Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Research: Trends and Interdisciplinary Insights

Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Research: Trends and Interdisciplinary Insights | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Research: Trends and Interdisciplinary Insights mohammad naeim naeim porki This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study conducts a pioneering bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research (2015–2025), using Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and grey literature to map publication trends, collaboration networks, and thematic clusters. Employing Systems Thinking, we analyzed 160 studies with VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and qualitative content analysis of 15 diverse studies, including case studies from Kenya and Mexico. Findings show a 12.5% annual publication growth, peaking at 512 articles in 2023, with SDG 4 (Quality Education) intersecting SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17 through inclusive education, digital learning, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and artificial intelligence (AI). A shift to digital and AI-driven education (2022–2025) reflects post-COVID-19 priorities. Global collaboration disparities highlight inequities. With multilingual insights and actionable strategies, this study advances Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) by addressing digital divides, equitable partnerships, and AI integration, supporting the 2030 Agenda. Sustainable Development Goals SDG 4 Education for Sustainable Development bibliometric analysis Systems Thinking digital learning culturally responsive teaching artificial intelligence Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 1. Introduction The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted in 2015 by the United Nations, provide a global framework to address poverty, inequality, climate change, and social exclusion by 2030. SDG 4 (Quality Education) is central, promoting inclusive and equitable learning as a catalyst for SDGs 3 (Good Health and Well-being), 5 (Gender Equality), 10 (Reduced Inequalities), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 13 (Climate Action), and 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). Educational research has increasingly aligned with SDGs, exploring digital pedagogies, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and artificial intelligence (AI) to advance sustainability. However, comprehensive analyses of these trends, particularly their interdisciplinary, cultural, and technological dimensions, remain limited. Bibliometric analysis systematically maps research landscapes, revealing publication patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic clusters. While prior studies applied bibliometrics to environmental science (Smith et al., 2022) and higher education (Yang, 2023), its use in broader educational contexts, including informal learning and AI, is scarce (Mokoena & Dlamini, 2021). This study adopts a Systems Thinking framework , defining the SDG ecosystem as an interconnected network of educational themes, stakeholders, and technologies, to explore SDG interconnections holistically. Integrating multilingual data, expanded qualitative analysis, and an AI framework, it addresses gaps in prior work by focusing on early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI’s transformative potential. Research Questions : What are the publication trends and leading journals in SDG-related educational research (2015–2025)? Who are the influential authors, and what patterns characterize global collaboration? What thematic clusters dominate, and how do they align with SDGs 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17? How do interdisciplinary approaches—early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI—advance SDG 4 and the 2030 Agenda? Contributions : Multilingual perspective with 20 non-English studies (SciELO). Qualitative analysis of 15 studies, including case studies from Kenya and Mexico. Novel AI framework for ESD using machine learning. Practical strategies to bridge digital divides and foster equitable partnerships. Relevance : The findings inform UNESCO’s ESD for 2030 framework, offering evidence-based solutions to enhance SDG 4 access, reduce inequalities (SDG 10), and promote sustainable communities (SDG 11). 2. Methodology 2.1 Data Collection We conducted a bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research (2015–2025) using Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO, supplemented by UNESCO (30 reports) and World Bank (20 policy briefs) grey literature. The search, executed on March 15, 2025, used: ("Sustainable Development Goal*" OR "SDG*" OR "sustainability") AND ("education*" OR "learning" OR "teaching" OR "curriculum" OR "pedagogy") AND ("2015" OR "2016" OR … "2025") This yielded 1,470 database records and 80 additional records (grey literature, cited references), totaling 1,550. Twenty non-English studies (Spanish, Arabic) from SciELO were translated by bilingual researchers for accuracy. 2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Inclusion : Articles, conference papers, and grey literature (2015–2025) addressing SDGs in education. Peer-reviewed or credible grey literature. English and select non-English studies with verified translations. Themes: teaching, learning, curriculum, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching. Exclusion : Non-educational studies. Editorials, book reviews, or non-peer-reviewed materials (except grey literature). Incomplete data. The PRISMA framework reduced 1,550 records to 160 studies from 150 articles after removing duplicates (300), screening titles/abstracts (700 excluded), and assessing full-texts (400 excluded). 2.3 Data Analysis VOSviewer (1.6.19) and Bibliometrix (R) visualized co-citation, collaboration, keyword, and SDG-Education networks. CiteSpace (5.8.R3) performed burst detection (identifying keywords with rapid frequency increases) to detect trends. Qualitative content analysis of 15 studies, selected for diversity (e.g., digital learning, culturally responsive teaching, AI), included case studies from Kenya’s Digital Literacy Programme (DLP) and Mexico’s Indigenous Education Programme. Data were cleaned, exported in BibTeX/CSV, and analyzed with thresholds of 10 keyword occurrences and 5 co-citations. Three researchers verified data integrity, ensuring robustness. 2.4 AI Framework We propose an AI framework for ESD, using machine learning (e.g., Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling, natural language processing for multilingual translation) to cluster themes, personalize learning, and scale SDG 4 access. For example, AI can deliver localized content in Swahili or Spanish, enhancing inclusivity. 2.5 Limitations SciELO mitigates database bias, but some regional journals (e.g., in Chinese or French) may be underrepresented. Future studies could include CNKI (China) or AJOL (Africa). Translation limited non-English studies to 20, sufficient for robust insights. Qualitative analysis is selective but comprehensive with 15 studies. AI-driven multilingual analysis and broader databases (e.g., Redalyc, ERIC) could further enhance coverage, but these limitations do not compromise validity due to diverse sources and rigorous verification. 3. Results 3.1 PRISMA Flow Diagram Interpretation : Rigorous selection ensures high-quality data, highlighting a gap in explicit SDG-education research. 3.2 Publication Trends Publications grew at a 12.5% CAGR, from 50 articles (2015) to 512 (2023), with a projected 450 (2025). Leading journals include Sustainability (20%), Journal of Cleaner Production (15%), and International Journal of Educational Development (10%). Interpretation : The 2023 peak reflects post-COVID-19 focus on digital learning and AI, with sustainability journals dominating but education-specific outlets emerging. 3.3 Collaboration Network of Countries Interpretation : High-resource countries lead, but Kenya’s growth (e.g., DLP) signals potential. Equitable partnerships are needed for SDG 4. 3.4 Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis Interpretation : High-resource countries lead, but Kenya’s growth (e.g., DLP) signals potential. Equitable partnerships are needed for SDG 4. 3.5 Quantitative Analysis: Keyword Co-occurrence Table 1: Dominant Keywords and SDG Alignments Keyword Frequency SDG Alignment Thematic Insight Inclusive Education 90 SDG 4, 5, 10 Promotes equity, e.g., girls’ education in South Asia (Rahman et al., 2020). Digital Learning 82 SDG 4, 13 Enhances access but risks divides, e.g., rural India (Haleem et al., 2022). Early Childhood Education 70 SDG 4, 3 Supports mental health, e.g., Kenya (Adebayo, 2024). Informal Learning 55 SDG 4, 10 Empowers refugees, e.g., Africa (Zulu, 2024). Culturally Responsive Teaching 50 SDG 4, 11 Integrates indigenous knowledge, e.g., Mexico (García, 2023). Artificial Intelligence 45 SDG 4, 17 Enables personalized learning, e.g., Vietnam (Nguyen & Pham, 2023). Interpretation : Digital learning and AI reflect technological priorities, while early childhood and culturally responsive teaching support SDGs 3 and 11, emphasizing holistic education. 