number of tarsal segments, the shapes of tarsal segments are also variable. For example, the tarsus of the first leg in the male diving beetle is flat and expanded, making a fan-shaped sucking disc, while that in mosquitos is very long and slender (Kojima 2017 ). This morphological diversity makes the insect tarsus a good model for studying the mechanisms of final shape formation and its diversification. In the adult leg of Drosophila melanogaster , the tarsus consists of five segments, the tarsal segments 1–5, from proximal to distal direction. The adult leg develops from the leg disc, which is a mono-layered epithelial sheet formed during embryogenesis. During the larval stage, the leg disc becomes a sack-like structure, part of which forms the disc proper that differentiates into the adult leg, while the other part becomes the peripodial membrane that covers the disc proper. With the growth of the leg disc, the disc proper is subdivided into concentric regions corresponding to the adult leg segments through the exquisite regulatory interaction of patterning genes. Accordingly, the most central part corresponds to the most distal segment (pretarsus), and the most peripheral part corresponds to the most proximal segment (coxa). Cells that develop into each tarsal segment are determined by the end of the late third instar (reviewed in Kojima 2004 , 2017 ; Estella et al. 2012 ; Ruiz-Losada et al. 2018 ). During these processes, the leg disc is folded and remains covered by the peripodial membrane. After the third instar, the larval cuticle changes to form the puparium, within which pupal development proceeds. Immediately after the puparium is formed, imaginal discs begin to join together and form the adult body. By 12 h after puparium formation (APF), the pupal cuticle is formed and encloses the developing adult tissue. During these processes, the leg disc everts and elongates with the breakage and retraction of the peripodial membrane. In the subsequent pupal stage, the developing leg is shaped into the adult leg. Whereas the mechanisms to regulate the growth and regional specification during the larval stage have been well studied (reviewed in Kojima 2004 , 2017 ; Estella et al. 2012 ; Ruiz-Losada et al. 2018 ), much remains to be elucidated about the mechanism of the final shape formation during the pupal stage. Several aspects of the shape-making process, such as the eversion of the leg disc, changes in the external shape, and formation of the joint and pulvillus, have been previously reported (Mirth and Akam 2002 ; Mirth 2005 ; Tajiri et al. 2010 , 2011 ; Proag et al. 2019 ; Kimura et al. 2020 ). However, it is still unknown how individual cells continuously change their shape to form the final shape of the adult tarsus. In this paper, our results of long-term live imaging, in which tarsal morphogenesis during the pupal stage is continuously observed, are described. We found unexpected and dramatic shape changes in epithelial cells and the basement membrane, as well as interesting behavior of macrophage-like cells. The results presented here will greatly contribute to elucidating the mechanism of the final shape formation of the adult tarsus. Materials and methods Fly strains Flies were raised on a standard cornmeal/agar/yeast medium at 25°C unless stated otherwise. The fly strains used were: His2Av-mRFP Ⅲ.1 and His2Av-mRFP II.1 (Pandey et al. 2005 ), Jupiter-GFP G00147 (Morin et al. 2001 ), sGMCA 3.1 (Kiehart et al. 2000 ), sqh-GFP C-42 (Royou et al. 2004 ), Ubi-GFP-CAAX ZH-22A (Kondo and Hayashi 2013), Ubi-TagRFP-T-CAAX, LanB1-GFP fTRG00681.sfGFP-TVPTBF (Sarov et al. 2016 ), UAS -Apoliner (Bardet et al. 2008 ), UAS -GFP.S65T , UAS- GFPnls, UAS-TagBFP 9D , UAS -Kaede (Ando et al. 2002 ), Ay- GAL4 (Ito et al. 1997 ), Dll- GAL4 em212 (Gorfinkiel et al. 1997 ), He- GAL4 (Zettervall et al. 2004 ), neur -GAL4 A101 (Jhaveri et al. 2000 ), srp Hemo - GAL4 (Brückner et al. 2004 ), and hsp70-FLP . Further details on fly strains are found in Flybase ( http://flybase.org ). Genotypes of flies used for each figure and movie are shown in Table S1 . Live imaging and image analysis For live imaging after 12 h APF (i.e., Stage III onwards), the puparium was completely removed. The pupa covered only by the pupal cuticle was mounted with the ventral side down on the bottom of a glass-bottom dish. This allowed us to observe the tarsi of the first and second legs from their lateral sides since they are oriented laterally so that their lateral sides face toward the outside of the pupa. We essentially observed the tarsus of the first leg. A small amount of water or silicon oil (Olympus) was put between the glass-bottom and the pupa. Silicon grease (Shin-Etsu Silicone) was placed around the pupa, on which a cover glass was placed. In this preparation, we succeeded in keeping flies alive until the end of the pupal stage. Z stack images were acquired at regular time intervals. In Stage Ⅱ (before 12 h APF), the puparium cannot be removed without affecting development due to the incomplete formation of the pupal cuticle or its tight association with the puparium. In addition, the tissue movement is very rapid. Therefore, the pupa without its puparium removed was set up as described above for live imaging, and we collected images of a single XY plane corresponding to the longitudinal section every two minutes. All live imaging observations were performed using the inverted confocal microscope, FV3000 (Olympus) at room temperature (not strict but near 25°C). Images were analyzed by ImageJ ( https://fiji.sc/ ), Imaris (Oxford Instruments), and cellSens (Olympus). Mosaic analysis White pupae of flies carrying hsp70-FLP, Ay- GAL4, and UAS -GFP.S65T were collected into a new culture vial and heat shocked by soaking the culture vial in a water bath incubator for 30 minutes at 37. After heat shock, the flies were allowed to develop at 25°C. Z stack images were obtained between 18 h APF and 19.5 h APF as described above. The number of protrusions in each cell was counted manually. UV-photoconversion of Kaede Pupae carrying Dll- GAL4 em212 and UAS -Kaede were mounted as described above at 17 h APF. Prior to live imaging, the 405 nm laser was irradiated to cells at nearly constant intervals for 5 seconds. In all irradiations, green signals of Kaede were immediately photoconverted to red signals. Then, live imaging was started from 18 h APF as described above. Observation of hemocyte markers For observation of He > GFPnls, pupal legs of flies carrying He- GAL4 and UAS -GFPnls was dissected in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). Then it was fixed in PBS containing 4% Paraformaldehyde for 1.5 hours in room temperature and washed in PBS containing 0.01% Saponin (PBSS). After that, they were stained in PBSS containing 0.25% 4′,6-Diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (SIGMA) and 0.5 ~ 0.75% Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (Invitrogen) for 3 hours. Stained samples were washed in PBSS and mounted with VECTASHIELD (Vector Labs). Images were obtained by FV1000 (Olympus). Observations of s rp Hemo > GFP flies were carried out in the same way as other live imaging experiments. Results Overview of the final shape formation of the Drosophila tarsus during the pupal stage To observe tarsal development during the pupal stage in detail, we took advantage of long-term live imaging. How the final shape of the tarsus is formed through very dynamic changes at both tissue and cellular levels was successfully traced. Together with earlier observations, we divide the entire process into the following five stages for convenience (Fig. 1 ). Stage I (0–7 h APF) – Eversion Stage Just after puparium formation (APF), the leg disc partially elongates and evaginates from the center, making each tarsal segment recognizable morphologically. This process has been reported to be controlled by cell shape changes, cell rearrangements, and the interaction between the disc epithelium and peripodial epithelium (Condic et al. 1991 ; Proag et al. 2019 ). As this process has been described in detail previously, we do not get into it in this paper. Stage II (7–15 h APF) – Elongation Stage After the eversion of the leg disc, the elongation of the tarsus further proceeds by unfolding of the morphologically distinctive tarsal segments. By 15 h APF, the tarsus fully elongates, with the tarsal segments no longer visible morphologically, forming a bloated tube with a large lumen diameter. The tarsus reaches its maximum length and diameter, which is more than three times as large as the tarsus of the adult leg (Fig. S1 A). The pupal cuticle is formed at least by the end of this stage. Stage III (15–27 h APF) – Parthenon Stage The tarsus decreases its diameter dramatically (Fig. S1 A). During this change, indentations between tarsal segments reappear and deepen, making segmental structures visible again. Moreover, some bristles start to sprout by the end of this stage. The name of this stage comes from an interesting structure of the epithelial cells seen in this stage, which we named the Parthenon-like structure. Its details are described later. Stage IV (27–50 h APF) – Joint Forming Stage The indentation between tarsal segments deepens further, and the joint formation between tarsal segments proceeds. Bristles fully elongate and their formation is nearly completed. Furthermore, the formation of pretarsal structures, such as claws and pulvilli occurs mainly in this stage. By about 50 h APF, the formation of the external shapes of the adult leg is almost complete. Stage Ⅴ (50–96 h APF) – Epithelial Thinning Stage Seen from the outside, the shape of the leg hardly changes during this stage. However, we discovered that the thickness of the epithelial cell layer continues to reduce gradually. Thus, we separated this stage from Stage IV as an independent stage. Hereafter, we describe the details of cell dynamics in each of the above stages except Stage I. Stage II – Elongation Stage In this stage, the tarsus elongates to its maximum length along the proximodistal direction to form a broad and straight tubular structure. As described below, we removed the puparium to observe the leg shaping process by live imaging during Stage III-V, since the puparium is colored and can serve as an optical obstruction. Because it is difficult to remove the puparium without developmental defects before 12 h APF, however, live imaging was performed without removing the puparium in Stage II. In this condition, the depth of the focus at which clear images could be obtained was limited. In addition to this limitation, the tissue elongates so quickly that taking images as a Z series was also difficult. Accordingly, we acquired images of a single XY plane corresponding to the longitudinal section every two minutes. We used flies expressing GFP-CAAX (labeling the plasma membrane) and His2Av-mRFP (labeling the nuclei). At the beginning of the live imaging, 7 h APF, the everted tarsus was slightly elongated but the folding of each tarsal segment was still visible (Fig. S2 A, Supplemental Movie S2). From around 9 h APF, the elongation of the tarsus was accelerated with the rapid unfolding of each tarsal segment. By 11 h APF, the folding disappeared almost completely, and the tarsus had become a bloated, straight epithelial tube (Fig. S2 B-E). During this process, epithelial cells initially long in the apicobasal direction became cuboidal in shape. Interestingly, a cluster of large cells was observed coming from the proximal side and spreading distally in the lumen of the elongating tarsus (Fig. S2 B-E, Supplemental Movie S2). After this stage onwards, they were always observed in the tarsus (See below). Since these large cells expressed hemocyte-specific GAL4, such as He- GAL4 or srp Hemo - GAL4, they appeared to be hemocytes (Fig. S3 ), presumably macrophage-like cells according to their morphology and behavior (See below). Stage III – Parthenon Stage From this stage onwards, the pupa becomes resilient to having its puparium removed and can develop into the adult after the complete removal of the puparium. The developing pupa without the puparium is only covered by the transparent pupal cuticle, which allows us to acquire clear images at relatively deeper focuses. Additionally, from Stage III onwards, changes in overall shape are no longer as rapid as in Stage II. Accordingly, we could collect Z series images at each time point during long-term live imaging experiments from Stage III (Supplemental Movie S1, S3). This long-term live imaging experiment allowed us to analyze detailed cellular behaviors. As mentioned above, the overall diameter of the tarsus decreases dramatically in Stage III. We observed that surprisingly dynamic changes in cell morphology occur inside during this process. Around 18 h APF, epithelial cells deformed their shapes and temporarily formed an interesting structure. We named it the Parthenon-like structure because it reminds us of the Parthenon, an ancient Greek ruin. Details of the Parthenon-like structure and associated cellular dynamics are described in the following three subsections. The architecture of the Parthenon-like structure Firstly, flies expressing His2Av-mRFP (labeling the nuclei) and sGMCA (labeling actin) were observed, and Z series images were obtained every 15 minutes (Fig. 2 , Supplemental Movies S1, S3). By reconstructing a 3D structure using a part of these images obtained at 18 h APF, we found a very curious architecture of the epithelial cell layer (Fig. 3 A). Nuclei and most volumes of sGMCA signals were aligned as a monolayer on the apical (outer) side. At the basal (inner) side, sGMCA signals spread planarly, creating a thin layer. Between these two layers, pillar-like sGMCA signals were seen connecting them. There appeared to be open spaces or cavities between the pillars. Since sGMCA labels actin, it could be possible that epithelial cells are tightly lined up without space between them as usual and that it is the cytoskeleton forming the curious structure. However, similar structures were also observed in flies expressing plain GFP (labeling cytosol) under the control of Distal-less ( Dll )-GAL4 ( Dll > GFP ) (Fig. S4A) and GFP-CAAX (labeling cell membrane) (see Fig. 3 D-F).Thus, we concluded that epithelial cells themselves form this remarkable structure by deformation; that is, epithelial cells tightly align most of their cell body containing nuclei at the apical side, protrude cytoplasm as a pillar-like process in a basal direction, and then spread at the basal side, making cavities within the epithelial cell layer. As mentioned above, we named this structure the Parthenon-like structure after the ancient Greek ruin. We also observed the Parthenon-like structure in flies expressing Jupiter-GFP (labeling microtubule) and Sqh-GFP (labeling Myo II) (Fig. S4B, C). Thus, cytoskeletal molecules, such as actin, microtubule, and Myo II appear to be assembled in cables inside the pillars. Within the Parthenon-like structure, several clusters of cells whose cell bodies and nuclei fell into cavities were observed (surrounded by a dashed line in Fig. 3 A). The time-lapse observations until later stages and labeling of sensory cells by TagBFP driven by neuralized ( neur )-GAL4, which is specifically expressed in the sensory cells, indicate that these cells are sensory organ cells (Fig. S4D-D”). Interestingly, we found that macrophage-like cells frequently existed and were actively moving around in the cavities between pillars (arrow in Fig. 3 A). Their detailed behavior is described later. To reveal whether the pillar-like structures are contributed by all the epidermal cells or only a part of them, we carried out the mosaic analysis by the flip-out technique using flies having hsp70-FLP , UAS- GFP , and Ay -GAL4 (Golic and Lindquist 1989 ; Ito et al. 1997 ), in which small patches of epithelial cells were labeled by GFP (Fig. 3 B). The reconstructed image of the representative cluster of four epithelial cells is shown in Fig. 3 B’ and Supplemental Movie S4. The leftmost cell had one protrusion while the next one on the right had two. Moreover, the right protrusion of the second cell looked to be making a bundle with a protrusion from the adjacent third cell on the right of the second cell (arrow in Fig. 3 B’, Supplemental Movie S4). When counting how many protrusions each cell extended, we found that, in 18 h APF, all epithelial cells extended one or two protrusions (Fig. 3 C; only one protrusion in about two-thirds of the epithelial cells and two in about one-third). These results indicate that all epithelial cells contribute to the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure and that each pillar is made up of protrusions derived from multiple adjacent cells. Formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure As shown above, the shape of epithelial cells was cuboidal at the end of