Efficacy of intrauterine balloon stent or oral estrogen on prevention of adhesion after transcervical resection of septum in septate uterus: Study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter study in China
This paper outlines the protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter study in China to evaluate the efficacy of intrauterine balloon stents or oral estrogen in preventing adhesions after transcervical resection of septum in patients with septate uterus.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper outlines the study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter trial conducted in China to evaluate methods for preventing intrauterine adhesions following transcervical resection of a septate uterus. The research design compares the efficacy of an intrauterine balloon stent against oral estrogen therapy as postoperative interventions. While the text provided consists primarily of acknowledgments and funding information, it establishes the framework for assessing surgical outcomes in patients with uterine septum anomalies. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
606 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Funding
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:42:03.417289+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:47:16.638238+00:00