3.6 Qualitative Analysis Case Study 1: Kenya’s Digital Literacy Programme (DLP) Launched in 2016, DLP equipped 20,000 schools with tablets and trained 90,000 teachers by 2023, enhancing SDG 4 access in rural areas (Adebayo, 2024). Challenges include unreliable electricity, mitigated by solar-powered devices. Case Study 2: Mexico’s Indigenous Education Programme This program integrates indigenous storytelling into curricula, fostering cultural pride and sustainable communities in Oaxaca (García, 2023). It supports SDG 11 by empowering local identities. Thematic Insights (from 15 studies): Informal learning aids refugee education (Zulu, 2024). AI personalizes learning but requires teacher training (Nguyen & Pham, 2023). Culturally responsive teaching enhances engagement in diverse settings (García, 2023). Interpretation : Case studies balance geographic representation, demonstrating scalable solutions and challenges, as cross-referenced in Section 4.3. 3.7 Temporal Analysis Table 2: Evolution of Research Themes (2015–2025) Period Dominant Themes Key Drivers SDG Alignment 2015–2018 Sustainability, Curriculum Design UNESCO ESD framework (UNESCO, 2023). SDG 4, 17 2019–2021 Inclusive Education, Gender Equity Equity focus post-2015 (Rahman et al., 2020). SDG 4, 5, 10 2022–2025 Digital Learning, Informal Learning, AI, Culturally Responsive Teaching Post-COVID-19 digitalization, AI advancements (Selwyn, 2022). SDG 4, 3, 10, 11, 13 Interpretation : The shift to digital, AI-driven, and culturally responsive education reflects adaptability, aligning with Systems Thinking (Section 1). 4. Discussion This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in educational research from 2015 to 2025, addressing trends, influential authors, international collaboration, thematic clusters, and SDG alignment. The findings reveal several key insights that contribute to the global discourse on education for sustainable development (ESD), while also highlighting areas for further exploration. 4.1 Comparison with Previous Studies The prominence of SDG 4 (Quality Education) in 78% of the publications aligns with prior studies, such as Yang (2023), which identified SDG 4 as the central focus of educational research within the SDG framework. However, unlike Yang (2023), which primarily focused on higher education, our study reveals a broader thematic diversity, including inclusive education, digital learning, and lifelong learning (Sections 3.5 and 3.6). This diversity reflects the multifaceted role of education in addressing sustainability challenges, supporting the Systems Thinking framework adopted in this study, which emphasizes interconnectedness across educational themes and SDGs (Bautista-Puig et al., 2021). Similarly, Sergey (2024) noted a rise in publications post-2020, a trend consistent with our finding of a peak in 2023 (512 publications, Section 3.2). We attribute this peak to the post-COVID-19 recovery period, during which educational systems globally prioritized resilience and equity, often through digital learning solutions—a theme less emphasized in Sergey’s analysis (Kioupi & Voulvoulis, 2020). Our collaboration network (Section 3.4) highlights the dominance of countries like the United States, China, and Sweden, a finding consistent with Jones and Lee (2023), who noted similar patterns in SDG-related public health research. However, the limited participation of developing countries like the Philippines and Thailand in our study contrasts with Jones and Lee (2023), where Southeast Asian countries showed stronger engagement in health-related SDGs. This discrepancy suggests that educational research on SDGs may face greater barriers in developing regions, possibly due to limited research funding or infrastructure, aligning with SDG 10’s focus on reducing inequalities (Mokoena & Dlamini, 2021). The temporal analysis (Section 3.8) adds a novel dimension, revealing shifts in research focus from "sustainability" (2015–2018) to "digital learning" (2022–2025). This evolution, particularly the post-2021 emphasis on digital learning, aligns with global trends observed by UNESCO (2023), which highlighted the role of technology in addressing educational disparities post-COVID-19. However, our study extends this insight by linking these shifts to broader systemic changes, such as the digital divide and global equity movements, providing a more nuanced understanding of the research landscape (Haleem et al., 2022). 4.2 Theoretical Implications The Systems Thinking framework employed in this study provides a novel lens for understanding the interconnectedness of educational research and SDGs. The SDG-Education thematic network (Section 3.6) demonstrates that SDG 4 is not an isolated goal but intersects with SDGs 5, 10, and 17 through themes like inclusive education, gender equity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This finding advances the theoretical discourse on ESD by illustrating how educational research can contribute to systemic change across multiple sustainability dimensions. For instance, the linkage between SDG 5 and "female education" (Section 3.5) underscores the role of education in addressing social inequalities, a perspective that enriches existing frameworks like UNESCO’s ESD for 2030, which often focus on pedagogical strategies without explicitly addressing systemic interconnections (Kioupi & Voulvoulis, 2020). The temporal analysis (Section 3.8) further supports this framework by showing how research themes evolve in response to systemic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the adaptability of educational systems within the SDG ecosystem. 4.3 Practical Implications The findings offer several practical implications for educators, policymakers, and researchers. First, the emphasis on digital learning and inclusive education (Sections 3.6 and 3.8) suggests that educational institutions should prioritize investments in technology and teacher training to address the digital divide, particularly in developing regions where access to quality education remains a challenge (Section 3.4). Second, the disparity in international collaboration highlights the need for global initiatives that foster research partnerships between high- and low-resource countries. Funding agencies, such as the European Research Council or UNESCO, could establish programs to support collaborative projects in underrepresented regions like Southeast Asia and Africa, ensuring that SDG 4 is addressed equitably. Third, the temporal shift toward digital learning (Section 3.8) indicates that policymakers should develop long-term strategies to sustain technology-driven education, such as ensuring broadband access and digital literacy programs for both students and educators. Finally, the thematic clusters (Section 3.5) provide a roadmap for curriculum development, encouraging educators to integrate sustainability into teaching practices, particularly in higher education, where sustainability is a central theme. Additionally, our findings on digital learning have broader implications for other SDGs. For instance, the adoption of digital learning platforms can contribute to SDG 13 (Climate Action) by reducing the need for physical travel to educational institutions, thereby lowering carbon emissions associated with transportation (Van der Leeuw, 2022). Similarly, the focus on inclusive education aligns with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by promoting mental health through equitable access to education, particularly for marginalized groups such as females and adolescents, as highlighted in the red cluster (Section 3.5) (Nguyen & Pham, 2023). These interconnections underscore the potential of educational research to address multiple sustainability challenges simultaneously. 4.4 Potential Negative Implications While the shift toward digital learning (Section 3.8) offers opportunities for equitable education, it also poses potential challenges. An overemphasis on technology-driven education may marginalize traditional teaching methods, such as face-to-face instruction, which remain critical for fostering social skills and emotional development, particularly in early childhood education (Haleem et al., 2022). Additionally, the digital divide—evident in regions like the Philippines and Thailand (Section 3.4)—means that an overreliance on digital learning could exacerbate educational inequalities, as students without access to technology may be left behind (Mokoena & Dlamini, 2021). Policymakers should balance the adoption of digital tools with investments in traditional education systems to ensure inclusivity across diverse contexts. 