The emerging need to manage scavenged wildlife resources

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,456 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Scavenged wildlife resources are a unique type of common pool wildlife resource that are collected without killing or capturing the animal, and their collection is understudied and potentially underregulated relative to their conservation significance. The separability of these resources from the living population of animals that produce them can complicate efforts to link collection to future resource availability and develop management strategies. Furthermore, these resources are gaining popularity as online markets cater to a growing global demand for niche animal products. A notable example is naturally shed antlers from wild herds collected by “shed hunters” for both personal and commercial use. In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), home to the largest migratory cervid populations in the continental United States, shed hunting's growing popularity has created a potential common-pool resource dilemma. We surveyed shed hunters before and after a key policy change in Wyoming. Our results reveal diverse recreational and commercial values for antler collection. We also show that resource users are experiencing externalities from increased congestion and indicate strong overall support for active management, though participants differ in their preferred approaches. Exploration of the social dynamics reveals multiple types of scavenged resource user groups giving rise to a complex management environment. In considering future management in the GYE shed hunting context, we emphasize the importance of the separability of the resource from the animal. Specifically, approaches like seasons designed to reduce overlap of resource use and wildlife during key periods can support recreational opportunities while reducing disturbances to wildlife. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2C637 Subjects Biodiversity

Keywords

wildlife trade, common pool resources, congestion externality, conservation, antlers, Wyoming, Survey, common pool resource, congestion externality, conservation, antlers, Wyoming, survey Dates Published: 2025-03-10 10:44 Last Updated: 2025-09-10 04:51 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Open data/code are not currently available. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00