The Study of Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Treatment for Adenomyosis
Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatment was found to be safe and effective in reducing uterine volume and improving dysmenorrhea in 62 adenomyosis patients.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for uterine adenomyosis in 62 patients, monitoring adverse reactions during treatment and assessing changes in uterine size and dysmenorrhea scores pre- versus post-treatment. The authors report that all 62 patients completed MRgFUS successfully without severe adverse reactions, with an average ablation rate of 69.12% ± 17.64%. After treatment, uterine volume and dysmenorrhea scores improved significantly compared with baseline (p < 0.05). The paper is presented as an abstract and does not specify additional limitations such as study design details beyond the safety/efficacy observations. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it investigates MRgFUS as a non-invasive treatment for adenomyosis-related dysmenorrhea and uterine changes.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,878 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Results
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00