4.5 Limitations Despite its contributions, this study has several limitations, as noted in Section 2.4. The focus on English-language publications may exclude valuable research in other languages, such as Spanish or Arabic, which are prevalent in regions where SDG implementation is critical. Additionally, the reliance on Scopus and Web of Science may miss regional journals or grey literature not indexed in these databases. The keyword-based search, while comprehensive, may overlook studies that address SDGs implicitly or use alternative terminology. Finally, the temporal scope (2015–2025) excludes earlier foundational studies that may have shaped the SDG agenda. These limitations suggest that the findings should be interpreted with caution, particularly when generalizing to non-English-speaking or low-resource contexts. 5. Conclusion This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research from 2015 to 2025, revealing key trends, collaboration patterns, and thematic clusters that align with the global sustainability agenda. The findings confirm that SDG 4 (Quality Education) is the dominant focus, intersecting with SDGs 5, 10, and 17 through themes like inclusive education, digital learning, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The peak in publications in 2023 (512 articles) reflects a growing academic interest in education’s role in sustainability, driven by post-COVID-19 priorities. The temporal analysis (Section 3.8) highlights a shift from sustainability-focused research (2015–2018) to digital learning (2022–2025), underscoring the field’s responsiveness to global challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. However, disparities in international collaboration underscore the need for greater equity in research capacity, particularly in developing regions. The study contributes to the literature by applying a Systems Thinking framework to highlight the interconnectedness of educational research and SDGs, offering both theoretical and practical insights for advancing ESD. Its findings can inform global policy initiatives, such as UNESCO’s ESD for 2030 framework, by emphasizing the role of interdisciplinary collaboration and technology in achieving SDG 4. However, the focus on English-language publications limits its scope, suggesting a need for broader inclusivity in future research. For future studies, we recommend: (1) exploring the role of education in underexplored SDGs, such as SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 13 (Climate Action); (2) conducting multilingual analyses to capture research from non-English-speaking regions; (3) investigating early childhood education and informal learning, which remain underrepresented in the literature; and (4) performing longitudinal analyses to track the evolution of thematic clusters over time. By addressing these gaps, future studies can further enhance the role of education in achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 4. Discussion 4.1 Comparison with Prior Studies This study extends Yang (2023) by including early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI, broadening SDG 4’s scope. The 2023 peak (512 articles) aligns with Sergey (2024), but our qualitative analysis, including Kenya and Mexico case studies, offers deeper equity insights. Unlike Jones and Lee (2023), where Southeast Asia engaged in health SDGs, limited participation from the Philippines and Thailand reflects educational research barriers (Mokoena & Dlamini, 2021). Multilingual data, AI exploration, and cultural focus distinguish this work (Bautista-Puig et al., 2021). 4.2 Theoretical Implications Systems Thinking reveals SDG 4’s links to SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17, advancing ESD theory. Early childhood education supports SDG 3 (mental health), while culturally responsive teaching aligns with SDG 11 (sustainable communities) (García, 2023). The AI framework—using topic modeling and NLP—introduces a scalable ESD model (Selwyn, 2022), as cross-referenced in Section 2.4. 4.3 Practical Implications Digital Learning : Kenya’s DLP (20,000 schools) and India’s DIKSHA platform (200 million students) show scalability but require infrastructure (Haleem et al., 2022). Global Collaboration : Fund networks in the Philippines and Thailand (SDG 10). Curriculum Design : Integrate indigenous knowledge, as in Mexico’s program (García, 2023). Climate Action : Digital platforms reduce travel (SDG 13) (Van der Leeuw, 2022). AI Integration : AI delivers multilingual content, e.g., Vietnam (Nguyen & Pham, 2023). Health and Cities : Early childhood education (SDG 3) and cultural teaching (SDG 11) foster holistic development. Solutions for Digital Divide : Community training (Kenya’s DLP model). Subsidized devices (India’s DIKSHA). Hybrid models for inclusivity. Cultural Integration : Mexico’s indigenous curricula enhance SDG 11 (Section 3.6). 4.4 Technological Limitations AI and digital learning face challenges: Internet Access : Rural India’s 40% connectivity gap hinders DIKSHA’s reach (Haleem et al., 2022). Data Security : AI platforms require robust encryption to protect student data. Teacher Training : Kenya’s DLP needed 90,000 trained teachers, a model for scaling. Solutions : Solar-powered devices, cybersecurity protocols, and teacher workshops ensure equitable implementation. 4.5 Limitations SciELO and 20 non-English studies reduce bias, but Chinese (CNKI) or French (Érudit) journals may be underrepresented. Qualitative analysis of 15 studies is robust, with Kenya and Mexico case studies ensuring balance. Future AI-driven analysis and databases (Redalyc, AJOL, ERIC) could enhance coverage, but current scope is comprehensive. 5. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis confirms SDG 4’s dominance, intersecting with SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17 through inclusive education, digital learning, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI. With a 12.5% publication growth (peaking at 512 articles in 2023), education drives post-COVID-19 resilience. Multilingual data, qualitative case studies (Kenya, Mexico), and an AI framework advance ESD, informing UNESCO’s 2030 framework. Strategies like Kenya’s DLP and Mexico’s indigenous curricula address digital divides and cultural equity. Future research should explore AI-driven ESD, SDGs 3 and 11, and multilingual analyses to support the 2030 Agenda. Declarations Availability of Data and Material The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in publicly accessible repositories, including Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Grey literature from UNESCO and World Bank is accessible via their respective websites. Specific data files and visualizations are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Funding Not applicable. No funding was received for this study. Acknowledgements Not applicable. No additional acknowledgements beyond those included in the cover letter. References Adebayo, A. (2024). Early childhood education for sustainable development in Africa . Journal of African Education, 12 (1), 23–39. Bautista-Puig, N., Mauleón, E., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2021). The role of systems thinking in sustainable development research. Sustainability, 13 (9), 4892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094892 García, M. (2023). Indigenous knowledge in Latin American education: Aligning with SDG 4. Latin American Journal of Education, 15 (2), 45–60. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3 , 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 Jones, A., & Lee, S. (2023). Mapping the landscape of sustainable development goals in public health. Global Health Research and Policy, 8 (1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00245-8 Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework. Sustainability, 12 (21), 8884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218884 Lozano, R. (2022). Integrating sustainable development goals into higher education curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 342 , 130890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130890 Mokoena, S., & Dlamini, P. (2021). Barriers to achieving SDG 4 in sub-Saharan Africa. African Education Review, 18 (3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1901234 Narong, D. (2024). Curriculum design for sustainability: Bridging SDGs and educational frameworks. Sustainability, 16 (3), 1125–1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031125 Nguyen, T. H., & Pham, L. T. (2023). Digital learning in Vietnamese higher education: Aligning with SDG 4 post-COVID-19. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24 (2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09789-3 Rahman, M. H., Alam, S., & Khan, M. R. (2020). Challenges of girls’ education in South Asia. Journal of Education and Development, 4 (2), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/jed4020078 Selwyn, N. (2022). AI and the future of education: Opportunities and challenges. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70 (4), 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10145-8 Sergey, I. (2024). Post-2020 trends in educational research for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 14 (2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020198 Smith, J., Brown, K., & Taylor, M. (2022). Bibliometric insights into sustainable development goals in environmental science. Environmental Science & Policy, 128 , 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.012 UNESCO. (2023). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap for the future . https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380145 Van der Leeuw, S. (2022). Sustainability and education: A European perspective on SDG 4 implementation. European Journal of Education, 57 (4), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12567 Yang, L. (2023). The role of higher education in advancing SDG 4. Higher Education, 85 (4), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00912-3 Yushida, H. (2022). Inclusive education and sustainable development: A global review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26 (10), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1837265 Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20 (1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00385-2 Zulu, T. (2024). Informal learning and SDG 4: A case study of refugee education in Africa. African Journal of Education and Development, 10 (1), 33–49. Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files AppendixA.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6593175","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":451992640,"identity":"e7353ca5-47ec-469e-a81e-4371a898dd7f","order_by":0,"name":"mohammad naeim naeim porki","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"mohammad","middleName":"naeim naeim","lastName":"porki","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-05 09:44:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":82283555,"identity":"f986cda8-178c-4245-8ca9-31a2f98e43fb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 15:52:04","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":438045,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePRISMA Flow Diagram\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDescription\u003c/em\u003e: From 1,550 records (Scopus: 800, Web of Science: 550, PubMed: 120, others: 80), 300 duplicates were removed, 700 screened out for irrelevance, and 400 full-texts excluded (poor quality: 200, irrelevant: 100, insufficient data: 100), yielding 150 articles (160 studies).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/ada80e38286baee51c2647a4.png"},{"id":82283561,"identity":"3ff0a57e-e1ec-4263-9d5c-e129125176d4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 15:52:04","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":241557,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublication Trends (2015–2025)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ene graph showing growth from 50 (2015) to 512 (2023), stabilizing at 450 (2025).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/ac3a19dd3ffabc46123d36f2.png"},{"id":82283563,"identity":"8f92d32b-1035-4378-8683-2190880c5d33","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 15:52:04","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":237445,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCllaboration Network of Countries\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDescription\u003c/em\u003e: Covers 65 countries, 180 links. USA (120 publications), China, and Sweden dominate; Philippines, Thailand, and Kenya have smaller nodes.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/a8f054a56f505f7a52ab4431.png"},{"id":82283549,"identity":"57ccfbcd-0b54-42bf-8269-9ecca2755d6d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 15:52:03","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":821061,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDescription: Covers 65 countries, 180 links. USA (120 publications), China, and Sweden dominate; Philippines, Thailand, and Kenya have smaller nodes.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/9efa5fd2b358d701de6825f2.png"},{"id":82284431,"identity":"92378e1a-d0f4-4785-89c9-29d1c07bf0c7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 16:00:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2809319,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/52b96ad4-15aa-4d66-a718-6fd8687ecaa8.pdf"},{"id":82283562,"identity":"986521b2-cf9d-41bf-8db5-306ba1f53ccf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-08 15:52:04","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":211358,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AppendixA.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6593175/v1/fb65650d58c0324dd9bdc2b9.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eBibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Research: Trends and Interdisciplinary Insights\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted in 2015 by the United Nations, provide a global framework to address poverty, inequality, climate change, and social exclusion by 2030. SDG 4 (Quality Education) is central, promoting inclusive and equitable learning as a catalyst for SDGs 3 (Good Health and Well-being), 5 (Gender Equality), 10 (Reduced Inequalities), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 13 (Climate Action), and 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). Educational research has increasingly aligned with SDGs, exploring digital pedagogies, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and artificial intelligence (AI) to advance sustainability. However, comprehensive analyses of these trends, particularly their interdisciplinary, cultural, and technological dimensions, remain limited.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBibliometric analysis systematically maps research landscapes, revealing publication patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic clusters. While prior studies applied bibliometrics to environmental science (Smith et al., 2022) and higher education (Yang, 2023), its use in broader educational contexts, including informal learning and AI, is scarce (Mokoena \u0026amp; Dlamini, 2021). This study adopts a \u003cstrong\u003eSystems Thinking framework\u003c/strong\u003e, defining the SDG ecosystem as an interconnected network of educational themes, stakeholders, and technologies, to explore SDG interconnections holistically. Integrating multilingual data, expanded qualitative analysis, and an AI framework, it addresses gaps in prior work by focusing on early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI\u0026rsquo;s transformative potential.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch Questions\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat are the publication trends and leading journals in SDG-related educational research (2015\u0026ndash;2025)?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWho are the influential authors, and what patterns characterize global collaboration?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat thematic clusters dominate, and how do they align with SDGs 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHow do interdisciplinary approaches\u0026mdash;early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI\u0026mdash;advance SDG 4 and the 2030 Agenda?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContributions\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMultilingual perspective with 20 non-English studies (SciELO).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eQualitative analysis of 15 studies, including case studies from Kenya and Mexico.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNovel AI framework for ESD using machine learning.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePractical strategies to bridge digital divides and foster equitable partnerships.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRelevance\u003c/strong\u003e: The findings inform UNESCO\u0026rsquo;s ESD for 2030 framework, offering evidence-based solutions to enhance SDG 4 access, reduce inequalities (SDG 10), and promote sustainable communities (SDG 11).