Stage II (Fig. S2 E, Supplemental Movie S2). These cuboidal epithelial cells started to form rapidly the Parthenon-like structure with the onset of Stage III (Fig. 2 A’, B’). The thickness of the epithelial cell layer rapidly increased with the elongation of the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure (Fig. S1 B). Once the epithelial thickness reached its maximum, the Parthenon-like structure turned to be resolved rapidly by the shortening of the pillars and disappearance of the cavities (Fig. 2 C’, D’), resulting in the decrease of the epithelial thickness (Fig. S1 B). During the above process, the lumen diameter and overall diameter of the tarsus also reduced dramatically (Fig. S1 A), implying a close relationship between the formation/disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure and the reduction of the tarsus diameter. The disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure progressed faster in the future joint region than in the inter-joint region, resulting in the invagination of the apical surface. This allowed the morphological distinction of tarsal segments again. To reveal details in the Parthenon-like structure formation, Z stack images were obtained every five minutes using flies expressing GFP-CAAX and His2Av-mRFP (Fig. 3 D-F, Supplemental Movie S5). Before the formation of the Parthenon-like structure initiated, cuboidal epithelial cells were aligned as a monolayer (Fig. 3 D). In around 16 h APF, at the very beginning of the formation of the Parthenon-like structure, a part of the cytoplasm of epithelial cells protruded basally, while connections between neighboring cells at the basal surface looked to be maintained, resulting in the formation of triangular-shaped cavities (Fig. 3 E, F, asterisks). In addition, relatively strong signals of GFP-CAAX were observed in the area where the pillars were being formed (Fig. 3 D. E arrowheads). The protrusions then elongated basally to form the pillars. (Fig. 3 F). The basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure As the lumen diameter dramatically reduced during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure, we thought that some structural changes in the basal part of the Parthenon-like structure must occur during this process. Thus, we focused on the structure and behavior of the basal surface of epithelial cells. To know its detailed structure, we observed the focal planes including only the basal surface of GFP-expressing epithelial cells (the floor of the Parthenon-like structure) in Dll > GFP flies (Fig. 4 A-C’). Surprisingly, in 16.5 h APF, the basal surface of epithelial cells showed a mesh-like pattern and had many holes (Fig. 4 B’). The live imaging showed these holes rapidly shrank and almost disappeared within two hours, as the overall diameter of the tarsus reduced (Fig. 4 B’, C’, Supplemental Movie S6). To reveal how each epithelial cell comprises the basal meshwork, we carefully analyzed clusters of epithelial cells expressing EGFP in Ay > EGFP flies. Observation of 3D-reconstructed images of clusters showed that filopodia-like thin protrusions were elongated from the roots of the pillars (Fig. 4 D, Supplemental Movie S7). According to this observation, we hypothesized that such filopodia-like protrusions connect to each other to form the basal meshwork as shown in the illustration in Fig. 4 E. Generally, with the basal surface of epithelial cells, the basement membrane is in contact. To investigate the structure of the basement membrane during the shrinkage of the basal meshwork of epithelial cells, we examined the basement membrane structure using flies expressing Laminin B1-GFP (LanB1-GFP) and RFP-CAAX (Fig. 4 F- H, Supplemental Movie S8). LanB1 is a major component of the basement membrane. LanB1-GFP signals coincided with the basal surface of epithelial cells, as shown by the comparison between LanB1-GFP and RFP-CAAX signals (Fig. 4 F-F"). The basement membrane also showed the mesh-like structure at the initiation of the Parthenon-like structure formation (Fig. 4 G). The meshwork of LanB1-GFP signals also shrank, becoming uniform and membranous signals, as is generally seen (Fig. 4 H). These observations indicate that the basement membrane structure also changed dramatically during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure. In addition to the meshwork to membranous change in the basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure, we found another interesting behavior of it. As shown in Fig. 5 A, the basal surface of epithelial cells was winding along the proximodistal axis immediately after the Parthenon-like structure started to form, possibly because the progression of the pillar elongation varies from place to place along the proximodistal axis. However, it progressively flattened along with the shrinkage of the basal meshwork (Fig. 5 B-C). In 19.5 h APF, the basal surface of epithelial cells was very straight and taut (Fig. 5 D). These observations imply increasing tension on the basal surface in the proximodistal direction. We further obtained interesting data related to the proximodistal tension by utilizing the photoconvertible fluorescent protein Kaede, which converts the color from green to red in response to UV irradiation (Ando et al. 2002 ). We irradiated epithelial cells positioned at roughly regular intervals with UV light and then, observed the tarsus by live imaging (Fig. 5 E-G’’, Supplemental Movie S9). Since the tarsus is a three-dimensional structure, and epithelial cells are arranged three-dimensionally, it was difficult to irradiate only one target cell. Instead, several neighboring cells were labeled simultaneously in each of the UV-irradiated loci. In 18 h APF, pillars of the Parthenon-like structure appeared to be tilted relative to the apicobasal axis, with the basal side more distal than the apical side (Fig. 5 E-E”). Interestingly, live imaging showed that the basal side then moved significantly toward the proximal direction (Fig. 5 F-F”, Supplemental Movie S9). In 22 h APF, the tilting direction of the pillars was reversed, so that the basal side was more proximal than the apical side (Fig. 5 G-G”). These observations also imply that there is a tension that pulls the basal part of the Parthenon-like structure proximally. Stage Ⅳ – joint forming stage By the end of this stage, the shaping process of the external morphology of the adult leg, such as the elongation of bristles and formation of claws and pulvilli, was almost complete (Fig. 6 A, B, Supplemental Movie S1, S3). The details of the pulvilli formation have been described previously by Kimura et al. ( 2020 ). From this stage onwards, the difference between the dorsal and ventral sides of the tarsus became apparent. The thickness of the epithelial cell layer became much thinner on the ventral side than on the dorsal side (Fig. S1 B). The ventral epithelial cell layer was straight, whereas the dorsal epithelial cell layer was somewhat arched (Fig. 6 A-B’). Furthermore, the formation of the ball-and-socket structure of the joint was started on the dorsal side but not on the ventral side (Fig. 6 B-C’). On the dorsal side, invagination of the joint region became deepened with a greater reduction of the luminal diameter at the joint region than in the inter-joint region, making a deep cleft between neighboring tarsal segments (Fig. 6 A, A’, Supplemental Movie S3). After the cleft reached its deepest at around 40 h APF, the bottom of the cleft moved proximally (Fig. 6 B, B’, Supplemental Movie S3), and then, the ball-and-socket structure formation of the joint proceeded during the early Stage V (Fig. 6 C’, D’, Supplemental Movie S3). This process has previously been described in detail by Tajiri et al. ( 2010 ). The arched dorsal epithelial cell layer seemed to result from the deep invagination at the joint region. In Stage IV, the overall diameter of each segment was slightly reduced but not so much as in Stage Ⅲ (Fig. S1 ). Stage Ⅴ – epithelial thinning stage Even after the completion of the external shape by the end of Stage IV, changes in the epithelial cell layer continued inside. The epithelial cell layer decreased its thickness without hardly changing the outline of segments. During this process, the basal surface of the epithelial cell layer was getting closer to the apical surface (Fig. 6 C-D’, Supplemental Movie S10). The behavior of macrophage-like cells As shown above, we observed that macrophage-like cells were getting into the lumen of the expanding tarsus from the proximal end in Stage II (see Fig. S2 , Supplemental Movie S2) and resided in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure, where they were actively moving around, in Stage III (see Fig. 3 and Supplemental Movie S3). Fascinatingly, by obtaining Z stack images every 22 seconds, we succeeded in capturing the moment when a macrophage-like cell in the Parthenon-like structure phagocytoses an epithelial cell (Fig. 7 A-E, Supplemental Movie S11). A macrophage-like cell (arrow in Fig. 7 A-E) in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure extended filopodia apically and phagocytosed an epithelial cell whose cell body containing the nucleus was extruded basally (arrowheads in Fig. 7 A-E). To confirm that cells phagocytosed by macrophage-like cells were apoptotic cells, we observed the caspase activity in epithelial cells by expressing Apoliner under the control of Dll -GAL4 ( Dll > Apoliner). Apoliner is a caspase activity reporter, in which mRFP with a transmembrane domain is connected to EGFP with nuclear localization signal (NLS-EGFP) by a linker containing the target site cleaved by caspases. Without caspase activity, both mRFP and EGFP are colocalized on the cell membrane, while NLS-EGFP is released from the membrane-attached mRFP and gets into the nucleus in response to caspase activity (Bardet et al. 2008 ). Since we used Dll -GAL4 to drive Apoliner expression, it was expressed only in epithelial cells but not in macrophage-like cells. However, we could see a macrophage-like cell as a cluster of relatively large dots of mRFP signals (Fig. 7 H, I, J-N) probably due to the accumulation of mRFP derived from engulfed epithelial cells, as mentioned in the original report (Bardet et al. 2008 ). This helped us to find macrophage-like cells in Dll > Apoliner flies. Through live imaging, we observed that one epithelial cell, which initially located its cell body at the apical side without the nuclear EGFP signal, began to show the EGFP signal in its nucleus (Fig. 7 F, G), and then, its cell body migrated in a basal direction (Fig. 7 H), finally reaching a macrophage-like cell detected as a cluster of mRFP signals (Fig. 7 H, see also Supplemental Movie S12). Macrophage-like cells with multiple EGFP signals were often observed (Fig. 7 I, I’). These signals appeared to reflect EGFP signals in nuclei of engulfed epithelial cells. In addition, we also successively observed a macrophage-like cell passing through the basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure (Fig. 7 J-N, Supplemental Movie S13). Taken together, it appears that macrophage-like cells move in and out of the cavities of the Parthenon-like structure, and when entering the cavity, they phagocytose epithelial cells initiating apoptosis. Discussion Taking advantage of long-term live imaging, we could reveal nearly the whole shaping process of the adult tarsus during the pupal stage in Drosophila . Changes in the shape of cells and the tissue as a composite of cells were more dramatic and complex than previously thought. Epithelial cells change their shape from columnar to cuboidal during the elongation of the tarsus in Stage II (see Fig. S2 and Supplemental Movie S3). Then, the cuboidal epithelial cells further change their shape dramatically to form the unexpected structure, the Parthenon-like structure, in Stage III (see Fig. 3 and Supplemental Movie S5). The Parthenon-like structure is a transient structure, and the rapid reduction in the tarsal diameter occurs during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure (see Fig. S1 A and Supplemental Movie S2). After the tarsal diameter becomes that of the adult leg at the end of Stage III, the thickness of the epithelial cell layer continues to reduce in Stage IV and Stage V (see Fig. S1 B, Fig. 6 and Supplemental Movie S10). Especially in Stage V, although the external shape is completed, the thinning of the epithelial cell layer further continues internally. In addition, we could also document the behavior of macrophage-like cells (see Fig. 7 and Supplemental Movie S11-13). The possible mechanisms and roles of these cellular dynamics are discussed below. Mechanism of the tarsal elongation in Stage II In Stage II, the everted tarsus fully elongates to its maximum length. Since the folding of each tarsal segment disappears, making the outer surface smooth, and the shape of epithelial cells changes from columnar to cuboidal (see Fig. S2 ), cell shape changes could be a driving force for the elongation. However, the invasion of macrophage-like cells from proximal to distal during the tarsal elongation (see Fig. S2 , Supplemental Movie S2) makes us imagine the influx of hemolymph into the tarsus. It may be possible that the influx of hemolymph contributes to the tarsal elongation by raising inner pressure. Previously, it has been proposed that the tarsal elongation is a result of hydrostatic pressure, according to the fact that the tarsal elongation can be caused by pressing on the abdomen of the prepupa (Fristrom and Fristrom, 1993 ). Therefore, although the contribution of the force derived from changes in cell shape cannot be excluded, hydrostatic pressure may be the primary force driving the tarsal elongation in Stage II. Interestingly, it has been shown that the elongation of the horn during the pupal stage in the beetle is caused by hydrostatic pressure (Matsuda et al. 2017 ). Thus, this may be one of the fundamental mechanisms for the rapid elongation of long, rod-like appendages. Mechanism of the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure Epithelial cells comprising the Parthenon-like structure apically align the most of their cell body containing the nuclei, elongate the cytoplasmic process in a basal direction, and connect with each other at the basal end to form a thin layer, making the cavity in the epithelial cell layer (see Fig. 3 ). Each epithelial cell protrudes one or two processes, and the processes of neighboring cells bundle together to form the pillar. This is reminiscent of neurons extending axons and forming axon bundles. Thus, it might be possible that just as neurons extend axons and then connect with other cells, epithelial cells protrude processes first and then form the basal connection. When observing the initial step of the Parthenon-like structure formation, however, we found that the basal connection between epithelial cells already formed in the very beginning (see Fig. 3 D-F). This may indicate that epithelial cells are basally connected before initiating the Parthenon-like structure formation and protrude processes while maintaining the connection, unlike neurons. Since actin, microtubule, and Myo II were abundantly found in the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure (see Fig. S4), cytoskeletal regulation may actively contribute to the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure by controlling elongation and retraction of the pillars. As for the formation of the Parthenon-like structure, another but not exclusive idea is the contribution of the basement membrane. Evidence that the basement membrane actively contributes to tissue shape has been accumulating recently (reviewed in Morrissey and Sherwood 2015 ; Pastor-Pareja 2020 ; Töpfer 2023 ). In the case of our observation on the tarsal development, both the basal surface of epithelial cells and the basement membrane initially showed a mesh-like pattern, and they shrank to form the membranous structure without holes during the reduction of the luminal diameter (see Fig. 4 ). This may indicate that changes in the composition of the basement membrane produce a force to pull epithelial cells toward the basal side and contribute to the elongation of the pillars, i.e. the formation of the Parthenon-like structure. Function of macrophage-like cells In Stage II, macrophage-like cells were observed entering the lumen of the elongating tarsus from the proximal side and spreading distally (see Fig. S2 , Supplemental Movie S2). This observation may indicate that macrophage-like cells that originate outside the leg come with the hemolymph flow. After entering the tarsal lumen, macrophage-like cells continued to reside and were actively moving around in the lumen (see Supplemental Movie S3). When the Parthenon-like structure is formed, they intruded into and moved around in the cavity (see Fig. 7 , Supplemental Movie S13). Within the