Health Implications of Head Portering in Female Head Porters: A Scoping Review Protocol

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 4,259 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective This scoping review protocol outlines the steps to conduct a scoping review to assess the health experiences of female head porters and their unique health challenges and needs. The review aims to broaden our understanding of the occupational health challenges facing head porters in sub-Saharan Africa and identify any gaps in the health literature related to this population.

Introduction

Head portering is an informal occupation predominantly undertaken by women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa. Female head porters often lack education and skills, which makes head portering an appealing yet laborious occupation to improve income and associated social conditions and support families left behind. Inclusion criteria Studies were included in the review if they included females of all ages engaging in head-portering activities as a livelihood in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

and Analysis The six stages of the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework guided the design and reporting of this scoping review. The methodology adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews. Relevant articles and grey literature were identified through searches of health-related databases. The extracted data will be presented using a narrative summary to complement a data table. Ethics and dissemination The ethical approval submission for this scoping review protocol was not completed as it is not required. Formal knowledge translation and dissemination activities will include publishing findings in African-based high-impact journals and conference presentations to reach relevant audiences. The final recommendations for practice, policy, and research will be shared and distributed through toolkits for healthcare professionals and stakeholder information leaflets. Registration The review has been registered with Open Science Framework Registries: https://osf.io/c3q7as Strengths and Limitations This scoping review explores the literature on the health implications of head portering among female head porters, encompassing a broad range of studies and evidence. It aims to identify research gaps, highlight key health concerns requiring further investigation, and serve as a foundation for future reviews and primary studies. However, this review does not include a formal quality assessment of the included studies, which may impact the reliability of the findings. Due to its broad scope, detailed analyses of specific health issues may be limited. Additionally, the risk of selection and interpretation bias may constrain the depth of analytic synthesis, reducing its applicability for precise policy and practice recommendations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes solina.richter{at}usask.ca, pmp139{at}mail.usask.ca Data Availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00