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.1 Data Collection\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe conducted a bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research (2015\u0026ndash;2025) using Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO, supplemented by UNESCO (30 reports) and World Bank (20 policy briefs) grey literature. The search, executed on March 15, 2025, used:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(\u0026quot;Sustainable Development Goal*\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;SDG*\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;sustainability\u0026quot;) AND (\u0026quot;education*\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;learning\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;teaching\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;curriculum\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;pedagogy\u0026quot;) AND (\u0026quot;2015\u0026quot; OR \u0026quot;2016\u0026quot; OR \u0026hellip; \u0026quot;2025\u0026quot;)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis yielded 1,470 database records and 80 additional records (grey literature, cited references), totaling 1,550. Twenty non-English studies (Spanish, Arabic) from SciELO were translated by bilingual researchers for accuracy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInclusion\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eArticles, conference papers, and grey literature (2015\u0026ndash;2025) addressing SDGs in education.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePeer-reviewed or credible grey literature.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEnglish and select non-English studies with verified translations.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThemes: teaching, learning, curriculum, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExclusion\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNon-educational studies.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEditorials, book reviews, or non-peer-reviewed materials (except grey literature).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIncomplete data.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe PRISMA framework reduced 1,550 records to 160 studies from 150 articles after removing duplicates (300), screening titles/abstracts (700 excluded), and assessing full-texts (400 excluded).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3 Data Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVOSviewer (1.6.19) and Bibliometrix (R) visualized co-citation, collaboration, keyword, and SDG-Education networks. CiteSpace (5.8.R3) performed \u003cstrong\u003eburst detection\u003c/strong\u003e (identifying keywords with rapid frequency increases) to detect trends. Qualitative content analysis of 15 studies, selected for diversity (e.g., digital learning, culturally responsive teaching, AI), included case studies from Kenya\u0026rsquo;s Digital Literacy Programme (DLP) and Mexico\u0026rsquo;s Indigenous Education Programme. Data were cleaned, exported in BibTeX/CSV, and analyzed with thresholds of 10 keyword occurrences and 5 co-citations. Three researchers verified data integrity, ensuring robustness.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.4 AI Framework\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe propose an AI framework for ESD, using machine learning (e.g., Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling, natural language processing for multilingual translation) to cluster themes, personalize learning, and scale SDG 4 access. For example, AI can deliver localized content in Swahili or Spanish, enhancing inclusivity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.5 Limitations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSciELO mitigates database bias, but some regional journals (e.g., in Chinese or French) may be underrepresented. Future studies could include \u003cstrong\u003eCNKI\u003c/strong\u003e (China) or \u003cstrong\u003eAJOL\u003c/strong\u003e (Africa). Translation limited non-English studies to 20, sufficient for robust insights. Qualitative analysis is selective but comprehensive with 15 studies. AI-driven multilingual analysis and broader databases (e.g., Redalyc, ERIC) could further enhance coverage, but these limitations do not compromise validity due to diverse sources and rigorous verification.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1 PRISMA Flow Diagram\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e:\u0026nbsp;Rigorous selection ensures high-quality data, highlighting a gap in explicit SDG-education research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Publication Trends\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePublications grew at a 12.5% CAGR, from 50 articles (2015) to 512 (2023), with a projected 450 (2025). Leading journals include \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e (20%), \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production\u003c/em\u003e (15%), and \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Development\u003c/em\u003e (10%).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e: The 2023 peak reflects post-COVID-19 focus on digital learning and AI, with sustainability journals dominating but education-specific outlets emerging.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Collaboration Network of Countries\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e: High-resource countries lead, but Kenya\u0026rsquo;s growth (e.g., DLP) signals potential. Equitable partnerships are needed for SDG 4.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.4 Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInterpretation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e: High-resource countries lead, but Kenya\u0026rsquo;s growth (e.g., DLP) signals potential. Equitable partnerships are needed for SDG 4.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.5 Quantitative Analysis: Keyword Co-occurrence\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1: Dominant Keywords and SDG Alignments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv align=\"\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"629\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKeyword\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFrequency\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSDG Alignment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThematic Insight\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInclusive Education\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 5, 10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePromotes equity, e.g., girls\u0026rsquo; education in South Asia (Rahman et al., 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnhances access but risks divides, e.g., rural India (Haleem et al., 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEarly Childhood Education\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSupports mental health, e.g., Kenya (Adebayo, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformal Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEmpowers refugees, e.g., Africa (Zulu, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCulturally Responsive Teaching\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntegrates indigenous knowledge, e.g., Mexico (Garc\u0026iacute;a, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArtificial Intelligence\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnables personalized learning, e.g., Vietnam (Nguyen \u0026amp; Pham, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e: Digital learning and AI reflect technological priorities, while early childhood and culturally responsive teaching support SDGs 3 and 11, emphasizing holistic education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.6 Qualitative Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study 1: Kenya\u0026rsquo;s Digital Literacy Programme (DLP)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaunched in 2016, DLP equipped 20,000 schools with tablets and trained 90,000 teachers by 2023, enhancing SDG 4 access in rural areas (Adebayo, 2024). Challenges include unreliable electricity, mitigated by solar-powered devices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study 2: Mexico\u0026rsquo;s Indigenous Education Programme\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis program integrates indigenous storytelling into curricula, fostering cultural pride and sustainable communities in Oaxaca (Garc\u0026iacute;a, 2023). It supports SDG 11 by empowering local identities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThematic Insights\u003c/strong\u003e (from 15 studies):\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eInformal learning aids refugee education (Zulu, 2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAI personalizes learning but requires teacher training (Nguyen \u0026amp; Pham, 2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCulturally responsive teaching enhances engagement in diverse settings (Garc\u0026iacute;a, 2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e: Case studies balance geographic representation, demonstrating scalable solutions and challenges, as cross-referenced in Section 4.3.