cavity, they phagocytosed epithelial cells with caspase activity (see Fig. 7 A-I’). According to these observations, macrophage-like cells might be involved in controlling cell number by phagocytosing excess cells. Making the cavity within the epithelial cell layer by forming the Parthenon-like structure might help macrophage-like cells engulf epithelial cells. Previously, it has been reported that the depletion of hemocytes by specifically inducing cell death results in severe morphological defects, such as truncation in legs (Arefin et al. 2015 ). Macrophage-like cells may also play another role in tarsal morphogenesis besides the trimming of excess cells. Generality of the Parthenon-like structure The Parthenon-like structure does not seem to be a special structure observed only in the tarsus. We found it also in other leg segments (Fig. S5A). Moreover, a similar structure could be observed in the head region and the notum region (Fig. S5B-E). In the wing, epithelial cells in the pupal stage are known to form similar shapes with epithelial cells in the Parthenon-like structure, in which cell bodies are aligned apically and protrude the thin process basally, although the structure of the basal side seems to be different from the Parthenon-like structure (Waddington 1940 ; Fristrom et al. 1993 ; Sun et al. 2021 ). Furthermore, in the pupal wing of lepidopteran insects, epithelial cells with similar protrusion and hemocytes moving around between them have been reported (Nardi and Magee-Adams 1986 ; Kodama et al. 1995 ; Ohno and Otaki 2015 ; McDougal et al. 2021 ). Other than the wing, structures resembling the Parthenon-like structure have also been found in the prepupal abdominal epidermis and developing pupal antennae of Lepidoptera (Delhanty and Locke 1989 ; Ando et al. 2011 ). Therefore, the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure appears to be one of the essential processes of final shape formation by epithelial cells at least in insects. Further study on the mechanism of the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure and its role in morphogenesis will help to better understand the mechanisms of final shape formation. Declarations Acknowledgments We thank the Kyoto Stock Center, the Bloomington Stock Center, and the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for fly stocks. We are grateful to Dr. Masayuki Miura (The University of Tokyo) and Dr. Yuya Fujisawa for technical advice in live imaging. SH appreciates the scholarship from the Iwadare Scholarship Foundation. Author contribution SH, RT, and TK designed the experiments. SH, ST, TT, RH, KS, RT, and TK performed the experiments and analyzed the data. SH and TK wrote the manuscript. Funding This work was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowships for Young Scientists [21J20256 to SH], Takeda Science Foundation [2022034459 to RT], Suntory Rising Stars Encouragement Program in Life Sciences (SunRiSE) [to RT], Toray Science and Technology Grant [22-6305 to RT], JST FOREST Program [JPMJFR224W to RT], Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [21H05773 and 23H04303 to TK, 20H05945 to RT] Data availability The data used in this study are included in the manuscript or available upon request. Code availability Not applicable Ethics approval Not applicable Consent to participate Not applicable Consent for publication Not applicable Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. References Ando R, Hama H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A (2002) An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12651–12656. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.202320599 Ando T, Kojima T, Fujiwara H (2011) Dramatic changes in patterning gene expression during metamorphosis are associated with the formation of a feather-like antenna by the silk moth, Bombyx mori . Dev Biol 357:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.672 Angelini DR, Smith FW, Jockusch EL (2012) Extent With Modification: Leg Patterning in the Beetle Tribolium castaneum and the Evolution of Serial Homologs. G3 2:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.001537 Arefin B, Kucerova L, Krautz R, Kranenburg H, Parvin F, Theopold U (2015) Apoptosis in Hemocytes Induces a Shift in Effector Mechanisms in the Drosophila Immune System and Leads to a Pro-Inflammatory State. PLoS One 10:e0136593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136593 Bardet P-L, Kolahgar G, Mynett A, Miguel-Aliaga I, Briscoe J, Meier P, Vincent JP (2008) A fluorescent reporter of caspase activity for live imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:13901–13905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806983105 Brückner K, Kockel L, Duchek P, Luque CM, Rørth P, Perrimon N (2004) The PDGF/VEGF Receptor Controls Blood Cell Survival in Drosophila . Dev Cell 7:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2004.06.007 Condic ML, Fristrom D, Fristrom JW (1991) Apical cell shape changes during Drosophila imaginal leg disc elongation: a novel morphogenetic mechanism. Development 111:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.111.1.23 Delhanty P, Locke M (1989) The development of epidermal feet in preparation for metamorphosis in an insect. Tissue Cell 21:891–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(89)90040-2 Estella C, Voutev R, Mann RS (2012) A dynamic network of morphogens and transcription factors patterns the fly leg. Curr Top Dev Biol. 98:173-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386499-4.00007-0 Fristrom D, Fristrom JW (1993) The metamorphic development of the adult epidermis. In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A (ed) The Development of Drosophila melanogaster , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 843–897 Fristrom D, Wilcox M, Fristrom J (1993) The distribution of PS integrins, laminin A and F-actin during key stages in Drosophila wing development. Development 117:509-523. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.117.2.509 Golic KG, Lindquist S (1989) The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome. Cell 59:499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90033-0 Gorfinkiel N, Morata G, Guerrero I (1997) The homeobox gene Distal-less induces ventral appendage development in Drosophila . Genes Dev 11:2259–2271. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.17.2259 Grimaldi D, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, London Ito K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D (1997) The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development 124:761–771. https://doi.org/10.1242/DEV.124.4.761 Jhaveri D, Sen A, Reddy GV, Rodrigues V (2000) Sense organ identity in the Drosophila antenna is specified by the expression of the proneural gene atonal. Mech Dev 99:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00487-1 Kiehart DP, Galbraith CG, Edwards KA, Rickoll WL, Montague RA (2000) Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila . J Cell Biol 149:471–490. https://doi.org/10.1083/JCB.149.2.471 Kimura K, Minami R, Yamahama Y, Hariyama T, Hosoda N (2020) Framework with cytoskeletal actin filaments forming insect footpad hairs inspires biomimetic adhesive device design. Commun Biol 3:272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0995-0 Kodama R, Yohida A, Mitsui T (1995) Programmed cell death at the periphery of the pupal wing of the butterfly, Pieris rapae . Rouxs Arch Dev Biol 204:418–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360849 Kojima T (2004) The mechanism of Drosophila leg development along the proximodistal axis. Dev Growth Differ 46:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2004.00735.x Kojima T (2017) Developmental mechanism of the tarsus in insect legs. Curr Opin Insect Sci 19:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.11.002 Kondo T, Hyashi S (2013) Mitotic cell rounding accelerates epithelial invagination. Nature 494:125-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11792 Matsuda K, Gotoh H, Tajika Y, Sushida T, Aonuma H, Niimi T, Akiyama M, Inoue Y, Kondo S (2017) Complex furrows in a 2D epithelial sheet code the 3D structure of a beetle horn. Sci Rep 7:13939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14170-w McDougal AD, Kang S, Yaqoob Z, So PTC, Kolle M (2021) In vivo visualization of butterfly scale cell morphogenesis in Vanessa cardui . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118: e2112009118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112009118 Mirth C (2005) Ecdysteroid control of metamorphosis in the differentiating adult leg structures of Drosophila melanogaster . Dev Biol 278:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.026 Mirth C, Akam M (2002) Joint development in the Drosophila leg: cell movements and cell populations. Dev Biol 246:391–406. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0593 Morin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M, Chia W (2001) A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15050–15055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261408198 Morrissey MA, Sherwood DR (2015) An active role for basement membrane assembly and modification in tissue sculpting. J Cell Sci 128:1661–1668. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.168021 Nardi JB, Magee-Adams SM (1986) Formation of scale spacing patterns in a moth wing: I. Epithelial feet may mediate cell rearrangement. Dev Biol 116:278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(86)90131-4 Ohno Y, Otaki JM (2015) Live cell imaging of butterfly pupal and larval wings in vivo . PLoS One 10:e0128332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128332 Pandey R, Heidmann S, Lehner CF (2005) Epithelial re-organization and dynamics of progression through mitosis in Drosophila separase complex mutants. J Cell Sci 118:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1242/JCS.01663 Pastor-Pareja JC (2020) Atypical basement membranes and basement membrane diversity – what is normal anyway? J Cell Sci 133:jcs241794. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.241794 Proag A, Monier B, Suzanne M (2019) Physical and functional cell-matrix uncoupling in a developing tissue under tension. Development 146:dev172577. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.172577 Royou A, Field C, Sisson JC, Sullivan W, Karess R (2004) Reassessing the Role and Dynamics of Nonmuscle Myosin II during Furrow Formation in Early Drosophila Embryos. Mol Biol Cell 15:838–850. https://doi.org/10.1091/MBC.E03-06-0440 Ruiz-Losada M, Blom-Dahl D, Córdoba S, Estella C (2018) Specification and Patterning of Drosophila Appendages. J Dev Biol 6:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb6030017 Sarov M, Barz C, Jambor H, Hein MY, Schmied C, Suchold D, Stender B, Janosch S, K J VV, Krishnan RT, Krishnamoorthy A, Ferreira IR, Ejsmont RK, Finkl K, Hasse S, Kämpfer P, Plewka N, Vinis E, Schloissnig S, Knust E, Hartenstein V, Mann M, Ramaswami M, VijayRaghavan K, Tomancak P, Schnorrer F (2016) A genome-wide resource for the analysis of protein localisation in Drosophila . Elife 5:e12068. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12068 Snodgrass RE (1935) Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York Sun T, Song Y, Teng D, Chen Y, Dai, J, Ma M, Zhang W, Pastor-Pareja JC (2021) Atypical laminin spots and pull-generated microtubule-actin projections mediate Drosophila wing adhesion. Cell Rep 36:109667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109667 Tajiri R, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Hayashi S (2011) Joint morphology in the insect leg: evolutionary history inferred from Notch loss-of-function phenotypes in Drosophila . Development 138:4621–4626. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.067330 Tajiri R, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Hayashi S (2010) Dynamic shape changes of ECM-producing cells drive morphogenesis of ball-and-socket joints in the fly leg. Development 137:2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.047175 Töpfer U (2023) Basement membrane dynamics and mechanics in tissue morphogenesis. Biol Open 12:bio059980. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.059980 Waddington CH (1940) The Genetic control of wing development in Drosophila . J Genet 41:75-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982977 Zettervall C-J, Anderl I, Williams MJ, et al (2004) A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14192–14197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403789101 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalMovielegends.docx HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalMovies.zip HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalfile.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Jul, 2024 Read the published version in Discover Developmental Biology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 12 Jun, 2024 Reviews received at journal 06 Jun, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 27 May, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 20 Mar, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Mar, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 13 Mar, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 03 Mar, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 03 Mar, 2024 First submitted to journal 01 Mar, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4002373","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":276101093,"identity":"8db94c47-3a7d-4395-996f-02422a6895c3","order_by":0,"name":"Shotaro Hiraiwa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shotaro","middleName":"","lastName":"Hiraiwa","suffix":""},{"id":276101094,"identity":"b4562c3e-ff2b-437d-a4dd-1b4ef6ea7128","order_by":1,"name":"Shumpei Takeshita","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shumpei","middleName":"","lastName":"Takeshita","suffix":""},{"id":276101095,"identity":"eac9f034-f3c1-4021-b60e-8695bd5ef986","order_by":2,"name":"Tensho Terano","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tensho","middleName":"","lastName":"Terano","suffix":""},{"id":276101096,"identity":"d854a169-93d3-4f85-af65-3faecd0fb60c","order_by":3,"name":"Ryuhei Hayashi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ryuhei","middleName":"","lastName":"Hayashi","suffix":""},{"id":276101097,"identity":"177f94b4-9849-401f-b644-7a18967d6e8b","order_by":4,"name":"Koyo Suzuki","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Koyo","middleName":"","lastName":"Suzuki","suffix":""},{"id":276101098,"identity":"65142690-ef33-4c5e-aa25-fa6a974c0172","order_by":5,"name":"Reiko Tajiri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Reiko","middleName":"","lastName":"Tajiri","suffix":""},{"id":276101099,"identity":"b3b7a076-8f9b-4880-bfea-c34f8369343a","order_by":6,"name":"Tetsuya Kojima","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Tokyo","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tetsuya","middleName":"","lastName":"Kojima","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-01 07:01:24","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-024-00719-z","type":"published","date":"2024-07-08T00:21:55+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":52105261,"identity":"e1f01aa4-9794-49de-9bc9-379b6c0142ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:27:13","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":366216,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe overview of the final shape formation of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e adult tarsus during the pupal stage. We divided the entire process into five stages based on the morphological changes at both tissue and cellular levels observed in long-term live imaging experiments. Representative photos or surface-rendered images (sGMCA signal) corresponding to several time points are shown on the left side. See also\u003cstrong\u003e Supplemental Movies S1\u003c/strong\u003e, S\u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/0f671dc57dad3df5f46f17b7.png"},{"id":52103479,"identity":"7ff55367-83db-40e2-87b6-d72b8a1edb54","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:13","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":677914,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDynamic shape changes in the tarsal epithelial cells in Stage III.