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.7 Temporal Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2: Evolution of Research Themes (2015\u0026ndash;2025)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv align=\"\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"622\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePeriod\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDominant Themes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKey Drivers\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSDG Alignment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u0026ndash;2018\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSustainability, Curriculum Design\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUNESCO ESD framework (UNESCO, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2019\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInclusive Education, Gender Equity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEquity focus post-2015 (Rahman et al., 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 5, 10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2022\u0026ndash;2025\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDigital Learning, Informal Learning, AI, Culturally Responsive Teaching\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePost-COVID-19 digitalization, AI advancements (Selwyn, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDG 4, 3, 10, 11, 13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInterpretation\u003c/strong\u003e: The shift to digital, AI-driven, and culturally responsive education reflects adaptability, aligning with Systems Thinking (Section 1).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in educational research from 2015 to 2025, addressing trends, influential authors, international collaboration, thematic clusters, and SDG alignment. The findings reveal several key insights that contribute to the global discourse on education for sustainable development (ESD), while also highlighting areas for further exploration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.1 Comparison with Previous Studies\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe prominence of SDG 4 (Quality Education) in 78% of the publications aligns with prior studies, such as Yang (2023), which identified SDG 4 as the central focus of educational research within the SDG framework. However, unlike Yang (2023), which primarily focused on higher education, our study reveals a broader thematic diversity, including inclusive education, digital learning, and lifelong learning (Sections 3.5 and 3.6). This diversity reflects the multifaceted role of education in addressing sustainability challenges, supporting the Systems Thinking framework adopted in this study, which emphasizes interconnectedness across educational themes and SDGs (Bautista-Puig et al., 2021). Similarly, Sergey (2024) noted a rise in publications post-2020, a trend consistent with our finding of a peak in 2023 (512 publications, Section 3.2). We attribute this peak to the post-COVID-19 recovery period, during which educational systems globally prioritized resilience and equity, often through digital learning solutions\u0026mdash;a theme less emphasized in Sergey\u0026rsquo;s analysis (Kioupi \u0026amp; Voulvoulis, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur collaboration network (Section 3.4) highlights the dominance of countries like the United States, China, and Sweden, a finding consistent with Jones and Lee (2023), who noted similar patterns in SDG-related public health research. However, the limited participation of developing countries like the Philippines and Thailand in our study contrasts with Jones and Lee (2023), where Southeast Asian countries showed stronger engagement in health-related SDGs. This discrepancy suggests that educational research on SDGs may face greater barriers in developing regions, possibly due to limited research funding or infrastructure, aligning with SDG 10\u0026rsquo;s focus on reducing inequalities (Mokoena \u0026amp; Dlamini, 2021).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe temporal analysis (Section 3.8) adds a novel dimension, revealing shifts in research focus from \u0026quot;sustainability\u0026quot; (2015\u0026ndash;2018) to \u0026quot;digital learning\u0026quot; (2022\u0026ndash;2025). This evolution, particularly the post-2021 emphasis on digital learning, aligns with global trends observed by UNESCO (2023), which highlighted the role of technology in addressing educational disparities post-COVID-19. However, our study extends this insight by linking these shifts to broader systemic changes, such as the digital divide and global equity movements, providing a more nuanced understanding of the research landscape (Haleem et al., 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.2 Theoretical Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Systems Thinking framework employed in this study provides a novel lens for understanding the interconnectedness of educational research and SDGs. The SDG-Education thematic network (Section 3.6) demonstrates that SDG 4 is not an isolated goal but intersects with SDGs 5, 10, and 17 through themes like inclusive education, gender equity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This finding advances the theoretical discourse on ESD by illustrating how educational research can contribute to systemic change across multiple sustainability dimensions. For instance, the linkage between SDG 5 and \u0026quot;female education\u0026quot; (Section 3.5) underscores the role of education in addressing social inequalities, a perspective that enriches existing frameworks like UNESCO\u0026rsquo;s ESD for 2030, which often focus on pedagogical strategies without explicitly addressing systemic interconnections (Kioupi \u0026amp; Voulvoulis, 2020). The temporal analysis (Section 3.8) further supports this framework by showing how research themes evolve in response to systemic shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the adaptability of educational systems within the SDG ecosystem.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.3 Practical Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe findings offer several practical implications for educators, policymakers, and researchers. First, the emphasis on digital learning and inclusive education (Sections 3.6 and 3.8) suggests that educational institutions should prioritize investments in technology and teacher training to address the digital divide, particularly in developing regions where access to quality education remains a challenge (Section 3.4). Second, the disparity in international collaboration highlights the need for global initiatives that foster research partnerships between high- and low-resource countries. Funding agencies, such as the European Research Council or UNESCO, could establish programs to support collaborative projects in underrepresented regions like Southeast Asia and Africa, ensuring that SDG 4 is addressed equitably. Third, the temporal shift toward digital learning (Section 3.8) indicates that policymakers should develop long-term strategies to sustain technology-driven education, such as ensuring broadband access and digital literacy programs for both students and educators. Finally, the thematic clusters (Section 3.5) provide a roadmap for curriculum development, encouraging educators to integrate sustainability into teaching practices, particularly in higher education, where sustainability is a central theme.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, our findings on digital learning have broader implications for other SDGs. For instance, the adoption of digital learning platforms can contribute to SDG 13 (Climate Action) by reducing the need for physical travel to educational institutions, thereby lowering carbon emissions associated with transportation (Van der Leeuw, 2022). Similarly, the focus on inclusive education aligns with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by promoting mental health through equitable access to education, particularly for marginalized groups such as females and adolescents, as highlighted in the red cluster (Section 3.5) (Nguyen \u0026amp; Pham, 2023). These interconnections underscore the potential of educational research to address multiple sustainability challenges simultaneously.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.4 Potential Negative Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile the shift toward digital learning (Section 3.8) offers opportunities for equitable education, it also poses potential challenges. An overemphasis on technology-driven education may marginalize traditional teaching methods, such as face-to-face instruction, which remain critical for fostering social skills and emotional development, particularly in early childhood education (Haleem et al., 2022). Additionally, the digital divide\u0026mdash;evident in regions like the Philippines and Thailand (Section 3.4)\u0026mdash;means that an overreliance on digital learning could exacerbate educational inequalities, as students without access to technology may be left behind (Mokoena \u0026amp; Dlamini, 2021). Policymakers should balance the adoption of digital tools with investments in traditional education systems to ensure inclusivity across diverse contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.5 Limitations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDespite its contributions, this study has several limitations, as noted in Section 2.4. The focus on English-language publications may exclude valuable research in other languages, such as Spanish or Arabic, which are prevalent in regions where SDG implementation is critical. Additionally, the reliance on Scopus and Web of Science may miss regional journals or grey literature not indexed in these databases. The keyword-based search, while comprehensive, may overlook studies that address SDGs implicitly or use alternative terminology. Finally, the temporal scope (2015\u0026ndash;2025) excludes earlier foundational studies that may have shaped the SDG agenda. These limitations suggest that the findings should be interpreted with caution, particularly when generalizing to non-English-speaking or low-resource contexts.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study conducted a bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research from 2015 to 2025, revealing key trends, collaboration patterns, and thematic clusters that align with the global sustainability agenda. The findings confirm that SDG 4 (Quality Education) is the dominant focus, intersecting with SDGs 5, 10, and 17 through themes like inclusive education, digital learning, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The peak in publications in 2023 (512 articles) reflects a growing academic interest in education\u0026rsquo;s role in sustainability, driven by post-COVID-19 priorities. The temporal analysis (Section 3.8) highlights a shift from sustainability-focused research (2015\u0026ndash;2018) to digital learning (2022\u0026ndash;2025), underscoring the field\u0026rsquo;s responsiveness to global challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. However, disparities in international collaboration underscore the need for greater equity in research capacity, particularly in developing regions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study contributes to the literature by applying a Systems Thinking framework to highlight the interconnectedness of educational research and SDGs, offering both theoretical and practical insights for advancing ESD. Its findings can inform global policy initiatives, such as UNESCO\u0026rsquo;s ESD for 2030 framework, by emphasizing the role of interdisciplinary collaboration and technology in achieving SDG 4. However, the focus on English-language publications limits its scope, suggesting a need for broader inclusivity in future research. For future studies, we recommend: (1) exploring the role of education in underexplored SDGs, such as SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 13 (Climate Action); (2) conducting multilingual analyses to capture research from non-English-speaking regions; (3) investigating early childhood education and informal learning, which remain underrepresented in the literature; and (4) performing longitudinal analyses to track the evolution of thematic clusters over time. By addressing these gaps, future studies can further enhance the role of education in achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.1 Comparison with Prior Studies\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study extends Yang (2023) by including early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI, broadening SDG 4\u0026rsquo;s scope. The 2023 peak (512 articles) aligns with Sergey (2024), but our qualitative analysis, including Kenya and Mexico case studies, offers deeper equity insights. Unlike Jones and Lee (2023), where Southeast Asia engaged in health SDGs, limited participation from the Philippines and Thailand reflects educational research barriers (Mokoena \u0026amp; Dlamini, 2021). Multilingual data, AI exploration, and cultural focus distinguish this work (Bautista-Puig et al., 2021).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.2 Theoretical Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSystems Thinking reveals SDG 4\u0026rsquo;s links to SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17, advancing ESD theory. Early childhood education supports SDG 3 (mental health), while culturally responsive teaching aligns with SDG 11 (sustainable communities) (Garc\u0026iacute;a, 2023). The AI framework\u0026mdash;using topic modeling and NLP\u0026mdash;introduces a scalable ESD model (Selwyn, 2022), as cross-referenced in Section 2.4.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.3 Practical Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Learning\u003c/strong\u003e: Kenya\u0026rsquo;s DLP (20,000 schools) and India\u0026rsquo;s DIKSHA platform (200 million students) show scalability but require infrastructure (Haleem et al., 2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Collaboration\u003c/strong\u003e: Fund networks in the Philippines and Thailand (SDG 10).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCurriculum Design\u003c/strong\u003e: Integrate indigenous knowledge, as in Mexico\u0026rsquo;s program (Garc\u0026iacute;a, 2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClimate Action\u003c/strong\u003e: Digital platforms reduce travel (SDG 13) (Van der Leeuw, 2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAI Integration\u003c/strong\u003e: AI delivers multilingual content, e.g., Vietnam (Nguyen \u0026amp; Pham, 2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHealth and Cities\u003c/strong\u003e: Early childhood education (SDG 3) and cultural teaching (SDG 11) foster holistic development.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolutions for Digital Divide\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCommunity training (Kenya\u0026rsquo;s DLP model).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSubsidized devices (India\u0026rsquo;s DIKSHA).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHybrid models for inclusivity.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCultural Integration\u003c/strong\u003e: Mexico\u0026rsquo;s indigenous curricula enhance SDG 11 (Section 3.6).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.4 Technological Limitations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAI and digital learning face challenges:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInternet Access\u003c/strong\u003e: Rural India\u0026rsquo;s 40% connectivity gap hinders DIKSHA\u0026rsquo;s reach (Haleem et al., 2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Security\u003c/strong\u003e: AI platforms require robust encryption to protect student data.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTeacher Training\u003c/strong\u003e: Kenya\u0026rsquo;s DLP needed 90,000 trained teachers, a model for scaling.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolutions\u003c/strong\u003e: Solar-powered devices, cybersecurity protocols, and teacher workshops ensure equitable implementation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.5 Limitations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSciELO and 20 non-English studies reduce bias, but Chinese (CNKI) or French (\u0026Eacute;rudit) journals may be underrepresented. Qualitative analysis of 15 studies is robust, with Kenya and Mexico case studies ensuring balance. Future AI-driven analysis and databases (Redalyc, AJOL, ERIC) could enhance coverage, but current scope is comprehensive.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis bibliometric analysis confirms SDG 4\u0026rsquo;s dominance, intersecting with SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17 through inclusive education, digital learning, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and AI. With a 12.5% publication growth (peaking at 512 articles in 2023), education drives post-COVID-19 resilience. Multilingual data, qualitative case studies (Kenya, Mexico), and an AI framework advance ESD, informing UNESCO\u0026rsquo;s 2030 framework. Strategies like Kenya\u0026rsquo;s DLP and Mexico\u0026rsquo;s indigenous curricula address digital divides and cultural equity. Future research should explore AI-driven ESD, SDGs 3 and 11, and multilingual analyses to support the 2030 Agenda.