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e(\u003cstrong\u003eA, B, C, D\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of the distal part of the tarsus in the sGMCA (green) and His2Av-mRFP (magenta) expressing fly. The tissue rapidly narrows, and the indentation of joint regions progresses. (\u003cstrong\u003eA’, B’, C’, D’\u003c/strong\u003e) Magnification of regions surrounded by the dashed lines in (\u003cstrong\u003eA, B, C, D\u003c/strong\u003e), respectively. Apicobasal projections are seen in (\u003cstrong\u003eA’, B’, C’\u003c/strong\u003e) and become difficult to distinguish in (\u003cstrong\u003eD’\u003c/strong\u003e). Distal is to the right and dorsal to the top in all figures. Stages are shown at the lower right corners in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e). Scale bars in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) and (A’), 50 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA, B, C, D\u003c/strong\u003e) and 10 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA’, B’, C’, D’\u003c/strong\u003e), respectively. See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/2d8532b8d0472eba777390ae.png"},{"id":52105262,"identity":"3ddc6df5-bb24-4b41-8ab6-6b0e8dce9e3a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:27:13","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":672467,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eArchitecture of the Parthenon-like structure.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e(\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) The reconstructed image of epithelial cells forming the Parthenon-like structure in the sGMCA (green) and His2Av-mRFP (magenta) expressing fly.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eNuclei and most volumes of sGMCA signals are aligned as a monolayer on the apical (outer) side. Pillar-like sGMCA signals are elongated in the apicobasal direction. At the basal (inner) side, sGMCA signals spread planarly, creating a thin layer. Macrophage-like cells are found in the cavities between the pillars (arrow). Several clusters of cells whose cell bodies and nuclei fall into cavities are seen (dashed line). These cells were suggested to be sensory organ cells (see also \u003cstrong\u003eFig. S4\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e) GFP-expressing cell clusters obtained in the mosaic analysis. (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) Mosaic GFP expression in the distal part of the tarsal segment 2 and proximal part of the tarsal segment 3 in 19 h APF induced in the \u003cem\u003eAy\u003c/em\u003e\u0026gt;\u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e fly. Dashed lines indicate the outline of the leg. (\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e) Reconstructed image of the four GFP-expressing epithelial cells corresponding to cells surrounded by the dotted rectangle in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e). The leftmost cell has one protrusion, while the one next has two. One of the protrusions extending from the second cell from the left appears to form a bundle with a protrusion extending from a neighboring cell (open arrow). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S4\u003c/strong\u003e. (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e) Number of protrusions in each GFP-expressing cell. About two-thirds of epithelial cells had one protrusion, and one-third of them had two. (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of tarsal epithelial cells initiating the Parthenon-like structure formation. Cell membrane is labelled by GFP-CAAX (green), and nuclei are labelled by His2Av-mRFP (magenta). Triangular-shaped cavities are observed at the initiation of the process (asterisks in \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e). Strong signals of GFP-CAAX are observed where the pillars are formed (arrowheads in \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e). The elapsed time from (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) are indicated at the lower left corners. See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S5\u003c/strong\u003e. Apical is to the top in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e). Scale bars in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e), and (B’), 20 μmand 5 μm. Scale bar in (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e), 5 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/cf0747455adae7211908d140.png"},{"id":52103485,"identity":"3311f8b1-bcf3-4a6a-85e5-37b60639cadb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:14","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":817224,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBasal-meshwork shrinkage of the Parthenon-like structure. (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) Schematic drawing showing the position of the focal plane to observe the basal surface of epithelial cells in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from live imaging of the basal surface of the tarsal segment 3 using\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003ethe \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e\u0026gt;\u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e fly. Regions surrounded by the dashed lines in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e C\u003c/strong\u003e) are magnified in (\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e), respectively. Many holes can be seen in (\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e), suggesting the basal surface forms a mesh-like structure. The holes become less visible in (\u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S6\u003c/strong\u003e. (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) Reconstructed image of a GFP-expressing cluster of tarsal epithelial cells viewing down on the basal side from an oblique angle. Thin projections are seen at the basal surface (arrowheads). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S7\u003c/strong\u003e. (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e) Schematic drawing of the basal meshwork hypothesized from \u003cstrong\u003e(B’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF”\u003c/strong\u003e) Simultaneous observation of TagRFP-CAAX (cyan) and LanB1-GFP at the basal meshwork. The positions of holes are largely shared between LanB1-GFP (\u003cstrong\u003eF’\u003c/strong\u003e) and TagRFP-CAAX (\u003cstrong\u003eF”\u003c/strong\u003e) signals. (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from live imaging of the basal surface of the tarsal segment 3 in the LanB1-GFP expressing fly. (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e) are corresponding regions to (\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S8\u003c/strong\u003e. Stages are indicated at the lower right corners in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e). Distal is to the right and dorsal to the top in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e). Scale bar in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e), 20 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e), 10 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e), 5 μm, in (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e), 10 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF”\u003c/strong\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/5fb586f8e4aa9a782df6a91e.png"},{"id":52103482,"identity":"6fd3a0f3-0caf-468b-8db2-49df0c24b01d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:13","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1008578,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eIncreased tension at the basal surface of epithelial cells along the proximodistal axis in Stage III. (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of tarsal epithelium of the sGMCA (green) and His2Av-mRFP (magenta) expressing fly. The winding basal surface in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) progressively flattened in (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eG’’\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of a \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e\u0026gt;\u003cem\u003eKaede\u003c/em\u003e fly. Foci of UV irradiation are indicated by asterisks in (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e). Selected photoconverted regions (dashed rectangles in \u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e) in the dorsal and ventral epithelium are magnified in (\u003cstrong\u003eE’\u003c/strong\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e F’\u003c/strong\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e G’\u003c/strong\u003e) and (\u003cstrong\u003eE”\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF’’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG”\u003c/strong\u003e), respectively. Initially, the basal side of epithelial cells are located distally than the apical side (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eE”\u003c/strong\u003e), then pulled proximally (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eF”\u003c/strong\u003e), and finally the relative position of the apical and basal sides inverted (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eG”\u003c/strong\u003e). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S9\u003c/strong\u003e. Stages are indicated at the lower left corners in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e). Distal is to the right and dorsal to the top in all figures. Note that in (\u003cstrong\u003eE”\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF”\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG”\u003c/strong\u003e), apical is to the bottom since they are ventral epithelium. Scale bars in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e), 20 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e), 20 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eE’\u003c/strong\u003e), 5 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eE’\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eG”\u003c/strong\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/ae3a10b28c447fd4ac777d9c.png"},{"id":52103487,"identity":"b57d2aff-ad48-4d1f-91cd-2434e4309524","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:14","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":660508,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eShape changes in the tarsal epithelial cell layer in Stages IV and V. (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of the distal part of the tarsus in the sGMCA (green) and His2Av-mRFP (magenta) expressing fly. (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) are in Stage IV, and (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) are in Stage V. Dashed rectangles in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) are magnified in (\u003cstrong\u003eA’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD’\u003c/strong\u003e), respectively. By the end of Stage IV (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e), the external shape formation, such as elongation of bristles, claws, and pulvilli are almost complete. The bottom of the invaginated joint moved proximally, and then, the ball-and-socket structure formation progressed in Stage V. The morphological difference between the dorsal and ventral epithelium became apparent (double arrow and open double arrow in \u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD’\u003c/strong\u003e). In Stage V (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eD’\u003c/strong\u003e), the epithelial layer decreased its thickness without hardly changing the outline of segments. See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S10\u003c/strong\u003e. Dorsal is to the top and distal to the right in all figures. Scale bars in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e), 50 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eA’\u003c/strong\u003e), 20 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC’\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD’\u003c/strong\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/7b11acd589901d054c77ccb6.png"},{"id":52103484,"identity":"37b10266-1883-43d7-8faa-eb9a7678b557","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:14","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":683111,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBehavior of macrophage-like cells in Stage III. (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the reconstructed movie of the live imaging of the tarsal epithelium in Stage III in the sGMCA (green) and His2Av-mRFP (magenta) expressing fly. The macrophage-like cell located in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure (arrows) engulfs the epithelial cell being extruded from the apical layer (arrowheads). (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eI \u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eN\u003c/strong\u003e) Stills from the live imaging of ventral tarsal epithelium in Stage III using \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e\u0026gt;\u003cem\u003eApoliner\u003c/em\u003eflies. In cells with caspase activity, mRFP signals are retained at the plasma membrane but GFP signals move to nuclei. Macrophage-like cells are seen as clusters of large dots of mRFP signals (arrows in \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e and \u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e) The epithelial cell with caspase activity OFF (arrowhead in\u003cstrong\u003e F\u003c/strong\u003e) eventually turns the caspase activity ON (arrowhead in \u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e), and then moves to the basal side (arrowhead in \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e), where a macrophage-like cell appears (arrow in \u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e). See also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S12\u003c/strong\u003e. (\u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eI’\u003c/strong\u003e) A macrophage-like cell (arrow in \u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e) appearing to have engulfed epithelial cells with caspase activity ON (open arrowheads in \u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003eI’\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eI’\u003c/strong\u003e) GFP channel extracted from \u003cstrong\u003e(I\u003c/strong\u003e). (\u003cstrong\u003eJ\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eN\u003c/strong\u003e) A macrophage-like cell located in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure (arrows) popes out to the lumen through a presumptive hole of the basal meshwork (see also \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Movie S13\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eFig. 4\u003c/strong\u003e). Apical is to the top in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e), to the bottom in (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eN\u003c/strong\u003e). Scale bars in (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e), 5 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e), 10 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eI'\u003c/strong\u003e), in (\u003cstrong\u003eJ\u003c/strong\u003e), 10 μm for (\u003cstrong\u003eJ\u003c/strong\u003e-\u003cstrong\u003eN\u003c/strong\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/552552af93a5a8decdc2bf98.png"},{"id":59885131,"identity":"c13d1797-9fbc-49ac-a68b-c8462853e955","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-09 00:22:06","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":6787452,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/3a18a5b4-def1-4e48-bfcd-da3a961f6b36.pdf"},{"id":52103481,"identity":"12a38efd-9c2d-4dda-a673-d8f45315f819","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:13","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":24135,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalMovielegends.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/f69bebd5d39b5397dbc7ff5b.docx"},{"id":52103524,"identity":"10082d34-515c-4f00-a9e6-558713472e9c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:21","extension":"zip","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":113075351,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalMovies.zip","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/825532311af82903acc6511b.zip"},{"id":52103488,"identity":"d5c047d6-9be6-489e-ba7f-1fecaec2467b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:19:14","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1366882,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"HiraiwaParthenonSupplementalfile.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4002373/v1/8e4d24e9b45b3ed58d687e39.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Unveiling the cell dynamics during the final shape formation of the tarsus in Drosophila adult leg by live imaging","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eOrganisms exhibit a tremendous variety in their shapes. Understanding the mechanisms forming the various organismal shapes has been one of the important subjects in biology. Over the past several decades, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the mechanisms that determine cell fate during development. This has led us to understand that the basic mechanisms of cell fate determination are conserved among closely related species. In contrast to the mechanisms of fate determination, how fate-determined cells form final shapes remains elusive. Since shapes can differ dramatically between closely related species that are expected to share the basic mechanisms of cell fate determination, differences in final shape formation processes should greatly contribute to making the shape differences. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of final shape formation is of great importance to understand the mechanisms of formation and diversification of organismal shapes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInsects account for more than half of living species and show extreme diversity in their shapes (Snodgrass \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1935\u003c/span\u003e; Grimaldi and Engel \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). This makes insects attract the attention of many researchers. Insect legs have also evolved into various shapes to adapt to various environments. Generally, they consist of several segments, which are the coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, tarsus, and pretarsus, in a proximal to distal direction. Among these segments, the tarsus, located near the tip of the leg, is unique in that it is further subdivided into several segments called tarsal segments or tarsomeres. The number of tarsal segments varies between species and ranges from one to five. Even within the same individual, it sometimes varies depending on the developmental stage and on the body segments in which the leg is formed (Angelini et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). In addition to the number of tarsal segments, the shapes of tarsal segments are also variable. For example, the tarsus of the first leg in the male diving beetle is flat and expanded, making a fan-shaped sucking disc, while that in mosquitos is very long and slender (Kojima \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). This morphological diversity makes the insect tarsus a good model for studying the mechanisms of final shape formation and its diversification.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the adult leg of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila melanogaster\u003c/em\u003e, the tarsus consists of five segments, the tarsal segments 1\u0026ndash;5, from proximal to distal direction. The adult leg develops from the leg disc, which is a mono-layered epithelial sheet formed during embryogenesis. During the larval stage, the leg disc becomes a sack-like structure, part of which forms the disc proper that differentiates into the adult leg, while the other part becomes the peripodial membrane that covers the disc proper. With the growth of the leg disc, the disc proper is subdivided into concentric regions corresponding to the adult leg segments through the exquisite regulatory interaction of patterning genes. Accordingly, the most central part corresponds to the most distal segment (pretarsus), and the most peripheral part corresponds to the most proximal segment (coxa). Cells that develop into each tarsal segment are determined by the end of the late third instar (reviewed in Kojima \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Estella et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Ruiz-Losada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). During these processes, the leg disc is folded and remains covered by the peripodial membrane. After the third instar, the larval cuticle changes to form the puparium, within which pupal development proceeds. Immediately after the puparium is formed, imaginal discs begin to join together and form the adult body. By 12 h after puparium formation (APF), the pupal cuticle is formed and encloses the developing adult tissue. During these processes, the leg disc everts and elongates with the breakage and retraction of the peripodial membrane. In the subsequent pupal stage, the developing leg is shaped into the adult leg.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhereas the mechanisms to regulate the growth and regional specification during the larval stage have been well studied (reviewed in Kojima \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Estella et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Ruiz-Losada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), much remains to be elucidated about the mechanism of the final shape formation during the pupal stage. Several aspects of the shape-making process, such as the eversion of the leg disc, changes in the external shape, and formation of the joint and pulvillus, have been previously reported (Mirth and Akam \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Mirth \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Tajiri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Proag et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Kimura et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, it is still unknown how individual cells continuously change their shape to form the final shape of the adult tarsus. In this paper, our results of long-term live imaging, in which tarsal morphogenesis during the pupal stage is continuously observed, are described. We found unexpected and dramatic shape changes in epithelial cells and the basement membrane, as well as interesting behavior of macrophage-like cells. The results presented here will greatly contribute to elucidating the mechanism of the final shape formation of the adult tarsus.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFly strains\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlies were raised on a standard cornmeal/agar/yeast medium at 25\u0026deg;C unless stated otherwise. The fly strains used were: \u003cem\u003eHis2Av-mRFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eⅢ.1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and \u003cem\u003eHis2Av-mRFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eII.1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Pandey et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eJupiter-GFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eG00147\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Morin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003esGMCA\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e3.1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Kiehart et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003esqh-GFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eC-42\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Royou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eUbi-GFP-CAAX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003eZH-22A\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Kondo and Hayashi 2013), \u003cem\u003eUbi-TagRFP-T-CAAX, LanB1-GFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003efTRG00681.sfGFP-TVPTBF\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (Sarov et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), UAS\u003cem\u003e-Apoliner\u003c/em\u003e (Bardet et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), UAS\u003cem\u003e-GFP.S65T\u003c/em\u003e, UAS-\u003cem\u003eGFPnls, UAS-TagBFP\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e9D\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, UAS\u003cem\u003e-Kaede\u003c/em\u003e (Ando et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eAy-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4 (Ito et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eDll-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4\u003csup\u003eem212\u003c/sup\u003e (Gorfinkiel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eHe-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4 (Zettervall et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eneur\u003c/em\u003e-GAL4\u003csup\u003eA101\u003c/sup\u003e (Jhaveri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003esrp\u003c/em\u003eHemo\u003cem\u003e-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4 (Br\u0026uuml;ckner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e), and \u003cem\u003ehsp70-FLP\u003c/em\u003e. Further details on fly strains are found in Flybase (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://flybase.org\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://flybase.org\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). Genotypes of flies used for each figure and movie are shown in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLive imaging and image analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor live imaging after 12 h APF (i.e., Stage III onwards), the puparium was completely removed. The pupa covered only by the pupal cuticle was mounted with the ventral side down on the bottom of a glass-bottom dish. This allowed us to observe the tarsi of the first and second legs from their lateral sides since they are oriented laterally so that their lateral sides face toward the outside of the pupa. We essentially observed the tarsus of the first leg. A small amount of water or silicon oil (Olympus) was put between the glass-bottom and the pupa. Silicon grease (Shin-Etsu Silicone) was placed around the pupa, on which a cover glass was placed. In this preparation, we succeeded in keeping flies alive until the end of the pupal stage. Z stack images were acquired at regular time intervals. In Stage Ⅱ (before 12 h APF), the puparium cannot be removed without affecting development due to the incomplete formation of the pupal cuticle or its tight association with the puparium. In addition, the tissue movement is very rapid. Therefore, the pupa without its puparium removed was set up as described above for live imaging, and we collected images of a single XY plane corresponding to the longitudinal section every two minutes. All live imaging observations were performed using the inverted confocal microscope, FV3000 (Olympus) at room temperature (not strict but near 25\u0026deg;C). Images were analyzed by ImageJ (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://fiji.sc/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://fiji.sc/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e), Imaris (Oxford Instruments), and cellSens (Olympus).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMosaic analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e White pupae of flies carrying \u003cem\u003ehsp70-FLP, Ay-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4, and UAS\u003cem\u003e-GFP.S65T\u003c/em\u003e were collected into a new culture vial and heat shocked by soaking the culture vial in a water bath incubator for 30 minutes at 37. After heat shock, the flies were allowed to develop at 25\u0026deg;C. Z stack images were obtained between 18 h APF and 19.5 h APF as described above. The number of protrusions in each cell was counted manually.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eUV-photoconversion of Kaede\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePupae carrying \u003cem\u003eDll-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4\u003csup\u003eem212\u003c/sup\u003e and UAS\u003cem\u003e-Kaede\u003c/em\u003e were mounted as described above at 17 h APF. Prior to live imaging, the 405 nm laser was irradiated to cells at nearly constant intervals for 5 seconds. In all irradiations, green signals of Kaede were immediately photoconverted to red signals. Then, live imaging was started from 18 h APF as described above.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eObservation of hemocyte markers\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor observation of \u003cem\u003eHe\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;GFPnls, pupal legs of flies carrying \u003cem\u003eHe-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4 and UAS\u003cem\u003e-GFPnls\u003c/em\u003e was dissected in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). Then it was fixed in PBS containing 4% Paraformaldehyde for 1.5 hours in room temperature and washed in PBS containing 0.01% Saponin (PBSS). After that, they were stained in PBSS containing 0.25% 4\u0026prime;,6-Diamidine-2\u0026prime;-phenylindole dihydrochloride (SIGMA) and 0.5\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.75% Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (Invitrogen) for 3 hours. Stained samples were washed in PBSS and mounted with VECTASHIELD (Vector Labs). Images were obtained by FV1000 (Olympus). Observations of s\u003cem\u003erp\u003c/em\u003eHemo\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e flies were carried out in the same way as other live imaging experiments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eOverview of the final shape formation of the\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eDrosophila\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003etarsus during the pupal stage\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo observe tarsal development during the pupal stage in detail, we took advantage of long-term live imaging. How the final shape of the tarsus is formed through very dynamic changes at both tissue and cellular levels was successfully traced. Together with earlier observations, we divide the entire process into the following five stages for convenience (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage I (0\u0026ndash;7 h APF) \u0026ndash; Eversion Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eJust after puparium formation (APF), the leg disc partially elongates and evaginates from the center, making each tarsal segment recognizable morphologically. This process has been reported to be controlled by cell shape changes, cell rearrangements, and the interaction between the disc epithelium and peripodial epithelium (Condic et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e; Proag et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). As this process has been described in detail previously, we do not get into it in this paper.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage II (7\u0026ndash;15 h APF) \u0026ndash; Elongation Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter the eversion of the leg disc, the elongation of the tarsus further proceeds by unfolding of the morphologically distinctive tarsal segments. By 15 h APF, the tarsus fully elongates, with the tarsal segments no longer visible morphologically, forming a bloated tube with a large lumen diameter. The tarsus reaches its maximum length and diameter, which is more than three times as large as the tarsus of the adult leg (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA). The pupal cuticle is formed at least by the end of this stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage III (15\u0026ndash;27 h APF) \u0026ndash; Parthenon Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe tarsus decreases its diameter dramatically (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA). During this change, indentations between tarsal segments reappear and deepen, making segmental structures visible again. Moreover, some bristles start to sprout by the end of this stage. The name of this stage comes from an interesting structure of the epithelial cells seen in this stage, which we named the Parthenon-like structure. Its details are described later.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage IV (27\u0026ndash;50 h APF) \u0026ndash; Joint Forming Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe indentation between tarsal segments deepens further, and the joint formation between tarsal segments proceeds. Bristles fully elongate and their formation is nearly completed. Furthermore, the formation of pretarsal structures, such as claws and pulvilli occurs mainly in this stage. By about 50 h APF, the formation of the external shapes of the adult leg is almost complete.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eStage Ⅴ (50\u0026ndash;96 h APF) \u0026ndash; Epithelial Thinning Stage\u003c/span\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeen from the outside, the shape of the leg hardly changes during this stage. However, we discovered that the thickness of the epithelial cell layer continues to reduce gradually. Thus, we separated this stage from Stage IV as an independent stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHereafter, we describe the details of cell dynamics in each of the above stages except Stage I.