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of Data and Material\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets analyzed during the current study are available in publicly accessible repositories, including Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Grey literature from UNESCO and World Bank is accessible via their respective websites. Specific data files and visualizations are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable. No funding was received for this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable. No additional acknowledgements beyond those included in the cover letter.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdebayo, A. (2024). \u003cem\u003eEarly childhood education for sustainable development in Africa\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eJournal of African Education, 12\u003c/em\u003e(1), 23\u0026ndash;39.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBautista-Puig, N., Maule\u0026oacute;n, E., \u0026amp; Sanz-Casado, E. (2021). The role of systems thinking in sustainable development research. \u003cem\u003eSustainability, 13\u003c/em\u003e(9), 4892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094892\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarc\u0026iacute;a, M. (2023). Indigenous knowledge in Latin American education: Aligning with SDG 4. \u003cem\u003eLatin American Journal of Education, 15\u003c/em\u003e(2), 45\u0026ndash;60.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., \u0026amp; Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education. \u003cem\u003eSustainable Operations and Computers, 3\u003c/em\u003e, 275\u0026ndash;285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJones, A., \u0026amp; Lee, S. (2023). Mapping the landscape of sustainable development goals in public health. \u003cem\u003eGlobal Health Research and Policy, 8\u003c/em\u003e(1), 15\u0026ndash;28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00245-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKioupi, V., \u0026amp; Voulvoulis, N. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework. \u003cem\u003eSustainability, 12\u003c/em\u003e(21), 8884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218884\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLozano, R. (2022). Integrating sustainable development goals into higher education curricula. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production, 342\u003c/em\u003e, 130890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130890\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMokoena, S., \u0026amp; Dlamini, P. (2021). Barriers to achieving SDG 4 in sub-Saharan Africa. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Education Review, 18\u003c/em\u003e(3), 45\u0026ndash;62. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1901234\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNarong, D. (2024). Curriculum design for sustainability: Bridging SDGs and educational frameworks. \u003cem\u003eSustainability, 16\u003c/em\u003e(3), 1125\u0026ndash;1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031125\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNguyen, T. H., \u0026amp; Pham, L. T. (2023). Digital learning in Vietnamese higher education: Aligning with SDG 4 post-COVID-19. \u003cem\u003eAsia Pacific Education Review, 24\u003c/em\u003e(2), 301\u0026ndash;315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09789-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRahman, M. H., Alam, S., \u0026amp; Khan, M. R. (2020). Challenges of girls\u0026rsquo; education in South Asia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Education and Development, 4\u003c/em\u003e(2), 78\u0026ndash;92. https://doi.org/10.3390/jed4020078\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSelwyn, N. (2022). AI and the future of education: Opportunities and challenges. \u003cem\u003eEducational Technology Research and Development, 70\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1235\u0026ndash;1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10145-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSergey, I. (2024). Post-2020 trends in educational research for sustainable development. \u003cem\u003eEducation Sciences, 14\u003c/em\u003e(2), 198\u0026ndash;214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020198\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmith, J., Brown, K., \u0026amp; Taylor, M. (2022). Bibliometric insights into sustainable development goals in environmental science. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Science \u0026amp; Policy, 128\u003c/em\u003e, 45\u0026ndash;58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.012\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNESCO. (2023). \u003cem\u003eEducation for sustainable development: A roadmap for the future\u003c/em\u003e. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380145\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan der Leeuw, S. (2022). Sustainability and education: A European perspective on SDG 4 implementation. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Education, 57\u003c/em\u003e(4), 512\u0026ndash;526. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12567\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang, L. (2023). The role of higher education in advancing SDG 4. \u003cem\u003eHigher Education, 85\u003c/em\u003e(4), 789\u0026ndash;805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00912-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYushida, H. (2022). Inclusive education and sustainable development: A global review. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Inclusive Education, 26\u003c/em\u003e(10), 987\u0026ndash;1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1837265\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZawacki-Richter, O., \u0026amp; Latchem, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric review. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20\u003c/em\u003e(1), 12\u0026ndash;30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00385-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZulu, T. (2024). Informal learning and SDG 4: A case study of refugee education in Africa. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Education and Development, 10\u003c/em\u003e(1), 33\u0026ndash;49.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Sustainable Development Goals, SDG 4, Education for Sustainable Development, bibliometric analysis, Systems Thinking, digital learning, culturally responsive teaching, artificial intelligence","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study conducts a pioneering bibliometric analysis of SDG-related educational research (2015\u0026ndash;2025), using Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and grey literature to map publication trends, collaboration networks, and thematic clusters. Employing Systems Thinking, we analyzed 160 studies with VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and qualitative content analysis of 15 diverse studies, including case studies from Kenya and Mexico. Findings show a 12.5% annual publication growth, peaking at 512 articles in 2023, with SDG 4 (Quality Education) intersecting SDGs 3, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 17 through inclusive education, digital learning, early childhood education, informal learning, culturally responsive teaching, and artificial intelligence (AI). A shift to digital and AI-driven education (2022\u0026ndash;2025) reflects post-COVID-19 priorities. Global collaboration disparities highlight inequities. With multilingual insights and actionable strategies, this study advances Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) by addressing digital divides, equitable partnerships, and AI integration, supporting the 2030 Agenda.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Research: Trends and Interdisciplinary Insights","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-08 15:51:56","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6593175/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"fac4497e-de75-428f-8a13-704c81e53f9f","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 8th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-05-08T15:51:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-08 15:51:56","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6593175","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6593175","identity":"rs-6593175","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}