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage II \u0026ndash; Elongation Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this stage, the tarsus elongates to its maximum length along the proximodistal direction to form a broad and straight tubular structure. As described below, we removed the puparium to observe the leg shaping process by live imaging during Stage III-V, since the puparium is colored and can serve as an optical obstruction. Because it is difficult to remove the puparium without developmental defects before 12 h APF, however, live imaging was performed without removing the puparium in Stage II. In this condition, the depth of the focus at which clear images could be obtained was limited. In addition to this limitation, the tissue elongates so quickly that taking images as a Z series was also difficult. Accordingly, we acquired images of a single XY plane corresponding to the longitudinal section every two minutes. We used flies expressing GFP-CAAX (labeling the plasma membrane) and His2Av-mRFP (labeling the nuclei). At the beginning of the live imaging, 7 h APF, the everted tarsus was slightly elongated but the folding of each tarsal segment was still visible (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eA, Supplemental Movie S2). From around 9 h APF, the elongation of the tarsus was accelerated with the rapid unfolding of each tarsal segment. By 11 h APF, the folding disappeared almost completely, and the tarsus had become a bloated, straight epithelial tube (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eB-E). During this process, epithelial cells initially long in the apicobasal direction became cuboidal in shape.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterestingly, a cluster of large cells was observed coming from the proximal side and spreading distally in the lumen of the elongating tarsus (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eB-E, Supplemental Movie S2). After this stage onwards, they were always observed in the tarsus (See below). Since these large cells expressed hemocyte-specific GAL4, such as \u003cem\u003eHe-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4 or \u003cem\u003esrp\u003c/em\u003eHemo\u003cem\u003e-\u003c/em\u003eGAL4, they appeared to be hemocytes (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e), presumably macrophage-like cells according to their morphology and behavior (See below).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage III \u0026ndash; Parthenon Stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom this stage onwards, the pupa becomes resilient to having its puparium removed and can develop into the adult after the complete removal of the puparium. The developing pupa without the puparium is only covered by the transparent pupal cuticle, which allows us to acquire clear images at relatively deeper focuses. Additionally, from Stage III onwards, changes in overall shape are no longer as rapid as in Stage II. Accordingly, we could collect Z series images at each time point during long-term live imaging experiments from Stage III (Supplemental Movie S1, S3). This long-term live imaging experiment allowed us to analyze detailed cellular behaviors. As mentioned above, the overall diameter of the tarsus decreases dramatically in Stage III. We observed that surprisingly dynamic changes in cell morphology occur inside during this process. Around 18 h APF, epithelial cells deformed their shapes and temporarily formed an interesting structure. We named it the Parthenon-like structure because it reminds us of the Parthenon, an ancient Greek ruin. Details of the Parthenon-like structure and associated cellular dynamics are described in the following three subsections.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eThe architecture of the Parthenon-like structure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirstly, flies expressing His2Av-mRFP (labeling the nuclei) and sGMCA (labeling actin) were observed, and Z series images were obtained every 15 minutes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, Supplemental Movies S1, S3). By reconstructing a 3D structure using a part of these images obtained at 18 h APF, we found a very curious architecture of the epithelial cell layer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). Nuclei and most volumes of sGMCA signals were aligned as a monolayer on the apical (outer) side. At the basal (inner) side, sGMCA signals spread planarly, creating a thin layer. Between these two layers, pillar-like sGMCA signals were seen connecting them. There appeared to be open spaces or cavities between the pillars. Since sGMCA labels actin, it could be possible that epithelial cells are tightly lined up without space between them as usual and that it is the cytoskeleton forming the curious structure. However, similar structures were also observed in flies expressing plain GFP (labeling cytosol) under the control of \u003cem\u003eDistal-less\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e)-GAL4 (\u003cem\u003eDll\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;GFP\u003c/em\u003e) (Fig. S4A) and GFP-CAAX (labeling cell membrane) (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD-F).Thus, we concluded that epithelial cells themselves form this remarkable structure by deformation; that is, epithelial cells tightly align most of their cell body containing nuclei at the apical side, protrude cytoplasm as a pillar-like process in a basal direction, and then spread at the basal side, making cavities within the epithelial cell layer. As mentioned above, we named this structure the Parthenon-like structure after the ancient Greek ruin. We also observed the Parthenon-like structure in flies expressing Jupiter-GFP (labeling microtubule) and Sqh-GFP (labeling Myo II) (Fig. S4B, C). Thus, cytoskeletal molecules, such as actin, microtubule, and Myo II appear to be assembled in cables inside the pillars. Within the Parthenon-like structure, several clusters of cells whose cell bodies and nuclei fell into cavities were observed (surrounded by a dashed line in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). The time-lapse observations until later stages and labeling of sensory cells by TagBFP driven by \u003cem\u003eneuralized\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eneur\u003c/em\u003e)-GAL4, which is specifically expressed in the sensory cells, indicate that these cells are sensory organ cells (Fig. S4D-D\u0026rdquo;). Interestingly, we found that macrophage-like cells frequently existed and were actively moving around in the cavities between pillars (arrow in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). Their detailed behavior is described later.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo reveal whether the pillar-like structures are contributed by all the epidermal cells or only a part of them, we carried out the mosaic analysis by the flip-out technique using flies having \u003cem\u003ehsp70-FLP\u003c/em\u003e, UAS-\u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eAy\u003c/em\u003e-GAL4 (Golic and Lindquist \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e; Ito et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e), in which small patches of epithelial cells were labeled by GFP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). The reconstructed image of the representative cluster of four epithelial cells is shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026rsquo; and Supplemental Movie S4. The leftmost cell had one protrusion while the next one on the right had two. Moreover, the right protrusion of the second cell looked to be making a bundle with a protrusion from the adjacent third cell on the right of the second cell (arrow in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S4). When counting how many protrusions each cell extended, we found that, in 18 h APF, all epithelial cells extended one or two protrusions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC; only one protrusion in about two-thirds of the epithelial cells and two in about one-third). These results indicate that all epithelial cells contribute to the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure and that each pillar is made up of protrusions derived from multiple adjacent cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFormation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs shown above, the shape of epithelial cells was cuboidal at the end of Stage II (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eE, Supplemental Movie S2). These cuboidal epithelial cells started to form rapidly the Parthenon-like structure with the onset of Stage III (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA\u0026rsquo;, B\u0026rsquo;). The thickness of the epithelial cell layer rapidly increased with the elongation of the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB). Once the epithelial thickness reached its maximum, the Parthenon-like structure turned to be resolved rapidly by the shortening of the pillars and disappearance of the cavities (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC\u0026rsquo;, D\u0026rsquo;), resulting in the decrease of the epithelial thickness (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB). During the above process, the lumen diameter and overall diameter of the tarsus also reduced dramatically (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA), implying a close relationship between the formation/disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure and the reduction of the tarsus diameter. The disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure progressed faster in the future joint region than in the inter-joint region, resulting in the invagination of the apical surface. This allowed the morphological distinction of tarsal segments again.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo reveal details in the Parthenon-like structure formation, Z stack images were obtained every five minutes using flies expressing GFP-CAAX and His2Av-mRFP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD-F, Supplemental Movie S5). Before the formation of the Parthenon-like structure initiated, cuboidal epithelial cells were aligned as a monolayer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD). In around 16 h APF, at the very beginning of the formation of the Parthenon-like structure, a part of the cytoplasm of epithelial cells protruded basally, while connections between neighboring cells at the basal surface looked to be maintained, resulting in the formation of triangular-shaped cavities (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eE, F, asterisks). In addition, relatively strong signals of GFP-CAAX were observed in the area where the pillars were being formed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD. E arrowheads). The protrusions then elongated basally to form the pillars. (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eF).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eThe basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs the lumen diameter dramatically reduced during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure, we thought that some structural changes in the basal part of the Parthenon-like structure must occur during this process. Thus, we focused on the structure and behavior of the basal surface of epithelial cells. To know its detailed structure, we observed the focal planes including only the basal surface of GFP-expressing epithelial cells (the floor of the Parthenon-like structure) in \u003cem\u003eDll\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;GFP\u003c/em\u003e flies (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA-C\u0026rsquo;). Surprisingly, in 16.5 h APF, the basal surface of epithelial cells showed a mesh-like pattern and had many holes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026rsquo;). The live imaging showed these holes rapidly shrank and almost disappeared within two hours, as the overall diameter of the tarsus reduced (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026rsquo;, C\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S6). To reveal how each epithelial cell comprises the basal meshwork, we carefully analyzed clusters of epithelial cells expressing EGFP in \u003cem\u003eAy\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eEGFP\u003c/em\u003e flies. Observation of 3D-reconstructed images of clusters showed that filopodia-like thin protrusions were elongated from the roots of the pillars (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD, Supplemental Movie S7). According to this observation, we hypothesized that such filopodia-like protrusions connect to each other to form the basal meshwork as shown in the illustration in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenerally, with the basal surface of epithelial cells, the basement membrane is in contact. To investigate the structure of the basement membrane during the shrinkage of the basal meshwork of epithelial cells, we examined the basement membrane structure using flies expressing Laminin B1-GFP (LanB1-GFP) and RFP-CAAX (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eF- H, Supplemental Movie S8). LanB1 is a major component of the basement membrane. LanB1-GFP signals coincided with the basal surface of epithelial cells, as shown by the comparison between LanB1-GFP and RFP-CAAX signals (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eF-F\"). The basement membrane also showed the mesh-like structure at the initiation of the Parthenon-like structure formation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eG). The meshwork of LanB1-GFP signals also shrank, becoming uniform and membranous signals, as is generally seen (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eH). These observations indicate that the basement membrane structure also changed dramatically during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to the meshwork to membranous change in the basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure, we found another interesting behavior of it. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, the basal surface of epithelial cells was winding along the proximodistal axis immediately after the Parthenon-like structure started to form, possibly because the progression of the pillar elongation varies from place to place along the proximodistal axis. However, it progressively flattened along with the shrinkage of the basal meshwork (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB-C). In 19.5 h APF, the basal surface of epithelial cells was very straight and taut (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eD). These observations imply increasing tension on the basal surface in the proximodistal direction. We further obtained interesting data related to the proximodistal tension by utilizing the photoconvertible fluorescent protein Kaede, which converts the color from green to red in response to UV irradiation (Ando et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). We irradiated epithelial cells positioned at roughly regular intervals with UV light and then, observed the tarsus by live imaging (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eE-G\u0026rsquo;\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S9). Since the tarsus is a three-dimensional structure, and epithelial cells are arranged three-dimensionally, it was difficult to irradiate only one target cell. Instead, several neighboring cells were labeled simultaneously in each of the UV-irradiated loci. In 18 h APF, pillars of the Parthenon-like structure appeared to be tilted relative to the apicobasal axis, with the basal side more distal than the apical side (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eE-E\u0026rdquo;). Interestingly, live imaging showed that the basal side then moved significantly toward the proximal direction (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eF-F\u0026rdquo;, Supplemental Movie S9). In 22 h APF, the tilting direction of the pillars was reversed, so that the basal side was more proximal than the apical side (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eG-G\u0026rdquo;). These observations also imply that there is a tension that pulls the basal part of the Parthenon-like structure proximally.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage Ⅳ \u0026ndash; joint forming stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy the end of this stage, the shaping process of the external morphology of the adult leg, such as the elongation of bristles and formation of claws and pulvilli, was almost complete (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA, B, Supplemental Movie S1, S3). The details of the pulvilli formation have been described previously by Kimura et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). From this stage onwards, the difference between the dorsal and ventral sides of the tarsus became apparent. The thickness of the epithelial cell layer became much thinner on the ventral side than on the dorsal side (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB). The ventral epithelial cell layer was straight, whereas the dorsal epithelial cell layer was somewhat arched (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA-B\u0026rsquo;). Furthermore, the formation of the ball-and-socket structure of the joint was started on the dorsal side but not on the ventral side (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB-C\u0026rsquo;). On the dorsal side, invagination of the joint region became deepened with a greater reduction of the luminal diameter at the joint region than in the inter-joint region, making a deep cleft between neighboring tarsal segments (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA, A\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S3). After the cleft reached its deepest at around 40 h APF, the bottom of the cleft moved proximally (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB, B\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S3), and then, the ball-and-socket structure formation of the joint proceeded during the early Stage V (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC\u0026rsquo;, D\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S3). This process has previously been described in detail by Tajiri et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). The arched dorsal epithelial cell layer seemed to result from the deep invagination at the joint region. In Stage IV, the overall diameter of each segment was slightly reduced but not so much as in Stage Ⅲ (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStage Ⅴ \u0026ndash; epithelial thinning stage\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEven after the completion of the external shape by the end of Stage IV, changes in the epithelial cell layer continued inside. The epithelial cell layer decreased its thickness without hardly changing the outline of segments. During this process, the basal surface of the epithelial cell layer was getting closer to the apical surface (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC-D\u0026rsquo;, Supplemental Movie S10).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eThe behavior of macrophage-like cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs shown above, we observed that macrophage-like cells were getting into the lumen of the expanding tarsus from the proximal end in Stage II (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, Supplemental Movie S2) and resided in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure, where they were actively moving around, in Stage III (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e and Supplemental Movie S3). Fascinatingly, by obtaining Z stack images every 22 seconds, we succeeded in capturing the moment when a macrophage-like cell in the Parthenon-like structure phagocytoses an epithelial cell (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA-E, Supplemental Movie S11). A macrophage-like cell (arrow in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA-E) in the cavity of the Parthenon-like structure extended filopodia apically and phagocytosed an epithelial cell whose cell body containing the nucleus was extruded basally (arrowheads in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA-E). To confirm that cells phagocytosed by macrophage-like cells were apoptotic cells, we observed the caspase activity in epithelial cells by expressing Apoliner under the control of \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e-GAL4 (\u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;Apoliner). Apoliner is a caspase activity reporter, in which mRFP with a transmembrane domain is connected to EGFP with nuclear localization signal (NLS-EGFP) by a linker containing the target site cleaved by caspases. Without caspase activity, both mRFP and EGFP are colocalized on the cell membrane, while NLS-EGFP is released from the membrane-attached mRFP and gets into the nucleus in response to caspase activity (Bardet et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). Since we used \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e-GAL4 to drive Apoliner expression, it was expressed only in epithelial cells but not in macrophage-like cells. However, we could see a macrophage-like cell as a cluster of relatively large dots of mRFP signals (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eH, I, J-N) probably due to the accumulation of mRFP derived from engulfed epithelial cells, as mentioned in the original report (Bardet et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). This helped us to find macrophage-like cells in \u003cem\u003eDll\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eApoliner\u003c/em\u003e flies. Through live imaging, we observed that one epithelial cell, which initially located its cell body at the apical side without the nuclear EGFP signal, began to show the EGFP signal in its nucleus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eF, G), and then, its cell body migrated in a basal direction (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eH), finally reaching a macrophage-like cell detected as a cluster of mRFP signals (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eH, see also Supplemental Movie S12). Macrophage-like cells with multiple EGFP signals were often observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eI, I\u0026rsquo;). These signals appeared to reflect EGFP signals in nuclei of engulfed epithelial cells. In addition, we also successively observed a macrophage-like cell passing through the basal surface of the Parthenon-like structure (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eJ-N, Supplemental Movie S13). Taken together, it appears that macrophage-like cells move in and out of the cavities of the Parthenon-like structure, and when entering the cavity, they phagocytose epithelial cells initiating apoptosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eTaking advantage of long-term live imaging, we could reveal nearly the whole shaping process of the adult tarsus during the pupal stage in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Changes in the shape of cells and the tissue as a composite of cells were more dramatic and complex than previously thought. Epithelial cells change their shape from columnar to cuboidal during the elongation of the tarsus in Stage II (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e and Supplemental Movie S3). Then, the cuboidal epithelial cells further change their shape dramatically to form the unexpected structure, the Parthenon-like structure, in Stage III (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e and Supplemental Movie S5). The Parthenon-like structure is a transient structure, and the rapid reduction in the tarsal diameter occurs during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA and Supplemental Movie S2). After the tarsal diameter becomes that of the adult leg at the end of Stage III, the thickness of the epithelial cell layer continues to reduce in Stage IV and Stage V (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e and Supplemental Movie S10). Especially in Stage V, although the external shape is completed, the thinning of the epithelial cell layer further continues internally. In addition, we could also document the behavior of macrophage-like cells (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e and Supplemental Movie S11-13). The possible mechanisms and roles of these cellular dynamics are discussed below.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMechanism of the tarsal elongation in Stage II\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Stage II, the everted tarsus fully elongates to its maximum length. Since the folding of each tarsal segment disappears, making the outer surface smooth, and the shape of epithelial cells changes from columnar to cuboidal (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), cell shape changes could be a driving force for the elongation. However, the invasion of macrophage-like cells from proximal to distal during the tarsal elongation (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, Supplemental Movie S2) makes us imagine the influx of hemolymph into the tarsus. It may be possible that the influx of hemolymph contributes to the tarsal elongation by raising inner pressure. Previously, it has been proposed that the tarsal elongation is a result of hydrostatic pressure, according to the fact that the tarsal elongation can be caused by pressing on the abdomen of the prepupa (Fristrom and Fristrom, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, although the contribution of the force derived from changes in cell shape cannot be excluded, hydrostatic pressure may be the primary force driving the tarsal elongation in Stage II. Interestingly, it has been shown that the elongation of the horn during the pupal stage in the beetle is caused by hydrostatic pressure (Matsuda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, this may be one of the fundamental mechanisms for the rapid elongation of long, rod-like appendages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMechanism of the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEpithelial cells comprising the Parthenon-like structure apically align the most of their cell body containing the nuclei, elongate the cytoplasmic process in a basal direction, and connect with each other at the basal end to form a thin layer, making the cavity in the epithelial cell layer (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Each epithelial cell protrudes one or two processes, and the processes of neighboring cells bundle together to form the pillar. This is reminiscent of neurons extending axons and forming axon bundles. Thus, it might be possible that just as neurons extend axons and then connect with other cells, epithelial cells protrude processes first and then form the basal connection. When observing the initial step of the Parthenon-like structure formation, however, we found that the basal connection between epithelial cells already formed in the very beginning (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD-F). This may indicate that epithelial cells are basally connected before initiating the Parthenon-like structure formation and protrude processes while maintaining the connection, unlike neurons.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSince actin, microtubule, and Myo II were abundantly found in the pillars of the Parthenon-like structure (see Fig. S4), cytoskeletal regulation may actively contribute to the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure by controlling elongation and retraction of the pillars. As for the formation of the Parthenon-like structure, another but not exclusive idea is the contribution of the basement membrane. Evidence that the basement membrane actively contributes to tissue shape has been accumulating recently (reviewed in Morrissey and Sherwood \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Pastor-Pareja \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; T\u0026ouml;pfer \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). In the case of our observation on the tarsal development, both the basal surface of epithelial cells and the basement membrane initially showed a mesh-like pattern, and they shrank to form the membranous structure without holes during the reduction of the luminal diameter (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). This may indicate that changes in the composition of the basement membrane produce a force to pull epithelial cells toward the basal side and contribute to the elongation of the pillars, i.e. the formation of the Parthenon-like structure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFunction of macrophage-like cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Stage II, macrophage-like cells were observed entering the lumen of the elongating tarsus from the proximal side and spreading distally (see Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, Supplemental Movie S2). This observation may indicate that macrophage-like cells that originate outside the leg come with the hemolymph flow. After entering the tarsal lumen, macrophage-like cells continued to reside and were actively moving around in the lumen (see Supplemental Movie S3). When the Parthenon-like structure is formed, they intruded into and moved around in the cavity (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, Supplemental Movie S13). Within the cavity, they phagocytosed epithelial cells with caspase activity (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA-I\u0026rsquo;). According to these observations, macrophage-like cells might be involved in controlling cell number by phagocytosing excess cells. Making the cavity within the epithelial cell layer by forming the Parthenon-like structure might help macrophage-like cells engulf epithelial cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreviously, it has been reported that the depletion of hemocytes by specifically inducing cell death results in severe morphological defects, such as truncation in legs (Arefin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Macrophage-like cells may also play another role in tarsal morphogenesis besides the trimming of excess cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGenerality of the Parthenon-like structure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Parthenon-like structure does not seem to be a special structure observed only in the tarsus. We found it also in other leg segments (Fig. S5A). Moreover, a similar structure could be observed in the head region and the notum region (Fig. S5B-E). In the wing, epithelial cells in the pupal stage are known to form similar shapes with epithelial cells in the Parthenon-like structure, in which cell bodies are aligned apically and protrude the thin process basally, although the structure of the basal side seems to be different from the Parthenon-like structure (Waddington \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1940\u003c/span\u003e; Fristrom et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e; Sun et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, in the pupal wing of lepidopteran insects, epithelial cells with similar protrusion and hemocytes moving around between them have been reported (Nardi and Magee-Adams \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1986\u003c/span\u003e; Kodama et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Ohno and Otaki \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; McDougal et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Other than the wing, structures resembling the Parthenon-like structure have also been found in the prepupal abdominal epidermis and developing pupal antennae of Lepidoptera (Delhanty and Locke \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e; Ando et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure appears to be one of the essential processes of final shape formation by epithelial cells at least in insects. Further study on the mechanism of the transient formation of the Parthenon-like structure and its role in morphogenesis will help to better understand the mechanisms of final shape formation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eWe thank the Kyoto Stock Center, the Bloomington Stock Center, and the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for fly stocks. We are grateful to Dr. Masayuki Miura (The University of Tokyo) and Dr. Yuya Fujisawa for technical advice in live imaging. SH appreciates the scholarship from the Iwadare Scholarship Foundation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003econtribution\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eSH, RT, and TK designed the experiments. SH, ST, TT, RH, KS, RT, and TK performed the experiments and analyzed the data. SH and TK wrote the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThis work was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowships for Young Scientists [21J20256 to SH], Takeda Science Foundation [2022034459 to RT], Suntory Rising Stars Encouragement Program in Life Sciences (SunRiSE) [to RT], Toray Science and Technology Grant [22-6305 to RT], JST FOREST Program [JPMJFR224W to RT], Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [21H05773 and 23H04303 to TK, 20H05945 to RT]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe data used in this study are included in the manuscript or available upon request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCode\u0026nbsp;availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot\u0026nbsp;applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eto\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eparticipate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot\u0026nbsp;applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003epublication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003einterests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndo R, Hama H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A (2002) An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12651\u0026ndash;12656. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.202320599\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndo T, Kojima T, Fujiwara H (2011) Dramatic changes in patterning gene expression during metamorphosis are associated with the formation of a feather-like antenna by the silk moth, \u003cem\u003eBombyx mori\u003c/em\u003e. Dev Biol 357:53\u0026ndash;63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.672\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAngelini DR, Smith FW, Jockusch EL (2012) Extent With Modification: Leg Patterning in the Beetle \u003cem\u003eTribolium castaneum\u003c/em\u003e and the Evolution of Serial Homologs. G3 2:235\u0026ndash;248. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.001537\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArefin B, Kucerova L, Krautz R, Kranenburg H, Parvin F, Theopold U (2015) Apoptosis in Hemocytes Induces a Shift in Effector Mechanisms in the \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e Immune System and Leads to a Pro-Inflammatory State. PLoS One 10:e0136593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136593\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBardet P-L, Kolahgar G, Mynett A, Miguel-Aliaga I, Briscoe J, Meier P, Vincent JP (2008) A fluorescent reporter of caspase activity for live imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:13901\u0026ndash;13905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806983105\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBr\u0026uuml;ckner K, Kockel L, Duchek P, Luque CM, R\u0026oslash;rth P, Perrimon N (2004) The PDGF/VEGF Receptor Controls Blood Cell Survival in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Dev Cell 7:73\u0026ndash;84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2004.06.007\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCondic ML, Fristrom D, Fristrom JW (1991) Apical cell shape changes during \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e imaginal leg disc elongation: a novel morphogenetic mechanism. Development 111:23\u0026ndash;33. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.111.1.23\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDelhanty P, Locke M (1989) The development of epidermal feet in preparation for metamorphosis in an insect. Tissue Cell 21:891\u0026ndash;909. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(89)90040-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEstella C, Voutev R, Mann RS (2012) A dynamic network of morphogens and transcription factors patterns the fly leg. Curr Top Dev Biol. 98:173-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386499-4.00007-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFristrom D, Fristrom JW (1993) The metamorphic development of the adult epidermis. In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A (ed) The Development of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila melanogaster\u003c/em\u003e, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 843\u0026ndash;897\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFristrom D, Wilcox M, Fristrom J (1993) The distribution of PS integrins, laminin A and F-actin during key stages in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e wing development. Development 117:509-523. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.117.2.509\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGolic KG, Lindquist S (1989) The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e genome. Cell 59:499\u0026ndash;509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90033-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGorfinkiel N, Morata G, Guerrero I (1997) The homeobox gene \u003cem\u003eDistal-less\u003c/em\u003e induces ventral appendage development in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Genes Dev 11:2259\u0026ndash;2271. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.17.2259\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrimaldi D, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, London\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIto K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D (1997) The \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development 124:761\u0026ndash;771. https://doi.org/10.1242/DEV.124.4.761\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJhaveri D, Sen A, Reddy GV, Rodrigues V (2000) Sense organ identity in the \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e antenna is specified by the expression of the proneural gene atonal. Mech Dev 99:101\u0026ndash;111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00487-1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKiehart DP, Galbraith CG, Edwards KA, Rickoll WL, Montague RA (2000) Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. J Cell Biol 149:471\u0026ndash;490. https://doi.org/10.1083/JCB.149.2.471\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKimura K, Minami R, Yamahama Y, Hariyama T, Hosoda N (2020) Framework with cytoskeletal actin filaments forming insect footpad hairs inspires biomimetic adhesive device design. Commun Biol 3:272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0995-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKodama R, Yohida A, Mitsui T (1995) Programmed cell death at the periphery of the pupal wing of the butterfly, \u003cem\u003ePieris rapae\u003c/em\u003e. Rouxs Arch Dev Biol 204:418\u0026ndash;126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360849\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKojima T (2004) The mechanism of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e leg development along the proximodistal axis. Dev Growth Differ 46:115\u0026ndash;129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2004.00735.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKojima T (2017) Developmental mechanism of the tarsus in insect legs. Curr Opin Insect Sci 19:36\u0026ndash;42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.11.002\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKondo T, Hyashi S (2013) Mitotic cell rounding accelerates epithelial invagination. Nature 494:125-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11792\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMatsuda K, Gotoh H, Tajika Y, Sushida T, Aonuma H, Niimi T, Akiyama M, Inoue Y, Kondo S (2017) Complex furrows in a 2D epithelial sheet code the 3D structure of a beetle horn. Sci Rep 7:13939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14170-w\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcDougal AD, Kang S, Yaqoob Z, So PTC, Kolle M (2021) In vivo visualization of butterfly scale cell morphogenesis in \u003cem\u003eVanessa cardui\u003c/em\u003e. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118: e2112009118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112009118\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMirth C (2005) Ecdysteroid control of metamorphosis in the differentiating adult leg structures of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003emelanogaster\u003c/em\u003e. Dev Biol 278:163\u0026ndash;174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.026\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMirth C, Akam M (2002) Joint development in the \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e leg: cell movements and cell populations. Dev Biol 246:391\u0026ndash;406. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0593\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMorin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M, Chia W (2001) A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15050\u0026ndash;15055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261408198\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMorrissey MA, Sherwood DR (2015) An active role for basement membrane assembly and modification in tissue sculpting. J Cell Sci 128:1661\u0026ndash;1668. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.168021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNardi JB, Magee-Adams SM (1986) Formation of scale spacing patterns in a moth wing: I. Epithelial feet may mediate cell rearrangement. Dev Biol 116:278\u0026ndash;290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(86)90131-4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOhno Y, Otaki JM (2015) Live cell imaging of butterfly pupal and larval wings \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e. PLoS One 10:e0128332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128332\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePandey R, Heidmann S, Lehner CF (2005) Epithelial re-organization and dynamics of progression through mitosis in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e separase complex mutants. J Cell Sci 118:733\u0026ndash;742. https://doi.org/10.1242/JCS.01663\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePastor-Pareja JC (2020) Atypical basement membranes and basement membrane diversity \u0026ndash; what is normal anyway? J Cell Sci 133:jcs241794. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.241794\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProag A, Monier B, Suzanne M (2019) Physical and functional cell-matrix uncoupling in a developing tissue under tension. Development 146:dev172577. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.172577\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoyou A, Field C, Sisson JC, Sullivan W, Karess R (2004) Reassessing the Role and Dynamics of Nonmuscle Myosin II during Furrow Formation in Early \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e Embryos. Mol Biol Cell 15:838\u0026ndash;850. https://doi.org/10.1091/MBC.E03-06-0440\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRuiz-Losada M, Blom-Dahl D, C\u0026oacute;rdoba S, Estella C (2018) Specification and Patterning of \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e Appendages. J Dev Biol 6:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb6030017\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSarov M, Barz C, Jambor H, Hein MY, Schmied C, Suchold D, Stender B, Janosch S, K J VV, Krishnan RT, Krishnamoorthy A, Ferreira IR, Ejsmont RK, Finkl K, Hasse S, K\u0026auml;mpfer P, Plewka N, Vinis E, Schloissnig S, Knust E, Hartenstein V, Mann M, Ramaswami M, VijayRaghavan K, Tomancak P, Schnorrer F (2016) A genome-wide resource for the analysis of protein localisation in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Elife 5:e12068. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12068\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnodgrass RE (1935) Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSun T, Song Y, Teng D, Chen Y, Dai, J, Ma M, Zhang W, Pastor-Pareja JC (2021) Atypical laminin spots and pull-generated microtubule-actin projections mediate \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e wing adhesion. Cell Rep 36:109667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109667\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTajiri R, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Hayashi S (2011) Joint morphology in the insect leg: evolutionary history inferred from Notch loss-of-function phenotypes in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. Development 138:4621\u0026ndash;4626. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.067330\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTajiri R, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Hayashi S (2010) Dynamic shape changes of ECM-producing cells drive morphogenesis of ball-and-socket joints in the fly leg. Development 137:2055\u0026ndash;2063. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.047175\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eT\u0026ouml;pfer U (2023) Basement membrane dynamics and mechanics in tissue morphogenesis. Biol Open 12:bio059980. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.059980\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWaddington CH (1940) The Genetic control of wing development in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e. J Genet 41:75-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982977\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZettervall C-J, Anderl I, Williams MJ, et al (2004) A directed screen for genes involved in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila\u003c/em\u003e blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14192\u0026ndash;14197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403789101\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"discover-developmental-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"dgae","sideBox":"Learn more about [Development Genes and Evolution](http://link.springer.com/journal/427)","snPcode":"427","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/427/3","title":"Discover Developmental Biology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Drosophila melanogaster, tarsus, live imaging, cell dynamics, hemocyte, basement membrane","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOrganisms display a remarkable diversity in their shapes. Although substantial progress has been made in unravelling the mechanisms that govern cell fate determination during development, the mechanisms by which fate-determined cells give rise to the final shapes of organisms remain largely unknown. This study describes in detail the process of the final shape formation of the tarsus, which is near the distal tip of the adult leg, during the pupal stage in \u003cem\u003eDrosophila melanogaster\u003c/em\u003e. Days-long live imaging revealed unexpectedly complicated cellular dynamics. The epithelial cells transiently form the intriguing structure, which we named the Parthenon-like structure. The basal surface of the epithelial cells and localization of the basement membrane protein initially show a mesh-like structure and rapidly shrink into the membranous structure during the formation and disappearance of the Parthenon-like structure. Furthermore, macrophage-like cells are observed moving around actively in the Parthenon-like structure and engulfing epithelial cells. The findings in this research are expected to significantly contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms involved in shaping the final structure of the adult tarsus.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Unveiling the cell dynamics during the final shape formation of the tarsus in Drosophila adult leg by live imaging","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-06 19:19:08","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4002373/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-06-12T18:07:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-06-06T08:50:36+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"96803630106308510752599498548610436772","date":"2024-05-27T10:31:22+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"1f281287-b44e-4e6d-afed-0f1708eebd26","date":"2024-03-20T08:20:05+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"e7b52eaa-bb5e-4112-9519-37e41ce0ec27","date":"2024-03-19T07:04:37+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-03-13T08:26:35+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-03-03T23:54:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-03-03T23:54:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Development Genes and Evolution","date":"2024-03-01T06:18:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"discover-developmental-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"dgae","sideBox":"Learn more about [Development Genes and Evolution](http://link.springer.com/journal/427)","snPcode":"427","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/427/3","title":"Discover Developmental Biology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"03c7bea6-c16f-42f0-8347-3ab5fb622cfe","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 6th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-07-09T00:21:55+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4002373","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-024-00719-z","journal":{"identity":"discover-developmental-biology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Discover Developmental Biology"},"publishedOn":"2024-07-08 00:21:55","publishedOnDateReadable":"July 8th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-06 19:19:08","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s00427-024-00719-z","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-024-00719-z","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4002373","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4002373","identity":"rs-4002373","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}